Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Texas by County

All Cancer Sites, 2015-2019

Hispanic (any race), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Texas *** 117.3 (116.1, 118.5) N/A 8,180 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.6, -1.3)
United States 6 *** 109.7 (109.2, 110.2) N/A 40,552 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.3, -1.2)
Presidio County *** 65.0 (42.6, 96.5) 139 (91, 139) 6 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.1, -1.6)
Smith County *** 65.2 (48.0, 85.8) 138 (105, 139) 13
*
*
Gillespie County *** 69.4 (38.3, 114.3) 137 (49, 139) 3
*
*
Gregg County *** 71.8 (47.4, 103.1) 136 (79, 139) 7
*
*
Erath County *** 79.2 (39.5, 137.5) 135 (15, 139) 3
*
*
Wise County *** 80.0 (50.0, 119.9) 134 (40, 139) 6
*
*
Denton County *** 80.8 (70.2, 92.4) 133 (103, 137) 55 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.1, -0.4)
Gray County *** 80.9 (43.6, 136.8) 132 (19, 139) 3
*
*
Montgomery County *** 81.2 (70.1, 93.4) 131 (104, 138) 51 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.2, -1.7)
Pecos County *** 81.7 (58.4, 110.9) 130 (67, 139) 8 falling falling trend -3.7 (-5.2, -2.3)
Jefferson County *** 82.5 (66.8, 100.4) 129 (91, 139) 22 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.5, -0.3)
Collin County *** 82.7 (72.0, 94.3) 128 (102, 138) 55 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.5, -1.2)
Burnet County *** 83.1 (50.5, 126.9) 127 (27, 139) 5
*
*
Henderson County *** 84.2 (48.6, 132.5) 126 (20, 139) 4
*
*
Cherokee County *** 84.6 (49.9, 131.6) 125 (19, 139) 5
*
*
Rockwall County *** 85.0 (53.4, 126.2) 124 (35, 139) 6
*
*
Live Oak County *** 88.5 (55.8, 133.7) 123 (23, 139) 5 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.9, -0.7)
Fort Bend County *** 92.5 (84.0, 101.6) 122 (94, 131) 102 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.5, -1.5)
Comal County *** 93.4 (77.8, 111.2) 121 (76, 135) 27 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.4, -1.3)
Grayson County *** 94.1 (59.5, 138.8) 120 (20, 139) 6
*
*
Hunt County *** 95.2 (59.2, 142.2) 119 (12, 139) 6
*
*
Hood County *** 95.9 (54.6, 153.4) 118 (7, 139) 4
*
*
Navarro County *** 96.5 (62.5, 140.4) 117 (17, 139) 6
*
*
Williamson County *** 96.8 (85.2, 109.4) 116 (82, 130) 63 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.1, -1.2)
Zapata County *** 97.2 (72.9, 126.7) 115 (42, 138) 11 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.5, 0.5)
Cooke County *** 99.2 (52.6, 166.3) 114 (5, 139) 3
*
*
Moore County *** 100.8 (69.0, 141.2) 113 (18, 139) 8
*
*
Scurry County *** 101.0 (63.0, 152.0) 112 (14, 139) 5
*
*
Dallas County *** 101.4 (96.8, 106.1) 111 (91, 118) 488 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -1.0)
Andrews County *** 102.0 (65.5, 149.6) 110 (12, 139) 5
*
*
Liberty County *** 102.1 (68.3, 144.8) 109 (14, 139) 8
*
*
Tarrant County *** 103.9 (98.0, 110.1) 108 (84, 117) 285 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -0.9)
Harris County *** 104.2 (101.2, 107.4) 107 (89, 114) 1,066 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.9, -1.3)
Travis County *** 104.7 (97.6, 112.1) 106 (82, 118) 203 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.8, -1.7)
Rusk County *** 104.7 (56.9, 171.9) 105 (5, 139) 4
*
*
Kendall County *** 104.8 (71.0, 147.7) 104 (14, 139) 7 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.2, -1.2)
Walker County *** 104.9 (64.4, 158.6) 103 (7, 139) 6
*
*
Brazos County *** 105.1 (85.2, 127.8) 102 (41, 134) 24 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.1, 0.1)
Brewster County *** 105.2 (68.6, 155.5) 101 (11, 139) 5 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.3, -0.7)
Goliad County *** 105.3 (60.4, 171.8) 100 (6, 139) 3
*
*
Lampasas County *** 105.4 (58.9, 171.9) 99 (4, 139) 3
*
*
McLennan County *** 106.1 (90.6, 123.1) 98 (50, 128) 38 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.5, -0.7)
Jones County *** 106.1 (60.6, 169.7) 97 (5, 139) 4
*
*
Ward County *** 107.0 (70.0, 155.6) 96 (10, 139) 6 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.8, 1.1)
Parmer County *** 107.0 (64.3, 165.3) 95 (5, 139) 4
*
*
Titus County *** 107.3 (65.6, 163.0) 94 (7, 139) 6
*
*
Milam County *** 110.7 (67.0, 169.7) 93 (7, 139) 4
*
*
Medina County *** 112.2 (93.8, 133.0) 92 (40, 127) 28 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.5)
Colorado County *** 115.8 (72.7, 173.3) 91 (4, 139) 5
*
*
Hidalgo County *** 116.0 (112.0, 120.0) 90 (69, 101) 671 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.6)
Waller County *** 116.6 (77.8, 165.6) 89 (7, 138) 7
*
*
Calhoun County *** 116.8 (85.2, 155.8) 88 (11, 137) 10 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.1, -1.5)
Angelina County *** 118.7 (86.5, 157.4) 87 (10, 136) 11 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.1, 0.4)
Cameron County *** 119.4 (114.1, 124.9) 86 (62, 98) 387 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.6)
Parker County *** 119.6 (84.5, 162.9) 85 (9, 137) 9
*
*
Johnson County *** 120.8 (97.1, 148.1) 84 (17, 125) 23
*
*
Reeves County *** 121.3 (93.3, 154.9) 83 (13, 132) 13 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.7, -0.6)
Willacy County *** 121.8 (100.1, 146.7) 82 (23, 124) 23 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.1, 0.3)
Wichita County *** 122.3 (96.1, 152.7) 81 (16, 128) 17 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.2, -0.6)
Guadalupe County *** 122.4 (107.5, 138.7) 80 (35, 114) 53 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.7, -1.3)
Nueces County *** 123.0 (116.3, 130.0) 79 (52, 95) 258 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -1.1)
Tom Green County *** 123.4 (107.0, 141.4) 78 (31, 114) 43 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.5)
Galveston County *** 124.2 (110.4, 139.1) 77 (35, 109) 65 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -0.9)
Gaines County *** 124.3 (80.9, 180.2) 76 (5, 138) 6 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.2, -0.1)
Ellis County *** 124.7 (101.9, 150.4) 75 (16, 121) 27 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.9, 1.4)
Hays County *** 124.7 (108.7, 142.1) 74 (27, 112) 52 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.7, -0.8)
Bell County *** 125.1 (109.0, 142.7) 73 (30, 112) 51 stable stable trend -1.0 (-1.9, 0.0)
Grimes County *** 125.4 (76.1, 191.6) 72 (3, 139) 5
*
*
Kerr County *** 125.7 (96.0, 161.2) 71 (10, 130) 13 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.4, -0.2)
Coryell County *** 125.9 (83.8, 179.3) 70 (4, 137) 7
*
*
El Paso County *** 127.6 (123.6, 131.7) 69 (50, 83) 803 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.3, -1.0)
Bastrop County *** 127.8 (102.4, 157.0) 68 (13, 123) 21 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.5, 1.2)
Brown County *** 128.2 (88.0, 179.2) 67 (5, 137) 7
*
*
Washington County *** 128.2 (68.0, 214.3) 66 (2, 139) 3
*
*
Wharton County *** 128.5 (100.8, 160.9) 65 (11, 122) 16 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.8, -0.9)
Wilson County *** 128.9 (105.9, 155.3) 64 (15, 119) 23 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.1, -1.1)
Atascosa County *** 129.9 (111.2, 150.6) 63 (18, 110) 36 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.3)
Webb County *** 130.6 (123.4, 138.1) 62 (40, 85) 252 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.9, -0.2)
Gonzales County *** 130.9 (96.4, 173.0) 61 (6, 132) 10 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.3, -0.6)
Brazoria County *** 131.5 (117.7, 146.4) 60 (24, 98) 79 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.2)
Bexar County *** 132.6 (129.2, 136.1) 59 (45, 74) 1,204 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.3, -1.0)
DeWitt County *** 135.3 (97.3, 182.7) 58 (5, 134) 9 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.6, 0.1)
Winkler County *** 136.0 (83.9, 206.2) 57 (2, 139) 5 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.8, 1.3)
Nolan County *** 136.0 (93.9, 190.1) 56 (3, 135) 7 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.5, 0.1)
Val Verde County *** 137.4 (121.5, 154.7) 55 (20, 97) 55 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.4, 1.6)
Dimmit County *** 138.5 (107.5, 175.8) 54 (5, 121) 14 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.4, -0.6)
Hale County *** 139.2 (111.6, 171.0) 53 (8, 117) 19 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.6, 1.0)
Howard County *** 139.8 (107.9, 177.5) 52 (6, 125) 15 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.0, 0.7)
Lubbock County *** 140.4 (127.3, 154.5) 51 (17, 83) 94 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.6)
Starr County *** 141.4 (127.3, 156.6) 50 (18, 85) 74 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.4, 0.9)
Midland County *** 142.8 (124.7, 162.6) 49 (12, 94) 52 stable stable trend 6.4 (-3.4, 17.2)
Burleson County *** 143.2 (84.2, 224.7) 48 (2, 139) 4
*
*
Maverick County *** 143.4 (128.8, 159.1) 47 (16, 82) 71 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.6, 0.5)
Robertson County *** 143.5 (83.0, 228.5) 46 (2, 139) 4
*
*
Terry County *** 143.7 (97.1, 203.2) 45 (2, 134) 7 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.1, -0.2)
Crosby County *** 144.7 (83.5, 230.6) 44 (2, 139) 4 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.9, 0.5)
Sutton County *** 145.1 (85.4, 230.9) 43 (2, 139) 4
*
*
Kaufman County *** 145.7 (105.2, 194.4) 42 (3, 129) 12 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.2, 2.1)
Taylor County *** 145.8 (121.7, 172.8) 41 (8, 101) 28 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 0.0)
Ector County *** 148.6 (132.8, 165.6) 40 (11, 78) 74 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.3)
Falls County *** 149.0 (88.6, 231.8) 39 (2, 139) 4
*
*
Yoakum County *** 149.5 (92.1, 225.9) 38 (2, 138) 5
*
*
Victoria County *** 150.6 (132.4, 170.3) 37 (9, 82) 52 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.5)
Potter County *** 151.0 (128.3, 176.2) 36 (7, 90) 36 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.8)
Hockley County *** 151.3 (112.6, 198.3) 35 (3, 121) 11 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.3, 0.1)
Caldwell County *** 151.7 (125.1, 181.9) 34 (5, 98) 25 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.0, 0.4)
Matagorda County *** 152.3 (119.3, 190.8) 33 (4, 112) 16 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.2, -0.1)
Austin County *** 152.5 (98.1, 222.5) 32 (2, 136) 6
*
*
Uvalde County *** 152.7 (127.9, 180.7) 31 (7, 96) 27 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.1)
Randall County *** 152.9 (115.0, 197.6) 30 (3, 121) 15
*
*
Jim Wells County *** 153.2 (134.9, 173.3) 29 (8, 78) 52 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.1)
Deaf Smith County *** 153.5 (116.0, 198.2) 28 (3, 122) 12 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.4, 0.6)
Karnes County *** 154.2 (115.3, 201.7) 27 (3, 116) 11 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.1, 0.8)
Aransas County *** 155.4 (112.4, 208.9) 26 (2, 121) 9 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.4, 0.4)
Frio County *** 156.6 (127.1, 190.6) 25 (4, 98) 20 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.0, 1.2)
Zavala County *** 157.2 (125.8, 194.1) 24 (3, 100) 18 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.6)
McCulloch County *** 159.1 (97.8, 244.8) 23 (2, 137) 4
*
*
Hill County *** 159.4 (106.0, 227.6) 22 (2, 134) 6
*
*
San Patricio County *** 160.0 (140.6, 181.1) 21 (6, 71) 52 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
La Salle County *** 160.2 (115.0, 216.7) 20 (2, 123) 9 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.3, 1.4)
Kleberg County *** 160.7 (136.1, 188.3) 19 (4, 83) 31 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.4)
Dawson County *** 160.7 (117.3, 214.3) 18 (2, 120) 9 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.6, 2.0)
Bee County *** 164.2 (135.7, 196.5) 17 (3, 92) 25 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.5)
Castro County *** 164.6 (109.6, 236.0) 16 (2, 130) 6
*
*
Lynn County *** 165.9 (101.8, 254.7) 15 (2, 137) 4
*
*
Polk County *** 166.8 (102.3, 251.7) 14 (2, 135) 5
*
*
Swisher County *** 169.3 (100.3, 264.2) 13 (1, 138) 4
*
*
Refugio County *** 169.4 (116.7, 238.5) 12 (2, 124) 7
*
*
Brooks County *** 169.7 (130.5, 217.4) 11 (2, 100) 14 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.8)
Floyd County *** 170.5 (105.8, 258.0) 10 (1, 137) 4
*
*
Jackson County *** 170.6 (110.9, 248.2) 9 (2, 134) 5 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.0, 2.0)
Palo Pinto County *** 172.8 (110.5, 254.4) 8 (2, 134) 6
*
*
Lamb County *** 175.2 (128.5, 232.5) 7 (2, 113) 10 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.9, 1.6)
Duval County *** 184.6 (152.3, 222.1) 6 (2, 59) 23 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.9)
Kinney County *** 192.8 (121.8, 291.3) 5 (1, 125) 5
*
*
Mitchell County *** 193.6 (123.8, 287.7) 4 (1, 126) 5
*
*
Jim Hogg County *** 204.2 (151.1, 270.1) 3 (1, 96) 11 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.4, 1.4)
Martin County *** 291.5 (144.1, 501.8) 2 (1, 135) 4
*
*
Anderson County *** 344.5 (268.6, 433.9) 1 (1, 5) 19
*
*
Archer County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Armstrong County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bailey County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bandera County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Baylor County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Blanco County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Borden County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bosque County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bowie County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Briscoe County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Callahan County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Camp County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carson County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cass County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chambers County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Childress County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cochran County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coke County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coleman County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Collingsworth County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Comanche County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Concho County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cottle County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crane County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crockett County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Culberson County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dallam County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Delta County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dickens County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Donley County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Eastland County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Edwards County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fannin County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fayette County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fisher County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Foard County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Franklin County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Freestone County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Garza County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glasscock County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hall County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hamilton County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hansford County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardeman County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardin County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harrison County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hartley County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Haskell County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hemphill County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hopkins County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Houston County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hudspeth County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hutchinson County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Irion County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jack County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jasper County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jeff Davis County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kenedy County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kent County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kimble County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
King County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Knox County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lamar County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lavaca County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lee County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Leon County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Limestone County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lipscomb County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Llano County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Loving County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Madison County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marion County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mason County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McMullen County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menard County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mills County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montague County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Morris County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Motley County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Nacogdoches County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Newton County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ochiltree County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oldham County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Orange County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Panola County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rains County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Reagan County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Real County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Red River County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roberts County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Runnels County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sabine County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Augustine County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Jacinto County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Saba County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schleicher County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shackelford County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shelby County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sherman County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Somervell County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stephens County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sterling County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stonewall County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Terrell County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Throckmorton County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Trinity County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tyler County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Upshur County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Upton County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Van Zandt County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wheeler County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilbarger County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wood County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Young County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 09/27/2022 1:59 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data for the following has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of estimates:
Archer, Armstrong, Bailey, Bandera, Baylor, Blanco, Borden, Bosque, Bowie, Briscoe, Callahan, Camp, Carson, Cass, Chambers, Childress, Clay, Cochran, Coke, Coleman, Collingsworth, Comanche, Concho, Cottle, Crane, Crockett, Culberson, Dallam, Delta, Dickens, Donley, Eastland, Edwards, Fannin, Fayette, Fisher, Foard, Franklin, Freestone, Garza, Glasscock, Hall, Hamilton, Hansford, Hardeman, Hardin, Harrison, Hartley, Haskell, Hemphill, Hopkins, Houston, Hudspeth, Hutchinson, Irion, Jack, Jasper, Jeff Davis, Kenedy, Kent, Kimble, King, Knox, Lamar, Lavaca, Lee, Leon, Limestone, Lipscomb, Llano, Loving, Madison, Marion, Mason, McMullen, Menard, Mills, Montague, Morris, Motley, Nacogdoches, Newton, Ochiltree, Oldham, Orange, Panola, Rains, Reagan, Real, Red River, Roberts, Runnels, Sabine, San Augustine, San Jacinto, San Saba, Schleicher, Shackelford, Shelby, Sherman, Somervell, Stephens, Sterling, Stonewall, Terrell, Throckmorton, Trinity, Tyler, Upshur, Upton, Van Zandt, Wheeler, Wilbarger, Wood, Young

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

NHIA (NAACCR Hispanic Identification Algorithm) was used for Hispanic Ethnicity (see Technical Notes section of the USCS).
Statistics for minorities may be affected by inconsistent race identification between the cancer case reports (sources for numerator of rate) and data from the Census Bureau (source for denominator of rate); and from undercounts of some population groups in the census.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top