Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Texas by County

All Cancer Sites, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Texas No 173.8 (172.8, 174.9) N/A 22,032 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.0, -1.9)
United States No 177.5 (177.2, 177.8) N/A 315,770 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.5, -2.0)
Anderson County No 322.8 (295.7, 351.8) 1 (1, 10) 113 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.6, -0.7)
Andrews County No 165.2 (123.3, 215.8) 190 (19, 230) 11 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.2, -0.6)
Angelina County No 189.8 (172.7, 208.3) 122 (48, 190) 93 stable stable trend -0.5 (-14.6, 16.0)
Aransas County No 222.8 (194.1, 255.5) 34 (8, 162) 49 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.4)
Archer County No 165.3 (123.2, 219.3) 189 (19, 229) 11 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.8, -0.5)
Armstrong County No 246.3 (131.6, 430.4) 14 (1, 230) 3
*
*
Atascosa County No 181.4 (158.5, 206.8) 148 (41, 213) 47 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.5)
Austin County No 171.2 (145.9, 200.1) 179 (45, 223) 35 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.6, -0.9)
Bailey County No 170.8 (115.5, 243.7) 181 (5, 230) 6 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.8, 0.0)
Bandera County No 174.1 (148.2, 204.4) 168 (36, 221) 37 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.3, -0.8)
Bastrop County No 187.8 (169.8, 207.2) 127 (43, 195) 90 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.9)
Baylor County No 301.1 (218.8, 411.4) 3 (1, 184) 9 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.0, 0.8)
Bee County No 186.1 (156.5, 219.6) 130 (24, 218) 30 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -0.7)
Bell County No 195.0 (184.4, 206.1) 103 (56, 153) 266 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -1.0)
Bexar County No 171.7 (167.6, 175.9) 177 (140, 187) 1,405 falling falling trend -1.7 (-1.9, -1.6)
Blanco County No 196.7 (157.8, 244.3) 99 (8, 221) 19 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.2)
Bosque County No 213.4 (180.4, 251.7) 63 (7, 192) 32 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.2, 1.2)
Bowie County No 205.5 (188.2, 223.9) 82 (25, 155) 109 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.1, -1.3)
Brazoria County No 188.8 (178.9, 199.1) 126 (76, 167) 301 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.3, -1.8)
Brazos County No 156.2 (143.2, 169.9) 206 (146, 220) 114 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.5, -1.9)
Brewster County No 131.5 (94.9, 179.6) 227 (92, 230) 9 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.9, -0.2)
Brooks County No 193.2 (136.8, 265.9) 111 (4, 229) 8 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.2)
Brown County No 215.3 (190.3, 243.1) 56 (11, 168) 56 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.8)
Burleson County No 184.0 (152.8, 220.5) 139 (24, 222) 26 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.6, -1.2)
Burnet County No 176.5 (156.7, 198.3) 160 (54, 213) 63 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.5, -1.3)
Caldwell County No 205.5 (178.6, 235.2) 81 (16, 188) 45 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.7)
Calhoun County No 196.9 (164.5, 234.2) 98 (13, 214) 27 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.4, -0.6)
Callahan County No 162.2 (127.7, 204.2) 195 (31, 229) 16 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.9, -0.7)
Cameron County No 134.6 (127.3, 142.2) 224 (204, 228) 260 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.9, -1.3)
Camp County No 222.6 (177.3, 276.7) 35 (4, 215) 18 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.3, -0.9)
Carson County No 150.4 (101.7, 217.3) 209 (19, 230) 6
*
*
Cass County No 212.9 (185.9, 243.3) 65 (12, 178) 47 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
Castro County No 156.0 (106.8, 220.6) 207 (14, 230) 7 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.5, -1.2)
Chambers County No 221.9 (190.4, 256.7) 39 (7, 177) 40 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.4, -0.6)
Cherokee County No 191.6 (170.4, 214.9) 116 (30, 199) 61 falling falling trend -2.5 (-2.9, -2.0)
Childress County No 214.1 (151.6, 293.8) 61 (1, 228) 8 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.8, -0.1)
Clay County No 177.6 (136.7, 228.7) 157 (12, 228) 14 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.5, -0.6)
Coke County No 280.4 (203.0, 387.5) 5 (1, 207) 9 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.8, 0.0)
Coleman County No 232.2 (182.7, 293.7) 22 (2, 206) 16 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.2)
Collin County No 139.9 (134.4, 145.6) 221 (199, 225) 536 falling falling trend -2.4 (-2.7, -2.1)
Collingsworth County No 184.7 (105.1, 305.1) 135 (1, 230) 3
*
*
Colorado County No 158.9 (131.5, 191.1) 201 (64, 228) 25 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.8, -1.1)
Comal County No 164.9 (152.8, 177.7) 191 (127, 214) 150 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.2, -1.4)
Comanche County No 160.4 (127.8, 200.3) 197 (47, 229) 18 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -0.8)
Concho County No 135.7 (79.5, 224.0) 223 (12, 230) 4
*
*
Cooke County No 190.5 (167.0, 216.6) 121 (27, 207) 50 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.7)
Coryell County No 230.3 (204.1, 258.6) 24 (7, 137) 60 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.2)
Crane County No 256.1 (164.3, 378.4) 10 (1, 229) 5 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.2, 1.2)
Crockett County No 239.4 (149.5, 364.2) 20 (1, 229) 5
*
*
Crosby County No 172.1 (115.8, 248.1) 175 (6, 230) 6 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.2, 0.3)
Dallam County No 142.1 (85.7, 219.5) 219 (11, 230) 4 stable stable trend -2.2 (-4.3, 0.0)
Dallas County No 175.9 (172.0, 179.8) 162 (132, 177) 1,758 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.2, -1.9)
Dawson County No 222.4 (173.6, 280.5) 36 (3, 217) 14 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.7)
DeWitt County No 232.1 (196.3, 273.0) 23 (4, 156) 31 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.1)
Deaf Smith County No 171.1 (133.2, 216.0) 180 (18, 228) 14 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.6)
Delta County No 309.5 (231.8, 407.6) 2 (1, 146) 12 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.4, 1.3)
Denton County No 144.7 (138.3, 151.3) 216 (193, 222) 453 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.6, -2.0)
Dimmit County No 193.0 (144.0, 253.7) 113 (5, 228) 11 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.2)
Donley County No 225.9 (147.4, 338.0) 31 (1, 229) 6 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.1, 1.4)
Duval County No 222.3 (175.5, 278.5) 38 (3, 210) 16 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.7)
Eastland County No 190.5 (157.7, 229.0) 120 (14, 219) 25 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.7, -1.1)
Ector County No 205.4 (188.4, 223.4) 83 (25, 160) 118 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.9, -1.2)
Edwards County No 271.2 (160.4, 440.6) 8 (1, 229) 4
*
*
El Paso County No 158.4 (152.4, 164.5) 203 (167, 210) 550 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.7, -1.2)
Ellis County No 193.7 (179.6, 208.6) 108 (43, 170) 155 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.2, -1.4)
Erath County No 170.1 (145.1, 198.2) 182 (52, 222) 35 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.4, -1.1)
Falls County No 186.8 (152.0, 227.8) 129 (13, 224) 21 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.5, -1.8)
Fannin County No 182.8 (159.4, 209.0) 145 (35, 211) 45 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.3, -1.1)
Fayette County No 145.8 (123.2, 172.2) 215 (127, 229) 32 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.6, -1.5)
Fisher County No 143.1 (89.0, 224.9) 218 (11, 230) 4 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.5, 0.7)
Floyd County No 146.0 (97.2, 213.2) 214 (23, 230) 6 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.2, -0.3)
Fort Bend County No 133.1 (127.0, 139.5) 225 (206, 228) 414 falling falling trend -2.6 (-2.9, -2.2)
Franklin County No 201.1 (155.9, 256.4) 93 (6, 226) 15 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.3)
Freestone County No 194.1 (161.7, 231.7) 106 (16, 216) 26 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Frio County No 171.9 (133.7, 217.1) 176 (19, 228) 15 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.6, -0.1)
Gaines County No 212.4 (164.8, 268.3) 66 (4, 222) 15 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.4)
Galveston County No 212.3 (202.3, 222.8) 67 (32, 110) 366 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.8, -1.4)
Garza County No 178.5 (114.7, 264.1) 153 (2, 230) 5 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.1, -0.6)
Gillespie County No 167.6 (144.7, 194.1) 186 (64, 224) 44 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.7)
Goliad County No 223.9 (167.5, 294.8) 32 (1, 222) 12 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.9, -0.2)
Gonzales County No 207.6 (172.7, 247.8) 78 (8, 207) 26 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.4)
Gray County No 164.3 (134.4, 199.1) 192 (53, 228) 21 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -0.7)
Grayson County No 214.8 (200.2, 230.2) 59 (23, 119) 171 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -1.0)
Gregg County No 200.3 (184.7, 216.9) 95 (34, 160) 126 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.3, -1.5)
Grimes County No 191.2 (163.6, 222.3) 117 (20, 211) 38 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.5, -1.4)
Guadalupe County No 172.6 (159.5, 186.4) 174 (98, 206) 135 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.1, -1.3)
Hale County No 183.3 (154.7, 215.6) 142 (24, 220) 30 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.5)
Hall County No 128.9 (74.3, 220.1) 228 (15, 230) 3 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.1, 0.2)
Hamilton County No 254.8 (199.7, 322.0) 11 (1, 186) 17 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.9, 0.9)
Hansford County No 204.8 (135.1, 297.8) 86 (1, 229) 6 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.0, 0.1)
Hardeman County No 229.6 (154.2, 332.5) 25 (1, 228) 6 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.5, 1.0)
Hardin County No 209.9 (187.6, 234.3) 74 (16, 165) 68 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.1, -1.4)
Harris County No 165.7 (162.9, 168.6) 188 (161, 196) 2,931 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.4, -2.2)
Harrison County No 177.9 (159.5, 198.0) 154 (59, 212) 72 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.3, -1.1)
Hartley County No 168.5 (108.2, 249.7) 184 (6, 230) 5
*
*
Haskell County No 210.1 (154.3, 283.4) 71 (2, 227) 10 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.2)
Hays County No 167.7 (154.6, 181.5) 185 (107, 212) 140 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.3, -1.5)
Hemphill County No 234.2 (142.8, 360.9) 21 (1, 230) 4
*
*
Henderson County No 213.0 (196.2, 231.1) 64 (19, 137) 127 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.1, -1.2)
Hidalgo County No 131.9 (126.4, 137.6) 226 (209, 228) 441 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.4, -0.9)
Hill County No 214.9 (189.5, 243.0) 57 (12, 169) 55 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.8)
Hockley County No 174.7 (141.6, 213.2) 165 (21, 227) 20 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.8, -0.9)
Hood County No 181.7 (164.5, 200.6) 147 (62, 202) 88 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.7, -1.6)
Hopkins County No 207.8 (181.6, 237.0) 77 (15, 183) 47 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.5, -1.1)
Houston County No 177.2 (150.3, 208.1) 158 (37, 222) 32 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.9, -1.4)
Howard County No 190.7 (162.9, 221.7) 119 (22, 213) 36 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.8)
Hudspeth County No 122.8 (69.3, 202.5) 229 (28, 230) 3
*
*
Hunt County No 211.9 (194.5, 230.4) 69 (20, 142) 116 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.7)
Hutchinson County No 187.1 (154.5, 224.8) 128 (18, 223) 24 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -0.6)
Jack County No 179.3 (131.9, 238.8) 152 (9, 229) 10 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.1, -0.8)
Jackson County No 219.1 (177.7, 267.8) 43 (5, 206) 20 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.7, 0.0)
Jasper County No 202.1 (176.6, 230.5) 91 (16, 191) 48 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.6, -1.2)
Jefferson County No 185.2 (174.7, 196.1) 133 (78, 176) 246 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.2, -1.6)
Jim Hogg County No 240.1 (160.6, 344.6) 18 (1, 229) 6 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.8, 0.9)
Jim Wells County No 201.9 (175.2, 231.5) 92 (16, 196) 43 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.4)
Johnson County No 196.3 (182.7, 210.6) 100 (47, 164) 167 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.4)
Jones County No 183.4 (149.7, 222.6) 141 (19, 223) 21 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.1)
Karnes County No 204.6 (162.2, 254.6) 88 (6, 220) 16 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.2)
Kaufman County No 215.3 (197.2, 234.6) 55 (18, 139) 118 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.3, -1.6)
Kendall County No 150.0 (130.1, 172.4) 210 (123, 228) 43 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.9, -1.4)
Kerr County No 184.1 (166.0, 203.9) 137 (50, 202) 85 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.7)
Kimble County No 222.4 (156.7, 312.8) 37 (1, 228) 9 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.6)
Kinney County No 159.7 (100.0, 246.7) 199 (6, 230) 5 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.8, 0.7)
Kleberg County No 213.8 (180.0, 252.1) 62 (8, 195) 29 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.7, -0.1)
Knox County No 273.4 (183.1, 395.2) 6 (1, 223) 6 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.2, 0.7)
La Salle County No 216.6 (151.6, 299.6) 49 (1, 228) 7 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.5, -0.3)
Lamar County No 227.3 (203.6, 253.3) 29 (8, 136) 70 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.9)
Lamb County No 185.3 (144.4, 234.7) 132 (11, 227) 14 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.7)
Lampasas County No 193.9 (162.4, 230.2) 107 (16, 214) 28 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.7, -1.4)
Lavaca County No 194.3 (163.9, 229.5) 105 (16, 215) 30 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.6)
Lee County No 227.9 (189.0, 273.1) 27 (4, 182) 26 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.2)
Leon County No 215.4 (181.7, 254.6) 54 (7, 195) 31 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.7, -1.1)
Liberty County No 218.7 (197.7, 241.2) 44 (12, 149) 90 falling falling trend -3.0 (-3.9, -2.2)
Limestone County No 204.9 (173.1, 241.2) 84 (12, 207) 31 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.5, -1.1)
Lipscomb County No 189.6 (111.4, 303.6) 124 (1, 230) 4 falling falling trend -2.6 (-5.0, -0.2)
Live Oak County No 144.6 (111.6, 185.5) 217 (53, 230) 13 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.2, -1.1)
Llano County No 163.1 (138.1, 192.9) 194 (57, 226) 39 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.8, -1.3)
Lubbock County No 189.3 (178.7, 200.3) 125 (68, 173) 251 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -1.0)
Lynn County No 220.6 (157.1, 302.6) 41 (1, 226) 8 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.8, 1.2)
Madison County No 214.8 (170.2, 267.5) 58 (4, 217) 16 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.3, -0.2)
Marion County No 189.7 (149.1, 240.7) 123 (7, 226) 17 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.0)
Martin County No 272.8 (186.8, 383.3) 7 (1, 225) 7
*
*
Mason County No 172.8 (118.0, 251.6) 172 (7, 230) 7 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.9, -0.9)
Matagorda County No 240.8 (211.4, 273.2) 17 (4, 119) 52 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.5)
Maverick County No 174.0 (150.6, 200.0) 169 (55, 221) 40 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.3)
McCulloch County No 211.9 (162.4, 274.0) 68 (3, 219) 13 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.9, -0.7)
McLennan County No 185.6 (174.8, 196.9) 131 (75, 179) 229 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.0, -1.7)
Medina County No 159.9 (140.1, 181.9) 198 (104, 224) 49 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.6)
Menard County No 138.5 (81.2, 251.4) 222 (7, 230) 4
*
*
Midland County No 166.3 (152.1, 181.4) 187 (111, 212) 110 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.1, -1.3)
Milam County No 191.0 (162.3, 223.9) 118 (17, 214) 33 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.1)
Mills County No 210.9 (150.8, 292.9) 70 (1, 228) 9 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.2, 0.4)
Mitchell County No 214.7 (156.1, 287.8) 60 (2, 227) 9 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.3, 0.3)
Montague County No 204.9 (173.0, 241.8) 85 (10, 208) 31 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -0.9)
Montgomery County No 171.4 (164.2, 178.9) 178 (127, 193) 468 falling falling trend -2.4 (-2.6, -2.1)
Moore County No 157.3 (122.6, 198.5) 205 (42, 229) 15 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.9, -0.9)
Morris County No 250.2 (204.1, 304.7) 13 (1, 151) 22 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -0.7)
Nacogdoches County No 192.0 (170.6, 215.3) 115 (32, 201) 63 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.1, -1.1)
Navarro County No 215.7 (191.7, 242.0) 51 (14, 161) 62 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.7)
Newton County No 220.0 (179.9, 267.6) 42 (4, 202) 23 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -0.6)
Nolan County No 250.2 (205.6, 302.2) 12 (1, 159) 23 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.8, 0.5)
Nueces County No 173.6 (164.9, 182.6) 170 (117, 194) 316 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.1, -1.6)
Ochiltree County No 147.1 (98.5, 210.5) 212 (13, 230) 6 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.8, -1.3)
Orange County No 217.2 (198.4, 237.4) 48 (15, 128) 103 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.2, -1.3)
Palo Pinto County No 208.5 (180.1, 240.4) 76 (9, 188) 41 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.8)
Panola County No 206.0 (174.1, 242.5) 80 (9, 198) 31 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.8, -1.1)
Parker County No 183.1 (169.4, 197.6) 143 (75, 192) 143 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.2, -1.4)
Parmer County No 141.1 (97.7, 197.1) 220 (22, 230) 7 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.9, 0.1)
Pecos County No 160.7 (123.2, 205.7) 196 (29, 229) 13 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.8, -0.9)
Polk County No 281.1 (252.1, 312.5) 4 (1, 39) 86 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.0)
Potter County No 228.0 (209.8, 247.3) 26 (11, 100) 122 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.1)
Presidio County Yes 85.9 (54.2, 132.6) 230 (198, 230) 5
*
*
Rains County No 182.9 (143.9, 230.7) 144 (12, 228) 18 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.0, -0.9)
Randall County No 169.2 (155.4, 183.9) 183 (107, 211) 116 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.4)
Reagan County No 203.0 (115.5, 327.8) 89 (1, 230) 3
*
*
Real County No 193.6 (127.3, 292.6) 109 (1, 230) 6 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.6, -1.7)
Red River County No 210.1 (170.1, 258.4) 72 (6, 214) 21 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.3)
Reeves County No 174.3 (131.7, 225.6) 166 (11, 229) 12 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.7, -0.2)
Refugio County No 217.3 (163.0, 286.4) 47 (2, 225) 11 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.7, 0.9)
Robertson County No 244.7 (203.9, 291.9) 15 (2, 166) 27 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -0.9)
Rockwall County No 159.6 (142.3, 178.3) 200 (109, 223) 69 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.7, -1.0)
Runnels County No 172.7 (131.5, 224.0) 173 (17, 229) 12 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.1, -1.0)
Rusk County No 202.8 (180.9, 226.6) 90 (19, 181) 65 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.3, -1.1)
Sabine County No 199.1 (161.5, 246.0) 97 (7, 213) 22 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -0.8)
San Augustine County No 195.9 (153.9, 249.6) 101 (9, 223) 15 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.9, -0.3)
San Jacinto County No 184.6 (159.5, 213.2) 136 (32, 214) 42 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.5)
San Patricio County No 204.7 (183.6, 227.7) 87 (20, 174) 72 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.3, -1.2)
San Saba County No 184.0 (132.2, 252.8) 138 (5, 229) 9 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.3)
Schleicher County No 217.6 (132.3, 342.7) 46 (1, 230) 4 stable stable trend -6.4 (-14.1, 2.0)
Scurry County No 223.2 (180.5, 272.8) 33 (3, 206) 20 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.1, -0.1)
Shelby County No 227.7 (194.5, 265.1) 28 (5, 170) 35 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.3, -0.9)
Sherman County No 195.0 (112.5, 316.2) 104 (1, 230) 3
*
*
Smith County No 182.4 (171.9, 193.4) 146 (84, 183) 232 rising rising trend 7.6 (5.0, 10.2)
Somervell County No 158.7 (115.3, 214.7) 202 (23, 230) 10 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.6, -1.2)
Starr County No 175.7 (153.0, 200.7) 163 (50, 218) 44 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.5, 0.9)
Stephens County No 216.0 (167.6, 275.2) 50 (3, 222) 14 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.5, -0.5)
Sutton County No 176.9 (109.7, 273.1) 159 (3, 230) 4 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.9, -0.3)
Swisher County No 217.9 (162.4, 287.3) 45 (2, 225) 10 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.8)
Tarrant County No 181.0 (176.7, 185.3) 150 (117, 167) 1,505 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.0, -1.7)
Taylor County No 210.0 (194.6, 226.4) 73 (24, 135) 140 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.8)
Terry County No 176.3 (133.3, 228.7) 161 (12, 229) 12 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.6, 0.0)
Titus County No 195.2 (165.1, 229.2) 102 (18, 211) 31 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -0.9)
Tom Green County No 193.2 (177.8, 209.6) 112 (46, 180) 120 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.8)
Travis County No 146.7 (141.3, 152.2) 213 (190, 220) 655 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.5, -2.1)
Trinity County No 242.7 (204.0, 288.1) 16 (3, 153) 31 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.5)
Tyler County No 177.8 (149.4, 210.5) 156 (32, 223) 29 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -0.9)
Upshur County No 208.7 (184.0, 236.0) 75 (13, 172) 55 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.8, -1.5)
Uvalde County No 206.5 (175.3, 241.9) 79 (9, 199) 32 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.5)
Val Verde County No 181.1 (157.7, 207.0) 149 (32, 215) 43 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.4, -1.2)
Van Zandt County No 215.4 (194.5, 238.2) 53 (13, 139) 81 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -0.9)
Victoria County No 192.3 (175.0, 210.8) 114 (41, 187) 94 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.1, -1.1)
Walker County No 183.9 (163.8, 205.8) 140 (48, 206) 66 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.4, -1.1)
Waller County No 184.9 (160.0, 212.4) 134 (28, 212) 43 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.5, -1.1)
Ward County No 174.8 (128.6, 231.8) 164 (9, 230) 10 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.4, -0.2)
Washington County No 163.9 (141.6, 189.0) 193 (65, 225) 41 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.7, -1.3)
Webb County No 158.1 (146.5, 170.5) 204 (148, 218) 144 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.5)
Wharton County No 193.3 (168.6, 220.6) 110 (25, 205) 46 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.6, -1.6)
Wheeler County No 200.9 (140.4, 281.9) 94 (3, 229) 7 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.2, 0.7)
Wichita County No 226.4 (210.1, 243.5) 30 (13, 97) 150 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -1.1)
Wilbarger County No 215.6 (170.9, 269.0) 52 (3, 215) 17 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.3)
Willacy County No 148.2 (116.4, 185.8) 211 (59, 230) 15 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.4, 0.1)
Williamson County No 155.3 (148.0, 162.9) 208 (170, 215) 362 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.3, -1.6)
Wilson County No 174.3 (153.1, 197.8) 167 (58, 215) 52 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.6, -1.3)
Winkler County No 173.4 (115.6, 248.9) 171 (5, 230) 6 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.7, 2.3)
Wise County No 221.4 (199.6, 244.8) 40 (11, 135) 82 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.4, -0.1)
Wood County No 199.3 (178.3, 222.5) 96 (26, 187) 75 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.2, -1.1)
Yoakum County No 239.8 (170.0, 327.0) 19 (1, 225) 8 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.4, 3.2)
Young County No 259.0 (218.8, 305.1) 9 (1, 120) 30 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.1, 4.4)
Zapata County No 177.8 (134.6, 230.2) 155 (9, 229) 12 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.8, 1.3)
Zavala County No 180.4 (133.3, 238.5) 151 (10, 229) 10 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.1, 0.0)
Borden County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Briscoe County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cochran County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cottle County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Culberson County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dickens County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Foard County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glasscock County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Irion County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jeff Davis County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kenedy County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kent County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
King County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Loving County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McMullen County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Motley County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oldham County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roberts County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shackelford County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sterling County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stonewall County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Terrell County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Throckmorton County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Upton County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/08/2022 2:16 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top