Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Texas by County

All Cancer Sites, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <65

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Texas Yes 46.6 (46.3, 47.0) N/A 13,210 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.8, -1.5)
United States Yes 47.3 (47.2, 47.4) N/A 168,038 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.6, -2.0)
Pecos County Yes 29.8 (19.0, 44.8) 198 (106, 198) 5 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.9, -0.7)
Runnels County Yes 30.0 (16.7, 50.5) 197 (78, 198) 3 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.4, -0.6)
Andrews County Yes 31.2 (20.2, 46.0) 196 (95, 198) 5 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.7, -1.4)
Collin County Yes 31.8 (30.3, 33.4) 195 (184, 198) 329 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.5, -2.0)
Kendall County Yes 32.4 (25.4, 41.0) 194 (148, 198) 16 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.8, -1.9)
Brewster County Yes 33.0 (19.2, 54.5) 193 (42, 198) 4 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.5, -1.2)
Fort Bend County Yes 33.9 (32.1, 35.8) 192 (179, 196) 281 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.5, -1.8)
Denton County Yes 34.0 (32.3, 35.8) 191 (178, 196) 301 falling falling trend -2.4 (-2.7, -2.1)
Travis County Yes 34.2 (32.7, 35.7) 190 (178, 196) 412 falling falling trend -2.7 (-2.9, -2.5)
Brazos County Yes 34.5 (30.7, 38.7) 189 (168, 198) 60 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.0, -1.9)
Reeves County Yes 34.7 (22.0, 52.3) 188 (49, 198) 5 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.7, -0.6)
Williamson County Yes 35.8 (33.6, 38.1) 187 (173, 195) 200 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.7, -1.9)
Fayette County Yes 36.0 (26.6, 48.1) 186 (76, 198) 12 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.5, -1.3)
Ochiltree County Yes 37.6 (21.9, 60.4) 185 (20, 198) 4 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.5, -0.9)
Comal County Yes 38.9 (34.7, 43.4) 184 (146, 195) 71 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.4, -1.3)
Rockwall County Yes 38.9 (33.7, 44.7) 183 (137, 196) 42 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.5, -1.9)
Hays County Yes 39.6 (35.7, 43.7) 182 (142, 193) 81 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.5, -1.1)
Deaf Smith County Yes 39.9 (27.1, 56.7) 181 (40, 198) 6 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.3, 0.5)
Hidalgo County Yes 40.1 (38.0, 42.3) 180 (159, 185) 271 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.6)
Gillespie County Yes 40.9 (30.5, 54.3) 179 (59, 198) 13 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.7, -1.2)
Archer County Yes 41.3 (25.5, 65.1) 178 (21, 198) 5 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.7, -1.2)
Walker County Yes 41.5 (35.0, 48.9) 177 (103, 196) 30 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.6, -0.8)
Webb County Yes 42.0 (38.3, 46.0) 176 (130, 185) 94 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.4)
Randall County Yes 42.1 (37.3, 47.5) 175 (123, 189) 59 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.9, -1.1)
Yoakum County Yes 42.2 (24.1, 68.6) 174 (8, 198) 3
*
*
Jack County Yes 42.6 (26.5, 66.2) 173 (10, 198) 4 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.3, -0.8)
Lavaca County Yes 43.1 (31.1, 58.7) 172 (34, 198) 10 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.6, 0.2)
Wilson County Yes 43.1 (35.7, 51.8) 171 (89, 195) 26 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.8, -0.9)
Medina County Yes 43.4 (35.7, 52.4) 170 (81, 195) 24 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.5)
Comanche County Yes 43.8 (29.5, 63.4) 169 (18, 198) 7 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.9, 0.2)
Cameron County Yes 44.0 (40.9, 47.2) 168 (129, 180) 159 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
El Paso County Yes 44.1 (42.0, 46.3) 167 (139, 178) 336 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.3)
Maverick County Yes 44.4 (36.4, 53.7) 166 (73, 194) 22 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.6)
Harris County Yes 44.9 (44.0, 45.8) 165 (143, 171) 2,025 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.4, -2.1)
Montgomery County Yes 45.3 (43.0, 47.8) 164 (128, 175) 289 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.7, -2.0)
Bexar County Yes 46.3 (44.9, 47.8) 163 (131, 167) 861 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.4)
Gaines County Yes 46.4 (33.1, 63.2) 162 (18, 198) 8 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.5, -0.6)
Live Oak County Yes 46.4 (30.7, 68.0) 161 (14, 198) 6 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.4, 0.8)
Tarrant County Yes 46.5 (45.2, 47.9) 160 (130, 165) 975 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.1, -1.7)
Dallas County Yes 47.0 (45.8, 48.2) 159 (128, 163) 1,193 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.3, -2.0)
Guadalupe County Yes 47.0 (42.4, 52.0) 158 (98, 179) 78 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.8, -0.4)
Terry County Yes 47.1 (30.8, 69.0) 157 (11, 198) 6 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.2, -0.4)
Erath County Yes 47.1 (37.3, 58.8) 156 (40, 195) 17 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.3)
Blanco County Yes 47.2 (32.3, 68.3) 155 (15, 198) 8 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.6, 0.7)
Waller County Yes 47.4 (39.1, 57.0) 154 (59, 190) 24 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.9, -1.3)
Carson County Yes 47.5 (27.5, 79.2) 153 (5, 198) 4
*
*
Scurry County Yes 47.8 (34.1, 65.3) 152 (19, 198) 8 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.5, 0.0)
Tom Green County Yes 47.8 (42.1, 54.1) 151 (80, 183) 55 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.8)
Washington County Yes 48.0 (38.2, 59.9) 150 (38, 194) 19 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.1, -1.2)
Brazoria County Yes 48.2 (45.1, 51.5) 149 (104, 170) 183 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.4, -1.6)
Midland County Yes 48.2 (43.4, 53.5) 148 (87, 177) 76 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.3, -1.1)
Smith County Yes 48.4 (44.3, 52.7) 147 (93, 172) 113 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.8, -1.8)
Dimmit County Yes 48.4 (29.8, 74.4) 146 (5, 198) 4
*
*
Austin County Yes 48.7 (38.2, 61.4) 145 (38, 195) 17 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.9, -1.1)
Kerr County Yes 48.7 (40.3, 58.5) 144 (51, 187) 29 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.5, -0.9)
Parker County Yes 48.9 (44.0, 54.4) 143 (82, 175) 77 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.5, -1.5)
Bell County Yes 49.3 (45.8, 53.0) 142 (95, 167) 153 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.2, -1.5)
Refugio County Yes 49.4 (29.5, 79.4) 141 (5, 198) 4 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.9, 2.6)
Nueces County Yes 49.5 (46.2, 52.9) 140 (95, 165) 184 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.0, -1.3)
Winkler County Yes 49.5 (30.1, 77.3) 139 (5, 198) 4 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.2, -0.4)
Gray County Yes 49.7 (37.5, 65.0) 138 (26, 196) 12 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.7, -0.3)
Ellis County Yes 49.8 (45.3, 54.6) 137 (81, 171) 94 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.6, -1.7)
Bastrop County Yes 50.0 (43.8, 57.0) 136 (59, 177) 50 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.8, -1.2)
Zapata County Yes 50.1 (33.2, 72.5) 135 (10, 198) 6
*
*
Rusk County Yes 50.2 (42.2, 59.3) 134 (44, 182) 30 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.8, -1.4)
Titus County Yes 50.3 (39.3, 63.5) 133 (26, 191) 15 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.4, -0.8)
Hood County Yes 50.5 (42.8, 59.4) 132 (49, 184) 36 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.3, -1.7)
Nacogdoches County Yes 50.7 (42.6, 59.9) 131 (45, 184) 31 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -0.9)
Howard County Yes 50.7 (41.0, 62.1) 130 (34, 188) 20 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.9, -1.2)
Willacy County Yes 50.9 (37.0, 68.2) 129 (16, 197) 9 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.6, 1.5)
Lee County Yes 51.3 (37.4, 69.1) 128 (13, 197) 10 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.4, -1.0)
Lampasas County Yes 51.3 (38.9, 66.9) 127 (18, 196) 13 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.5, -1.2)
Lubbock County Yes 51.4 (47.6, 55.4) 126 (81, 160) 143 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.9)
Bandera County Yes 51.4 (39.4, 66.6) 125 (19, 194) 17 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.8, -0.2)
Coryell County Yes 51.5 (43.8, 60.1) 124 (44, 181) 33 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -0.7)
Somervell County Yes 51.7 (32.4, 79.1) 123 (5, 198) 5 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.8, 0.3)
Chambers County Yes 51.7 (42.4, 62.6) 122 (28, 188) 22 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.2, -1.3)
Cooke County Yes 51.7 (42.3, 62.8) 121 (35, 184) 24 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.7, -1.0)
Burnet County Yes 51.9 (43.1, 62.0) 120 (32, 181) 29 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.5, -0.7)
Hockley County Yes 52.8 (39.6, 69.1) 119 (14, 194) 12 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.0, 1.0)
Calhoun County Yes 52.9 (40.1, 68.8) 118 (12, 195) 13 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.7, -0.2)
Tyler County Yes 52.9 (40.2, 68.9) 117 (13, 194) 13 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.4, -0.6)
Milam County Yes 53.1 (41.3, 67.6) 116 (21, 191) 15 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.0, 0.4)
Johnson County Yes 53.6 (48.8, 58.7) 115 (62, 157) 98 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.1)
Castro County Yes 53.6 (30.9, 86.5) 114 (4, 198) 4 stable stable trend -2.1 (-10.9, 7.5)
Moore County Yes 53.6 (39.8, 70.7) 113 (12, 194) 10 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.9, -0.3)
Atascosa County Yes 53.8 (45.0, 63.9) 112 (33, 177) 28 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.1)
Val Verde County Yes 53.9 (44.2, 65.1) 111 (25, 179) 22 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.3)
Ector County Yes 54.3 (48.9, 60.1) 110 (48, 160) 77 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -0.9)
McLennan County Yes 54.3 (50.1, 58.8) 109 (64, 146) 131 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.1)
Burleson County Yes 54.4 (41.0, 71.3) 108 (12, 192) 13 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.1, -0.6)
Dawson County Yes 54.8 (37.3, 77.8) 107 (6, 197) 7 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.8, 1.4)
Lamb County Yes 55.0 (38.6, 76.6) 106 (6, 197) 8 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 0.2)
Starr County Yes 55.1 (46.3, 65.1) 105 (27, 174) 28 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.4, 1.7)
Young County Yes 55.1 (40.6, 73.5) 104 (9, 195) 11 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.1, 0.2)
San Saba County Yes 55.2 (33.0, 89.4) 103 (3, 198) 4 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.6, 1.4)
Karnes County Yes 55.5 (39.4, 76.1) 102 (6, 197) 8 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.2, 0.6)
Jefferson County Yes 55.8 (51.7, 60.1) 101 (57, 138) 150 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.2)
Ward County Yes 55.9 (37.2, 80.6) 100 (5, 198) 6 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.9, 0.6)
Victoria County Yes 56.1 (49.1, 63.9) 99 (34, 165) 50 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.4)
Swisher County Yes 56.6 (34.6, 88.1) 98 (2, 198) 4 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.3, 1.7)
La Salle County Yes 56.8 (33.6, 90.2) 97 (1, 198) 4
*
*
Galveston County Yes 56.8 (53.4, 60.5) 96 (56, 126) 217 falling falling trend -1.7 (-1.9, -1.4)
Hale County Yes 57.4 (46.0, 70.9) 95 (12, 183) 18 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.2, 1.1)
Wise County Yes 57.6 (49.9, 66.2) 94 (24, 159) 44 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.6)
Caldwell County Yes 57.9 (48.0, 69.2) 93 (16, 175) 26 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.6, -0.4)
Kaufman County Yes 58.1 (52.3, 64.3) 92 (34, 139) 78 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.8, -1.7)
Falls County Yes 58.1 (43.1, 76.9) 91 (6, 191) 11 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.0, -0.8)
Montague County Yes 58.7 (44.6, 76.4) 90 (6, 187) 13 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.6, -0.3)
Van Zandt County Yes 58.7 (50.1, 68.5) 89 (19, 162) 37 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.7)
Hopkins County Yes 58.9 (48.3, 71.3) 88 (14, 170) 24 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.7, -0.9)
Potter County Yes 59.1 (52.8, 65.8) 87 (27, 139) 68 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.3, -1.4)
Upshur County Yes 59.1 (49.2, 70.7) 86 (14, 169) 28 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.6, -0.7)
DeWitt County Yes 59.2 (45.2, 76.4) 85 (8, 184) 13 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.9, -0.4)
Bee County Yes 59.2 (47.7, 72.8) 84 (11, 177) 19 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -0.6)
San Patricio County Yes 59.2 (51.0, 68.5) 83 (20, 157) 39 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.2)
San Augustine County Yes 59.3 (39.0, 88.5) 82 (3, 198) 6 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.1, 0.0)
Hardin County Yes 59.4 (50.9, 69.0) 81 (18, 159) 38 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.8)
Wharton County Yes 59.4 (49.3, 71.1) 80 (13, 169) 27 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.4)
Callahan County Yes 59.7 (42.9, 81.5) 79 (5, 193) 10 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.2)
Harrison County Yes 59.7 (52.0, 68.3) 78 (21, 152) 47 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -0.9)
Wheeler County Yes 59.8 (34.7, 98.2) 77 (1, 198) 4
*
*
Gonzales County Yes 59.8 (45.5, 77.4) 76 (7, 187) 13 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.9, -0.3)
Houston County Yes 60.0 (47.1, 75.9) 75 (8, 180) 16 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.2, -1.6)
Jones County Yes 60.2 (45.8, 78.1) 74 (7, 184) 12 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.3, 0.1)
Cherokee County Yes 60.2 (51.1, 70.6) 73 (15, 160) 33 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.6, -1.1)
Matagorda County Yes 60.3 (49.5, 72.8) 72 (11, 171) 25 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.3)
Gregg County Yes 60.4 (54.2, 67.1) 71 (28, 133) 75 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.0, -1.3)
Grayson County Yes 60.5 (54.8, 66.7) 70 (27, 128) 91 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -0.9)
Wichita County Yes 60.8 (54.7, 67.4) 69 (25, 125) 80 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.1, -1.1)
Brooks County Yes 60.8 (36.7, 95.3) 68 (1, 198) 4 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.1, 2.2)
Colorado County Yes 60.8 (46.7, 78.3) 67 (7, 184) 15 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.5)
Stephens County Yes 61.5 (41.3, 89.1) 66 (3, 196) 6 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.0, 0.4)
Fannin County Yes 61.9 (51.4, 74.3) 65 (10, 166) 26 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.5, -0.3)
Grimes County Yes 62.1 (50.5, 75.9) 64 (9, 167) 22 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.1)
Madison County Yes 62.1 (44.0, 85.3) 63 (4, 194) 8 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.1, 0.1)
Llano County Yes 62.3 (47.3, 81.4) 62 (5, 182) 16 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.7, 0.8)
Shelby County Yes 62.3 (49.2, 78.1) 61 (6, 171) 17 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.9, -1.3)
Freestone County Yes 62.4 (47.7, 80.6) 60 (5, 182) 13 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.1)
Taylor County Yes 62.4 (56.2, 69.2) 59 (21, 123) 78 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.6)
Panola County Yes 63.0 (50.0, 78.7) 58 (6, 174) 18 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.5, -0.2)
Frio County Yes 63.0 (46.6, 83.3) 57 (4, 182) 10 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.2, 1.9)
Brown County Yes 63.3 (52.8, 75.5) 56 (10, 156) 28 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.2)
Jackson County Yes 63.3 (46.4, 84.8) 55 (3, 188) 10 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.1, 0.3)
Mills County Yes 63.5 (34.7, 109.8) 54 (1, 198) 3
*
*
Bowie County Yes 63.6 (56.6, 71.3) 53 (17, 122) 63 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
Coleman County Yes 63.8 (42.2, 94.3) 52 (2, 194) 7 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.9, 1.7)
Wilbarger County Yes 64.1 (45.8, 87.8) 51 (3, 190) 9 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.4, 0.3)
Uvalde County Yes 64.2 (50.5, 80.6) 50 (6, 169) 16 rising rising trend 9.4 (1.1, 18.3)
Hunt County Yes 64.3 (57.4, 71.8) 49 (16, 113) 69 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
Eastland County Yes 64.4 (48.4, 84.4) 48 (4, 188) 13 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 0.1)
Hutchinson County Yes 64.7 (49.8, 82.9) 47 (4, 179) 14 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.3, 0.8)
Marion County Yes 64.9 (44.7, 92.8) 46 (2, 194) 8 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.1, 0.6)
Jim Wells County Yes 65.0 (53.7, 78.0) 45 (7, 151) 25 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.5)
San Jacinto County Yes 65.1 (52.7, 79.9) 44 (6, 162) 23 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.2)
Rains County Yes 65.6 (46.9, 90.3) 43 (2, 187) 10 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.1, 0.4)
Cass County Yes 65.7 (53.8, 79.9) 42 (7, 157) 24 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.0)
Angelina County Yes 66.1 (58.5, 74.3) 41 (12, 113) 59 stable stable trend 3.7 (-1.8, 9.4)
Camp County Yes 66.1 (47.2, 90.5) 40 (3, 188) 9 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.9, -0.4)
Hill County Yes 66.5 (54.7, 80.1) 39 (6, 156) 26 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.2)
Zavala County Yes 67.2 (45.9, 94.9) 38 (1, 195) 7 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.6, 2.0)
Bosque County Yes 68.6 (52.4, 88.6) 37 (2, 170) 15 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.7)
Lamar County Yes 68.7 (58.6, 80.1) 36 (7, 124) 36 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.5)
Wood County Yes 69.0 (58.3, 81.4) 35 (6, 130) 36 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.1)
Palo Pinto County Yes 69.1 (56.5, 84.0) 34 (4, 146) 24 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.7)
Goliad County Yes 69.4 (43.7, 105.6) 33 (1, 197) 5 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.3, 0.6)
Leon County Yes 69.6 (53.4, 89.7) 32 (3, 171) 15 falling falling trend -1.0 (-2.0, -0.1)
Red River County Yes 69.6 (51.1, 93.8) 31 (2, 172) 11 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.8, 0.9)
Robertson County Yes 69.8 (52.5, 91.2) 30 (2, 175) 12 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.3)
Orange County Yes 70.3 (62.7, 78.7) 29 (9, 91) 67 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
Liberty County Yes 70.4 (62.8, 78.8) 28 (7, 93) 64 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.4, -1.1)
Mitchell County Yes 70.5 (46.0, 103.6) 27 (1, 196) 5
*
*
Clay County Yes 70.5 (49.5, 98.5) 26 (1, 186) 9 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.1, 1.5)
Jasper County Yes 70.7 (58.8, 84.4) 25 (4, 129) 28 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.3, -0.2)
Sabine County Yes 70.8 (50.3, 98.6) 24 (1, 184) 10 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.5)
Polk County Yes 71.0 (61.4, 81.8) 23 (6, 113) 46 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.3)
Haskell County Yes 71.2 (45.2, 109.8) 22 (1, 197) 5
*
*
Navarro County Yes 71.3 (61.0, 83.0) 21 (5, 102) 37 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -0.6)
Nolan County Yes 71.4 (52.8, 94.6) 20 (2, 172) 11 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.6)
Henderson County Yes 71.4 (63.6, 80.1) 19 (7, 84) 69 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.2)
Limestone County Yes 72.7 (57.4, 91.1) 18 (2, 136) 17 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.2)
McCulloch County Yes 72.9 (48.7, 106.1) 17 (1, 196) 7 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.0, 1.1)
Childress County Yes 74.2 (46.1, 113.4) 16 (1, 197) 5 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.5, 2.8)
Duval County Yes 74.6 (53.1, 102.2) 15 (1, 176) 8 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.2, 2.1)
Trinity County Yes 76.0 (57.9, 99.0) 14 (1, 148) 14 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.6, 1.2)
Aransas County Yes 78.0 (63.1, 95.8) 13 (2, 108) 24 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.8)
Kleberg County Yes 78.2 (62.7, 96.4) 12 (2, 120) 18 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.5, 1.8)
Baylor County Yes 78.6 (43.1, 135.3) 11 (1, 198) 3
*
*
Kimble County Yes 79.6 (45.8, 132.1) 10 (1, 198) 4
*
*
Newton County Yes 82.5 (61.7, 108.6) 9 (1, 147) 12 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.4)
Morris County Yes 83.3 (61.9, 110.3) 8 (1, 145) 12 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.3)
Martin County Yes 84.5 (53.0, 128.1) 7 (1, 194) 5
*
*
Franklin County Yes 86.7 (62.2, 118.1) 6 (1, 138) 9 rising rising trend 8.4 (2.0, 15.2)
Delta County Yes 87.4 (55.1, 133.3) 5 (1, 189) 5
*
*
Lynn County Yes 90.4 (58.0, 135.1) 4 (1, 184) 5
*
*
Jim Hogg County Yes 94.4 (56.8, 147.2) 3 (1, 189) 4
*
*
Hamilton County Yes 100.7 (70.3, 140.6) 2 (1, 158) 8 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.0, 2.0)
Anderson County Yes 109.4 (98.0, 121.8) 1 (1, 8) 69 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.8, 1.2)
Armstrong County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bailey County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Borden County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Briscoe County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cochran County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coke County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Collingsworth County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Concho County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cottle County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crane County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crockett County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crosby County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Culberson County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dallam County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dickens County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Donley County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Edwards County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fisher County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Floyd County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Foard County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Garza County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glasscock County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hall County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hansford County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardeman County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hartley County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hemphill County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hudspeth County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Irion County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jeff Davis County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kenedy County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kent County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
King County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kinney County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Knox County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lipscomb County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Loving County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mason County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McMullen County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menard County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Motley County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oldham County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Parmer County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Presidio County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Reagan County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Real County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roberts County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schleicher County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shackelford County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sherman County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sterling County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stonewall County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sutton County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Terrell County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Throckmorton County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Upton County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 02/01/2023 6:02 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top