Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Texas by County

All Cancer Sites, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <65

Sorted by Name

County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Texas N/A Yes 44.8 (44.5, 45.2) N/A 12,984 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.8, -1.2)
United States N/A Yes 45.0 (44.9, 45.1) N/A 161,722 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.4, -1.9)
Anderson County Rural Yes 105.4 (94.3, 117.6) 1 (1, 11) 67 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.6, 3.9)
Andrews County Rural Yes 36.8 (25.0, 52.3) 188 (56, 200) 6 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.6, -0.9)
Angelina County Rural Yes 62.1 (54.7, 70.3) 68 (17, 128) 55 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.5, 7.0)
Aransas County Urban Yes 84.2 (68.0, 103.4) 9 (1, 89) 24 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 1.0)
Archer County Urban Yes 37.7 (23.5, 59.5) 186 (25, 200) 5 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.6, -1.2)
Atascosa County Urban Yes 56.6 (47.5, 67.0) 92 (23, 174) 29 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.4)
Austin County Urban Yes 47.8 (37.6, 60.3) 143 (37, 198) 17 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.1, -0.8)
Bandera County Urban Yes 48.4 (37.2, 62.9) 137 (29, 197) 16 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.0, 0.1)
Bastrop County Urban Yes 48.2 (42.2, 54.7) 138 (75, 181) 52 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.9, -1.3)
Baylor County Rural Yes 92.2 (51.7, 154.5) 4 (1, 198) 3
*
*
Bee County Rural Yes 62.4 (50.1, 77.0) 66 (10, 172) 18 stable stable trend 3.0 (-0.9, 16.3)
Bell County Urban Yes 49.0 (45.6, 52.6) 133 (94, 163) 161 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.1, -1.4)
Bexar County Urban Yes 45.4 (44.0, 46.8) 152 (129, 165) 857 stable stable trend -1.0 (-1.6, 1.0)
Blanco County Rural Yes 37.4 (24.6, 56.7) 187 (47, 200) 6 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.0, 1.3)
Bosque County Urban Yes 63.5 (48.4, 82.4) 58 (5, 177) 14 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.5)
Bowie County Urban Yes 60.9 (54.0, 68.6) 73 (22, 129) 60 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.7)
Brazoria County Urban Yes 46.1 (43.1, 49.3) 150 (112, 173) 178 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.2, -1.5)
Brazos County Urban Yes 34.9 (31.1, 39.2) 192 (167, 199) 62 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.1, -1.8)
Brewster County Rural Yes 35.7 (20.6, 58.8) 190 (33, 200) 4 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.4, -1.0)
Brooks County Rural Yes 76.7 (48.2, 116.0) 20 (1, 197) 5 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.4, 2.9)
Brown County Rural Yes 64.7 (54.0, 77.2) 52 (8, 150) 28 stable stable trend -1.0 (-1.9, 0.0)
Burleson County Urban Yes 64.3 (48.6, 83.8) 55 (5, 179) 13 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.1, 0.0)
Burnet County Rural Yes 49.0 (40.9, 58.5) 132 (53, 188) 30 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.5, -0.8)
Caldwell County Urban Yes 50.8 (42.1, 60.9) 123 (45, 183) 25 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.9, -0.8)
Calhoun County Rural Yes 56.9 (43.1, 74.1) 89 (13, 189) 13 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.5, -0.1)
Callahan County Urban Yes 65.2 (48.5, 86.7) 47 (3, 180) 11 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.4)
Cameron County Urban Yes 45.2 (42.1, 48.4) 154 (119, 176) 164 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.2)
Camp County Rural Yes 64.8 (45.5, 89.8) 51 (1, 194) 8 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 0.1)
Cass County Rural Yes 68.8 (56.2, 83.8) 35 (5, 140) 23 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.2)
Castro County Rural Yes 65.0 (38.9, 101.7) 50 (1, 200) 4 stable stable trend 3.2 (-0.7, 18.6)
Chambers County Urban Yes 49.8 (41.0, 59.9) 128 (45, 186) 23 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.1, -1.3)
Cherokee County Rural Yes 60.7 (51.4, 71.3) 74 (17, 157) 32 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.5, -0.9)
Childress County Rural Yes 66.5 (40.4, 103.8) 44 (1, 200) 4 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.6, 2.5)
Clay County Urban Yes 51.1 (33.6, 75.9) 121 (8, 200) 7 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.7, 1.4)
Coleman County Rural Yes 67.6 (45.5, 98.9) 40 (1, 196) 7 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.1, 1.8)
Collin County Urban Yes 29.3 (27.9, 30.8) 200 (189, 200) 327 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.6, -2.0)
Colorado County Rural Yes 63.4 (48.9, 81.2) 60 (6, 180) 15 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.2)
Comal County Urban Yes 40.2 (36.1, 44.6) 180 (135, 191) 79 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.2, -1.1)
Comanche County Rural Yes 54.2 (37.1, 76.9) 105 (6, 200) 8 falling falling trend -2.2 (-16.1, -0.4)
Cooke County Rural Yes 49.5 (40.3, 60.4) 130 (41, 188) 23 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.9, -1.0)
Coryell County Urban Yes 49.9 (42.7, 58.0) 125 (51, 183) 35 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -0.7)
Dallam County Rural Yes 49.1 (27.9, 80.1) 131 (5, 200) 3
*
*
Dallas County Urban Yes 44.3 (43.2, 45.5) 156 (137, 170) 1,124 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.3, -2.0)
Dawson County Rural Yes 46.7 (30.6, 68.4) 146 (14, 200) 6 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.0, 1.3)
DeWitt County Rural Yes 50.4 (37.9, 66.3) 124 (19, 198) 12 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.0, -0.3)
Deaf Smith County Rural Yes 41.3 (28.2, 58.4) 173 (48, 200) 7 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.3, 0.5)
Delta County Rural Yes 70.8 (43.0, 111.9) 25 (1, 200) 5
*
*
Denton County Urban Yes 32.3 (30.7, 33.9) 199 (182, 199) 308 falling falling trend -2.4 (-2.7, -2.1)
Dimmit County Rural Yes 72.4 (47.9, 105.3) 23 (1, 191) 6
*
*
Duval County Rural Yes 84.4 (59.0, 117.1) 8 (1, 173) 8 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.8, 2.7)
Eastland County Rural Yes 65.0 (48.5, 85.7) 49 (5, 180) 12 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 0.1)
Ector County Urban Yes 59.5 (53.9, 65.6) 78 (35, 127) 83 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.5)
El Paso County Urban Yes 42.4 (40.3, 44.5) 169 (139, 181) 335 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.9, 0.6)
Ellis County Urban Yes 47.2 (43.0, 51.8) 145 (96, 177) 96 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.6, -1.6)
Erath County Rural Yes 43.4 (34.0, 54.5) 163 (65, 199) 16 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.3)
Falls County Urban Yes 50.9 (37.0, 68.7) 122 (15, 198) 10 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.9, -0.7)
Fannin County Rural Yes 66.3 (55.4, 78.9) 46 (9, 139) 28 stable stable trend 2.3 (-0.6, 14.4)
Fayette County Rural Yes 48.5 (36.7, 63.2) 136 (23, 198) 14 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.1, -0.8)
Floyd County Rural Yes 60.2 (33.5, 100.8) 75 (1, 200) 3
*
*
Fort Bend County Urban Yes 33.1 (31.4, 34.9) 196 (180, 199) 286 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.4, -1.6)
Franklin County Rural Yes 78.4 (55.5, 108.2) 15 (1, 178) 9 stable stable trend 5.5 (-0.1, 28.3)
Freestone County Rural Yes 63.5 (48.5, 82.0) 59 (5, 178) 13 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.1)
Frio County Rural Yes 69.3 (51.2, 91.7) 31 (2, 178) 10 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.3, 2.2)
Gaines County Rural Yes 40.6 (28.2, 56.4) 178 (51, 200) 7 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.6, -0.5)
Galveston County Urban Yes 53.5 (50.2, 57.0) 107 (72, 138) 210 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.4)
Gillespie County Rural Yes 33.8 (24.1, 46.6) 194 (99, 200) 10 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.0, -1.1)
Goliad County Urban Yes 40.9 (22.5, 70.3) 176 (14, 200) 3 falling falling trend -24.2 (-50.5, -1.3)
Gonzales County Rural Yes 51.4 (37.7, 68.5) 120 (14, 198) 10 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.7, -0.1)
Gray County Rural Yes 51.6 (38.8, 67.5) 118 (18, 196) 11 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.4, -0.1)
Grayson County Urban Yes 59.1 (53.5, 65.1) 81 (35, 126) 92 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.8)
Gregg County Urban Yes 58.5 (52.4, 65.1) 83 (36, 137) 73 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.1, -1.3)
Grimes County Rural Yes 53.0 (42.3, 65.9) 110 (26, 190) 19 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.4)
Guadalupe County Urban Yes 43.8 (39.5, 48.5) 159 (115, 184) 79 falling falling trend -2.2 (-7.5, -0.2)
Hale County Rural Yes 49.9 (39.2, 62.6) 127 (26, 193) 16 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.2, 1.0)
Hamilton County Rural Yes 79.9 (52.7, 116.8) 11 (1, 190) 7 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.7, 2.0)
Hardin County Urban Yes 55.9 (47.6, 65.3) 95 (30, 166) 35 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.8)
Harris County Urban Yes 42.7 (41.9, 43.6) 167 (148, 176) 1,951 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.3, -2.1)
Harrison County Urban Yes 55.6 (48.2, 63.9) 97 (32, 163) 44 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.3, -1.0)
Haskell County Rural Yes 79.1 (49.3, 122.5) 13 (1, 198) 5
*
*
Hays County Urban Yes 35.7 (32.2, 39.4) 191 (164, 198) 80 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.5, -1.1)
Henderson County Rural Yes 70.9 (63.1, 79.5) 24 (10, 87) 70 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.3, 0.0)
Hidalgo County Urban Yes 41.4 (39.3, 43.6) 172 (146, 183) 289 stable stable trend 3.8 (-1.1, 7.0)
Hill County Rural Yes 72.5 (60.7, 86.3) 22 (4, 118) 30 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.1)
Hockley County Urban Yes 55.1 (41.3, 72.2) 98 (12, 194) 11 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.8, 1.1)
Hood County Rural Yes 51.8 (43.9, 60.7) 117 (46, 179) 37 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.2, -1.5)
Hopkins County Rural Yes 54.7 (44.6, 66.5) 102 (23, 182) 22 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.7, -0.7)
Houston County Rural Yes 52.5 (40.8, 67.1) 114 (21, 192) 15 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.2, -1.6)
Howard County Rural Yes 48.8 (39.1, 60.3) 135 (39, 194) 18 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.7, -1.0)
Hunt County Urban Yes 63.0 (56.3, 70.3) 62 (19, 116) 70 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.4)
Hutchinson County Rural Yes 66.3 (51.2, 84.7) 45 (4, 171) 15 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.3, 0.8)
Jack County Rural Yes 41.1 (24.8, 65.3) 175 (20, 200) 4 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.0, -0.4)
Jackson County Rural Yes 48.0 (33.7, 67.0) 140 (20, 200) 8 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.3, 0.2)
Jasper County Rural Yes 75.2 (62.3, 90.2) 21 (3, 115) 27 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.4, 5.1)
Jefferson County Urban Yes 55.0 (51.0, 59.3) 100 (58, 136) 150 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.1)
Jim Hogg County Rural Yes 105.1 (64.2, 162.4) 2 (1, 183) 4
*
*
Jim Wells County Rural Yes 76.9 (64.5, 91.0) 19 (3, 86) 29 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 1.0)
Johnson County Urban Yes 46.5 (42.2, 51.2) 147 (97, 179) 90 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.2, -1.2)
Jones County Urban Yes 62.2 (47.6, 80.3) 67 (6, 180) 13 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.3)
Karnes County Rural Yes 57.9 (41.5, 79.0) 85 (6, 197) 8 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.0, 0.9)
Kaufman County Urban Yes 51.4 (46.3, 56.9) 119 (63, 162) 77 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.8, -1.8)
Kendall County Urban Yes 36.1 (28.8, 45.0) 189 (110, 200) 19 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.1, -1.2)
Kerr County Rural Yes 47.9 (39.6, 57.7) 141 (54, 187) 28 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.5, -0.8)
Kimble County Rural Yes 79.8 (44.6, 134.5) 12 (1, 200) 4
*
*
Kleberg County Rural Yes 77.5 (62.1, 95.6) 18 (2, 123) 18 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.3, 2.1)
La Salle County Rural Yes 63.3 (37.4, 100.6) 61 (1, 200) 4
*
*
Lamar County Rural Yes 68.9 (58.8, 80.4) 34 (6, 111) 36 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.4)
Lamb County Rural Yes 38.7 (25.2, 57.4) 183 (35, 200) 6 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.8, -0.1)
Lampasas County Urban Yes 55.1 (42.3, 70.9) 99 (14, 189) 14 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.4, -1.2)
Lavaca County Rural Yes 52.9 (39.6, 69.7) 111 (12, 193) 12 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.3, 0.8)
Lee County Rural Yes 53.2 (39.2, 71.0) 108 (17, 197) 11 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.3, -0.8)
Leon County Rural Yes 67.6 (51.1, 88.6) 39 (3, 173) 13 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.0)
Liberty County Urban Yes 66.6 (59.3, 74.6) 43 (15, 100) 63 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.5, -1.0)
Limestone County Rural Yes 68.6 (53.6, 86.7) 37 (4, 158) 16 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.2)
Live Oak County Rural Yes 64.4 (44.1, 91.3) 53 (2, 197) 7 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.8, 1.4)
Llano County Rural Yes 67.3 (51.8, 86.8) 42 (4, 169) 18 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.8)
Lubbock County Urban Yes 54.5 (50.6, 58.7) 103 (59, 137) 150 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.7)
Lynn County Urban Yes 86.1 (54.0, 131.0) 7 (1, 196) 5
*
*
Madison County Rural Yes 69.7 (49.8, 95.0) 30 (2, 184) 8 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.5, 0.7)
Marion County Rural Yes 44.0 (28.5, 67.1) 158 (19, 200) 6 falling falling trend -18.8 (-36.7, -3.2)
Martin County Urban Yes 68.2 (39.9, 109.6) 38 (1, 200) 4
*
*
Mason County Rural Yes 87.8 (47.7, 150.3) 6 (1, 200) 3
*
*
Matagorda County Rural Yes 61.1 (50.3, 73.8) 71 (14, 161) 25 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.0)
Maverick County Urban Yes 41.9 (34.1, 50.9) 170 (82, 199) 20 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.6)
McCulloch County Rural Yes 79.9 (53.8, 115.6) 10 (1, 185) 7 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.6, 1.8)
McLennan County Urban Yes 52.6 (48.5, 56.9) 113 (68, 150) 130 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.1)
Medina County Urban Yes 43.4 (35.7, 52.3) 164 (82, 198) 24 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.5)
Midland County Urban Yes 43.7 (39.0, 48.7) 160 (112, 186) 67 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -1.1)
Milam County Rural Yes 62.6 (49.6, 78.3) 65 (7, 170) 18 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.8)
Mills County Rural Yes 69.3 (37.9, 119.4) 32 (1, 200) 3
*
*
Mitchell County Rural Yes 57.5 (36.2, 87.2) 86 (3, 200) 5
*
*
Montague County Rural Yes 49.6 (37.2, 65.4) 129 (17, 198) 12 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.9, -0.5)
Montgomery County Urban Yes 41.2 (39.0, 43.4) 174 (145, 184) 275 falling falling trend -2.4 (-2.8, -2.0)
Moore County Rural Yes 53.0 (39.0, 70.4) 109 (12, 195) 10 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.0, 0.0)
Morris County Rural Yes 67.3 (48.1, 92.4) 41 (2, 185) 9 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.3, 0.3)
Nacogdoches County Rural Yes 56.5 (47.9, 66.2) 93 (28, 166) 34 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -0.7)
Navarro County Rural Yes 58.4 (49.3, 68.7) 84 (23, 166) 32 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.6, -0.8)
Newton County Rural Yes 90.3 (67.3, 119.3) 5 (1, 123) 12 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.7)
Nolan County Rural Yes 69.1 (51.1, 91.6) 33 (3, 179) 10 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.3)
Nueces County Urban Yes 49.9 (46.6, 53.4) 126 (89, 157) 178 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.2)
Ochiltree County Rural Yes 32.8 (18.4, 54.3) 197 (41, 200) 3 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.9, -1.3)
Orange County Urban Yes 59.9 (52.9, 67.7) 77 (26, 136) 57 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.8)
Palo Pinto County Rural Yes 63.9 (51.4, 78.8) 57 (8, 171) 21 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 7.1)
Panola County Rural Yes 59.3 (46.3, 75.3) 80 (10, 182) 16 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.4, 0.2)
Parker County Urban Yes 43.6 (39.1, 48.5) 161 (112, 185) 74 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.5, -1.5)
Parmer County Rural Yes 40.9 (23.8, 65.4) 177 (19, 200) 4
*
*
Pecos County Rural Yes 45.2 (30.9, 64.0) 153 (22, 200) 7 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.0, 0.2)
Polk County Rural Yes 70.0 (60.5, 80.7) 29 (8, 104) 46 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.7, -0.1)
Potter County Urban Yes 59.0 (52.7, 65.9) 82 (34, 134) 67 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.3, -1.4)
Rains County Rural Yes 57.3 (41.5, 78.4) 87 (9, 197) 10 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.4)
Randall County Urban Yes 41.6 (36.9, 46.9) 171 (119, 190) 59 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.7)
Red River County Rural Yes 92.2 (69.8, 120.6) 3 (1, 97) 13 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.3, 1.6)
Reeves County Rural Yes 42.5 (27.7, 62.4) 168 (31, 200) 5 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.1, 0.3)
Refugio County Rural Yes 40.3 (23.3, 67.5) 179 (20, 200) 4 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.5, 2.5)
Robertson County Urban Yes 78.5 (60.2, 101.0) 14 (1, 126) 14 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.5)
Rockwall County Urban Yes 34.7 (30.0, 40.0) 193 (156, 200) 40 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.5, -1.8)
Runnels County Rural Yes 55.0 (36.2, 81.0) 101 (5, 200) 6 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.0, 0.5)
Rusk County Urban Yes 56.4 (47.8, 66.2) 94 (24, 168) 33 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.5, -1.0)
Sabine County Rural Yes 70.2 (48.7, 99.8) 28 (1, 186) 9 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.6)
San Augustine County Rural Yes 61.3 (41.8, 89.5) 70 (3, 198) 7 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.8, 0.2)
San Jacinto County Urban Yes 68.7 (55.4, 84.5) 36 (4, 140) 22 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.8)
San Patricio County Urban Yes 60.0 (51.8, 69.0) 76 (23, 142) 41 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.1, 0.0)
San Saba County Rural Yes 44.7 (25.4, 76.3) 155 (9, 200) 3 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.6, 2.2)
Scurry County Rural Yes 38.3 (26.1, 54.5) 184 (46, 200) 7 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.8, -0.3)
Shelby County Rural Yes 64.4 (50.9, 80.6) 54 (6, 171) 17 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.7, -1.2)
Smith County Urban Yes 48.8 (44.7, 53.2) 134 (88, 166) 114 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.6, -1.6)
Somervell County Rural Yes 37.9 (23.1, 60.1) 185 (33, 200) 4 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.2, -0.2)
Starr County Rural Yes 52.9 (44.4, 62.5) 112 (39, 178) 28 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.4, 1.7)
Stephens County Rural Yes 64.2 (42.7, 93.5) 56 (2, 200) 6 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.2, 0.3)
Swisher County Rural Yes 62.9 (38.4, 97.8) 63 (1, 200) 4 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.2, 2.0)
Tarrant County Urban Yes 43.2 (42.0, 44.5) 165 (140, 175) 926 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.1, -1.7)
Taylor County Urban Yes 61.1 (55.0, 67.8) 72 (25, 121) 78 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5)
Terry County Rural Yes 65.2 (45.2, 91.1) 48 (2, 197) 7 stable stable trend 20.8 (-0.3, 39.4)
Titus County Rural Yes 51.9 (40.5, 65.5) 116 (27, 193) 15 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.4, -0.6)
Tom Green County Urban Yes 47.8 (42.1, 54.2) 144 (80, 180) 54 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.7)
Travis County Urban Yes 32.3 (30.9, 33.8) 198 (183, 199) 405 falling falling trend -2.7 (-2.9, -2.5)
Trinity County Rural Yes 77.5 (58.5, 101.8) 17 (1, 142) 14 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.7, 1.5)
Tyler County Rural Yes 62.7 (48.0, 80.9) 64 (6, 181) 14 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.4)
Upshur County Urban Yes 61.8 (51.8, 73.5) 69 (13, 146) 30 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -0.6)
Uvalde County Rural Yes 55.7 (42.4, 71.9) 96 (11, 189) 12 stable stable trend 4.8 (-1.2, 24.2)
Val Verde County Rural Yes 48.1 (38.9, 58.7) 139 (44, 190) 19 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.4, -0.2)
Van Zandt County Rural Yes 57.2 (48.9, 66.6) 88 (23, 154) 39 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.7)
Victoria County Urban Yes 56.8 (49.7, 64.5) 90 (36, 152) 51 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
Walker County Rural Yes 38.9 (32.9, 45.8) 182 (124, 199) 31 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.7, -1.0)
Waller County Urban Yes 47.9 (39.6, 57.4) 142 (51, 190) 25 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.7, -1.0)
Ward County Rural Yes 42.9 (26.4, 65.9) 166 (16, 200) 4 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.5, 0.7)
Washington County Rural Yes 43.4 (34.0, 54.9) 162 (59, 199) 17 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.2, -1.2)
Webb County Urban Yes 46.4 (42.4, 50.6) 149 (104, 178) 103 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.2)
Wharton County Rural Yes 54.0 (44.3, 65.2) 106 (27, 180) 24 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.4)
Wichita County Urban Yes 59.5 (53.4, 66.1) 79 (29, 128) 77 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.8)
Wilbarger County Rural Yes 70.8 (51.7, 95.1) 26 (1, 183) 10 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.1, 0.3)
Willacy County Rural Yes 46.4 (32.9, 63.5) 148 (23, 200) 8 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.6, 1.5)
Williamson County Urban Yes 33.8 (31.7, 35.9) 195 (176, 198) 205 stable stable trend -1.6 (-2.4, 1.5)
Wilson County Urban Yes 45.5 (37.9, 54.4) 151 (66, 194) 27 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -0.6)
Winkler County Rural Yes 44.0 (26.5, 69.7) 157 (10, 200) 4 falling falling trend -3.9 (-19.2, -2.2)
Wise County Urban Yes 54.4 (47.1, 62.6) 104 (37, 166) 44 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.6)
Wood County Rural Yes 70.4 (59.6, 82.8) 27 (6, 118) 38 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.4, 11.5)
Yoakum County Rural Yes 52.1 (30.9, 82.5) 115 (4, 200) 4
*
*
Young County Rural Yes 56.7 (41.6, 75.8) 91 (7, 195) 11 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.1, 0.1)
Zapata County Rural Yes 39.9 (24.9, 60.4) 181 (25, 200) 4
*
*
Zavala County Rural Yes 78.4 (53.2, 111.2) 16 (1, 183) 6 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.0, 2.6)
Armstrong County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bailey County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Borden County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Briscoe County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carson County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cochran County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coke County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Collingsworth County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Concho County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cottle County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crane County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crockett County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crosby County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Culberson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dickens County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Donley County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Edwards County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fisher County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Foard County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Garza County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glasscock County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hall County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hansford County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardeman County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hartley County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hemphill County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hudspeth County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Irion County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jeff Davis County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kenedy County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kent County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
King County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kinney County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Knox County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lipscomb County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Loving County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McMullen County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menard County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Motley County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oldham County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Presidio County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Reagan County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Real County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roberts County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schleicher County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shackelford County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sherman County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sterling County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stonewall County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sutton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Terrell County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Throckmorton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Upton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wheeler County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/11/2024 11:40 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top