Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Texas by County

All Cancer Sites, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 65+

Sorted by CI*Rank

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Texas N/A No 825.4 (821.1, 829.7) N/A 29,106 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.3, -1.1)
United States N/A No 844.0 (842.9, 845.1) N/A 441,232 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.8, -1.5)
Presidio County Rural No 519.6 (364.8, 717.7) 238 (143, 238) 8 stable stable trend 6.3 (-3.3, 28.8)
Concho County Rural No 554.7 (351.1, 832.9) 237 (63, 238) 5
*
*
Brewster County Rural No 564.6 (431.0, 726.3) 236 (167, 238) 12 falling falling trend -5.4 (-17.6, -2.2)
Hidalgo County Urban No 622.0 (599.7, 644.8) 235 (220, 236) 595 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.1, -0.7)
Ochiltree County Rural No 635.3 (444.6, 880.8) 234 (53, 238) 7 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.8, 0.0)
Jeff Davis County Rural No 637.9 (394.7, 973.7) 233 (18, 238) 4
*
*
Starr County Rural No 640.9 (560.6, 729.4) 232 (180, 238) 46 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.3)
Castro County Rural No 642.6 (453.8, 882.6) 231 (42, 238) 8 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.4, -0.9)
Hall County Rural No 643.7 (403.1, 974.5) 230 (16, 238) 4 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.2, 1.1)
Winkler County Rural No 656.2 (440.8, 941.9) 229 (27, 238) 6 falling falling trend -5.0 (-30.9, -1.1)
Schleicher County Rural No 674.8 (388.9, 1,089.1) 228 (8, 238) 3 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.8, 2.2)
Cameron County Urban No 679.8 (649.5, 711.1) 227 (203, 232) 382 stable stable trend 3.6 (-0.7, 6.2)
Moore County Rural No 680.3 (539.1, 847.3) 226 (91, 238) 16 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.3, 0.0)
Fort Bend County Urban No 692.8 (666.9, 719.4) 225 (199, 230) 586 stable stable trend -1.4 (-1.9, 0.1)
Archer County Urban No 700.8 (534.0, 903.2) 224 (32, 238) 12 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.1)
Hardeman County Rural No 706.8 (469.0, 1,023.2) 223 (13, 238) 6 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.4, 0.8)
Bailey County Rural No 707.0 (491.9, 983.5) 222 (18, 238) 7 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.6, -0.7)
Denton County Urban No 712.6 (687.3, 738.6) 221 (193, 228) 633 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.5, -2.0)
Travis County Urban No 714.4 (692.4, 736.9) 220 (194, 227) 850 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.9, -1.7)
Collin County Urban No 720.8 (698.0, 744.1) 219 (192, 225) 787 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.0, -1.5)
Fayette County Rural No 722.4 (631.3, 822.9) 218 (128, 234) 46 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
Williamson County Urban No 734.1 (705.7, 763.2) 217 (185, 224) 522 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.8, -1.2)
El Paso County Urban No 734.5 (711.3, 758.3) 216 (188, 223) 768 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.4, -1.4)
Upton County Rural No 736.2 (423.8, 1,184.7) 215 (6, 238) 3
*
*
Menard County Rural No 736.5 (470.2, 1,102.3) 214 (7, 238) 5
*
*
Comanche County Rural No 738.6 (609.3, 887.0) 213 (71, 236) 23 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.7)
Gillespie County Rural No 742.4 (660.0, 832.1) 212 (126, 232) 59 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
Kendall County Urban No 743.4 (663.6, 830.2) 211 (114, 233) 64 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.2, -1.2)
Llano County Rural No 743.6 (660.3, 834.5) 210 (123, 232) 58 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -1.0)
Zapata County Rural No 746.6 (575.1, 952.9) 209 (36, 238) 13 rising rising trend 21.3 (0.3, 37.2)
Webb County Urban No 750.3 (702.3, 800.6) 208 (154, 226) 186 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.8, 0.1)
Hartley County Rural No 750.3 (513.2, 1,059.5) 207 (11, 238) 6 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.7, 0.4)
Nueces County Urban No 751.3 (717.6, 786.1) 206 (170, 221) 383 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.9, -1.4)
Live Oak County Rural No 752.3 (602.3, 928.4) 205 (49, 237) 17 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.5, -0.3)
Dallam County Rural No 753.8 (501.3, 1,088.2) 204 (8, 238) 6 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.5, -0.4)
Willacy County Rural No 758.3 (622.9, 914.4) 203 (49, 236) 22 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.3, 0.0)
Parmer County Rural No 760.7 (568.8, 996.4) 202 (26, 238) 11 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.9, 0.8)
Brazos County Urban No 762.2 (709.3, 818.0) 201 (138, 225) 157 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -1.0)
Shackelford County Rural No 775.7 (495.2, 1,157.3) 200 (5, 238) 5 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.8, 0.3)
Hutchinson County Rural No 782.6 (655.0, 927.8) 199 (51, 234) 27 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.2)
Harris County Urban No 783.2 (771.8, 794.8) 198 (170, 204) 3,726 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.0, -1.8)
Sherman County Rural No 790.9 (457.7, 1,270.2) 197 (3, 238) 3
*
*
Ward County Rural No 792.1 (600.0, 1,025.8) 196 (18, 238) 12 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.4)
Walker County Rural No 792.6 (714.7, 876.5) 195 (93, 225) 78 stable stable trend -2.0 (-8.6, 0.7)
Donley County Rural No 794.2 (542.7, 1,123.2) 194 (9, 238) 6 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.2, 0.5)
Val Verde County Rural No 797.2 (702.9, 900.6) 193 (79, 229) 52 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.3, 4.5)
Bexar County Urban No 798.9 (782.6, 815.5) 192 (159, 200) 1,863 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.3, -1.0)
Goliad County Urban No 799.0 (616.3, 1,019.4) 191 (17, 237) 13 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.6, 0.0)
Maverick County Urban No 800.3 (704.5, 905.5) 190 (80, 230) 51 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.6)
Harrison County Urban No 800.6 (727.6, 878.9) 189 (98, 223) 91 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.5, -1.4)
Washington County Rural No 803.2 (716.5, 897.5) 188 (82, 229) 63 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.3)
Frio County Rural No 808.1 (650.0, 993.0) 187 (30, 236) 18 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.2)
Austin County Urban No 811.2 (709.3, 923.5) 186 (62, 229) 47 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.2)
Angelina County Rural No 812.5 (745.8, 883.5) 185 (91, 218) 111 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.9)
Bastrop County Urban No 815.4 (747.9, 887.3) 184 (95, 219) 114 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.7)
Burnet County Rural No 817.7 (742.3, 898.5) 183 (82, 219) 88 falling falling trend -1.9 (-10.0, -0.6)
Guadalupe County Urban No 817.7 (766.1, 871.9) 182 (111, 208) 191 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.7)
Montgomery County Urban No 819.5 (790.4, 849.3) 181 (135, 199) 632 falling falling trend -1.8 (-4.5, -1.2)
Hood County Rural No 821.3 (757.2, 889.2) 180 (91, 215) 123 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.1, -1.1)
Callahan County Urban No 822.0 (676.1, 989.7) 179 (29, 233) 23 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 0.9)
Jim Hogg County Rural No 823.6 (573.6, 1,145.5) 178 (8, 238) 7 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 0.1)
Midland County Urban No 826.3 (764.6, 891.6) 177 (97, 210) 139 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.5)
Rockwall County Urban No 827.1 (755.7, 903.3) 176 (85, 215) 103 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.5)
Duval County Rural No 827.7 (646.4, 1,044.2) 175 (17, 236) 14 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.0)
Crosby County Urban No 830.5 (587.2, 1,140.4) 174 (7, 238) 8 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.2, 1.1)
Jefferson County Urban No 835.2 (793.7, 878.3) 173 (108, 200) 311 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.7, -1.5)
Brooks County Rural No 836.1 (620.1, 1,102.9) 172 (9, 237) 10 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.3)
Dallas County Urban No 836.9 (821.2, 852.8) 171 (133, 180) 2,248 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.6, -1.3)
Aransas County Urban No 838.1 (740.1, 945.5) 170 (56, 224) 54 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.8)
Medina County Urban No 841.0 (753.4, 935.9) 169 (60, 222) 69 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
Hays County Urban No 841.8 (789.3, 896.9) 168 (97, 203) 206 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
Atascosa County Urban No 841.9 (746.8, 945.6) 167 (58, 223) 58 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.6)
Jones County Urban No 842.0 (699.0, 1,005.6) 166 (25, 232) 25 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.6)
Franklin County Rural No 843.4 (678.9, 1,035.7) 165 (19, 234) 18 falling falling trend -2.1 (-12.6, -0.7)
Tom Green County Urban No 844.1 (785.7, 905.7) 164 (87, 203) 157 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.7)
Hale County Rural No 844.6 (726.8, 976.1) 163 (32, 226) 37 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.2)
Victoria County Urban No 845.0 (778.7, 915.4) 162 (79, 206) 122 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.4)
Comal County Urban No 845.9 (796.9, 897.2) 161 (99, 200) 231 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.5)
Kimble County Rural No 846.8 (629.2, 1,114.6) 160 (9, 238) 10 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.1)
Smith County Urban No 849.7 (808.8, 892.2) 159 (101, 190) 327 stable stable trend 0.3 (-3.2, 3.3)
Kerr County Rural No 849.8 (784.3, 919.2) 158 (74, 206) 125 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
Houston County Rural No 850.2 (738.1, 974.5) 157 (41, 226) 41 falling falling trend -2.0 (-4.4, -1.1)
Wharton County Rural No 850.6 (756.4, 953.3) 156 (55, 217) 60 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.9)
Tarrant County Urban No 852.3 (835.1, 869.7) 155 (125, 173) 1,951 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.4, -1.2)
Pecos County Rural No 853.1 (676.1, 1,062.3) 154 (13, 234) 16 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.1, -0.1)
Taylor County Urban No 855.7 (800.1, 914.1) 153 (79, 198) 178 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.6)
Limestone County Rural No 859.5 (741.1, 991.5) 152 (36, 227) 38 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.8)
Clay County Urban No 859.8 (698.1, 1,047.6) 151 (19, 233) 20 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.3)
Kleberg County Rural No 863.6 (739.8, 1,002.2) 150 (31, 226) 35 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.7, -0.1)
McLennan County Urban No 863.9 (822.1, 907.3) 149 (88, 189) 326 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.9, 3.5)
Bee County Rural No 865.3 (736.5, 1,010.1) 148 (28, 228) 33 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.6, -0.1)
Carson County Urban No 866.5 (635.0, 1,153.8) 147 (7, 237) 9 stable stable trend 16.7 (-1.5, 30.5)
Tyler County Rural No 867.0 (748.4, 999.1) 146 (30, 224) 38 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.6)
Grimes County Rural No 868.8 (756.7, 992.8) 145 (30, 221) 45 falling falling trend -1.7 (-8.6, -0.5)
Erath County Rural No 868.9 (764.6, 983.4) 144 (38, 218) 51 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.3)
Marion County Rural No 869.0 (711.9, 1,050.5) 143 (19, 232) 22 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.1)
Wilbarger County Rural No 870.2 (707.1, 1,059.4) 142 (19, 231) 20 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.4)
Rains County Rural No 873.1 (724.5, 1,043.5) 141 (18, 227) 25 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.3)
Sabine County Rural No 873.8 (730.4, 1,037.1) 140 (23, 229) 26 falling falling trend -1.0 (-2.0, -0.1)
La Salle County Rural No 877.0 (629.3, 1,189.9) 139 (6, 238) 8 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.1, 0.0)
Randall County Urban No 877.5 (819.9, 938.0) 138 (68, 193) 176 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.8, 0.0)
Floyd County Rural No 878.3 (637.8, 1,179.6) 137 (6, 237) 9 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.5)
Bandera County Urban No 878.6 (767.2, 1,001.6) 136 (29, 218) 47 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Deaf Smith County Rural No 881.3 (714.7, 1,074.8) 135 (15, 232) 20 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.7, 1.4)
Hardin County Urban No 881.5 (796.9, 972.7) 134 (49, 207) 81 falling falling trend -2.1 (-7.5, -1.5)
Throckmorton County Rural No 883.1 (521.1, 1,401.5) 133 (2, 238) 4
*
*
Terry County Rural No 884.1 (697.2, 1,105.6) 132 (11, 233) 15 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.4)
Dimmit County Rural No 886.6 (680.0, 1,136.2) 131 (9, 236) 13 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 0.9)
Armstrong County Urban No 886.7 (508.0, 1,437.0) 130 (1, 238) 3
*
*
Gaines County Rural No 888.1 (697.8, 1,113.3) 129 (10, 233) 15 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.8)
Brown County Rural No 888.4 (795.3, 989.4) 128 (39, 207) 67 falling falling trend -1.7 (-6.9, -1.0)
Waller County Urban No 889.6 (784.5, 1,004.7) 127 (32, 219) 54 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
Gray County Rural No 894.4 (757.9, 1,048.4) 126 (19, 225) 31 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.1)
Wilson County Urban No 895.1 (801.1, 997.0) 125 (33, 204) 68 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.1)
Kinney County Rural No 895.7 (622.7, 1,247.8) 124 (5, 238) 7 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.7, 2.3)
Lee County Rural No 895.9 (754.4, 1,056.1) 123 (15, 227) 29 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.6)
Colorado County Rural No 895.9 (774.8, 1,030.6) 122 (27, 220) 40 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
Lubbock County Urban No 897.0 (854.3, 941.2) 121 (72, 174) 339 stable stable trend 2.8 (-0.6, 4.9)
Navarro County Rural No 898.6 (809.8, 994.5) 120 (38, 206) 76 falling falling trend -3.1 (-9.5, -1.4)
Haskell County Rural No 899.2 (674.6, 1,174.7) 119 (8, 236) 11 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.5, 0.4)
Milam County Rural No 901.2 (786.9, 1,027.5) 118 (24, 214) 45 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.3)
Galveston County Urban No 903.6 (865.2, 943.3) 117 (74, 160) 435 falling falling trend -2.1 (-4.2, -1.5)
Caldwell County Urban No 903.7 (802.1, 1,014.5) 116 (32, 206) 59 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5)
Lynn County Urban No 907.5 (653.4, 1,228.3) 115 (4, 237) 8 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.0, 1.1)
Childress County Rural No 908.4 (671.4, 1,201.7) 114 (5, 236) 10 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.9, -0.1)
Brazoria County Urban No 910.0 (868.7, 952.7) 113 (70, 160) 380 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.1)
Edwards County Rural No 911.8 (513.7, 1,490.9) 112 (1, 238) 3 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.1, 2.0)
Bell County Urban No 913.5 (871.3, 957.3) 111 (68, 157) 362 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -1.0)
Sutton County Rural No 916.6 (611.8, 1,321.3) 110 (2, 238) 6 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.2, 0.2)
Cherokee County Rural No 917.4 (828.7, 1,013.0) 109 (37, 195) 80 rising rising trend 2.6 (0.7, 6.2)
San Jacinto County Urban No 918.0 (810.4, 1,035.9) 108 (27, 204) 55 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.2)
Somervell County Rural No 918.2 (723.8, 1,148.5) 107 (9, 233) 16 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.7, -0.4)
Potter County Urban No 918.3 (851.3, 989.3) 106 (47, 180) 143 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
Robertson County Urban No 918.7 (778.3, 1,077.1) 105 (15, 220) 31 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.6)
Hunt County Urban No 925.2 (857.6, 996.7) 104 (38, 178) 142 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.2)
Newton County Rural No 925.6 (771.1, 1,102.2) 103 (11, 225) 26 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.3)
Howard County Rural No 927.2 (800.8, 1,068.0) 102 (15, 215) 40 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.1)
Jim Wells County Rural No 929.9 (823.5, 1,046.3) 101 (22, 202) 56 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.3, 0.0)
Cochran County Urban No 930.1 (566.6, 1,442.3) 100 (2, 238) 4
*
*
Briscoe County Rural No 930.5 (531.2, 1,511.7) 99 (1, 238) 3
*
*
Van Zandt County Rural No 934.0 (856.6, 1,016.5) 98 (36, 183) 109 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.4)
Red River County Rural No 934.5 (782.5, 1,107.5) 97 (13, 224) 27 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.1)
Hockley County Urban No 935.7 (789.4, 1,101.1) 96 (11, 222) 29 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.7, -0.2)
Hopkins County Rural No 938.2 (835.8, 1,049.6) 95 (23, 202) 62 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.4)
Chambers County Urban No 939.3 (818.4, 1,072.7) 94 (16, 214) 46 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.3)
San Saba County Rural No 939.9 (716.4, 1,210.9) 93 (6, 234) 12 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 1.0)
Gregg County Urban No 941.6 (880.2, 1,006.1) 92 (39, 160) 178 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.4, -0.9)
Titus County Rural No 941.6 (815.4, 1,081.8) 91 (17, 211) 41 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.4)
Dickens County Rural No 945.3 (591.1, 1,435.0) 90 (2, 238) 4 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.4, 1.0)
Ellis County Urban No 945.5 (888.6, 1,005.0) 89 (43, 156) 216 falling falling trend -1.3 (-3.9, -0.9)
Calhoun County Rural No 946.3 (808.8, 1,100.4) 88 (14, 213) 34 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.1)
Jackson County Rural No 946.4 (792.6, 1,121.3) 87 (12, 219) 27 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.4)
Lamb County Rural No 948.2 (773.6, 1,150.3) 86 (10, 224) 21 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.8, 1.0)
Lavaca County Rural No 950.0 (828.3, 1,084.5) 85 (17, 206) 45 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.1)
Lipscomb County Rural No 955.2 (620.5, 1,403.3) 84 (2, 238) 5 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.6, -0.3)
Falls County Urban No 955.9 (808.4, 1,122.6) 83 (13, 216) 30 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.3)
Stephens County Rural No 958.9 (766.0, 1,185.4) 82 (7, 228) 17 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.2)
Mason County Rural No 961.0 (725.8, 1,248.2) 81 (5, 235) 11 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.1)
Burleson County Urban No 961.9 (823.1, 1,117.3) 80 (11, 206) 35 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
Gonzales County Rural No 963.0 (817.6, 1,126.7) 79 (10, 215) 31 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.1)
Collingsworth County Rural No 964.4 (593.1, 1,479.3) 78 (2, 238) 4 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.4, 1.8)
Orange County Urban No 966.6 (891.3, 1,046.5) 77 (26, 154) 124 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.9)
Stonewall County Rural No 967.6 (542.2, 1,592.5) 76 (1, 238) 3 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.1, 0.9)
Wood County Rural No 969.4 (891.1, 1,052.6) 75 (27, 164) 115 rising rising trend 9.0 (2.3, 16.8)
Rusk County Urban No 969.5 (877.3, 1,068.7) 74 (21, 168) 83 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.2)
Nacogdoches County Rural No 970.0 (882.5, 1,063.9) 73 (23, 169) 93 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.2)
San Patricio County Urban No 970.5 (883.9, 1,063.3) 72 (23, 174) 94 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.9)
Cooke County Rural No 974.2 (876.0, 1,080.3) 71 (19, 183) 73 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.3)
Henderson County Rural No 974.7 (909.7, 1,043.0) 70 (29, 147) 170 stable stable trend 4.5 (-0.8, 8.0)
San Augustine County Rural No 979.1 (798.8, 1,187.8) 69 (8, 224) 21 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.1)
Parker County Urban No 982.9 (923.8, 1,044.8) 68 (31, 137) 214 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.3)
Upshur County Urban No 984.0 (883.1, 1,093.3) 67 (17, 177) 71 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
Grayson County Urban No 984.7 (927.7, 1,044.2) 66 (31, 128) 227 falling falling trend -0.6 (-0.8, -0.3)
Leon County Rural No 987.9 (849.3, 1,142.5) 65 (11, 199) 37 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.3)
Montague County Rural No 990.1 (861.9, 1,132.1) 64 (11, 191) 43 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.1)
Johnson County Urban No 991.6 (934.6, 1,051.2) 63 (28, 127) 234 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.0, -0.4)
Camp County Rural No 994.9 (812.2, 1,206.0) 62 (7, 217) 21 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.6, -0.4)
Jasper County Rural No 997.2 (889.7, 1,114.0) 61 (14, 172) 64 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
Yoakum County Rural No 997.3 (717.0, 1,349.7) 60 (3, 236) 8 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.8, 2.8)
Uvalde County Rural No 1,002.3 (869.4, 1,149.8) 59 (11, 191) 41 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Anderson County Rural No 1,002.4 (907.7, 1,104.2) 58 (17, 155) 84 falling falling trend -1.5 (-3.2, -1.0)
Reeves County Rural No 1,002.7 (794.3, 1,248.9) 57 (6, 226) 16 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.3)
Dawson County Rural No 1,004.2 (801.7, 1,242.0) 56 (5, 226) 17 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.6)
Bowie County Urban No 1,005.4 (935.3, 1,079.4) 55 (22, 133) 155 stable stable trend 6.1 (-1.1, 11.0)
Andrews County Rural No 1,009.0 (804.3, 1,249.8) 54 (6, 222) 17 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.8)
Karnes County Rural No 1,015.5 (823.9, 1,237.9) 53 (6, 221) 20 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.5)
Kaufman County Urban No 1,016.1 (943.9, 1,092.4) 52 (18, 125) 155 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.7)
Zavala County Rural No 1,018.3 (788.1, 1,294.8) 51 (4, 229) 14 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.5)
Mills County Rural No 1,022.4 (788.3, 1,304.4) 50 (4, 228) 13 stable stable trend 6.4 (-2.1, 25.3)
Scurry County Rural No 1,025.2 (851.3, 1,223.9) 49 (7, 209) 25 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.9, 0.0)
Fisher County Rural No 1,030.4 (747.8, 1,383.6) 48 (2, 234) 9 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.4, 1.6)
Freestone County Rural No 1,032.0 (892.8, 1,186.6) 47 (8, 177) 40 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.9, 0.6)
Eastland County Rural No 1,032.2 (893.2, 1,186.7) 46 (8, 193) 40 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.0)
DeWitt County Rural No 1,032.5 (893.7, 1,186.7) 45 (8, 191) 40 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.4, 0.7)
Lamar County Rural No 1,032.9 (942.3, 1,129.8) 44 (14, 131) 96 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3)
Fannin County Rural No 1,033.6 (923.1, 1,153.7) 43 (13, 151) 64 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.1)
Cass County Rural No 1,035.9 (925.7, 1,155.5) 42 (10, 144) 65 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.2)
Panola County Rural No 1,036.7 (902.8, 1,184.7) 41 (8, 188) 44 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.1)
Crane County Rural No 1,041.0 (694.1, 1,499.5) 40 (1, 237) 6 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.4, 0.2)
Palo Pinto County Rural No 1,043.4 (924.0, 1,173.8) 39 (9, 157) 56 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.0)
Madison County Rural No 1,048.8 (858.9, 1,268.0) 38 (6, 210) 21 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.5)
Garza County Urban No 1,050.7 (730.5, 1,464.1) 37 (2, 237) 7 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.4, 0.5)
Wichita County Urban No 1,054.7 (989.4, 1,123.1) 36 (16, 98) 198 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.6)
Matagorda County Rural No 1,057.0 (941.7, 1,182.5) 35 (9, 143) 62 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.2)
Coryell County Urban No 1,057.5 (959.8, 1,162.5) 34 (14, 120) 88 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.4, 5.5)
Wise County Urban No 1,058.5 (966.7, 1,156.5) 33 (12, 117) 102 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.4, 0.8)
Ector County Urban No 1,058.7 (984.0, 1,137.5) 32 (13, 104) 153 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.3)
Morris County Rural No 1,060.1 (886.6, 1,257.5) 31 (6, 200) 27 stable stable trend 2.5 (-1.2, 12.6)
Liberty County Urban No 1,065.5 (977.4, 1,159.4) 30 (13, 109) 115 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.6, -1.1)
Delta County Rural No 1,065.6 (803.5, 1,385.7) 29 (2, 226) 11 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.4, 1.4)
Hamilton County Rural No 1,068.5 (879.9, 1,285.6) 28 (6, 207) 23 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.7, 0.8)
Bosque County Urban No 1,073.9 (941.4, 1,219.9) 27 (7, 147) 48 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.1)
Swisher County Rural No 1,079.9 (832.0, 1,378.3) 26 (3, 228) 13 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 1.0)
Mitchell County Rural No 1,080.1 (837.0, 1,372.3) 25 (3, 220) 14 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.4)
Refugio County Rural No 1,080.6 (851.0, 1,352.9) 24 (2, 217) 15 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.4, 0.2)
Lampasas County Urban No 1,086.8 (946.5, 1,241.9) 23 (6, 161) 44 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.1)
Hansford County Rural No 1,087.0 (782.4, 1,470.1) 22 (1, 235) 8 rising rising trend 3.4 (0.4, 18.8)
Jack County Rural No 1,097.2 (864.2, 1,373.7) 21 (2, 214) 15 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.8, 0.7)
Blanco County Rural No 1,098.1 (922.7, 1,296.9) 20 (5, 190) 29 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.6, 1.7)
Shelby County Rural No 1,101.3 (961.8, 1,255.2) 19 (7, 144) 45 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.3)
Hill County Rural No 1,121.7 (1,014.6, 1,237.1) 18 (8, 99) 81 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.8, 0.4)
Nolan County Rural No 1,157.0 (978.8, 1,358.3) 17 (3, 162) 30 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.0, 0.9)
Runnels County Rural No 1,164.7 (961.9, 1,397.3) 16 (2, 168) 23 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.0, 0.8)
Coke County Rural No 1,171.1 (871.5, 1,540.1) 15 (1, 226) 10 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.9, 0.5)
Trinity County Rural No 1,174.1 (1,016.7, 1,349.0) 14 (3, 120) 41 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.3, 1.0)
McCulloch County Rural No 1,174.5 (955.3, 1,428.8) 13 (2, 177) 20 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.4)
Wheeler County Rural No 1,190.8 (903.1, 1,541.1) 12 (1, 216) 12 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.5, 1.9)
Young County Rural No 1,227.0 (1,066.0, 1,405.3) 11 (3, 87) 42 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.6)
Knox County Rural No 1,236.8 (885.8, 1,680.3) 10 (1, 226) 8 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.5, 1.5)
Martin County Urban No 1,284.8 (895.6, 1,786.5) 9 (1, 227) 7
*
*
Baylor County Rural No 1,297.2 (968.4, 1,701.3) 8 (1, 182) 11 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.4, 1.9)
Coleman County Rural No 1,318.6 (1,095.6, 1,573.4) 7 (1, 99) 25 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.7, 1.0)
Real County Rural No 1,343.3 (1,002.5, 1,761.5) 6 (1, 192) 11 rising rising trend 7.8 (0.6, 28.8)
Crockett County Rural No 1,541.1 (1,094.6, 2,108.7) 5 (1, 206) 8 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.8, 1.9)
Polk County Rural No 1,551.3 (1,407.3, 1,705.4) 4 (1, 11) 105 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.2, 1.2)
Reagan County Rural No 1,555.4 (960.4, 2,371.1) 3 (1, 234) 5
*
*
Oldham County Urban No 1,621.2 (949.9, 2,564.2) 2 (1, 237) 4
*
*
Hudspeth County Urban No 1,702.3 (1,104.3, 2,502.6) 1 (1, 230) 5
*
*
Borden County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cottle County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Culberson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Foard County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glasscock County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hemphill County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Irion County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kenedy County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kent County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
King County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Loving County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McMullen County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Motley County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roberts County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sterling County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Terrell County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/12/2024 3:19 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top