Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Texas by County

All Cancer Sites, 2016-2020

Black Non-Hispanic, Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Texas No 178.1 (175.8, 180.4) N/A 5,187 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.5, -2.1)
United States No 174.7 (174.1, 175.3) N/A 70,283 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.1, -2.0)
DeWitt County No 356.6 (244.6, 503.4) 1 (1, 62) 7 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.8, 2.2)
Colorado County No 280.7 (198.0, 386.8) 2 (1, 82) 8 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.7, 1.0)
Wharton County No 254.7 (201.8, 318.0) 3 (1, 66) 17 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.2)
Grimes County No 254.0 (191.9, 330.2) 4 (1, 82) 12 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.2)
Potter County No 250.4 (201.9, 306.1) 5 (1, 61) 20 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.7)
Hill County No 247.1 (165.4, 355.2) 6 (1, 93) 6 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.2, 0.1)
Rockwall County No 246.0 (171.2, 338.5) 7 (1, 89) 10
*
*
Anderson County No 241.4 (199.4, 289.5) 8 (1, 60) 26 falling falling trend -3.6 (-5.4, -1.7)
Hunt County No 240.2 (190.4, 298.6) 9 (1, 76) 17 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.3)
Hardin County No 237.3 (169.2, 324.1) 10 (1, 90) 9 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.3)
Polk County No 236.7 (168.2, 322.2) 11 (1, 90) 10 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.0, 1.0)
Austin County No 234.5 (161.4, 329.8) 12 (1, 93) 7 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.1, 0.0)
Red River County No 231.9 (162.9, 326.6) 13 (1, 92) 8 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.0, 0.8)
Hale County No 230.2 (129.0, 377.0) 14 (1, 95) 3
*
*
Lee County No 227.6 (148.7, 337.3) 15 (1, 94) 6 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.8, 1.8)
Galveston County No 227.1 (207.7, 247.8) 16 (5, 43) 107 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -1.0)
Limestone County No 223.4 (164.4, 297.2) 17 (1, 89) 10 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.2)
Hays County No 222.5 (159.6, 299.3) 18 (1, 91) 10
*
*
Caldwell County No 221.0 (147.5, 319.1) 19 (1, 94) 6 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.1, 0.7)
Lamar County No 220.6 (172.0, 278.6) 20 (2, 84) 15 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.1)
Gonzales County No 220.1 (129.7, 354.8) 21 (1, 95) 4
*
*
Lubbock County No 220.0 (188.4, 255.2) 22 (4, 65) 38 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.1)
Navarro County No 216.1 (168.5, 273.2) 23 (2, 85) 15 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.2)
Rusk County No 216.0 (176.9, 261.5) 24 (3, 79) 23 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.5, -0.1)
Morris County No 214.7 (149.7, 299.7) 25 (1, 93) 8 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.4, 1.0)
Milam County No 212.4 (142.0, 307.9) 26 (1, 95) 6 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.7, 0.5)
Burleson County No 211.9 (143.8, 303.4) 27 (1, 94) 7 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.4, 0.6)
Taylor County No 210.8 (165.7, 263.7) 28 (2, 84) 16 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.3)
Cass County No 205.7 (158.6, 263.4) 29 (3, 90) 14 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.1)
Panola County No 204.3 (152.3, 270.5) 30 (2, 92) 11 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.4, -0.8)
Shelby County No 203.8 (151.2, 269.5) 31 (2, 92) 11 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.3, -0.2)
Liberty County No 203.4 (161.9, 252.4) 32 (4, 87) 18 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.3)
Tom Green County No 202.9 (144.3, 276.8) 33 (2, 94) 8 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.7, 0.2)
McLennan County No 198.1 (177.1, 220.8) 34 (13, 70) 69 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.6, -1.5)
Cherokee County No 196.4 (153.8, 247.3) 35 (5, 91) 16 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.4, -0.9)
Robertson County No 196.0 (138.5, 270.5) 36 (2, 94) 8 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.0, -0.4)
Madison County No 195.9 (121.7, 298.0) 37 (1, 95) 4 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.7, 1.1)
Matagorda County No 193.9 (143.5, 258.0) 38 (3, 93) 11 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.1, -0.4)
Bastrop County No 193.7 (149.4, 247.4) 39 (3, 92) 14 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -0.7)
Houston County No 193.1 (149.0, 246.9) 40 (4, 91) 13 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.7, -0.7)
Brazos County No 190.7 (160.2, 225.0) 41 (9, 85) 31 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.4, -0.6)
Gregg County No 190.5 (165.8, 217.8) 42 (13, 79) 46 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -1.1)
Randall County No 190.4 (103.0, 312.8) 43 (1, 95) 4
*
*
Harrison County No 189.8 (161.7, 221.7) 44 (13, 83) 35 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.5)
Titus County No 189.5 (127.1, 272.3) 45 (2, 95) 6 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.3, 1.0)
Dallas County No 189.3 (183.7, 195.1) 46 (30, 58) 978 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.1, -1.7)
Midland County No 189.1 (150.2, 234.6) 47 (7, 91) 17 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.9, -0.9)
Jefferson County No 185.1 (172.3, 198.6) 48 (27, 73) 165 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.1, -1.5)
Harris County No 184.2 (179.7, 188.9) 49 (36, 63) 1,372 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.6, -2.0)
Ector County No 183.3 (135.1, 242.2) 50 (4, 94) 10 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.0, -0.9)
Ellis County No 183.2 (153.0, 217.4) 51 (14, 88) 31 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.1, -1.4)
Jasper County No 183.1 (137.6, 239.0) 52 (6, 94) 12 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.9, -1.0)
Chambers County No 182.5 (125.1, 257.7) 53 (3, 95) 7 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.4, 0.2)
Victoria County No 182.1 (134.5, 241.0) 54 (5, 94) 11 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.9, -0.9)
Newton County No 181.0 (123.4, 258.7) 55 (3, 95) 7 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.9, 0.4)
Bowie County No 180.7 (156.1, 208.1) 56 (19, 85) 41 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.6, -1.1)
Kaufman County No 180.4 (146.3, 219.5) 57 (10, 90) 23 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.0, -1.0)
Henderson County No 179.8 (133.6, 237.3) 58 (6, 95) 11 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.6, -0.2)
Upshur County No 177.7 (129.3, 241.0) 59 (6, 94) 9 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.6, -1.1)
Wichita County No 177.6 (143.9, 216.5) 60 (12, 91) 20 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.1, -1.5)
Tarrant County No 176.4 (168.4, 184.7) 61 (39, 74) 433 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.3, -1.9)
Bexar County No 175.7 (165.1, 186.8) 62 (37, 77) 223 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.3)
San Jacinto County No 175.5 (122.4, 247.3) 63 (3, 95) 7 stable stable trend -2.0 (-3.9, 0.0)
Nacogdoches County No 175.2 (139.9, 216.6) 64 (13, 92) 18 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.6, -0.9)
Bell County No 174.7 (156.8, 193.9) 65 (28, 83) 86 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.1, -1.2)
Falls County No 173.3 (122.0, 239.4) 66 (4, 95) 8 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.7, 0.4)
Orange County No 172.9 (133.4, 220.7) 67 (9, 93) 13 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.2, -1.4)
Angelina County No 170.6 (139.5, 206.6) 68 (18, 93) 22 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.7, -0.6)
Travis County No 169.1 (156.1, 182.8) 69 (39, 82) 143 falling falling trend -2.4 (-2.7, -2.0)
Tyler County No 168.4 (97.7, 270.0) 70 (2, 95) 3 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.3, 0.0)
Grayson County No 167.8 (128.1, 215.7) 71 (11, 95) 14 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.9, -0.6)
Wood County No 167.6 (97.4, 270.0) 72 (2, 95) 4
*
*
Smith County No 167.0 (149.4, 186.2) 73 (34, 86) 70 stable stable trend 3.5 (-2.5, 9.8)
Marion County No 166.1 (109.5, 247.8) 74 (3, 95) 6 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.2, -0.1)
Waller County No 165.6 (127.8, 211.2) 75 (14, 94) 14 rising rising trend 24.6 (3.1, 50.5)
San Augustine County No 163.1 (99.5, 257.7) 76 (3, 95) 4 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.7, -0.3)
Brazoria County No 160.7 (141.0, 182.1) 77 (35, 90) 60 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.2, -1.8)
Nueces County No 158.7 (129.7, 192.4) 78 (27, 93) 22 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.3, -1.5)
Freestone County No 156.5 (106.7, 223.7) 79 (7, 95) 7 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.5, 1.2)
Fayette County No 155.9 (88.8, 258.8) 80 (3, 95) 3 stable stable trend 36.4 (-33.2, 178.8)
Washington County No 153.5 (113.8, 203.2) 81 (16, 95) 11 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.3, -0.8)
Montgomery County No 153.0 (128.6, 180.3) 82 (35, 93) 34 falling falling trend -2.9 (-3.7, -2.1)
Trinity County No 151.5 (84.2, 259.6) 83 (3, 95) 3
*
*
Guadalupe County No 150.8 (119.4, 187.7) 84 (29, 95) 18 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.3, -1.9)
Camp County No 150.3 (87.3, 241.7) 85 (3, 95) 4 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.2, -1.6)
Williamson County No 148.5 (123.6, 176.5) 86 (39, 94) 34 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.6, -1.5)
Hopkins County No 141.7 (90.0, 214.3) 87 (11, 95) 5 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.4, -0.9)
Johnson County No 140.3 (92.7, 202.2) 88 (14, 95) 7 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.8, -0.3)
Fort Bend County No 137.6 (127.4, 148.2) 89 (72, 94) 181 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.9, -1.8)
Denton County No 137.2 (118.8, 157.2) 90 (62, 94) 62 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.0, -1.9)
Collin County No 134.4 (118.2, 151.9) 91 (68, 94) 76 falling falling trend -3.4 (-4.3, -2.6)
Comal County No 130.2 (72.5, 212.8) 92 (5, 95) 4
*
*
Walker County No 129.8 (100.9, 163.9) 93 (50, 95) 16 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.4, -1.5)
Coryell County No 125.9 (84.8, 177.5) 94 (25, 95) 7 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.3, -0.8)
El Paso County Yes 104.2 (84.0, 127.3) 95 (84, 95) 20 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.7, -1.9)
Andrews County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Aransas County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Archer County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Armstrong County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Atascosa County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bailey County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bandera County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Baylor County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bee County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Blanco County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Borden County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bosque County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brewster County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Briscoe County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brooks County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brown County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Burnet County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Calhoun County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Callahan County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cameron County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carson County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Castro County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Childress County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cochran County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coke County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coleman County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Collingsworth County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Comanche County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Concho County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cooke County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cottle County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crane County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crockett County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crosby County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Culberson County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dallam County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dawson County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Deaf Smith County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Delta County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dickens County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dimmit County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Donley County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Duval County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Eastland County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Edwards County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Erath County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fannin County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fisher County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Floyd County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Foard County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Franklin County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Frio County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gaines County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Garza County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gillespie County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glasscock County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Goliad County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gray County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hall County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hamilton County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hansford County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardeman County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hartley County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Haskell County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hemphill County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hidalgo County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hockley County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hood County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Howard County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hudspeth County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hutchinson County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Irion County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jack County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jeff Davis County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jim Hogg County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jim Wells County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jones County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Karnes County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kendall County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kenedy County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kent County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kerr County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kimble County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
King County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kinney County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kleberg County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Knox County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
La Salle County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lamb County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lampasas County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lavaca County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Leon County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lipscomb County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Live Oak County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Llano County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Loving County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lynn County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Martin County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mason County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Maverick County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McCulloch County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McMullen County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Medina County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menard County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mills County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mitchell County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montague County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Moore County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Motley County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Nolan County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ochiltree County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oldham County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Palo Pinto County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Parker County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Parmer County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pecos County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Presidio County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rains County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Reagan County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Real County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Reeves County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Refugio County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roberts County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Runnels County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sabine County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Patricio County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Saba County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schleicher County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Scurry County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shackelford County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sherman County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Somervell County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Starr County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stephens County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sterling County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stonewall County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sutton County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Swisher County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Terrell County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Terry County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Throckmorton County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Upton County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Uvalde County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Val Verde County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Van Zandt County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ward County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Webb County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wheeler County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilbarger County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Willacy County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilson County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Winkler County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wise County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yoakum County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Young County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Zapata County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Zavala County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 04/19/2024 8:37 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top