Mortality > Table
Death Rates Table
Death Rate Report for Texas by County
All Cancer Sites, 2018-2022
Hispanic (any race), Both Sexes, All Ages
Sorted by CI*Rank
County |
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ |
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7? |
Age-Adjusted Death Rate † deaths per 100,000 (95% Confidence Interval) |
CI*Rank ⋔ (95% Confidence Interval) |
Average Annual Count |
Recent Trend |
Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Death Rates (95% Confidence Interval) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Texas | N/A | Yes | 115.6 (114.5, 116.7) | N/A | 8,904 | falling | -1.3 (-1.5, -1.2) |
United States 6 | N/A | Yes | 106.8 (106.4, 107.3) | N/A | 44,330 | falling | -1.1 (-1.2, -1.1) |
Mason County | Rural | No | 342.0 (196.7, 552.4) | 1 (1, 121) | 4 |
|
|
Anderson County | Rural | No | 304.3 (232.6, 389.2) | 2 (1, 15) | 16 |
|
|
Hudspeth County | Urban | No | 237.8 (144.3, 365.9) | 3 (1, 125) | 4 |
|
|
Lynn County | Urban | No | 227.7 (149.4, 332.0) | 4 (1, 106) | 6 |
|
|
Jim Hogg County | Rural | No | 225.9 (168.5, 297.0) | 5 (1, 68) | 11 | stable | 0.3 (-1.1, 1.8) |
McCulloch County | Rural | No | 222.6 (149.0, 320.4) | 6 (1, 107) | 6 |
|
|
Blanco County | Rural | No | 216.1 (122.1, 348.4) | 7 (1, 141) | 4 |
|
|
Swisher County | Rural | No | 205.3 (131.5, 303.5) | 8 (1, 127) | 5 |
|
|
Zavala County | Rural | No | 188.0 (150.0, 232.8) | 9 (2, 74) | 17 | stable | 0.2 (-1.0, 1.6) |
La Salle County | Rural | No | 182.0 (131.6, 244.8) | 10 (2, 107) | 9 | stable | -0.1 (-1.9, 2.1) |
Jim Wells County | Rural | No | 181.9 (161.9, 203.6) | 11 (4, 40) | 62 | stable | 0.0 (-0.6, 0.7) |
Duval County | Rural | No | 181.1 (145.9, 222.5) | 12 (3, 81) | 19 | stable | 0.2 (-0.7, 1.1) |
Karnes County | Rural | No | 177.6 (133.9, 230.3) | 13 (2, 100) | 12 | stable | -0.3 (-1.8, 1.3) |
Dawson County | Rural | No | 177.5 (131.3, 233.9) | 14 (2, 111) | 10 | stable | 0.4 (-0.9, 2.1) |
Brooks County | Rural | No | 173.3 (132.7, 222.8) | 15 (3, 106) | 13 | stable | -0.3 (-1.5, 0.9) |
Dimmit County | Rural | No | 172.4 (135.2, 216.9) | 16 (3, 99) | 15 | rising | 15.4 (0.5, 25.9) |
Reeves County | Rural | No | 172.0 (136.6, 213.6) | 17 (4, 89) | 16 | rising | 16.3 (0.1, 28.6) |
Runnels County | Rural | No | 171.6 (110.6, 252.9) | 18 (2, 143) | 5 | stable | -0.5 (-2.6, 2.1) |
Crockett County | Rural | No | 169.8 (102.7, 265.6) | 19 (2, 145) | 4 |
|
|
Bee County | Rural | No | 169.3 (141.1, 201.3) | 20 (4, 79) | 26 | stable | 0.0 (-0.8, 0.9) |
Robertson County | Urban | No | 168.6 (107.6, 250.5) | 21 (2, 142) | 5 |
|
|
Sutton County | Rural | No | 167.2 (103.6, 257.7) | 22 (1, 144) | 4 |
|
|
Uvalde County | Rural | No | 166.4 (139.7, 196.8) | 23 (5, 77) | 28 | stable | -0.7 (-1.6, 0.4) |
Frio County | Rural | No | 163.0 (132.7, 198.1) | 24 (5, 91) | 20 | stable | 0.3 (-0.7, 1.6) |
Calhoun County | Rural | No | 162.9 (125.5, 207.5) | 25 (4, 114) | 14 | falling | -1.8 (-3.0, -0.4) |
Nolan County | Rural | No | 162.7 (115.7, 221.8) | 26 (3, 129) | 8 | stable | -0.8 (-2.5, 1.5) |
Polk County | Rural | No | 162.0 (99.0, 244.8) | 27 (2, 144) | 5 |
|
|
Victoria County | Urban | No | 159.0 (140.9, 178.6) | 28 (9, 68) | 58 | stable | -0.3 (-1.2, 0.9) |
Kleberg County | Rural | No | 157.5 (133.6, 184.4) | 29 (8, 85) | 31 | stable | -0.4 (-1.2, 0.4) |
Lamb County | Rural | No | 155.6 (114.0, 206.8) | 30 (3, 131) | 10 | stable | -0.8 (-2.3, 1.2) |
Aransas County | Urban | No | 155.5 (115.1, 205.3) | 31 (4, 123) | 10 | stable | -0.9 (-2.3, 1.3) |
Burleson County | Urban | No | 155.0 (94.2, 237.5) | 32 (2, 145) | 4 |
|
|
Terry County | Rural | No | 154.8 (108.0, 213.7) | 33 (3, 138) | 8 | stable | -1.4 (-3.2, 0.9) |
San Patricio County | Urban | No | 154.4 (136.4, 173.9) | 34 (11, 74) | 55 | falling | -1.3 (-2.0, -0.5) |
Ector County | Urban | No | 154.1 (138.8, 170.6) | 35 (13, 67) | 85 | stable | -0.8 (-1.4, 0.2) |
Deaf Smith County | Rural | No | 152.3 (116.1, 195.3) | 36 (5, 121) | 13 | stable | -0.8 (-2.1, 0.8) |
Randall County | Urban | No | 150.4 (116.7, 189.3) | 37 (5, 118) | 19 |
|
|
Hill County | Rural | No | 150.1 (101.3, 212.0) | 38 (3, 138) | 7 |
|
|
Jackson County | Rural | No | 149.3 (98.4, 215.8) | 39 (3, 143) | 6 | stable | 0.3 (-1.2, 2.2) |
Wichita County | Urban | No | 147.4 (119.2, 179.7) | 40 (9, 107) | 21 | stable | -1.3 (-2.4, 0.3) |
Lubbock County | Urban | No | 147.2 (134.3, 160.9) | 41 (21, 71) | 105 | falling | -0.8 (-1.2, -0.3) |
Colorado County | Rural | No | 146.8 (99.7, 207.1) | 42 (3, 139) | 7 |
|
|
Ward County | Rural | No | 142.4 (97.6, 199.5) | 43 (4, 143) | 7 | stable | -0.3 (-2.1, 2.0) |
Willacy County | Rural | No | 142.3 (118.4, 169.5) | 44 (12, 108) | 25 | stable | -0.7 (-1.8, 0.6) |
Val Verde County | Rural | No | 142.0 (125.6, 159.9) | 45 (20, 89) | 55 | stable | 0.7 (-0.5, 2.8) |
Lampasas County | Urban | No | 141.9 (89.0, 212.8) | 46 (4, 145) | 5 |
|
|
Hale County | Rural | No | 141.4 (114.3, 172.6) | 47 (11, 114) | 20 | stable | 0.0 (-1.1, 1.4) |
Yoakum County | Rural | No | 139.9 (85.3, 213.8) | 48 (3, 146) | 5 |
|
|
Webb County | Urban | No | 139.2 (131.8, 146.9) | 49 (33, 72) | 274 | stable | -0.2 (-0.6, 0.2) |
Floyd County | Rural | No | 138.9 (81.5, 219.4) | 50 (3, 147) | 4 |
|
|
Mitchell County | Rural | No | 137.9 (81.3, 217.3) | 51 (2, 147) | 4 |
|
|
Atascosa County | Urban | No | 137.5 (118.7, 158.3) | 52 (20, 101) | 40 | falling | -1.3 (-2.2, -0.1) |
Gonzales County | Rural | No | 137.5 (101.1, 181.8) | 53 (8, 134) | 10 | stable | -1.5 (-2.8, 0.0) |
Taylor County | Urban | No | 136.7 (115.6, 160.3) | 54 (18, 108) | 32 | falling | -1.4 (-2.3, -0.3) |
Maverick County | Urban | No | 135.8 (121.5, 151.2) | 55 (26, 93) | 67 | stable | -0.2 (-0.6, 0.4) |
Midland County | Urban | No | 134.9 (117.7, 153.6) | 56 (22, 102) | 53 | stable | -0.5 (-1.4, 0.8) |
Starr County | Rural | No | 133.6 (120.1, 148.2) | 57 (30, 93) | 72 | stable | 0.1 (-0.4, 0.7) |
Wilson County | Urban | No | 133.1 (110.3, 159.2) | 58 (19, 118) | 26 | falling | -1.7 (-2.6, -0.7) |
Wilbarger County | Rural | No | 133.1 (73.6, 216.7) | 59 (2, 147) | 3 |
|
|
Potter County | Urban | No | 131.8 (111.9, 153.9) | 60 (23, 115) | 36 | stable | -0.7 (-1.6, 0.5) |
Caldwell County | Urban | No | 131.3 (109.0, 156.6) | 61 (18, 122) | 26 | stable | -1.2 (-2.2, 0.1) |
DeWitt County | Rural | No | 130.8 (93.7, 177.4) | 62 (8, 140) | 8 | stable | -1.4 (-2.9, 0.2) |
Matagorda County | Rural | No | 129.2 (100.5, 163.0) | 63 (13, 134) | 15 | stable | -1.7 (-3.1, 0.1) |
Goliad County | Urban | No | 128.9 (78.8, 201.3) | 64 (5, 147) | 4 |
|
|
Tom Green County | Urban | No | 128.6 (112.6, 146.2) | 65 (29, 107) | 49 | falling | -1.1 (-1.6, -0.3) |
Palo Pinto County | Rural | No | 128.6 (77.7, 197.7) | 66 (4, 147) | 5 |
|
|
Howard County | Rural | No | 128.4 (97.7, 165.0) | 67 (13, 137) | 13 | stable | -0.7 (-1.8, 0.5) |
Bexar County | Urban | No | 128.0 (124.7, 131.3) | 68 (51, 82) | 1,245 | falling | -1.1 (-1.3, -1.0) |
Coryell County | Urban | No | 127.2 (90.8, 171.7) | 69 (9, 143) | 9 |
|
|
Zapata County | Rural | No | 126.8 (98.6, 160.4) | 70 (17, 134) | 14 | stable | 17.5 (-0.5, 32.6) |
Hays County | Urban | No | 125.6 (111.1, 141.4) | 71 (35, 109) | 64 | falling | -1.5 (-2.4, -0.3) |
Live Oak County | Rural | No | 125.4 (84.0, 180.0) | 72 (6, 146) | 6 | stable | -1.3 (-2.7, 0.2) |
El Paso County | Urban | No | 125.2 (121.4, 129.0) | 73 (56, 86) | 845 | falling | -1.1 (-1.3, -0.9) |
Medina County | Urban | Yes | 122.7 (103.8, 143.9) | 74 (32, 125) | 32 | falling | -1.2 (-2.0, -0.2) |
Navarro County | Rural | Yes | 122.6 (86.5, 167.0) | 75 (10, 143) | 9 |
|
|
Walker County | Rural | Yes | 122.2 (80.3, 175.5) | 76 (8, 146) | 7 |
|
|
Bailey County | Rural | Yes | 121.5 (71.5, 191.1) | 77 (4, 147) | 4 |
|
|
Castro County | Rural | Yes | 121.4 (77.5, 180.3) | 78 (5, 146) | 5 |
|
|
Refugio County | Rural | Yes | 121.0 (78.1, 180.3) | 79 (7, 147) | 5 |
|
|
Cameron County | Urban | Yes | 121.0 (115.7, 126.4) | 80 (58, 95) | 409 | falling | -0.8 (-1.0, -0.5) |
Scurry County | Rural | Yes | 120.0 (77.8, 175.2) | 81 (8, 147) | 6 |
|
|
Parker County | Urban | Yes | 119.0 (86.4, 158.4) | 82 (13, 143) | 11 |
|
|
Grimes County | Rural | Yes | 118.6 (74.6, 176.7) | 83 (7, 147) | 5 |
|
|
Grayson County | Urban | Yes | 117.8 (82.2, 161.5) | 84 (13, 145) | 9 |
|
|
Kaufman County | Urban | Yes | 117.4 (86.0, 154.8) | 85 (14, 142) | 14 | stable | -1.2 (-2.9, 1.7) |
Hidalgo County | Urban | Yes | 116.4 (112.6, 120.3) | 86 (69, 100) | 721 | falling | -0.7 (-1.0, -0.4) |
Lavaca County | Rural | Yes | 116.1 (68.2, 183.2) | 87 (6, 147) | 4 |
|
|
Jones County | Urban | Yes | 115.7 (71.7, 175.4) | 88 (7, 147) | 5 |
|
|
Parmer County | Rural | Yes | 114.7 (72.1, 171.3) | 89 (10, 147) | 5 |
|
|
Brazoria County | Urban | Yes | 113.7 (101.9, 126.5) | 90 (55, 122) | 79 | falling | -1.0 (-1.6, -0.2) |
Nueces County | Urban | Yes | 113.4 (107.1, 120.0) | 91 (69, 110) | 249 | falling | -3.4 (-7.0, -1.9) |
Washington County | Rural | Yes | 113.4 (64.9, 180.6) | 92 (6, 147) | 4 |
|
|
Pecos County | Rural | Yes | 113.0 (85.1, 147.1) | 93 (23, 144) | 11 | stable | 8.6 (-0.8, 24.1) |
Wharton County | Rural | Yes | 112.2 (87.7, 141.1) | 94 (29, 142) | 15 | falling | -1.7 (-2.7, -0.6) |
Brown County | Rural | Yes | 112.0 (75.9, 158.1) | 95 (14, 145) | 7 |
|
|
Guadalupe County | Urban | Yes | 111.0 (98.0, 125.2) | 96 (53, 124) | 56 | falling | -1.9 (-2.5, -1.2) |
Austin County | Urban | Yes | 111.0 (69.8, 164.8) | 97 (9, 147) | 5 |
|
|
Hockley County | Urban | Yes | 110.6 (79.2, 149.7) | 98 (19, 145) | 9 | stable | -1.8 (-3.4, 0.3) |
Moore County | Rural | Yes | 110.3 (77.7, 150.9) | 99 (17, 145) | 9 |
|
|
Galveston County | Urban | Yes | 110.0 (98.0, 123.0) | 100 (58, 124) | 68 | falling | -2.5 (-6.4, -1.7) |
Kerr County | Rural | Yes | 109.7 (83.5, 141.0) | 101 (30, 144) | 13 | stable | -1.3 (-2.3, 0.0) |
Gaines County | Rural | Yes | 108.5 (70.8, 157.5) | 102 (13, 147) | 6 | falling | -2.2 (-3.9, -0.1) |
McLennan County | Urban | Yes | 108.5 (94.1, 124.2) | 103 (56, 129) | 46 | falling | -1.6 (-2.3, -0.6) |
Bell County | Urban | Yes | 108.0 (94.5, 122.7) | 104 (60, 129) | 53 | falling | -1.3 (-2.1, -0.1) |
Brazos County | Urban | Yes | 105.4 (86.1, 127.2) | 105 (48, 139) | 26 | stable | -1.3 (-2.5, 0.5) |
Tarrant County | Urban | Yes | 105.3 (99.7, 111.0) | 106 (82, 119) | 334 | falling | -1.3 (-1.6, -0.7) |
Harris County | Urban | Yes | 104.3 (101.4, 107.2) | 107 (89, 117) | 1,217 | falling | -1.3 (-1.7, -1.0) |
Ellis County | Urban | Yes | 103.8 (84.8, 125.4) | 108 (47, 141) | 27 | stable | -0.9 (-2.1, 1.0) |
Comal County | Urban | Yes | 103.4 (88.4, 120.1) | 109 (58, 137) | 37 | falling | -1.9 (-2.8, -0.8) |
Andrews County | Rural | Yes | 102.8 (67.1, 148.8) | 110 (19, 147) | 6 |
|
|
Liberty County | Urban | Yes | 102.6 (72.7, 139.3) | 111 (25, 146) | 12 |
|
|
Fayette County | Rural | Yes | 102.4 (59.7, 162.1) | 112 (9, 147) | 4 |
|
|
Dallas County | Urban | Yes | 102.0 (97.7, 106.3) | 113 (89, 122) | 560 | falling | -1.1 (-1.4, -0.8) |
Bastrop County | Urban | Yes | 99.5 (80.3, 121.5) | 114 (52, 143) | 23 | stable | -1.6 (-3.0, 0.7) |
Angelina County | Rural | Yes | 98.7 (72.4, 130.7) | 115 (35, 146) | 11 | stable | -1.3 (-2.8, 0.9) |
Travis County | Urban | Yes | 98.4 (92.1, 105.0) | 116 (89, 129) | 224 | falling | -2.2 (-2.5, -1.7) |
Johnson County | Urban | Yes | 97.7 (78.0, 120.3) | 117 (53, 143) | 21 |
|
|
Montgomery County | Urban | Yes | 97.7 (86.6, 109.6) | 118 (79, 135) | 73 | stable | 6.8 (-1.7, 16.1) |
Bandera County | Urban | Yes | 96.8 (59.9, 148.1) | 119 (19, 147) | 5 |
|
|
Wood County | Rural | Yes | 96.7 (55.4, 155.1) | 120 (12, 147) | 3 |
|
|
Nacogdoches County | Rural | Yes | 94.0 (57.6, 142.0) | 121 (17, 147) | 5 |
|
|
Wise County | Urban | Yes | 92.5 (59.6, 135.0) | 122 (28, 147) | 6 |
|
|
Waller County | Urban | Yes | 92.3 (63.3, 128.7) | 123 (36, 147) | 8 |
|
|
Cherokee County | Rural | Yes | 92.0 (56.8, 138.6) | 124 (19, 147) | 5 |
|
|
Rockwall County | Urban | Yes | 91.9 (62.8, 128.2) | 125 (33, 147) | 9 |
|
|
Fort Bend County | Urban | Yes | 91.2 (83.4, 99.4) | 126 (99, 137) | 119 | falling | -1.7 (-2.1, -1.2) |
Chambers County | Urban | Yes | 88.7 (47.7, 146.7) | 127 (12, 147) | 4 |
|
|
Hunt County | Urban | Yes | 88.2 (59.0, 125.3) | 128 (41, 147) | 7 |
|
|
Titus County | Rural | Yes | 86.6 (54.0, 129.9) | 129 (30, 147) | 6 |
|
|
Kendall County | Urban | Yes | 86.5 (58.2, 122.7) | 130 (30, 147) | 6 | falling | -3.3 (-4.7, -1.3) |
Presidio County | Rural | Yes | 84.7 (56.8, 123.0) | 131 (46, 147) | 7 | falling | -2.6 (-4.4, -0.9) |
Williamson County | Urban | Yes | 84.5 (74.8, 95.0) | 132 (103, 143) | 67 | falling | -2.3 (-3.0, -1.2) |
Collin County | Urban | Yes | 84.0 (74.2, 94.6) | 133 (105, 143) | 66 | falling | -2.0 (-2.9, -0.5) |
Erath County | Rural | Yes | 82.9 (46.0, 134.7) | 134 (22, 147) | 4 |
|
|
Winkler County | Rural | Yes | 81.8 (45.9, 134.0) | 135 (28, 147) | 3 | stable | -2.0 (-4.1, 0.4) |
Denton County | Urban | Yes | 80.5 (71.3, 90.3) | 136 (112, 144) | 72 | falling | -1.9 (-2.7, -0.3) |
Milam County | Rural | Yes | 79.9 (47.3, 125.1) | 137 (37, 147) | 4 |
|
|
Gillespie County | Rural | Yes | 79.7 (46.5, 126.0) | 138 (39, 147) | 4 |
|
|
Burnet County | Rural | Yes | 79.0 (49.2, 118.4) | 139 (46, 147) | 6 |
|
|
Van Zandt County | Rural | Yes | 78.7 (43.2, 129.4) | 140 (30, 147) | 4 |
|
|
Cooke County | Rural | Yes | 77.5 (45.2, 122.9) | 141 (38, 147) | 4 |
|
|
Gregg County | Urban | Yes | 77.5 (53.3, 107.7) | 142 (66, 147) | 9 |
|
|
Jefferson County | Urban | Yes | 76.9 (63.0, 92.6) | 143 (106, 146) | 25 | falling | -1.4 (-2.4, -0.2) |
Brewster County | Rural | Yes | 75.1 (45.6, 117.6) | 144 (51, 147) | 4 | falling | -8.2 (-31.7, -3.5) |
Smith County | Urban | Yes | 70.5 (53.6, 90.5) | 145 (102, 147) | 15 |
|
|
Rusk County | Urban | Yes | 59.8 (33.0, 99.1) | 146 (76, 147) | 4 |
|
|
Henderson County | Rural | Yes | 57.7 (33.3, 91.6) | 147 (94, 147) | 4 |
|
|
Archer County | Urban | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Armstrong County | Urban | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Baylor County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Borden County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Bosque County | Urban | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Bowie County | Urban | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Briscoe County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Callahan County | Urban | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Camp County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Carson County | Urban | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Cass County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Childress County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Clay County | Urban | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Cochran County | Urban | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Coke County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Coleman County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Collingsworth County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Comanche County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Concho County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Cottle County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Crane County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Crosby County | Urban | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Culberson County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Dallam County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Delta County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Dickens County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Donley County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Eastland County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Edwards County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Falls County | Urban | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Fannin County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Fisher County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Foard County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Franklin County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Freestone County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Garza County | Urban | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Glasscock County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Gray County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Hall County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Hamilton County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Hansford County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Hardeman County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Hardin County | Urban | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Harrison County | Urban | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Hartley County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Haskell County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Hemphill County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Hood County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Hopkins County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Houston County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Hutchinson County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Irion County | Urban | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Jack County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Jasper County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Jeff Davis County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Kenedy County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Kent County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Kimble County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
King County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Kinney County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Knox County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Lamar County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Lee County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Leon County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Limestone County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Lipscomb County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Llano County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Loving County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Madison County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Marion County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Martin County | Urban | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
McMullen County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Menard County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Mills County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Montague County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Morris County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Motley County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Newton County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Ochiltree County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Oldham County | Urban | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Orange County | Urban | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Panola County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Rains County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Reagan County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Real County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Red River County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Roberts County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Sabine County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
San Augustine County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
San Jacinto County | Urban | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
San Saba County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Schleicher County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Shackelford County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Shelby County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Sherman County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Somervell County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Stephens County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Sterling County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Stonewall County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Terrell County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Throckmorton County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Trinity County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Tyler County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Upshur County | Urban | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Upton County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Wheeler County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Young County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/05/2024 10:24 am.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
6 Hispanic mortality recent trend data for the United States has been excluded for the following states: Louisiana, New Hampshire, and Oklahoma. The data on Hispanic and non-Hispanic mortality for these states may be unreliable for the time period used in the generation of the recent trend (1990 - 2022) and has been excluded from the calculation of the United States recent trend. This was based on the NCHS Policy.
Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
NHIA (NAACCR Hispanic Identification Algorithm) was used for Hispanic Ethnicity (see Technical Notes section of the USCS).
Statistics for minorities may be affected by inconsistent race identification between the cancer case reports (sources for numerator of rate) and data from the Census Bureau (source for denominator of rate); and from undercounts of some population groups in the census.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/05/2024 10:24 am.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
6 Hispanic mortality recent trend data for the United States has been excluded for the following states: Louisiana, New Hampshire, and Oklahoma. The data on Hispanic and non-Hispanic mortality for these states may be unreliable for the time period used in the generation of the recent trend (1990 - 2022) and has been excluded from the calculation of the United States recent trend. This was based on the NCHS Policy.
Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
NHIA (NAACCR Hispanic Identification Algorithm) was used for Hispanic Ethnicity (see Technical Notes section of the USCS).
Statistics for minorities may be affected by inconsistent race identification between the cancer case reports (sources for numerator of rate) and data from the Census Bureau (source for denominator of rate); and from undercounts of some population groups in the census.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.