Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Texas by County

All Cancer Sites, 2012-2016

White Non-Hispanic, Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 161.4?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Texas No 163.3 (162.4, 164.2) 25,698 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.6, -1.4)
United States 6 No 165.4 (165.2, 165.7) 465,052 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.4, -1.3)
Cottle County No 293.4 (175.4, 479.8) 5 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.9, 2.0)
Maverick County No 272.6 (166.2, 419.9) 4 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.7, 2.8)
Polk County No 248.8 (229.4, 269.7) 134 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.5)
Reagan County No 237.7 (141.0, 385.5) 4 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.4, 3.6)
Donley County No 235.9 (176.8, 312.9) 12 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.2, 1.8)
Winkler County No 227.0 (164.8, 307.2) 9 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.3, 3.0)
Delta County No 225.0 (176.3, 285.4) 15 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.9, 1.4)
Wilbarger County No 218.6 (182.5, 260.9) 28 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.9, 0.7)
Camp County No 218.5 (181.5, 262.1) 27 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.1)
Anderson County No 217.9 (199.7, 237.6) 109 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
Haskell County No 215.9 (170.3, 274.0) 17 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.5, 1.4)
Sabine County No 215.8 (183.2, 254.1) 40 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.3)
Mitchell County No 214.7 (166.8, 274.1) 15 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.1, 1.0)
Coleman County No 214.6 (176.6, 260.1) 26 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.8)
Gray County No 212.0 (185.8, 241.4) 50 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.4)
Hamilton County No 211.7 (175.3, 255.1) 28 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.7, 0.9)
Trinity County No 211.6 (183.8, 243.6) 46 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 1.1)
Crosby County No 211.3 (153.2, 291.4) 10 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.1, 1.1)
Goliad County No 209.1 (164.4, 265.5) 16 stable stable trend 18.2 (-1.0, 41.1)
San Patricio County No 207.8 (187.6, 229.9) 81 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.4)
Castro County No 205.7 (152.4, 277.7) 11 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.4, 0.8)
Callahan County No 205.5 (176.8, 238.2) 39 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.5, 1.1)
Liberty County No 205.4 (189.6, 222.1) 134 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.9)
Calhoun County No 205.2 (175.8, 239.4) 37 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.6)
Wheeler County No 205.1 (158.3, 264.4) 14 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.3, 0.9)
Coryell County No 204.8 (185.9, 225.1) 88 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.5, 0.5)
Armstrong County No 204.7 (133.7, 307.4) 6
*
*
Aransas County No 204.2 (181.8, 229.5) 74 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.1)
Marion County No 204.1 (170.4, 244.6) 28 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.9)
Nolan County No 203.4 (169.8, 242.7) 29 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.7)
Leon County No 202.9 (176.8, 232.6) 48 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.0)
Milam County No 201.9 (178.4, 228.4) 57 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.5, 0.9)
Orange County No 201.8 (188.5, 215.7) 178 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5)
Ochiltree County No 201.7 (155.5, 258.6) 14 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.9, 0.5)
Matagorda County No 201.6 (177.0, 229.3) 56 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.6)
Crane County No 201.3 (127.4, 309.0) 5 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.9, 0.9)
Floyd County No 198.5 (143.1, 277.4) 11 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.5, 1.1)
Scurry County No 198.2 (165.9, 235.7) 28 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.2)
Motley County No 198.0 (111.3, 353.8) 4 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.1, 2.4)
Wise County No 197.5 (181.9, 214.3) 125 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.6, 0.5)
Yoakum County No 197.4 (138.8, 275.2) 8 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.9, 2.7)
Panola County No 197.1 (172.0, 225.0) 48 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.3)
Montague County No 197.0 (173.2, 223.6) 54 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.9, 1.8)
Runnels County No 196.8 (161.4, 239.6) 24 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.0, 0.3)
Deaf Smith County No 196.4 (157.1, 245.3) 19 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.2, 2.5)
Galveston County No 196.1 (187.9, 204.5) 458 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.7)
Refugio County No 196.0 (147.0, 261.2) 12 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.5, 1.2)
Hunt County No 194.8 (182.1, 208.4) 180 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.1)
Potter County No 194.5 (180.9, 209.0) 159 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.6)
Bowie County No 194.0 (180.9, 207.8) 170 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Limestone County No 193.5 (168.7, 221.7) 47 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.6, 1.8)
Chambers County No 193.5 (170.4, 219.0) 54 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.3)
Young County No 193.5 (169.2, 221.0) 48 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.2)
Hall County No 193.3 (129.7, 289.6) 7 stable stable trend -12.1 (-27.4, 6.5)
Gonzales County No 193.1 (163.3, 228.4) 32 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.0)
Brown County No 192.9 (174.4, 213.1) 87 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.1)
Hutchinson County No 192.4 (166.9, 221.1) 43 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.1)
Wichita County No 192.1 (181.0, 203.7) 231 stable stable trend 2.4 (-2.0, 7.1)
Ector County No 192.0 (177.7, 207.1) 140 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
Morris County No 191.9 (159.3, 230.4) 27 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.1)
Lamar County No 191.2 (175.2, 208.5) 110 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.6)
Johnson County No 191.1 (180.9, 201.8) 273 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.6)
Bastrop County No 189.5 (174.0, 206.2) 120 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.3)
Red River County No 189.4 (160.3, 223.6) 33 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.7)
Lampasas County No 189.4 (164.2, 217.8) 43 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.0)
Fisher County No 189.3 (141.4, 255.6) 11 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.9, 1.5)
Sherman County No 189.1 (122.5, 286.9) 5 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.9, 2.9)
Moore County No 188.3 (154.4, 228.5) 22 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.5)
Ward County No 188.1 (145.0, 241.5) 14 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.6, 0.2)
San Jacinto County No 187.8 (166.8, 211.2) 63 falling falling trend -10.8 (-16.3, -4.9)
DeWitt County No 187.7 (160.7, 218.8) 39 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 0.8)
Upshur County No 186.9 (169.2, 206.1) 86 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.4)
Stephens County No 186.5 (153.2, 226.6) 23 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.1)
Real County No 186.5 (133.3, 264.7) 10 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.9, -0.3)
Jackson County No 186.4 (155.1, 223.1) 27 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.9)
Clay County No 186.2 (156.6, 221.1) 29 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.8)
Gaines County No 186.1 (149.6, 228.5) 18 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.5, 1.2)
Henderson County No 186.1 (174.1, 198.7) 199 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
Rains County No 186.0 (155.8, 221.6) 30 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.3)
Kaufman County No 185.9 (173.2, 199.4) 166 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -0.9)
Caldwell County No 185.7 (162.6, 211.7) 49 stable stable trend 5.2 (-0.7, 11.5)
Palo Pinto County No 185.5 (164.8, 208.4) 63 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
Bell County No 185.1 (176.2, 194.2) 338 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
Hopkins County No 185.0 (166.4, 205.4) 75 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.4)
Upton County No 185.0 (116.6, 286.7) 5
*
*
Jones County No 184.7 (157.6, 216.0) 34 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.7)
Hardeman County No 184.7 (134.1, 253.2) 10 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.1, 1.4)
Waller County No 184.5 (162.0, 209.5) 52 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.5)
Fannin County No 184.5 (166.3, 204.4) 79 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.4)
Jasper County No 184.3 (165.4, 205.0) 73 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.6)
Eastland County No 184.0 (160.7, 210.5) 48 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.6, -0.1)
Stonewall County No 183.6 (114.2, 301.8) 5 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.5, 1.9)
Brazoria County No 183.5 (175.2, 192.1) 383 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -1.0)
Howard County No 183.3 (160.4, 208.9) 48 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.3)
Freestone County No 183.0 (157.9, 211.7) 40 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.7)
Bosque County No 182.8 (159.8, 209.2) 51 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.3)
Sutton County No 182.8 (108.2, 296.8) 4 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.3, 0.7)
Knox County No 182.5 (128.8, 258.2) 8 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.8, 0.7)
Dallam County No 182.4 (128.1, 252.4) 8 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.7, -0.4)
Gregg County No 182.2 (170.6, 194.4) 195 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.5, -0.9)
Burleson County No 181.6 (156.0, 211.3) 38 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.5)
Throckmorton County No 181.1 (112.7, 289.4) 5 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.7, 2.6)
Newton County No 181.1 (150.0, 217.2) 26 falling falling trend -3.6 (-6.6, -0.4)
Hill County No 180.7 (162.6, 200.7) 80 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.4, -0.1)
Schleicher County No 180.6 (110.6, 288.6) 4 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.1, 4.4)
Grayson County No 180.4 (170.5, 190.8) 261 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.4)
Childress County No 180.1 (135.4, 236.9) 12 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.9, 0.9)
Jim Wells County No 180.1 (146.9, 219.5) 22 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.4, -0.2)
Victoria County No 179.3 (164.8, 195.0) 118 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.6)
San Augustine County No 179.3 (145.6, 221.3) 22 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.5)
Atascosa County No 179.0 (155.7, 205.3) 45 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.7, 0.0)
Lee County No 178.4 (150.9, 210.3) 32 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.0)
Garza County No 178.2 (126.5, 248.7) 8 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.1, 0.6)
Edwards County No 177.9 (105.8, 340.0) 4
*
*
Andrews County No 177.8 (141.4, 221.3) 17 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.1)
Cass County No 177.5 (158.4, 198.6) 67 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.0)
Jefferson County No 176.2 (167.1, 185.8) 297 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.8)
Somervell County No 175.8 (140.0, 219.3) 18 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -0.6)
Hardin County No 175.7 (160.9, 191.6) 108 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.2, -1.3)
Navarro County No 175.7 (158.6, 194.4) 81 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.1)
Duval County No 175.4 (97.5, 303.2) 3 falling falling trend -2.9 (-5.1, -0.7)
Kleberg County No 175.3 (139.9, 218.2) 18 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.0, 0.6)
Hale County No 175.2 (149.8, 204.4) 37 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.7, 0.9)
Angelina County No 175.1 (162.2, 189.0) 140 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.9)
Menard County No 175.1 (98.2, 305.8) 5 stable stable trend -2.2 (-4.5, 0.1)
Swisher County No 175.1 (134.0, 229.2) 13 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.6)
Franklin County No 174.9 (144.3, 211.3) 25 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.5)
Nacogdoches County No 174.9 (158.7, 192.4) 91 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.2)
Shelby County No 174.8 (152.1, 200.4) 44 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.5)
Parker County No 174.6 (164.4, 185.4) 229 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.5)
Taylor County No 173.2 (162.6, 184.3) 208 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
Tyler County No 173.1 (151.1, 198.0) 48 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.5)
Ellis County No 172.1 (161.6, 183.2) 209 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.8)
Lamb County No 171.0 (137.0, 213.7) 19 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.8, 1.2)
Nueces County No 170.8 (161.7, 180.3) 282 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.9, -1.4)
Dawson County No 170.1 (130.8, 219.6) 14 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 0.2)
Comanche County No 170.0 (143.9, 201.2) 34 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.1)
Falls County No 169.6 (141.3, 203.2) 27 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.4)
Blanco County No 169.6 (137.5, 208.3) 25 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.3, 1.0)
Burnet County No 169.0 (154.1, 185.3) 104 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.9)
Grimes County No 168.2 (145.9, 193.4) 44 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.7, -0.1)
Hansford County No 167.8 (120.6, 232.1) 9 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.3, 0.1)
Coke County No 167.7 (122.9, 233.3) 9 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.2, -0.4)
Shackelford County No 167.1 (117.3, 234.7) 8 stable stable trend -2.0 (-3.9, 0.0)
Hockley County No 167.0 (139.6, 198.8) 28 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.2)
Lavaca County No 166.8 (145.1, 191.7) 48 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.2)
Medina County No 166.8 (147.7, 188.1) 59 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.3)
Uvalde County No 166.5 (136.8, 202.4) 25 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.7, -0.7)
McLennan County No 166.4 (158.1, 175.0) 320 falling falling trend -5.5 (-9.7, -1.1)
Hood County No 166.4 (153.9, 179.8) 146 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.7, -1.4)
Midland County No 165.5 (153.9, 177.7) 162 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.5)
Bee County No 165.1 (137.0, 198.1) 25 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.5, -0.8)
Guadalupe County No 165.0 (154.0, 176.8) 169 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.6)
Van Zandt County No 164.9 (151.4, 179.4) 118 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.4)
Bexar County No 163.8 (159.6, 168.1) 1,200 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.6, -1.2)
Archer County No 163.8 (132.7, 201.3) 20 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.1, 0.0)
Harrison County No 163.5 (149.0, 179.2) 97 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.2)
Madison County No 163.5 (133.1, 200.1) 21 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.2)
McCulloch County No 163.5 (129.8, 206.1) 17 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.1, 0.0)
San Saba County No 163.5 (123.2, 217.0) 12 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.8, 1.5)
Harris County No 163.4 (160.7, 166.2) 2,898 falling falling trend -2.8 (-5.2, -0.4)
Tarrant County No 163.2 (159.9, 166.6) 1,920 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.4, -1.2)
Concho County No 162.5 (110.9, 245.7) 6 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.1, 1.4)
Kerr County No 162.4 (149.2, 177.0) 135 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.4)
Wharton County No 162.1 (142.1, 184.6) 52 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.4)
Robertson County No 161.9 (134.4, 194.4) 27 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.6)
Colorado County No 161.8 (138.6, 188.9) 40 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.3)
Montgomery County No 161.7 (156.2, 167.4) 688 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.3)
Cochran County No 161.4 (93.6, 277.3) 3
*
*
Baylor County Yes 161.3 (119.1, 219.2) 10 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.6, 0.6)
Washington County Yes 161.2 (143.9, 180.6) 70 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.5)
Pecos County Yes 161.1 (118.1, 217.1) 9 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.5, 0.3)
Houston County Yes 160.5 (139.6, 184.5) 45 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.0)
El Paso County Yes 160.3 (151.0, 170.0) 229 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.4, -1.6)
Cooke County Yes 160.2 (144.0, 178.1) 76 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
Terry County Yes 159.2 (122.2, 205.7) 14 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.6)
Oldham County Yes 159.1 (89.1, 267.1) 3
*
*
Tom Green County Yes 159.1 (147.8, 171.1) 154 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.5)
Dallas County Yes 158.1 (154.8, 161.5) 1,813 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.6, -1.4)
Bailey County Yes 157.8 (105.4, 232.5) 7 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.7, 0.7)
Randall County Yes 157.7 (147.8, 168.1) 197 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.8, -0.2)
Bandera County Yes 157.2 (135.8, 181.9) 47 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.3)
Lynn County Yes 157.1 (106.5, 226.6) 7 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.7, 0.7)
Rusk County Yes 156.5 (141.1, 173.3) 79 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.7)
Karnes County Yes 156.4 (123.0, 198.2) 16 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.3, 0.4)
Llano County Yes 155.9 (136.3, 178.6) 66 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.4)
Fayette County Yes 154.8 (136.8, 175.4) 60 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.4)
Willacy County Yes 154.5 (93.7, 245.3) 5
*
*
Titus County Yes 153.9 (132.6, 178.2) 40 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.4, -0.6)
Walker County Yes 153.6 (138.3, 170.2) 77 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.8)
Kimble County Yes 152.9 (111.3, 211.7) 10 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.6, 0.1)
Comal County Yes 152.5 (142.9, 162.7) 199 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.6)
Rockwall County Yes 151.6 (138.7, 165.4) 106 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.6)
Lubbock County Yes 151.1 (143.4, 159.0) 304 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.8)
Gillespie County Yes 150.5 (133.6, 170.0) 72 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5)
Briscoe County Yes 149.7 (88.3, 268.9) 4
*
*
Jack County Yes 149.3 (117.1, 188.7) 15 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.4, -0.2)
Hemphill County Yes 148.6 (98.8, 217.8) 6
*
*
Kendall County Yes 148.5 (132.4, 166.3) 68 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.5, -1.1)
Val Verde County Yes 148.1 (117.9, 184.7) 17 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.4, -1.0)
Martin County Yes 147.2 (95.0, 219.6) 5 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.5, 0.3)
Hays County Yes 146.0 (135.7, 156.8) 162 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -1.0)
Carson County Yes 144.7 (108.9, 190.2) 11 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.1, -0.6)
Fort Bend County Yes 144.5 (137.8, 151.6) 370 falling falling trend -3.9 (-6.6, -1.1)
Reeves County Yes 144.4 (93.0, 218.2) 5 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.4, 1.1)
Frio County Yes 143.8 (97.6, 207.8) 7 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.7, -0.5)
Brazos County Yes 143.7 (133.5, 154.6) 151 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.0, -1.2)
Austin County Yes 143.7 (125.0, 165.1) 46 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.5)
Wood County Yes 143.1 (130.4, 157.2) 104 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.8)
Erath County Yes 142.6 (125.6, 161.4) 54 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.4)
Wilson County Yes 142.4 (125.4, 161.3) 53 falling falling trend -4.0 (-6.7, -1.2)
Denton County Yes 141.3 (136.1, 146.5) 624 falling falling trend -2.4 (-2.9, -1.8)
Collingsworth County Yes 141.0 (90.8, 218.6) 5 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.5, 0.8)
Kinney County Yes 140.9 (85.8, 247.6) 6 stable stable trend -2.2 (-4.2, 0.0)
Cameron County Yes 139.6 (127.9, 152.5) 134 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
Cherokee County Yes 139.3 (124.6, 155.5) 71 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.6, -1.6)
Live Oak County Yes 139.3 (111.9, 173.8) 18 falling falling trend -1.5 (-3.0, -0.1)
Parmer County Yes 138.3 (97.3, 193.9) 9 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.0, 1.2)
Williamson County Yes 138.3 (132.6, 144.1) 469 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.1, -1.4)
Hartley County Yes 135.1 (95.2, 188.4) 8 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.1, 0.2)
Collin County Yes 134.2 (129.8, 138.8) 732 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.1, -1.5)
Travis County Yes 133.1 (128.7, 137.5) 766 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.1, -1.6)
Smith County Yes 130.0 (122.9, 137.4) 265 stable stable trend -1.2 (-13.2, 12.4)
Dickens County Yes 125.1 (76.2, 212.7) 4 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.3, 0.4)
Hidalgo County Yes 124.5 (114.8, 135.2) 172 stable stable trend 2.3 (-0.4, 5.1)
Mason County Yes 124.3 (89.9, 176.9) 9 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.6, -0.7)
Lipscomb County Yes 123.8 (76.9, 194.7) 5 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.3, 1.1)
Brewster County Yes 121.8 (90.6, 163.7) 11 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.6, 0.1)
Zapata County Yes 114.0 (64.4, 267.6) 3 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.1, 3.3)
Mills County Yes 112.2 (77.7, 161.0) 9 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.9, 1.3)
Jeff Davis County Yes 108.1 (64.2, 236.8) 4
*
*
Webb County Yes 105.6 (79.6, 137.6) 12 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.3, -1.5)
Borden County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brooks County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crockett County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Culberson County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dimmit County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Foard County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glasscock County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hudspeth County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Irion County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jim Hogg County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kenedy County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kent County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
King County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
La Salle County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Loving County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McMullen County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Presidio County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roberts County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Starr County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sterling County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Terrell County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Zavala County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 04/02/2020 4:18 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2016 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Health Service Areas are a single county or cluster of contiguous counties which are relatively self-contained with respect to hospital care. For more detailed information, please see Health Service Area information page.
6 Hispanic mortality recent trend data for the United States has been excluded for the following states: Louisiana, New Hampshire, and Oklahoma. The data on Hispanic and non-Hispanic mortality for these states may be unreliable for the time period used in the generation of the recent trend (1990 - 2016) and has been excluded from the calculation of the United States recent trend. This was based on the NCHS Policy.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top