Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Texas by County

All Cancer Sites, 2016-2020

Hispanic (any race), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Texas Yes 115.7 (114.5, 116.9) N/A 8,405 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.6, -1.3)
United States 6 Yes 108.2 (107.8, 108.7) N/A 41,779 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.5, -1.0)
Bandera County Yes 75.8 (42.5, 124.4) 143 (35, 146) 3
*
*
Cooke County Yes 87.3 (46.3, 146.6) 131 (12, 146) 3
*
*
Falls County No 124.3 (69.5, 201.7) 74 (3, 146) 3
*
*
Gray County Yes 88.6 (47.0, 150.0) 128 (12, 146) 3
*
*
Hopkins County Yes 90.9 (46.0, 157.9) 124 (7, 146) 3
*
*
Hudspeth County Yes 89.4 (50.6, 146.6) 127 (20, 146) 3
*
*
Knox County No 312.2 (174.5, 510.6) 3 (1, 114) 3
*
*
Chambers County Yes 77.9 (37.0, 139.6) 140 (11, 146) 3
*
*
Crockett County No 132.7 (76.9, 214.3) 59 (3, 146) 3
*
*
Floyd County Yes 121.8 (70.2, 195.3) 75 (4, 146) 3
*
*
Washington County No 136.9 (75.0, 223.5) 54 (2, 146) 3
*
*
Erath County Yes 88.0 (47.2, 146.0) 129 (15, 146) 4
*
*
Fayette County Yes 111.2 (63.6, 177.6) 95 (4, 146) 4
*
*
Goliad County Yes 111.0 (64.8, 178.6) 96 (6, 146) 4
*
*
Lampasas County Yes 116.5 (67.4, 185.2) 86 (4, 146) 4
*
*
Martin County No 323.5 (153.8, 567.3) 1 (1, 141) 4
*
*
Mitchell County No 134.2 (78.7, 213.5) 57 (3, 146) 4
*
*
Runnels County Yes 120.7 (70.1, 192.1) 79 (4, 146) 4 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.3, 1.0)
Burleson County No 145.1 (85.4, 227.2) 41 (2, 146) 4
*
*
Nacogdoches County Yes 83.6 (47.7, 132.5) 132 (25, 146) 4
*
*
Robertson County No 148.3 (87.9, 232.2) 36 (3, 146) 4
*
*
Winkler County Yes 110.1 (64.3, 173.8) 97 (6, 146) 4 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.0, 0.9)
Henderson County Yes 80.2 (46.1, 126.5) 139 (26, 146) 4
*
*
Hood County Yes 93.4 (53.4, 148.7) 123 (10, 146) 4
*
*
Rusk County Yes 109.1 (61.1, 175.5) 99 (5, 146) 4
*
*
Swisher County No 173.1 (105.7, 264.9) 12 (1, 142) 4
*
*
Milam County Yes 105.6 (64.4, 161.2) 105 (8, 146) 4
*
*
Sutton County No 165.6 (102.4, 254.1) 13 (2, 142) 4
*
*
Yoakum County No 142.3 (86.5, 216.9) 44 (3, 145) 4
*
*
Burnet County Yes 81.7 (48.8, 125.8) 137 (29, 146) 5
*
*
McCulloch County No 173.7 (110.5, 260.5) 11 (2, 140) 5
*
*
Parmer County Yes 119.9 (73.9, 181.4) 80 (4, 146) 5
*
*
Scurry County Yes 102.0 (63.8, 152.9) 113 (9, 146) 5
*
*
Kinney County No 210.8 (134.4, 315.3) 4 (1, 131) 5
*
*
Titus County Yes 77.8 (47.2, 119.4) 141 (39, 146) 5
*
*
Brewster County Yes 104.7 (68.2, 154.8) 109 (11, 146) 5 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.2, -0.7)
Cherokee County Yes 98.8 (61.2, 148.4) 116 (13, 146) 5
*
*
Jackson County No 161.4 (104.0, 236.7) 22 (2, 143) 5 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.4, 1.7)
Jones County No 137.6 (87.8, 203.6) 53 (3, 144) 5
*
*
Live Oak County Yes 98.5 (63.9, 145.4) 117 (17, 146) 5 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.5, -0.6)
Lynn County No 198.1 (128.1, 292.4) 6 (1, 132) 5
*
*
Palo Pinto County No 145.6 (91.9, 217.1) 39 (2, 143) 5
*
*
Andrews County Yes 96.3 (61.8, 141.6) 120 (14, 146) 5
*
*
Refugio County No 131.9 (86.3, 193.6) 60 (4, 145) 5
*
*
Austin County No 137.6 (87.5, 202.6) 52 (3, 145) 6
*
*
Grimes County No 138.5 (87.0, 206.2) 51 (3, 145) 6
*
*
Polk County No 189.0 (119.7, 278.4) 7 (1, 134) 6
*
*
Presidio County Yes 66.0 (42.8, 98.7) 145 (94, 146) 6 falling falling trend -3.5 (-5.2, -1.8)
Gaines County Yes 118.1 (76.9, 171.4) 84 (5, 145) 6 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.3, -0.4)
Kendall County Yes 87.7 (58.2, 125.7) 130 (37, 146) 6 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.3, -1.5)
Wise County Yes 82.1 (52.5, 120.9) 135 (47, 146) 6
*
*
Castro County No 154.7 (103.2, 221.8) 31 (3, 141) 6
*
*
Ward County No 127.1 (86.2, 179.8) 67 (5, 144) 6 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.0, 1.6)
Colorado County No 143.2 (96.9, 202.7) 43 (3, 142) 7
*
*
Rockwall County Yes 81.4 (52.4, 118.8) 138 (40, 146) 7
*
*
Navarro County Yes 105.3 (70.2, 149.7) 108 (13, 146) 7
*
*
Terry County No 141.5 (95.6, 200.2) 46 (3, 143) 7 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.2, -0.5)
Coryell County Yes 116.3 (77.9, 164.9) 87 (8, 145) 7
*
*
Hill County No 163.9 (111.1, 230.7) 16 (2, 137) 7
*
*
Hunt County Yes 109.4 (72.3, 156.5) 98 (9, 146) 7
*
*
Waller County Yes 107.6 (72.4, 151.9) 101 (14, 146) 7
*
*
Grayson County Yes 107.1 (70.9, 152.8) 102 (12, 146) 8
*
*
Moore County Yes 95.6 (65.4, 134.0) 121 (25, 146) 8
*
*
Walker County Yes 121.4 (79.4, 175.1) 76 (6, 145) 8
*
*
Brown County No 135.4 (94.0, 187.4) 56 (5, 143) 8
*
*
Nolan County No 163.4 (116.9, 221.8) 17 (2, 127) 8 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.7, 0.8)
Liberty County Yes 96.5 (64.3, 137.2) 119 (23, 146) 9
*
*
Gregg County Yes 76.1 (52.4, 105.9) 142 (61, 146) 9
*
*
Dawson County No 157.3 (115.0, 209.6) 28 (3, 127) 9 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.6, 1.8)
La Salle County No 177.2 (128.5, 237.6) 9 (2, 114) 9 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.0, 1.4)
Parker County Yes 106.0 (75.1, 144.2) 104 (19, 145) 9
*
*
DeWitt County No 151.3 (110.9, 201.1) 33 (4, 133) 10 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.6, -0.1)
Hockley County No 126.8 (91.9, 169.8) 68 (7, 139) 10 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.5, -0.2)
Aransas County No 160.7 (117.8, 213.6) 25 (3, 121) 10 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.7, 0.8)
Pecos County Yes 97.4 (71.9, 128.8) 118 (41, 146) 10 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.3, -1.6)
Lamb County No 183.1 (136.2, 240.2) 8 (2, 100) 11 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.0, 1.3)
Jim Hogg County No 202.0 (149.8, 266.9) 5 (1, 93) 11 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.4, 1.2)
Angelina County Yes 104.6 (75.8, 139.6) 110 (24, 145) 11 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.6, 0.1)
Gonzales County No 145.9 (109.2, 190.2) 38 (5, 127) 11 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.9, -0.4)
Karnes County No 161.6 (121.4, 210.2) 21 (3, 112) 11 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.7)
Calhoun County No 133.4 (100.1, 173.6) 58 (7, 134) 11 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.6, -1.2)
Zapata County Yes 100.2 (75.8, 129.7) 114 (41, 144) 12 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.3, 0.4)
Reeves County Yes 111.5 (84.8, 143.7) 94 (22, 142) 12 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -0.6)
Kerr County Yes 111.5 (84.3, 144.1) 93 (22, 142) 12 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.5, -0.4)
Brooks County No 153.1 (116.7, 198.0) 32 (4, 118) 13 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.6)
Deaf Smith County No 148.7 (112.6, 191.6) 35 (5, 127) 13 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.4, 0.4)
Kaufman County No 135.9 (98.5, 180.8) 55 (5, 138) 13 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.4, 1.6)
Smith County Yes 65.4 (48.7, 85.4) 146 (112, 146) 13
*
*
Dimmit County No 129.5 (99.7, 165.8) 63 (10, 134) 13 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.6)
Howard County No 125.6 (96.0, 160.9) 73 (10, 136) 14 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.0, 0.5)
Matagorda County No 141.1 (109.6, 178.1) 47 (7, 125) 15 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.3, -0.4)
Wharton County Yes 116.0 (90.6, 145.8) 89 (23, 139) 15 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.9, -1.0)
Randall County No 149.8 (114.7, 190.8) 34 (5, 117) 17
*
*
Anderson County No 320.5 (248.8, 405.3) 2 (1, 7) 18
*
*
Zavala County No 162.6 (130.4, 200.2) 18 (4, 101) 18 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.6)
Wichita County No 126.3 (100.4, 156.3) 70 (13, 129) 18 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.2, -0.7)
Bastrop County Yes 118.0 (94.5, 144.9) 85 (19, 134) 21 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.6, 0.8)
Jefferson County Yes 75.0 (60.3, 91.7) 144 (106, 146) 21 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.5, -0.5)
Frio County No 162.0 (132.6, 195.9) 20 (4, 91) 22 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.7, 1.4)
Hale County No 159.8 (130.3, 193.6) 26 (4, 97) 22 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.2, 1.3)
Johnson County Yes 105.6 (84.9, 129.4) 106 (44, 140) 22
*
*
Duval County No 176.3 (144.5, 213.3) 10 (3, 85) 22 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.8)
Wilson County No 125.9 (103.5, 151.7) 72 (18, 122) 23 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.0, -1.2)
Willacy County No 128.3 (106.0, 153.8) 65 (15, 124) 24 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.0, 0.3)
Brazos County Yes 109.0 (88.7, 132.0) 100 (35, 136) 25 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.7, 0.3)
Bee County No 164.9 (137.1, 196.4) 15 (4, 78) 26 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.5)
Ellis County Yes 118.9 (97.2, 143.3) 82 (27, 130) 27 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.0, 1.1)
Caldwell County No 162.4 (135.5, 192.8) 19 (5, 84) 28 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.6)
Comal County Yes 90.5 (75.5, 107.4) 125 (82, 142) 28 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.3, -1.4)
Medina County Yes 111.9 (93.9, 132.4) 92 (40, 132) 29 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.6)
Uvalde County No 161.1 (135.8, 189.6) 23 (5, 80) 29 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.0)
Taylor County No 155.2 (130.8, 182.5) 30 (6, 85) 31 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.3, 0.0)
Kleberg County No 165.4 (140.6, 193.3) 14 (5, 73) 32 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.4)
Atascosa County No 126.4 (108.5, 146.5) 69 (26, 117) 37 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.5, -0.5)
Potter County No 156.6 (133.8, 181.8) 29 (6, 83) 38 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.6)
McLennan County Yes 106.9 (91.9, 123.5) 103 (54, 131) 40 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -0.7)
Tom Green County No 130.5 (114.0, 148.6) 62 (24, 105) 48 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.4)
Bell County Yes 112.6 (97.9, 128.8) 91 (48, 124) 49 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.3)
Victoria County No 145.1 (127.7, 164.2) 40 (12, 86) 52 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.4)
Midland County No 140.2 (122.5, 159.5) 49 (16, 95) 53 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.4)
San Patricio County No 159.4 (140.5, 180.0) 27 (8, 72) 54 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
Guadalupe County Yes 121.0 (106.6, 136.6) 77 (39, 117) 55 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.6, -1.3)
Jim Wells County No 160.9 (142.3, 181.3) 24 (6, 60) 55 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.2)
Montgomery County Yes 83.3 (72.6, 95.1) 133 (100, 144) 57 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.8, -1.6)
Val Verde County No 141.7 (125.7, 159.3) 45 (17, 89) 57 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.7, 1.9)
Collin County Yes 81.9 (71.6, 93.1) 136 (107, 144) 58 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.2, -1.0)
Hays County No 131.1 (115.3, 148.3) 61 (24, 106) 58 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.5, -0.7)
Denton County Yes 83.0 (72.9, 93.9) 134 (107, 143) 62 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.0, -0.6)
Galveston County Yes 119.6 (106.4, 133.9) 81 (40, 113) 65 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.3, -1.0)
Williamson County Yes 94.9 (83.9, 106.9) 122 (87, 138) 66 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.2, -1.3)
Maverick County No 143.3 (128.7, 159.1) 42 (17, 82) 72 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.6, 0.4)
Starr County No 140.1 (126.1, 155.2) 50 (20, 86) 74 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.4, 0.8)
Ector County No 147.9 (132.5, 164.4) 37 (12, 76) 77 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Brazoria County Yes 120.9 (108.2, 134.6) 78 (40, 113) 78 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.4)
Lubbock County No 140.9 (127.9, 154.6) 48 (19, 84) 98 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5)
Fort Bend County Yes 90.0 (81.9, 98.7) 126 (99, 138) 105 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.5, -1.6)
Travis County Yes 103.1 (96.2, 110.2) 112 (85, 124) 212 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.7, -1.8)
Webb County No 127.7 (120.7, 135.0) 66 (44, 91) 253 falling falling trend -0.6 (-0.9, -0.2)
Nueces County Yes 118.7 (112.2, 125.5) 83 (59, 102) 258 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.2)
Tarrant County Yes 105.4 (99.6, 111.4) 107 (82, 119) 305 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.8)
Cameron County Yes 116.0 (110.8, 121.3) 88 (67, 104) 386 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.7)
Dallas County Yes 99.3 (94.9, 103.7) 115 (95, 125) 509 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.6, -1.1)
Hidalgo County Yes 113.9 (110.1, 117.9) 90 (71, 104) 678 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.1, -0.6)
El Paso County No 126.1 (122.2, 130.1) 71 (53, 86) 811 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.3, -0.9)
Harris County Yes 103.9 (101.0, 107.0) 111 (90, 117) 1,118 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.7, -1.2)
Bexar County No 129.4 (126.1, 132.8) 64 (48, 80) 1,208 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.4, -1.1)
Archer County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Armstrong County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bailey County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Baylor County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Blanco County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Borden County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bosque County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bowie County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Briscoe County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Callahan County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Camp County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carson County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cass County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Childress County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cochran County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coke County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coleman County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Collingsworth County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Comanche County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Concho County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cottle County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crane County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crosby County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Culberson County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dallam County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Delta County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dickens County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Donley County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Eastland County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Edwards County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fannin County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fisher County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Foard County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Franklin County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Freestone County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Garza County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gillespie County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glasscock County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hall County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hamilton County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hansford County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardeman County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardin County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harrison County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hartley County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Haskell County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hemphill County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Houston County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hutchinson County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Irion County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jack County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jasper County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jeff Davis County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kenedy County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kent County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kimble County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
King County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lamar County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lavaca County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lee County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Leon County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Limestone County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lipscomb County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Llano County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Loving County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Madison County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marion County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mason County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McMullen County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menard County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mills County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montague County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Morris County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Motley County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Newton County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ochiltree County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oldham County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Orange County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Panola County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rains County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Reagan County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Real County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Red River County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roberts County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sabine County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Augustine County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Jacinto County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Saba County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schleicher County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shackelford County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shelby County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sherman County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Somervell County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stephens County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sterling County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stonewall County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Terrell County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Throckmorton County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Trinity County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tyler County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Upshur County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Upton County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Van Zandt County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wheeler County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilbarger County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wood County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Young County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/09/2022 6:53 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

6 Hispanic mortality recent trend data for the United States has been excluded for the following states: Louisiana, New Hampshire, and Oklahoma. The data on Hispanic and non-Hispanic mortality for these states may be unreliable for the time period used in the generation of the recent trend (1990 - 2020) and has been excluded from the calculation of the United States recent trend. This was based on the NCHS Policy.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

NHIA (NAACCR Hispanic Identification Algorithm) was used for Hispanic Ethnicity (see Technical Notes section of the USCS).
Statistics for minorities may be affected by inconsistent race identification between the cancer case reports (sources for numerator of rate) and data from the Census Bureau (source for denominator of rate); and from undercounts of some population groups in the census.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top