Death Rates Table
County
|
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7? |
Age-Adjusted Death Rate† deaths per 100,000 (95% Confidence Interval) 
|
CI*Rank⋔ (95% Confidence Interval)
|
Average Annual Count
|
Recent Trend |
Recent 5-Year Trend‡ in Death Rates (95% Confidence Interval)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Texas | Yes | 115.7 (114.5, 116.9) | N/A | 8,405 |
falling 
|
-1.5 (-1.6, -1.3) |
| United States 6 | Yes | 108.2 (107.8, 108.7) | N/A | 41,779 |
falling
|
-1.8 (-2.5, -1.0) |
| Bexar County | No | 129.4 (126.1, 132.8) | 64 (48, 80) | 1,208 |
falling
|
-1.2 (-1.4, -1.1) |
| Harris County | Yes | 103.9 (101.0, 107.0) | 111 (90, 117) | 1,118 |
falling
|
-1.5 (-1.7, -1.2) |
| El Paso County | No | 126.1 (122.2, 130.1) | 71 (53, 86) | 811 |
falling
|
-1.1 (-1.3, -0.9) |
| Hidalgo County | Yes | 113.9 (110.1, 117.9) | 90 (71, 104) | 678 |
falling
|
-0.9 (-1.1, -0.6) |
| Dallas County | Yes | 99.3 (94.9, 103.7) | 115 (95, 125) | 509 |
falling
|
-1.4 (-1.6, -1.1) |
| Cameron County | Yes | 116.0 (110.8, 121.3) | 88 (67, 104) | 386 |
falling
|
-1.0 (-1.3, -0.7) |
| Tarrant County | Yes | 105.4 (99.6, 111.4) | 107 (82, 119) | 305 |
falling
|
-1.3 (-1.7, -0.8) |
| Nueces County | Yes | 118.7 (112.2, 125.5) | 83 (59, 102) | 258 |
falling
|
-1.5 (-1.8, -1.2) |
| Webb County | No | 127.7 (120.7, 135.0) | 66 (44, 91) | 253 |
falling
|
-0.6 (-0.9, -0.2) |
| Travis County | Yes | 103.1 (96.2, 110.2) | 112 (85, 124) | 212 |
falling
|
-2.3 (-2.7, -1.8) |
| Fort Bend County | Yes | 90.0 (81.9, 98.7) | 126 (99, 138) | 105 |
falling
|
-2.0 (-2.5, -1.6) |
| Lubbock County | No | 140.9 (127.9, 154.6) | 48 (19, 84) | 98 |
falling
|
-1.0 (-1.5, -0.5) |
| Brazoria County | Yes | 120.9 (108.2, 134.6) | 78 (40, 113) | 78 |
falling
|
-1.1 (-1.7, -0.4) |
| Ector County | No | 147.9 (132.5, 164.4) | 37 (12, 76) | 77 |
falling
|
-0.9 (-1.6, -0.2) |
| Starr County | No | 140.1 (126.1, 155.2) | 50 (20, 86) | 74 |
stable 
|
0.2 (-0.4, 0.8) |
| Maverick County | No | 143.3 (128.7, 159.1) | 42 (17, 82) | 72 |
stable
|
-0.1 (-0.6, 0.4) |
| Williamson County | Yes | 94.9 (83.9, 106.9) | 122 (87, 138) | 66 |
falling
|
-2.3 (-3.2, -1.3) |
| Galveston County | Yes | 119.6 (106.4, 133.9) | 81 (40, 113) | 65 |
falling
|
-1.7 (-2.3, -1.0) |
| Denton County | Yes | 83.0 (72.9, 93.9) | 134 (107, 143) | 62 |
falling
|
-1.8 (-3.0, -0.6) |
| Hays County | No | 131.1 (115.3, 148.3) | 61 (24, 106) | 58 |
falling
|
-1.6 (-2.5, -0.7) |
| Collin County | Yes | 81.9 (71.6, 93.1) | 136 (107, 144) | 58 |
falling
|
-2.1 (-3.2, -1.0) |
| Val Verde County | No | 141.7 (125.7, 159.3) | 45 (17, 89) | 57 |
stable
|
0.6 (-0.7, 1.9) |
| Montgomery County | Yes | 83.3 (72.6, 95.1) | 133 (100, 144) | 57 |
falling
|
-2.7 (-3.8, -1.6) |
| Jim Wells County | No | 160.9 (142.3, 181.3) | 24 (6, 60) | 55 |
stable
|
-0.4 (-1.0, 0.2) |
| Guadalupe County | Yes | 121.0 (106.6, 136.6) | 77 (39, 117) | 55 |
falling
|
-2.0 (-2.6, -1.3) |
| San Patricio County | No | 159.4 (140.5, 180.0) | 27 (8, 72) | 54 |
falling
|
-1.2 (-1.8, -0.6) |
| Midland County | No | 140.2 (122.5, 159.5) | 49 (16, 95) | 53 |
stable
|
-0.5 (-1.5, 0.4) |
| Victoria County | No | 145.1 (127.7, 164.2) | 40 (12, 86) | 52 |
stable
|
-0.6 (-1.6, 0.4) |
| Bell County | Yes | 112.6 (97.9, 128.8) | 91 (48, 124) | 49 |
falling
|
-1.2 (-2.2, -0.3) |
| Tom Green County | No | 130.5 (114.0, 148.6) | 62 (24, 105) | 48 |
falling
|
-1.1 (-1.7, -0.4) |
| McLennan County | Yes | 106.9 (91.9, 123.5) | 103 (54, 131) | 40 |
falling
|
-1.6 (-2.4, -0.7) |
| Potter County | No | 156.6 (133.8, 181.8) | 29 (6, 83) | 38 |
stable
|
-0.4 (-1.5, 0.6) |
| Atascosa County | No | 126.4 (108.5, 146.5) | 69 (26, 117) | 37 |
falling
|
-1.5 (-2.5, -0.5) |
| Kleberg County | No | 165.4 (140.6, 193.3) | 14 (5, 73) | 32 |
stable
|
-0.4 (-1.2, 0.4) |
| Taylor County | No | 155.2 (130.8, 182.5) | 30 (6, 85) | 31 |
stable
|
-1.2 (-2.3, 0.0) |
| Uvalde County | No | 161.1 (135.8, 189.6) | 23 (5, 80) | 29 |
stable
|
-0.9 (-1.8, 0.0) |
| Medina County | Yes | 111.9 (93.9, 132.4) | 92 (40, 132) | 29 |
falling
|
-1.4 (-2.3, -0.6) |
| Comal County | Yes | 90.5 (75.5, 107.4) | 125 (82, 142) | 28 |
falling
|
-2.3 (-3.3, -1.4) |
| Caldwell County | No | 162.4 (135.5, 192.8) | 19 (5, 84) | 28 |
stable
|
-0.5 (-1.6, 0.6) |
| Ellis County | Yes | 118.9 (97.2, 143.3) | 82 (27, 130) | 27 |
stable
|
-0.5 (-2.0, 1.1) |
| Bee County | No | 164.9 (137.1, 196.4) | 15 (4, 78) | 26 |
stable
|
-0.4 (-1.3, 0.5) |
| Brazos County | Yes | 109.0 (88.7, 132.0) | 100 (35, 136) | 25 |
stable
|
-1.2 (-2.7, 0.3) |
| Willacy County | No | 128.3 (106.0, 153.8) | 65 (15, 124) | 24 |
stable
|
-0.8 (-2.0, 0.3) |
| Wilson County | No | 125.9 (103.5, 151.7) | 72 (18, 122) | 23 |
falling
|
-2.1 (-3.0, -1.2) |
| Duval County | No | 176.3 (144.5, 213.3) | 10 (3, 85) | 22 |
stable
|
-0.2 (-1.1, 0.8) |
| Hale County | No | 159.8 (130.3, 193.6) | 26 (4, 97) | 22 |
stable
|
0.1 (-1.2, 1.3) |
| Johnson County | Yes | 105.6 (84.9, 129.4) | 106 (44, 140) | 22 |
|
|
| Frio County | No | 162.0 (132.6, 195.9) | 20 (4, 91) | 22 |
stable
|
0.3 (-0.7, 1.4) |
| Jefferson County | Yes | 75.0 (60.3, 91.7) | 144 (106, 146) | 21 |
falling
|
-1.5 (-2.5, -0.5) |
| Bastrop County | Yes | 118.0 (94.5, 144.9) | 85 (19, 134) | 21 |
stable
|
-0.9 (-2.6, 0.8) |
| Wichita County | No | 126.3 (100.4, 156.3) | 70 (13, 129) | 18 |
falling
|
-2.0 (-3.2, -0.7) |
| Zavala County | No | 162.6 (130.4, 200.2) | 18 (4, 101) | 18 |
stable
|
-0.4 (-1.4, 0.6) |
| Anderson County | No | 320.5 (248.8, 405.3) | 2 (1, 7) | 18 |
|
|
| Randall County | No | 149.8 (114.7, 190.8) | 34 (5, 117) | 17 |
|
|
| Wharton County | Yes | 116.0 (90.6, 145.8) | 89 (23, 139) | 15 |
falling
|
-2.0 (-2.9, -1.0) |
| Matagorda County | No | 141.1 (109.6, 178.1) | 47 (7, 125) | 15 |
falling
|
-1.9 (-3.3, -0.4) |
| Howard County | No | 125.6 (96.0, 160.9) | 73 (10, 136) | 14 |
stable
|
-0.7 (-2.0, 0.5) |
| Dimmit County | No | 129.5 (99.7, 165.8) | 63 (10, 134) | 13 |
falling
|
-1.4 (-2.3, -0.6) |
| Smith County | Yes | 65.4 (48.7, 85.4) | 146 (112, 146) | 13 |
|
|
| Kaufman County | No | 135.9 (98.5, 180.8) | 55 (5, 138) | 13 |
stable
|
-0.9 (-3.4, 1.6) |
| Brooks County | No | 153.1 (116.7, 198.0) | 32 (4, 118) | 13 |
stable
|
-0.6 (-1.7, 0.6) |
| Deaf Smith County | No | 148.7 (112.6, 191.6) | 35 (5, 127) | 13 |
stable
|
-1.0 (-2.4, 0.4) |
| Kerr County | Yes | 111.5 (84.3, 144.1) | 93 (22, 142) | 12 |
falling
|
-1.5 (-2.5, -0.4) |
| Reeves County | Yes | 111.5 (84.8, 143.7) | 94 (22, 142) | 12 |
falling
|
-1.6 (-2.6, -0.6) |
| Zapata County | Yes | 100.2 (75.8, 129.7) | 114 (41, 144) | 12 |
stable
|
-1.0 (-2.3, 0.4) |
| Calhoun County | No | 133.4 (100.1, 173.6) | 58 (7, 134) | 11 |
falling
|
-2.4 (-3.6, -1.2) |
| Gonzales County | No | 145.9 (109.2, 190.2) | 38 (5, 127) | 11 |
falling
|
-1.7 (-2.9, -0.4) |
| Karnes County | No | 161.6 (121.4, 210.2) | 21 (3, 112) | 11 |
stable
|
-0.6 (-1.9, 0.7) |
| Angelina County | Yes | 104.6 (75.8, 139.6) | 110 (24, 145) | 11 |
stable
|
-1.8 (-3.6, 0.1) |
| Jim Hogg County | No | 202.0 (149.8, 266.9) | 5 (1, 93) | 11 |
stable
|
-0.1 (-1.4, 1.2) |
| Lamb County | No | 183.1 (136.2, 240.2) | 8 (2, 100) | 11 |
stable
|
-0.4 (-2.0, 1.3) |
| Aransas County | No | 160.7 (117.8, 213.6) | 25 (3, 121) | 10 |
stable
|
-1.0 (-2.7, 0.8) |
| Pecos County | Yes | 97.4 (71.9, 128.8) | 118 (41, 146) | 10 |
falling
|
-3.0 (-4.3, -1.6) |
| DeWitt County | No | 151.3 (110.9, 201.1) | 33 (4, 133) | 10 |
falling
|
-1.3 (-2.6, -0.1) |
| Hockley County | No | 126.8 (91.9, 169.8) | 68 (7, 139) | 10 |
falling
|
-1.8 (-3.5, -0.2) |
| Dawson County | No | 157.3 (115.0, 209.6) | 28 (3, 127) | 9 |
stable
|
0.0 (-1.6, 1.8) |
| La Salle County | No | 177.2 (128.5, 237.6) | 9 (2, 114) | 9 |
stable
|
-0.3 (-2.0, 1.4) |
| Parker County | Yes | 106.0 (75.1, 144.2) | 104 (19, 145) | 9 |
|
|
| Gregg County | Yes | 76.1 (52.4, 105.9) | 142 (61, 146) | 9 |
|
|
| Liberty County | Yes | 96.5 (64.3, 137.2) | 119 (23, 146) | 9 |
|
|
| Nolan County | No | 163.4 (116.9, 221.8) | 17 (2, 127) | 8 |
stable
|
-1.0 (-2.7, 0.8) |
| Brown County | No | 135.4 (94.0, 187.4) | 56 (5, 143) | 8 |
|
|
| Grayson County | Yes | 107.1 (70.9, 152.8) | 102 (12, 146) | 8 |
|
|
| Moore County | Yes | 95.6 (65.4, 134.0) | 121 (25, 146) | 8 |
|
|
| Walker County | Yes | 121.4 (79.4, 175.1) | 76 (6, 145) | 8 |
|
|
| Hunt County | Yes | 109.4 (72.3, 156.5) | 98 (9, 146) | 7 |
|
|
| Waller County | Yes | 107.6 (72.4, 151.9) | 101 (14, 146) | 7 |
|
|
| Coryell County | Yes | 116.3 (77.9, 164.9) | 87 (8, 145) | 7 |
|
|
| Hill County | No | 163.9 (111.1, 230.7) | 16 (2, 137) | 7 |
|
|
| Navarro County | Yes | 105.3 (70.2, 149.7) | 108 (13, 146) | 7 |
|
|
| Terry County | No | 141.5 (95.6, 200.2) | 46 (3, 143) | 7 |
falling
|
-2.4 (-4.2, -0.5) |
| Colorado County | No | 143.2 (96.9, 202.7) | 43 (3, 142) | 7 |
|
|
| Rockwall County | Yes | 81.4 (52.4, 118.8) | 138 (40, 146) | 7 |
|
|
| Ward County | No | 127.1 (86.2, 179.8) | 67 (5, 144) | 6 |
stable
|
-0.2 (-2.0, 1.6) |
| Castro County | No | 154.7 (103.2, 221.8) | 31 (3, 141) | 6 |
|
|
| Gaines County | Yes | 118.1 (76.9, 171.4) | 84 (5, 145) | 6 |
falling
|
-2.4 (-4.3, -0.4) |
| Kendall County | Yes | 87.7 (58.2, 125.7) | 130 (37, 146) | 6 |
falling
|
-3.4 (-5.3, -1.5) |
| Wise County | Yes | 82.1 (52.5, 120.9) | 135 (47, 146) | 6 |
|
|
| Austin County | No | 137.6 (87.5, 202.6) | 52 (3, 145) | 6 |
|
|
| Grimes County | No | 138.5 (87.0, 206.2) | 51 (3, 145) | 6 |
|
|
| Polk County | No | 189.0 (119.7, 278.4) | 7 (1, 134) | 6 |
|
|
| Presidio County | Yes | 66.0 (42.8, 98.7) | 145 (94, 146) | 6 |
falling
|
-3.5 (-5.2, -1.8) |
| Andrews County | Yes | 96.3 (61.8, 141.6) | 120 (14, 146) | 5 |
|
|
| Refugio County | No | 131.9 (86.3, 193.6) | 60 (4, 145) | 5 |
|
|
| Brewster County | Yes | 104.7 (68.2, 154.8) | 109 (11, 146) | 5 |
falling
|
-2.0 (-3.2, -0.7) |
| Cherokee County | Yes | 98.8 (61.2, 148.4) | 116 (13, 146) | 5 |
|
|
| Jackson County | No | 161.4 (104.0, 236.7) | 22 (2, 143) | 5 |
stable
|
0.1 (-1.4, 1.7) |
| Jones County | No | 137.6 (87.8, 203.6) | 53 (3, 144) | 5 |
|
|
| Live Oak County | Yes | 98.5 (63.9, 145.4) | 117 (17, 146) | 5 |
falling
|
-2.1 (-3.5, -0.6) |
| Lynn County | No | 198.1 (128.1, 292.4) | 6 (1, 132) | 5 |
|
|
| Palo Pinto County | No | 145.6 (91.9, 217.1) | 39 (2, 143) | 5 |
|
|
| Kinney County | No | 210.8 (134.4, 315.3) | 4 (1, 131) | 5 |
|
|
| Titus County | Yes | 77.8 (47.2, 119.4) | 141 (39, 146) | 5 |
|
|
| Burnet County | Yes | 81.7 (48.8, 125.8) | 137 (29, 146) | 5 |
|
|
| McCulloch County | No | 173.7 (110.5, 260.5) | 11 (2, 140) | 5 |
|
|
| Parmer County | Yes | 119.9 (73.9, 181.4) | 80 (4, 146) | 5 |
|
|
| Scurry County | Yes | 102.0 (63.8, 152.9) | 113 (9, 146) | 5 |
|
|
| Milam County | Yes | 105.6 (64.4, 161.2) | 105 (8, 146) | 4 |
|
|
| Sutton County | No | 165.6 (102.4, 254.1) | 13 (2, 142) | 4 |
|
|
| Yoakum County | No | 142.3 (86.5, 216.9) | 44 (3, 145) | 4 |
|
|
| Swisher County | No | 173.1 (105.7, 264.9) | 12 (1, 142) | 4 |
|
|
| Henderson County | Yes | 80.2 (46.1, 126.5) | 139 (26, 146) | 4 |
|
|
| Hood County | Yes | 93.4 (53.4, 148.7) | 123 (10, 146) | 4 |
|
|
| Rusk County | Yes | 109.1 (61.1, 175.5) | 99 (5, 146) | 4 |
|
|
| Burleson County | No | 145.1 (85.4, 227.2) | 41 (2, 146) | 4 |
|
|
| Nacogdoches County | Yes | 83.6 (47.7, 132.5) | 132 (25, 146) | 4 |
|
|
| Robertson County | No | 148.3 (87.9, 232.2) | 36 (3, 146) | 4 |
|
|
| Winkler County | Yes | 110.1 (64.3, 173.8) | 97 (6, 146) | 4 |
stable
|
-1.6 (-4.0, 0.9) |
| Erath County | Yes | 88.0 (47.2, 146.0) | 129 (15, 146) | 4 |
|
|
| Fayette County | Yes | 111.2 (63.6, 177.6) | 95 (4, 146) | 4 |
|
|
| Goliad County | Yes | 111.0 (64.8, 178.6) | 96 (6, 146) | 4 |
|
|
| Lampasas County | Yes | 116.5 (67.4, 185.2) | 86 (4, 146) | 4 |
|
|
| Martin County | No | 323.5 (153.8, 567.3) | 1 (1, 141) | 4 |
|
|
| Mitchell County | No | 134.2 (78.7, 213.5) | 57 (3, 146) | 4 |
|
|
| Runnels County | Yes | 120.7 (70.1, 192.1) | 79 (4, 146) | 4 |
stable
|
-1.2 (-3.3, 1.0) |
| Chambers County | Yes | 77.9 (37.0, 139.6) | 140 (11, 146) | 3 |
|
|
| Crockett County | No | 132.7 (76.9, 214.3) | 59 (3, 146) | 3 |
|
|
| Floyd County | Yes | 121.8 (70.2, 195.3) | 75 (4, 146) | 3 |
|
|
| Washington County | No | 136.9 (75.0, 223.5) | 54 (2, 146) | 3 |
|
|
| Bandera County | Yes | 75.8 (42.5, 124.4) | 143 (35, 146) | 3 |
|
|
| Cooke County | Yes | 87.3 (46.3, 146.6) | 131 (12, 146) | 3 |
|
|
| Falls County | No | 124.3 (69.5, 201.7) | 74 (3, 146) | 3 |
|
|
| Gray County | Yes | 88.6 (47.0, 150.0) | 128 (12, 146) | 3 |
|
|
| Hopkins County | Yes | 90.9 (46.0, 157.9) | 124 (7, 146) | 3 |
|
|
| Hudspeth County | Yes | 89.4 (50.6, 146.6) | 127 (20, 146) | 3 |
|
|
| Knox County | No | 312.2 (174.5, 510.6) | 3 (1, 114) | 3 |
|
|
| Archer County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Armstrong County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Bailey County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Baylor County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Blanco County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Borden County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Bosque County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Bowie County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Briscoe County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Callahan County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Camp County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Carson County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Cass County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Childress County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Clay County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Cochran County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Coke County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Coleman County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Collingsworth County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Comanche County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Concho County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Cottle County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Crane County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Crosby County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Culberson County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Dallam County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Delta County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Dickens County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Donley County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Eastland County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Edwards County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Fannin County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Fisher County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Foard County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Franklin County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Freestone County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Garza County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Gillespie County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Glasscock County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Hall County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Hamilton County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Hansford County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Hardeman County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Hardin County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Harrison County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Hartley County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Haskell County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Hemphill County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Houston County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Hutchinson County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Irion County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Jack County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Jasper County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Jeff Davis County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Kenedy County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Kent County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Kimble County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| King County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Lamar County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Lavaca County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Lee County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Leon County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Limestone County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Lipscomb County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Llano County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Loving County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Madison County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Marion County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Mason County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| McMullen County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Menard County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Mills County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Montague County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Morris County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Motley County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Newton County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Ochiltree County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Oldham County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Orange County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Panola County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Rains County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Reagan County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Real County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Red River County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Roberts County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Sabine County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| San Augustine County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| San Jacinto County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| San Saba County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Schleicher County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Shackelford County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Shelby County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Sherman County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Somervell County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Stephens County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Sterling County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Stonewall County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Terrell County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Throckmorton County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Trinity County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Tyler County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Upshur County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Upton County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Van Zandt County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Wheeler County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Wilbarger County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Wood County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Young County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 06/09/2023 6:39 pm.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
6 Hispanic mortality recent trend data for the United States has been excluded for the following states: Louisiana, New Hampshire, and Oklahoma. The data on Hispanic and non-Hispanic mortality for these states may be unreliable for the time period used in the generation of the recent trend (1990 - 2020) and has been excluded from the calculation of the United States recent trend. This was based on the NCHS Policy.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.
NHIA (NAACCR Hispanic Identification Algorithm) was used for Hispanic Ethnicity (see Technical Notes section of the USCS).
Statistics for minorities may be affected by inconsistent race identification between the cancer case reports (sources for numerator of rate) and data from the Census Bureau (source for denominator of rate); and from undercounts of some population groups in the census.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 06/09/2023 6:39 pm.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
6 Hispanic mortality recent trend data for the United States has been excluded for the following states: Louisiana, New Hampshire, and Oklahoma. The data on Hispanic and non-Hispanic mortality for these states may be unreliable for the time period used in the generation of the recent trend (1990 - 2020) and has been excluded from the calculation of the United States recent trend. This was based on the NCHS Policy.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.
NHIA (NAACCR Hispanic Identification Algorithm) was used for Hispanic Ethnicity (see Technical Notes section of the USCS).
Statistics for minorities may be affected by inconsistent race identification between the cancer case reports (sources for numerator of rate) and data from the Census Bureau (source for denominator of rate); and from undercounts of some population groups in the census.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.