Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Texas by County

All Cancer Sites, 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <65

Sorted by Recentaapc
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
Texas *** 47.4 (47.0, 47.7) N/A 13,238 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.8, -1.4)
United States *** 48.4 (48.3, 48.5) N/A 171,025 falling falling trend -2.4 (-2.7, -2.0)
Cherokee County *** 59.1 (50.0, 69.4) 86 (18, 165) 32 stable stable trend 9.3 (-3.8, 24.2)
Franklin County *** 71.4 (49.5, 100.3) 25 (1, 189) 8 rising rising trend 7.9 (0.2, 16.1)
Childress County *** 71.5 (44.4, 109.5) 23 (1, 198) 5 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.3, 3.1)
Jasper County *** 78.6 (66.2, 92.9) 11 (2, 94) 32 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.5, 2.7)
Kleberg County *** 78.6 (63.1, 96.7) 10 (2, 112) 19 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.6, 1.9)
Starr County *** 56.5 (47.5, 66.6) 99 (25, 174) 28 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.4, 1.8)
Hamilton County *** 93.9 (64.8, 132.4) 2 (1, 164) 8 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.2, 2.0)
Duval County *** 73.6 (52.5, 100.7) 20 (1, 183) 8 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.6, 1.9)
Refugio County *** 59.9 (37.8, 91.8) 76 (2, 199) 5 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.2, 2.7)
Clay County *** 63.2 (43.8, 89.6) 54 (3, 196) 8 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.3, 1.5)
Dawson County *** 67.5 (48.0, 92.5) 38 (2, 189) 8 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.6, 1.7)
Hale County *** 56.1 (44.8, 69.4) 103 (16, 184) 18 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.2, 1.2)
Brooks County *** 63.0 (37.4, 99.4) 57 (1, 199) 4 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.4, 2.2)
Coleman County *** 63.6 (42.8, 93.0) 52 (2, 197) 7 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.0, 1.9)
Willacy County *** 46.7 (33.6, 63.3) 161 (19, 199) 9 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.7, 1.6)
Anderson County *** 109.5 (98.2, 121.9) 1 (1, 8) 69 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.9, 1.5)
Floyd County *** 64.3 (37.5, 103.7) 50 (1, 199) 4 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.1, 1.7)
Hutchinson County *** 63.2 (48.5, 81.0) 55 (5, 180) 14 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.3, 0.9)
Maverick County *** 48.3 (39.9, 57.9) 149 (48, 192) 24 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.8)
McCulloch County *** 80.5 (54.6, 115.3) 8 (1, 186) 7 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.9, 1.4)
Trinity County *** 79.5 (60.7, 103.3) 9 (1, 153) 14 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.8, 1.3)
Hockley County *** 67.1 (52.5, 84.5) 39 (4, 170) 15 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.8, 1.2)
Swisher County *** 46.3 (26.5, 75.8) 163 (8, 199) 3 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.4, 1.9)
Aransas County *** 77.4 (62.6, 95.2) 15 (2, 119) 23 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.5)
Frio County *** 50.3 (36.0, 68.4) 133 (12, 199) 8 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.9, 1.1)
Llano County *** 60.9 (45.6, 80.4) 67 (4, 187) 15 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.7, 0.9)
Marion County *** 69.2 (48.1, 97.8) 31 (1, 194) 9 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.7, 1.0)
Zavala County *** 57.3 (38.0, 82.7) 96 (3, 199) 6 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.3, 1.6)
Bosque County *** 74.7 (57.7, 95.7) 16 (2, 169) 16 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.8)
El Paso County *** 44.5 (42.4, 46.7) 173 (136, 178) 337 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.3)
Morris County *** 83.7 (62.0, 111.0) 6 (1, 141) 12 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.6)
Red River County *** 62.4 (45.2, 85.2) 61 (3, 193) 10 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.0, 0.8)
Sabine County *** 68.7 (47.8, 97.1) 34 (1, 189) 9 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.7)
San Saba County *** 62.7 (37.7, 100.2) 60 (1, 199) 4 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.8, 1.5)
Bexar County *** 47.9 (46.4, 49.3) 153 (123, 163) 878 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.1)
Cass County *** 71.2 (58.7, 85.9) 26 (3, 132) 26 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.1)
Deaf Smith County *** 40.9 (27.9, 57.7) 179 (41, 199) 7 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.1, 0.7)
Jackson County *** 64.7 (47.5, 86.5) 49 (4, 191) 10 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.9, 0.6)
Milam County *** 52.8 (41.1, 67.1) 120 (20, 195) 15 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.0, 0.6)
Newton County *** 77.5 (58.0, 102.1) 14 (1, 154) 12 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.3)
San Patricio County *** 59.2 (51.0, 68.4) 83 (21, 162) 39 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.1)
Blanco County *** 50.0 (34.3, 72.0) 136 (9, 199) 8 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.0, 1.3)
Cameron County *** 45.3 (42.2, 48.6) 168 (119, 181) 164 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
Karnes County *** 53.3 (37.7, 73.4) 119 (7, 198) 8 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.2, 0.7)
Nolan County *** 68.4 (50.0, 91.6) 37 (2, 186) 10 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.0, 0.4)
Atascosa County *** 51.1 (42.6, 60.9) 127 (40, 187) 26 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.2)
Brown County *** 66.9 (56.0, 79.6) 40 (7, 141) 29 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.0)
Grimes County *** 66.3 (54.0, 80.7) 42 (6, 162) 23 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.7, 0.0)
Henderson County *** 70.0 (62.1, 78.7) 30 (8, 96) 66 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Hidalgo County *** 40.8 (38.6, 43.0) 180 (157, 187) 273 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.6)
Jim Wells County *** 56.2 (45.8, 68.4) 102 (20, 180) 21 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.1)
Matagorda County *** 71.7 (59.6, 85.7) 22 (4, 128) 28 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.8, -0.1)
Williamson County *** 37.9 (35.6, 40.4) 187 (166, 194) 202 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.2)
Wood County *** 68.9 (58.1, 81.3) 33 (5, 129) 35 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.2)
Young County *** 59.1 (44.1, 77.9) 85 (6, 193) 12 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.1, 0.3)
Eastland County *** 68.6 (52.2, 88.8) 35 (3, 173) 14 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.3, 0.3)
Lamb County *** 58.2 (41.2, 80.4) 93 (5, 198) 8 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.4, 0.4)
Leon County *** 72.8 (56.2, 93.4) 21 (2, 154) 15 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.0)
Limestone County *** 74.7 (59.6, 92.7) 17 (2, 143) 19 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.1)
Live Oak County *** 41.4 (27.1, 61.5) 178 (29, 199) 6 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.6, 0.8)
Rains County *** 59.1 (41.4, 82.9) 87 (4, 197) 9 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.3, 0.4)
Robertson County *** 68.5 (51.2, 89.9) 36 (3, 178) 12 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.2)
Scurry County *** 58.3 (43.2, 77.1) 92 (6, 192) 10 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.2)
Somervell County *** 60.9 (39.6, 90.4) 66 (2, 198) 6 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.5, 0.6)
Taylor County *** 62.8 (56.5, 69.6) 59 (19, 121) 78 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5)
Callahan County *** 56.4 (40.3, 77.4) 101 (6, 197) 9 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.3, 0.0)
Comanche County *** 45.4 (30.8, 65.3) 167 (21, 199) 7 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.7, 0.6)
Freestone County *** 60.4 (45.9, 78.2) 72 (5, 191) 13 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.1)
Orange County *** 74.6 (66.7, 83.1) 18 (5, 72) 71 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
San Jacinto County *** 59.6 (47.8, 73.8) 78 (8, 180) 21 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.3, 0.0)
Victoria County *** 54.2 (47.3, 61.9) 112 (42, 172) 48 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.5)
Webb County *** 40.3 (36.7, 44.3) 182 (148, 194) 89 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.4)
Wise County *** 60.2 (52.2, 69.2) 73 (19, 156) 44 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
Bowie County *** 66.2 (59.1, 74.1) 43 (12, 110) 66 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.5)
Erath County *** 48.4 (38.4, 60.3) 147 (42, 196) 17 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.2)
Fannin County *** 70.7 (59.0, 84.3) 28 (4, 133) 28 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.4, 0.0)
Goliad County *** 74.5 (48.3, 110.8) 19 (1, 196) 6 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.2, 0.8)
Hill County *** 65.0 (53.3, 78.5) 47 (7, 157) 25 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.3, -0.2)
Hunt County *** 62.2 (55.4, 69.8) 62 (20, 133) 64 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.5)
Medina County *** 43.0 (35.3, 52.0) 175 (87, 197) 23 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.4)
Polk County *** 65.6 (56.3, 76.2) 44 (9, 130) 42 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.4)
Stephens County *** 63.5 (42.8, 91.7) 53 (2, 199) 7 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.9, 0.6)
Wharton County *** 57.8 (47.8, 69.3) 94 (18, 176) 26 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.3, -0.2)
Gray County *** 54.8 (42.0, 70.5) 109 (12, 195) 13 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.5, -0.1)
Lamar County *** 71.1 (61.0, 82.5) 27 (5, 112) 39 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.6)
Lubbock County *** 52.1 (48.2, 56.1) 122 (82, 161) 144 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -0.9)
Madison County *** 62.0 (43.9, 85.2) 63 (4, 196) 8 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.0, 0.3)
Montague County *** 65.0 (50.0, 83.4) 48 (4, 179) 14 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.5, -0.1)
Panola County *** 65.0 (51.8, 80.9) 46 (5, 169) 18 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.5, -0.1)
Bandera County *** 51.4 (39.2, 67.1) 125 (14, 197) 16 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.8, 0.0)
DeWitt County *** 60.8 (46.9, 77.9) 69 (8, 184) 14 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.7, -0.2)
Ector County *** 56.7 (51.2, 62.6) 97 (45, 154) 79 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.9)
Gonzales County *** 60.6 (46.2, 78.2) 71 (7, 189) 13 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.8, -0.1)
Grayson County *** 59.3 (53.6, 65.5) 82 (34, 137) 88 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.9)
Lavaca County *** 45.9 (33.5, 61.8) 165 (27, 199) 10 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.9, 0.1)
McLennan County *** 55.8 (51.5, 60.4) 107 (56, 145) 132 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.0)
San Augustine County *** 61.6 (40.6, 91.6) 65 (2, 199) 6 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.1, 0.2)
Ward County *** 50.1 (32.9, 73.3) 135 (9, 199) 6 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.3, 0.4)
Wilbarger County *** 55.3 (38.5, 77.4) 108 (7, 198) 8 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.7, 0.0)
Camp County *** 66.9 (48.4, 90.7) 41 (3, 190) 9 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.8, -0.2)
Coryell County *** 56.6 (48.5, 65.6) 98 (28, 170) 36 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -0.6)
Hardin County *** 59.2 (50.8, 68.7) 84 (21, 163) 39 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.8)
Harrison County *** 59.6 (52.0, 68.2) 77 (20, 148) 47 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -0.9)
Jefferson County *** 59.0 (54.9, 63.4) 88 (42, 121) 161 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.1)
Johnson County *** 56.1 (51.1, 61.3) 104 (47, 146) 100 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.0)
Jones County *** 47.4 (34.9, 63.3) 157 (26, 198) 10 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.8, -0.3)
Nacogdoches County *** 49.8 (41.8, 58.9) 137 (50, 185) 30 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -0.8)
Navarro County *** 70.1 (60.0, 81.5) 29 (6, 119) 37 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.4, -0.6)
Tom Green County *** 46.7 (41.0, 52.9) 162 (95, 186) 53 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -0.9)
Van Zandt County *** 53.8 (45.6, 63.2) 116 (34, 176) 34 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.7)
Angelina County *** 62.9 (55.6, 70.9) 58 (18, 130) 57 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -0.9)
Gregg County *** 61.7 (55.5, 68.5) 64 (24, 127) 76 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.9, -1.2)
Kerr County *** 50.8 (42.3, 60.6) 131 (41, 190) 30 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.5, -0.8)
Nueces County *** 50.8 (47.5, 54.3) 130 (86, 161) 188 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.0, -1.3)
Tyler County *** 53.9 (41.2, 69.8) 115 (16, 193) 13 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.5, -0.6)
Val Verde County *** 48.6 (39.3, 59.3) 146 (48, 193) 20 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -0.5)
Walker County *** 45.2 (38.5, 53.0) 169 (85, 192) 33 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.5, -0.6)
Burnet County *** 49.2 (40.7, 59.1) 142 (48, 190) 28 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.7, -0.7)
Caldwell County *** 54.6 (44.9, 65.8) 110 (25, 181) 24 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.9, -0.6)
Colorado County *** 56.4 (43.3, 72.8) 100 (11, 192) 14 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.6, -0.8)
Comal County *** 40.8 (36.4, 45.6) 181 (136, 194) 69 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.3, -1.1)
Midland County *** 49.3 (44.4, 54.6) 141 (80, 174) 78 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.3, -1.1)
Upshur County *** 58.8 (48.7, 70.5) 89 (16, 171) 27 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.7, -0.7)
Uvalde County *** 59.4 (46.1, 75.4) 81 (8, 189) 14 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.8, -0.7)
Wilson County *** 48.1 (40.2, 57.2) 150 (51, 191) 28 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.6, -0.7)
Austin County *** 49.3 (38.8, 62.0) 140 (39, 196) 17 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.7, -0.9)
Bee County *** 52.7 (42.0, 65.5) 121 (26, 190) 17 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.9, -0.8)
Bell County *** 51.2 (47.6, 55.0) 126 (83, 161) 155 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.2, -1.5)
Burleson County *** 60.2 (46.4, 77.5) 74 (8, 187) 15 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.1, -0.4)
Calhoun County *** 48.3 (36.3, 63.3) 148 (25, 198) 12 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.1, -0.5)
Falls County *** 60.8 (45.6, 79.9) 68 (6, 186) 12 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.9, -0.6)
Gaines County *** 56.0 (41.2, 74.2) 106 (9, 196) 10 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.2, -0.3)
Hays County *** 40.0 (36.1, 44.2) 183 (145, 195) 78 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.5, -1.1)
Hopkins County *** 58.3 (47.8, 70.7) 91 (17, 174) 23 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.8, -0.9)
Liberty County *** 71.4 (63.6, 79.9) 24 (8, 85) 64 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.5, -1.0)
Palo Pinto County *** 63.0 (51.0, 77.2) 56 (8, 170) 22 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.6, -1.1)
Tarrant County *** 46.9 (45.6, 48.3) 160 (130, 167) 968 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.0, -1.6)
Winkler County *** 48.7 (29.1, 76.8) 145 (4, 199) 4 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.4, -0.3)
Brazoria County *** 49.5 (46.3, 52.9) 139 (101, 166) 184 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.3, -1.5)
Cooke County *** 50.2 (41.0, 61.0) 134 (37, 192) 23 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.8, -1.0)
Moore County *** 53.6 (39.9, 70.5) 117 (13, 197) 11 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.2, -0.5)
Potter County *** 57.5 (51.4, 64.1) 95 (35, 149) 68 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.3, -1.5)
Shelby County *** 65.2 (51.7, 81.2) 45 (4, 172) 17 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.7, -1.1)
Howard County *** 50.7 (41.1, 62.1) 132 (32, 192) 20 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.9, -1.1)
Parker County *** 50.8 (45.7, 56.3) 129 (71, 173) 78 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.5, -1.5)
Terry County *** 43.0 (27.6, 64.0) 176 (15, 199) 5 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.5, -0.4)
Bastrop County *** 49.0 (42.8, 55.9) 144 (72, 182) 49 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.9, -1.2)
Ellis County *** 52.0 (47.3, 57.0) 123 (71, 167) 95 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.6, -1.7)
Fort Bend County *** 34.7 (32.9, 36.6) 195 (179, 198) 279 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.5, -1.8)
Waller County *** 47.8 (39.3, 57.8) 154 (50, 195) 23 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.9, -1.2)
Washington County *** 47.1 (37.4, 58.7) 159 (48, 198) 19 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.1, -1.1)
Collin County *** 32.7 (31.1, 34.3) 198 (185, 199) 326 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.6, -1.9)
Dallas County *** 47.9 (46.7, 49.2) 151 (125, 161) 1,208 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.3, -2.0)
Harris County *** 45.5 (44.6, 46.4) 166 (143, 171) 2,035 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.4, -2.1)
Kaufman County *** 60.7 (54.7, 67.1) 70 (28, 126) 78 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.8, -1.6)
Reeves County *** 36.6 (23.4, 54.6) 191 (55, 199) 5 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.8, -0.5)
Rusk County *** 49.0 (41.2, 58.0) 143 (51, 191) 29 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.9, -1.4)
Houston County *** 58.7 (45.9, 74.4) 90 (9, 182) 16 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.2, -1.4)
Lampasas County *** 53.9 (41.0, 70.1) 114 (11, 196) 13 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.5, -1.1)
Smith County *** 47.9 (43.8, 52.2) 152 (94, 175) 110 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.8, -1.7)
Denton County *** 34.7 (33.0, 36.6) 194 (180, 198) 294 falling falling trend -2.4 (-2.8, -2.1)
Jack County *** 46.0 (28.9, 70.6) 164 (12, 199) 5 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.1, -0.6)
Lee County *** 49.5 (36.0, 67.0) 138 (19, 198) 10 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.7, -1.1)
Montgomery County *** 45.0 (42.7, 47.5) 171 (133, 177) 277 falling falling trend -2.4 (-2.8, -2.0)
Runnels County *** 37.7 (22.7, 59.6) 189 (24, 199) 4 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.4, -0.4)
Andrews County *** 36.9 (24.7, 52.9) 190 (58, 199) 6 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.7, -1.3)
Brazos County *** 35.6 (31.6, 40.0) 192 (165, 199) 59 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.2, -1.9)
Chambers County *** 54.4 (44.8, 65.7) 111 (25, 183) 23 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.5, -1.4)
Guadalupe County *** 47.8 (43.1, 52.9) 156 (91, 180) 78 stable stable trend -2.5 (-5.1, 0.1)
Brewster County *** 44.8 (28.1, 69.0) 172 (12, 199) 5 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.3, -0.9)
Gillespie County *** 42.4 (31.6, 56.3) 177 (55, 199) 13 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.9, -1.3)
Hood County *** 53.4 (45.3, 62.7) 118 (40, 178) 37 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.4, -1.8)
Titus County *** 45.2 (34.9, 57.7) 170 (40, 198) 14 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.9, -1.2)
Fayette County *** 32.8 (24.1, 44.3) 197 (125, 199) 11 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.8, -1.5)
Pecos County *** 26.9 (16.8, 41.2) 199 (134, 199) 4 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.4, -0.9)
Travis County *** 34.8 (33.3, 36.3) 193 (179, 198) 412 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.0, -2.5)
Kendall County *** 34.0 (26.7, 43.0) 196 (138, 199) 16 falling falling trend -2.9 (-3.9, -1.8)
Archer County *** 47.2 (29.6, 72.9) 158 (9, 199) 5 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.9, -1.0)
Ochiltree County *** 38.0 (22.5, 60.2) 186 (22, 199) 4 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.9, -1.0)
Randall County *** 39.5 (34.8, 44.7) 184 (138, 197) 55 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.5, -1.5)
Rockwall County *** 37.8 (32.6, 43.7) 188 (137, 198) 39 falling falling trend -3.0 (-3.8, -2.2)
Castro County *** 56.0 (33.5, 88.3) 105 (2, 199) 4 stable stable trend -3.8 (-14.6, 8.4)
Galveston County *** 59.4 (55.9, 63.2) 79 (41, 115) 223 stable stable trend -5.5 (-14.2, 4.0)
Wichita County *** 60.0 (54.0, 66.4) 75 (27, 133) 80 stable stable trend -7.3 (-20.2, 7.7)
Delta County *** 93.3 (59.7, 140.6) 3 (1, 181) 5
*
*
Dimmit County *** 51.7 (32.6, 77.9) 124 (5, 199) 5
*
*
Donley County *** 93.2 (50.4, 160.4) 4 (1, 199) 3
*
*
Hardeman County *** 78.1 (43.0, 132.6) 12 (1, 199) 3
*
*
Haskell County *** 59.4 (35.6, 96.0) 80 (2, 199) 4
*
*
Jim Hogg County *** 77.8 (44.6, 125.9) 13 (1, 199) 3
*
*
Kimble County *** 81.7 (47.3, 134.7) 7 (1, 199) 4
*
*
La Salle County *** 54.0 (31.4, 87.0) 113 (3, 199) 3
*
*
Lynn County *** 69.0 (40.8, 109.9) 32 (1, 199) 4
*
*
Martin County *** 88.9 (56.5, 133.5) 5 (1, 192) 5
*
*
Mitchell County *** 64.1 (41.2, 95.6) 51 (1, 198) 5
*
*
Parmer County *** 38.6 (22.3, 62.3) 185 (22, 199) 4
*
*
Wheeler County *** 50.9 (28.6, 86.0) 128 (3, 199) 3
*
*
Yoakum County *** 44.0 (25.7, 70.6) 174 (8, 199) 4
*
*
Zapata County *** 47.8 (31.4, 69.6) 155 (9, 199) 5
*
*
Armstrong County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bailey County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Baylor County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Borden County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Briscoe County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carson County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cochran County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coke County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Collingsworth County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Concho County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cottle County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crane County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crockett County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crosby County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Culberson County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dallam County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dickens County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Edwards County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fisher County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Foard County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Garza County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glasscock County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hall County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hansford County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hartley County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hemphill County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hudspeth County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Irion County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jeff Davis County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kenedy County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kent County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
King County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kinney County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Knox County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lipscomb County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Loving County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mason County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McMullen County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menard County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mills County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Motley County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oldham County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Presidio County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Reagan County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Real County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roberts County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schleicher County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shackelford County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sherman County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sterling County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stonewall County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sutton County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Terrell County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Throckmorton County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Upton County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 06/26/2022 1:58 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data for the following has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of estimates:
Armstrong, Bailey, Baylor, Borden, Briscoe, Carson, Cochran, Coke, Collingsworth, Concho, Cottle, Crane, Crockett, Crosby, Culberson, Dallam, Dickens, Edwards, Fisher, Foard, Garza, Glasscock, Hall, Hansford, Hartley, Hemphill, Hudspeth, Irion, Jeff Davis, Kenedy, Kent, King, Kinney, Knox, Lipscomb, Loving, Mason, McMullen, Menard, Mills, Motley, Oldham, Presidio, Reagan, Real, Roberts, Schleicher, Shackelford, Sherman, Sterling, Stonewall, Sutton, Terrell, Throckmorton, Upton

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top