Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Texas by County

All Cancer Sites, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Texas Yes 122.5 (121.8, 123.3) N/A 19,039 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.6, -1.4)
United States No 128.7 (128.5, 129.0) N/A 283,896 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.2, -1.7)
Baylor County No 211.6 (142.5, 309.7) 1 (1, 207) 7 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.8, 2.0)
Polk County No 198.7 (175.6, 224.3) 2 (1, 41) 62 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.6, 1.1)
Mitchell County No 197.4 (141.9, 268.8) 3 (1, 195) 9 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.8, 0.9)
Lynn County No 193.8 (135.1, 271.3) 4 (1, 207) 8 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.5, 1.2)
McCulloch County No 183.4 (137.3, 242.5) 5 (1, 182) 12 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.0, 1.9)
Knox County No 182.5 (120.2, 272.4) 6 (1, 215) 6
*
*
Hamilton County No 181.4 (135.8, 239.6) 7 (1, 182) 14 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.1, 1.3)
Liberty County No 173.6 (156.8, 191.8) 8 (3, 69) 80 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.7)
DeWitt County No 172.7 (143.3, 207.3) 9 (1, 137) 28 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.8, 0.8)
Trinity County No 171.9 (141.0, 209.2) 10 (1, 159) 24 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.6, 1.3)
Jones County No 168.4 (132.3, 211.9) 11 (1, 176) 17 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.8)
Callahan County No 167.2 (133.3, 208.3) 12 (1, 185) 18 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.1, 1.9)
Stephens County No 166.3 (124.6, 219.4) 13 (1, 208) 12 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.4)
Delta County No 166.2 (108.4, 245.7) 14 (1, 216) 6 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.8, 1.9)
Nolan County No 165.9 (131.6, 207.2) 15 (1, 182) 17 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.5)
Kleberg County No 165.3 (137.9, 196.6) 16 (1, 166) 27 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.8, 0.8)
Hutchinson County No 164.5 (134.0, 200.2) 17 (2, 185) 22 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.6)
Somervell County No 164.4 (121.8, 218.6) 18 (1, 207) 11 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.6, 0.4)
Frio County No 164.2 (128.4, 207.1) 19 (1, 190) 15 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.6, 2.1)
Panola County No 164.1 (138.3, 194.0) 20 (2, 159) 30 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.3)
Coleman County No 164.0 (123.3, 217.1) 21 (1, 206) 12 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.9, 1.5)
Dickens County No 163.7 (89.4, 297.2) 22 (1, 218) 3
*
*
Wheeler County No 163.1 (109.1, 237.5) 23 (1, 216) 6 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.6, 1.2)
Hill County No 162.7 (141.1, 187.0) 24 (3, 141) 45 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.4)
Runnels County No 162.0 (125.6, 207.8) 25 (1, 205) 14 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.6, 1.5)
Kinney County No 161.3 (94.9, 262.5) 26 (1, 217) 5 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.0, 2.8)
Bosque County No 160.0 (131.9, 193.6) 27 (2, 173) 26 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.5)
Haskell County No 159.5 (109.7, 229.0) 28 (1, 215) 8 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.2, 1.5)
Montague County No 159.3 (131.7, 191.8) 29 (2, 179) 26 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.4)
Orange County No 158.3 (143.6, 174.2) 30 (8, 115) 88 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Fannin County No 158.1 (136.1, 183.2) 31 (4, 150) 39 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.2)
Clay County No 157.9 (121.1, 204.4) 32 (1, 206) 14 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.7, 1.7)
Freestone County No 157.2 (128.4, 191.1) 33 (2, 179) 23 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.7, 1.0)
Lampasas County No 157.0 (130.0, 188.7) 34 (3, 179) 25 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.6)
Menard County No 156.4 (86.3, 284.4) 35 (1, 218) 3
*
*
Falls County No 156.0 (126.2, 191.3) 36 (2, 189) 20 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.6)
Wichita County No 155.3 (143.2, 168.3) 37 (11, 107) 131 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.6)
Franklin County No 155.1 (117.4, 202.5) 38 (1, 208) 13 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.7)
Bowie County No 154.5 (140.7, 169.4) 39 (11, 122) 98 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3)
Jim Hogg County No 154.1 (96.1, 235.5) 40 (1, 217) 5 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.5, 0.9)
Martin County No 154.0 (95.7, 234.9) 41 (1, 217) 4
*
*
Kimble County No 153.7 (99.3, 233.6) 42 (1, 216) 6 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.5, 0.1)
Kaufman County No 153.5 (140.3, 167.5) 43 (12, 117) 104 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.6)
Madison County No 153.2 (115.6, 199.6) 44 (2, 210) 12 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.1, 0.1)
Johnson County No 152.6 (141.8, 163.9) 45 (16, 108) 155 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.3)
Real County No 152.4 (91.7, 248.2) 46 (1, 217) 5
*
*
Coryell County No 152.0 (133.9, 171.8) 47 (10, 155) 52 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.2)
Bee County No 151.8 (124.6, 183.4) 48 (3, 189) 23 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.0)
Gregg County No 151.6 (139.6, 164.5) 49 (15, 123) 123 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.7)
Ector County No 151.1 (138.5, 164.6) 50 (14, 127) 108 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.1)
Fisher County No 150.8 (95.5, 234.0) 51 (1, 217) 5 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.3, 0.9)
Uvalde County No 150.1 (124.7, 179.3) 52 (4, 184) 26 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.7, -0.2)
Lamar County No 149.0 (131.4, 168.5) 53 (9, 158) 56 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.1)
Navarro County No 148.9 (130.4, 169.5) 54 (10, 165) 50 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.0)
Wise County No 148.7 (132.2, 166.7) 55 (11, 157) 62 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.5)
Parker County No 148.1 (136.5, 160.4) 56 (20, 132) 126 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.1)
Hockley County No 148.1 (120.0, 180.9) 57 (4, 200) 20 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.7)
Crane County No 148.0 (86.7, 236.1) 58 (1, 218) 4
*
*
Hale County No 147.7 (123.8, 175.1) 59 (6, 189) 28 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.1, 1.2)
Grimes County No 147.6 (123.0, 176.1) 60 (5, 188) 27 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.3)
Sabine County No 147.1 (112.4, 191.8) 61 (2, 209) 15 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.6)
Dallam County No 147.1 (94.5, 218.2) 62 (1, 217) 5 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.4, -0.4)
Aransas County No 147.1 (123.6, 174.7) 63 (6, 189) 33 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.3)
Potter County No 147.0 (133.8, 161.2) 64 (21, 140) 95 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
Zavala County No 147.0 (108.4, 195.4) 65 (2, 213) 10 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.3, 1.4)
Colorado County No 146.8 (120.9, 177.5) 66 (6, 192) 26 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.4, -0.1)
Matagorda County No 146.8 (125.9, 170.3) 67 (11, 175) 37 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.1)
Childress County No 146.7 (95.0, 218.4) 68 (1, 217) 6 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.4, 1.6)
Upshur County No 146.4 (127.2, 168.0) 69 (10, 170) 44 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.7, -0.1)
Morris County No 145.8 (113.1, 186.5) 70 (2, 210) 15 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.2)
Houston County No 145.8 (121.0, 175.1) 71 (6, 191) 28 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.3, -0.7)
Shelby County No 145.7 (120.9, 174.5) 72 (6, 191) 25 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.4)
Hunt County No 145.2 (132.0, 159.5) 73 (18, 148) 92 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.1)
Crockett County No 144.8 (84.4, 236.6) 74 (1, 218) 4
*
*
Cass County No 144.4 (123.7, 168.2) 75 (9, 183) 38 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.0)
San Patricio County No 143.9 (127.3, 162.0) 76 (16, 162) 57 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3)
Floyd County No 142.9 (95.5, 208.4) 77 (1, 217) 6 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.4, 1.8)
Jasper County No 142.9 (122.5, 166.0) 78 (12, 183) 38 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.7)
Cooke County No 142.8 (123.4, 164.7) 79 (15, 182) 41 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.2)
Donley County No 142.5 (78.1, 243.9) 80 (1, 218) 4 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.0, 1.5)
Jackson County No 142.3 (110.9, 180.6) 81 (3, 212) 15 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.6, 1.0)
Grayson County No 141.6 (130.9, 153.0) 82 (32, 147) 137 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.0, -0.3)
Calhoun County No 141.6 (115.0, 173.0) 83 (7, 202) 21 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.1)
Wharton County No 141.4 (122.5, 162.6) 84 (14, 183) 42 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.1)
Palo Pinto County No 141.3 (119.2, 166.8) 85 (9, 191) 31 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.5)
Young County No 141.3 (114.0, 174.0) 86 (6, 208) 20 falling falling trend -3.5 (-5.9, -1.1)
Coke County No 140.9 (88.3, 225.0) 87 (1, 217) 5
*
*
Eastland County No 140.7 (113.5, 173.4) 88 (6, 205) 21 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.4)
Gray County No 140.3 (113.4, 172.3) 89 (5, 208) 20 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.1)
Henderson County No 139.9 (127.0, 153.9) 90 (27, 164) 96 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Limestone County No 139.6 (113.3, 170.6) 91 (7, 207) 22 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.3)
Robertson County No 139.0 (110.4, 173.6) 92 (6, 210) 18 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.4)
Rusk County No 138.8 (121.4, 158.2) 93 (16, 185) 48 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.1)
Bastrop County No 138.7 (124.3, 154.4) 94 (22, 174) 71 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.5)
Galveston County No 138.7 (131.5, 146.3) 95 (48, 137) 283 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.1)
Lee County No 138.6 (110.6, 172.5) 96 (8, 211) 18 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.2)
Taylor County No 137.8 (126.5, 149.9) 97 (35, 160) 117 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.4)
Leon County No 137.7 (110.7, 170.5) 98 (7, 209) 21 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.0)
Burleson County No 136.4 (109.5, 168.8) 99 (9, 211) 20 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.2)
Van Zandt County No 136.3 (120.8, 153.4) 100 (25, 185) 60 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.1)
Bell County No 135.8 (128.0, 144.0) 101 (54, 150) 231 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.8)
Milam County No 135.4 (112.9, 161.8) 102 (12, 203) 27 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.3)
Ellis County No 135.1 (124.8, 145.9) 103 (44, 161) 134 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.9)
Llano County No 135.1 (111.6, 163.6) 104 (12, 204) 34 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.4)
Angelina County No 135.0 (121.6, 149.5) 105 (34, 179) 78 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5)
Caldwell County No 134.8 (115.2, 156.9) 106 (19, 193) 35 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.1)
Deaf Smith County No 134.1 (103.0, 171.6) 107 (3, 215) 13 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.5, 1.5)
San Augustine County No 133.9 (96.8, 183.7) 108 (3, 216) 10 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.1)
Nacogdoches County No 133.8 (117.5, 151.8) 109 (26, 190) 52 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.0)
Titus County No 133.6 (111.0, 159.6) 110 (14, 209) 25 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.6, -0.4)
Cherokee County No 133.4 (116.5, 152.3) 111 (26, 195) 48 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.8)
Sutton County No 133.1 (77.6, 217.8) 112 (1, 218) 4 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.1, 0.7)
McLennan County No 132.8 (124.7, 141.3) 113 (58, 164) 210 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.1, -1.1)
Andrews County No 132.5 (99.4, 172.7) 114 (6, 215) 11 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.2)
Harrison County No 132.0 (117.2, 148.2) 115 (35, 189) 61 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
Jefferson County No 131.8 (123.7, 140.4) 116 (64, 166) 208 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -1.1)
Blanco County No 131.7 (100.5, 172.1) 117 (6, 215) 14 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.0, 1.7)
Brazoria County No 131.5 (124.2, 139.2) 118 (72, 160) 247 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.1)
Hardin County No 131.2 (115.3, 148.9) 119 (29, 192) 51 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.6)
Red River County No 130.9 (102.5, 167.1) 120 (7, 213) 16 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.2)
Wood County No 130.9 (114.3, 149.7) 121 (26, 194) 55 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.2)
Rains County No 130.8 (101.0, 169.0) 122 (8, 215) 14 falling falling trend -3.7 (-5.8, -1.5)
Swisher County No 130.5 (87.8, 188.6) 123 (2, 217) 7 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.8, 1.1)
Lavaca County No 129.6 (105.3, 158.8) 124 (14, 209) 23 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.8)
Midland County No 129.4 (118.4, 141.2) 125 (53, 181) 106 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.4)
Guadalupe County No 129.0 (118.9, 139.8) 126 (63, 180) 122 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.7)
Ochiltree County No 128.9 (86.4, 184.7) 127 (2, 217) 6 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.7, 1.1)
Victoria County No 128.2 (115.3, 142.3) 128 (51, 187) 76 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.3)
San Jacinto County No 128.2 (106.5, 153.5) 129 (18, 209) 27 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.2)
Gonzales County No 128.0 (102.3, 158.7) 130 (13, 213) 18 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.5)
Waller County No 127.7 (108.6, 149.2) 131 (26, 207) 33 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -0.9)
Live Oak County No 127.6 (94.9, 169.6) 132 (7, 216) 11 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.2, 0.6)
Austin County No 127.6 (106.6, 151.9) 133 (26, 213) 28 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.2)
Rockwall County No 127.1 (113.8, 141.5) 134 (47, 191) 69 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.7)
Lubbock County No 126.9 (119.2, 134.9) 135 (84, 174) 212 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.6)
Tom Green County No 126.8 (115.5, 139.1) 136 (62, 186) 96 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.7)
Ward County No 126.8 (90.5, 173.1) 137 (3, 217) 8 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.5, -0.2)
Hopkins County No 126.7 (107.7, 148.3) 138 (32, 208) 34 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.4)
Tarrant County No 126.6 (123.5, 129.7) 139 (109, 156) 1,352 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.6, -1.4)
Dallas County No 126.1 (123.3, 128.9) 140 (111, 157) 1,629 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.0, -1.5)
Yoakum County No 125.7 (81.5, 185.0) 141 (2, 218) 5 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.0, 0.3)
Duval County No 125.6 (90.8, 170.2) 142 (5, 217) 9 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.8, -0.1)
Mills County No 125.5 (81.1, 193.0) 143 (2, 218) 6 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.0, 1.8)
Brown County No 125.5 (107.7, 145.8) 144 (40, 205) 38 falling falling trend -4.2 (-7.2, -1.2)
Anderson County No 125.3 (108.2, 144.7) 145 (37, 205) 41 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.4, -1.1)
Mason County No 125.0 (74.3, 204.3) 146 (1, 218) 5 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.0, -0.1)
Hansford County No 124.9 (77.7, 192.7) 147 (1, 218) 4 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.3, 0.7)
Jim Wells County No 124.5 (105.6, 146.0) 148 (32, 210) 32 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.1)
Tyler County No 124.2 (100.6, 152.7) 149 (18, 213) 22 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.3, -0.9)
Burnet County No 124.1 (108.3, 141.9) 150 (42, 203) 49 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.8)
Wilbarger County No 123.5 (92.4, 162.7) 151 (8, 217) 11 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 0.9)
Parmer County No 123.4 (84.6, 174.5) 152 (4, 218) 7
*
*
Camp County No 123.3 (91.6, 163.1) 153 (10, 216) 11 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.9, -1.0)
Kerr County No 123.2 (109.3, 138.8) 154 (57, 203) 67 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.6)
Brooks County No 122.8 (81.2, 180.0) 155 (2, 217) 6 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.8, 1.8)
Montgomery County No 122.8 (117.4, 128.4) 156 (107, 174) 405 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.6, -1.7)
Chambers County No 122.8 (102.0, 146.5) 157 (29, 212) 26 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.6, -0.5)
Hays County Yes 121.4 (111.7, 131.6) 158 (84, 189) 123 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.5)
Maverick County Yes 121.3 (103.8, 140.9) 159 (42, 210) 35 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.8, 0.7)
Newton County Yes 121.0 (88.8, 161.8) 160 (14, 217) 11 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.3, 0.4)
Bexar County Yes 120.9 (117.9, 123.9) 161 (129, 174) 1,281 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.4, -1.1)
Harris County Yes 120.7 (118.7, 122.8) 162 (132, 171) 2,680 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.0, -1.6)
Dawson County Yes 119.8 (87.1, 161.7) 163 (8, 217) 9 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.9, 0.6)
Comal County Yes 119.6 (110.3, 129.7) 164 (95, 197) 126 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Hood County Yes 119.6 (106.3, 134.4) 165 (74, 205) 66 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.7, -1.3)
Refugio County Yes 119.0 (81.4, 170.9) 166 (4, 218) 7 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.9, 0.2)
Randall County Yes 118.5 (108.3, 129.6) 167 (95, 201) 101 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.6)
Smith County Yes 118.4 (110.7, 126.5) 168 (109, 191) 185 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.3, -1.3)
Erath County Yes 118.1 (99.1, 140.0) 169 (50, 213) 29 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.4)
Washington County Yes 118.1 (100.5, 138.5) 170 (50, 212) 37 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.1)
Willacy County Yes 118.1 (91.3, 150.6) 171 (23, 216) 14 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.9, 0.6)
Val Verde County Yes 118.0 (100.6, 137.6) 172 (51, 211) 34 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.5, -0.8)
Scurry County Yes 117.2 (89.1, 152.0) 173 (17, 217) 12 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.5)
Wilson County Yes 117.0 (100.4, 135.8) 174 (58, 210) 37 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.5)
Lamb County Yes 116.9 (86.7, 155.1) 175 (14, 216) 11 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.4)
Bandera County Yes 116.9 (95.7, 142.7) 176 (40, 215) 25 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -0.6)
Crosby County Yes 116.8 (74.3, 177.8) 177 (2, 218) 5 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.6, 0.9)
Garza County Yes 116.8 (69.1, 188.7) 178 (2, 218) 4
*
*
Medina County Yes 116.7 (100.4, 135.0) 179 (58, 212) 38 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.4)
Archer County Yes 116.3 (82.7, 161.4) 180 (8, 217) 8
*
*
Moore County Yes 115.5 (87.4, 149.6) 181 (19, 217) 12 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.2)
Howard County Yes 115.4 (94.3, 139.9) 182 (40, 215) 22 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
La Salle County Yes 114.8 (72.5, 174.6) 183 (3, 218) 5 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.2, 1.5)
Carson County Yes 114.2 (73.4, 172.9) 184 (4, 218) 5 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.7, 0.5)
Bailey County Yes 113.4 (69.2, 175.5) 185 (4, 218) 4 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.9, 1.1)
Hartley County Yes 113.3 (63.6, 188.7) 186 (1, 218) 3 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.8, 0.7)
El Paso County Yes 113.1 (108.7, 117.6) 187 (148, 193) 521 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.1)
Karnes County Yes 112.1 (82.4, 150.0) 188 (18, 217) 10 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.0, 0.3)
Nueces County Yes 111.7 (105.4, 118.3) 189 (142, 200) 247 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.0, -1.5)
Jack County Yes 110.2 (75.4, 158.1) 190 (8, 218) 7 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.9, 0.3)
Marion County Yes 110.1 (78.9, 152.2) 191 (17, 218) 10 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.6, 0.0)
Williamson County Yes 109.7 (104.3, 115.3) 192 (154, 202) 323 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.9, -1.3)
Denton County Yes 108.3 (103.7, 113.2) 193 (160, 202) 432 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.2, -1.7)
Atascosa County Yes 107.4 (91.3, 125.7) 194 (96, 215) 32 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.7)
Gaines County Yes 106.8 (76.8, 144.1) 195 (21, 218) 9 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 0.2)
Goliad County Yes 105.3 (70.6, 154.0) 196 (7, 218) 7 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.3, 0.0)
Fayette County Yes 105.0 (87.0, 126.7) 197 (89, 216) 26 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.0)
Cameron County Yes 104.2 (98.4, 110.2) 198 (166, 210) 249 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.0, -0.4)
Webb County Yes 103.9 (95.8, 112.4) 199 (156, 212) 126 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.9, -1.3)
Fort Bend County Yes 103.7 (99.0, 108.5) 200 (172, 210) 393 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.9, -1.3)
Collin County Yes 103.6 (99.6, 107.8) 201 (172, 208) 509 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.1, -1.6)
Walker County Yes 103.4 (88.9, 119.8) 202 (115, 216) 38 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.3, -1.1)
Brazos County Yes 103.2 (94.0, 113.0) 203 (149, 213) 95 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.1, -1.1)
Starr County Yes 102.2 (86.9, 119.3) 204 (114, 216) 32 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.7)
Travis County Yes 101.4 (97.5, 105.4) 205 (180, 210) 550 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.2, -1.7)
Terry County Yes 101.2 (71.2, 140.5) 206 (31, 218) 8 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.8, 0.8)
Gillespie County Yes 100.6 (83.4, 121.4) 207 (105, 217) 30 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.4, -0.7)
Comanche County Yes 99.6 (74.6, 131.9) 208 (49, 218) 12 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.1, 0.1)
Pecos County Yes 99.0 (70.1, 136.1) 209 (31, 218) 8 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.5, -0.1)
Castro County Yes 98.1 (60.6, 151.5) 210 (13, 218) 5 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.7, 0.0)
Hidalgo County Yes 96.7 (92.5, 101.1) 211 (187, 214) 400 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.1, -0.6)
Brewster County Yes 94.8 (65.5, 135.3) 212 (32, 218) 8 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -0.5)
Kendall County Yes 94.5 (80.2, 111.1) 213 (148, 217) 33 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.2, -1.6)
San Saba County Yes 94.1 (59.2, 148.2) 214 (22, 218) 5 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.3, 1.2)
Winkler County Yes 92.3 (55.1, 145.6) 215 (16, 218) 4 falling falling trend -3.7 (-6.0, -1.3)
Reeves County Yes 87.2 (58.5, 125.3) 216 (67, 218) 6 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.7, -0.9)
Dimmit County Yes 75.7 (47.9, 114.6) 217 (95, 218) 5 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.0, 0.2)
Zapata County Yes 48.4 (27.5, 78.5) 218 (206, 218) 3 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.8, 0.5)
Armstrong County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Borden County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Briscoe County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cochran County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Collingsworth County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Concho County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cottle County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Culberson County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Edwards County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Foard County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glasscock County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hall County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardeman County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hemphill County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hudspeth County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Irion County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jeff Davis County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kenedy County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kent County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
King County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lipscomb County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Loving County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McMullen County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Motley County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oldham County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Presidio County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Reagan County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roberts County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schleicher County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shackelford County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sherman County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sterling County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stonewall County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Terrell County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Throckmorton County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Upton County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 07/22/2024 7:13 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top