Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Texas by County

All Cancer Sites, 2013-2017

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <65

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 161.4?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Texas Yes 49.2 (48.8, 49.5) N/A 13,278 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.1)
United States Yes 50.4 (50.3, 50.5) N/A 175,590 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.4, -1.3)
Anderson County Yes 105.4 (94.3, 117.5) 1 (1, 9) 67 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.2, 0.6)
Donley County Yes 105.3 (59.3, 175.1) 2 (1, 196) 4
*
*
Morris County Yes 93.5 (71.0, 121.5) 3 (1, 99) 13 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.8)
Hamilton County Yes 89.7 (62.8, 125.5) 4 (1, 164) 8 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.6, 2.1)
Crosby County Yes 88.2 (55.1, 134.3) 5 (1, 195) 5 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.1, 2.7)
Delta County Yes 87.8 (56.1, 133.0) 6 (1, 189) 5
*
*
Marion County Yes 84.3 (62.4, 113.1) 7 (1, 145) 11 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.5, 1.3)
Leon County Yes 80.6 (63.0, 102.2) 8 (1, 127) 16 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.1, 0.1)
Orange County Yes 78.7 (70.7, 87.4) 9 (4, 52) 75 stable stable trend 5.8 (-2.3, 14.6)
Panola County Yes 78.0 (63.1, 95.6) 10 (2, 118) 21 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.1, 0.3)
Newton County Yes 77.6 (57.5, 102.7) 11 (1, 168) 11 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.1, 0.3)
Jasper County Yes 77.5 (65.3, 91.5) 12 (2, 93) 31 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.6, 0.0)
Cass County Yes 77.2 (63.9, 92.6) 13 (2, 106) 27 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.1)
Trinity County Yes 75.2 (56.8, 98.5) 14 (1, 156) 13 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.0, 1.4)
Kimble County Yes 74.6 (43.2, 123.9) 15 (1, 198) 4
*
*
Duval County Yes 74.6 (53.2, 101.9) 16 (1, 186) 8 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.6, 2.1)
Aransas County Yes 73.6 (59.7, 90.3) 17 (3, 139) 23 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.6)
Henderson County Yes 73.6 (65.4, 82.6) 18 (5, 82) 66 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.0)
Matagorda County Yes 73.5 (61.4, 87.5) 19 (2, 124) 29 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.1)
Palo Pinto County Yes 73.3 (60.2, 88.5) 20 (3, 124) 24 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.5, 1.3)
Brown County Yes 73.2 (61.5, 86.8) 21 (3, 124) 30 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.1)
Refugio County Yes 72.9 (48.7, 106.4) 22 (1, 195) 6 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.4, 3.5)
Dawson County Yes 72.8 (52.9, 97.8) 23 (1, 184) 9 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.5, 1.8)
Real County Yes 72.2 (38.8, 129.8) 24 (1, 198) 3
*
*
Goliad County Yes 72.1 (47.7, 105.9) 25 (1, 195) 6 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.5, 1.0)
Hunt County Yes 71.9 (64.3, 80.2) 26 (7, 83) 70 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.3)
Franklin County Yes 71.7 (49.7, 100.6) 27 (1, 191) 8 stable stable trend 9.8 (-1.1, 21.8)
Liberty County Yes 71.1 (63.2, 79.7) 28 (8, 94) 62 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.7, -1.0)
Polk County Yes 70.5 (60.5, 81.9) 29 (6, 114) 40 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.3)
Limestone County Yes 70.4 (56.5, 87.2) 30 (4, 152) 19 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.1)
Montague County Yes 70.4 (54.9, 89.5) 31 (3, 164) 15 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.3, 0.2)
San Saba County Yes 70.0 (42.5, 110.3) 32 (1, 197) 4 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.4, 2.2)
Kleberg County Yes 69.8 (55.8, 86.3) 33 (4, 166) 18 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.1, 1.7)
San Jacinto County Yes 69.4 (56.4, 84.8) 34 (4, 156) 23 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.9, 0.5)
Jackson County Yes 69.0 (50.8, 91.8) 35 (2, 187) 11 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.7, 1.1)
Camp County Yes 68.6 (49.5, 93.1) 36 (2, 196) 9 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.8, 0.1)
Lamar County Yes 67.4 (57.8, 78.4) 37 (8, 131) 37 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.7)
Grimes County Yes 67.4 (55.2, 81.9) 38 (5, 158) 23 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.1)
Bowie County Yes 67.0 (59.8, 74.8) 39 (13, 106) 66 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.5)
DeWitt County Yes 66.9 (52.3, 84.7) 40 (4, 179) 15 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.1)
Rains County Yes 66.3 (46.4, 92.8) 41 (2, 194) 9 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.4, 0.7)
Navarro County Yes 66.1 (56.2, 77.3) 42 (9, 144) 34 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.8, -0.8)
Galveston County Yes 65.6 (61.8, 69.6) 43 (25, 88) 237 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.2)
Sabine County Yes 65.4 (44.6, 93.9) 44 (1, 196) 8 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.5, 0.5)
Scurry County Yes 65.3 (49.2, 85.2) 45 (3, 188) 12 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.3, 0.5)
Hopkins County Yes 65.1 (53.8, 78.2) 46 (6, 158) 25 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.7, -0.5)
Tyler County Yes 64.9 (50.6, 82.3) 47 (4, 182) 15 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.5, -0.4)
Zavala County Yes 64.7 (44.2, 91.4) 48 (2, 197) 7 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.3, 2.1)
San Patricio County Yes 64.0 (55.5, 73.5) 49 (13, 140) 42 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.1)
Callahan County Yes 64.0 (46.5, 86.5) 50 (3, 193) 10 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.1, 0.5)
Hockley County Yes 63.7 (49.4, 80.9) 51 (4, 183) 14 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.1, 1.2)
Hardin County Yes 63.6 (54.8, 73.5) 52 (13, 147) 40 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.5)
San Augustine County Yes 63.5 (42.6, 92.9) 53 (2, 197) 7 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.1, 0.7)
Somervell County Yes 63.4 (42.1, 92.8) 54 (2, 197) 6 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.5, 1.0)
Clay County Yes 62.8 (44.4, 87.8) 55 (3, 197) 9 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.3, 1.7)
Wichita County Yes 62.8 (56.7, 69.3) 56 (22, 123) 84 stable stable trend 6.5 (-1.5, 15.2)
Eastland County Yes 62.8 (47.5, 81.8) 57 (5, 193) 13 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.8, 0.1)
Upshur County Yes 62.6 (52.3, 74.6) 58 (10, 157) 29 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.0, -0.8)
Brooks County Yes 62.4 (38.0, 97.1) 59 (1, 198) 4 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.1, 2.2)
Haskell County Yes 62.2 (38.1, 98.6) 60 (1, 198) 4
*
*
Taylor County Yes 62.2 (56.0, 68.9) 61 (24, 127) 78 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.6)
Gregg County Yes 62.0 (55.7, 68.7) 62 (26, 133) 77 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.1, -1.3)
Coryell County Yes 62.0 (53.4, 71.4) 63 (14, 156) 38 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.4)
Garza County Yes 61.9 (36.9, 98.5) 64 (1, 198) 4
*
*
Carson County Yes 61.5 (37.9, 96.4) 65 (1, 197) 5
*
*
Fannin County Yes 61.5 (50.7, 74.2) 66 (11, 174) 24 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.1, -0.6)
Milam County Yes 61.5 (48.7, 76.9) 67 (7, 185) 17 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.2, 0.7)
Dimmit County Yes 61.3 (41.4, 87.8) 68 (3, 197) 6
*
*
Blanco County Yes 60.9 (41.5, 87.3) 69 (2, 197) 8 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.6, 1.8)
Wise County Yes 60.9 (52.7, 70.1) 70 (17, 156) 43 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.6)
Coleman County Yes 60.9 (39.5, 91.1) 71 (2, 197) 6 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.7, 1.5)
Lamb County Yes 60.6 (42.7, 83.8) 72 (4, 197) 8 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.1, 1.0)
Ward County Yes 60.6 (41.8, 85.3) 73 (3, 197) 7 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.9, 1.0)
Mitchell County Yes 60.5 (38.7, 90.6) 74 (2, 197) 5
*
*
Gray County Yes 60.4 (46.8, 76.9) 75 (7, 190) 14 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.6, 0.1)
Jefferson County Yes 60.1 (55.9, 64.4) 76 (41, 122) 164 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -1.0)
Caldwell County Yes 60.1 (49.7, 72.0) 77 (15, 178) 25 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.3, -0.7)
Wheeler County Yes 59.9 (36.5, 95.0) 78 (1, 198) 4
*
*
Wilbarger County Yes 59.8 (42.4, 82.5) 79 (3, 197) 8 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.8, 0.3)
Falls County Yes 59.8 (44.9, 78.5) 80 (6, 195) 11 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.3, -0.7)
McCulloch County Yes 59.7 (38.6, 89.5) 81 (1, 197) 6 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.7, 0.9)
Young County Yes 59.5 (45.2, 77.3) 82 (6, 193) 13 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.1, 0.6)
Kaufman County Yes 59.3 (53.2, 65.9) 83 (29, 148) 72 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.9, -1.5)
Wood County Yes 59.2 (49.4, 70.6) 84 (15, 174) 30 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.6, -0.2)
Freestone County Yes 59.1 (45.2, 76.4) 85 (7, 193) 13 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.4, 0.1)
Bosque County Yes 59.1 (44.5, 77.6) 86 (7, 194) 13 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.2, 0.7)
Grayson County Yes 59.0 (53.2, 65.3) 87 (34, 140) 83 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.2, -1.1)
Red River County Yes 59.0 (41.7, 81.9) 88 (5, 197) 9 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.3, 1.1)
Gonzales County Yes 58.9 (44.9, 76.3) 89 (8, 194) 13 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.8, 0.2)
Ector County Yes 58.8 (53.1, 64.9) 90 (36, 147) 81 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.7)
Hill County Yes 58.8 (47.8, 71.7) 91 (13, 184) 22 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.6, -0.1)
Nolan County Yes 58.7 (42.4, 79.7) 92 (5, 197) 9 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.3, 0.5)
Gaines County Yes 58.7 (43.4, 77.5) 93 (7, 195) 10 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.3, -0.3)
Houston County Yes 58.5 (45.9, 74.0) 94 (12, 188) 16 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.8, -1.4)
McLennan County Yes 58.5 (54.1, 63.2) 95 (42, 135) 137 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.9)
Harrison County Yes 57.9 (50.2, 66.5) 96 (26, 164) 44 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.3, -0.9)
Angelina County Yes 57.7 (50.8, 65.3) 97 (29, 164) 53 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.6, -1.2)
Robertson County Yes 57.4 (42.0, 76.9) 98 (6, 196) 10 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.0)
Johnson County Yes 57.3 (52.3, 62.8) 99 (46, 145) 99 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.9)
Colorado County Yes 57.3 (44.1, 73.7) 100 (10, 193) 15 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -0.6)
Atascosa County Yes 57.1 (47.9, 67.7) 101 (21, 181) 28 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.1, 0.3)
Potter County Yes 57.0 (51.0, 63.5) 102 (41, 158) 68 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.5, -1.6)
Hale County Yes 56.9 (45.7, 70.0) 103 (14, 191) 19 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.2, 1.5)
Childress County Yes 56.5 (32.2, 92.1) 104 (1, 198) 3 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.3, 2.5)
Runnels County Yes 56.4 (38.4, 81.0) 105 (4, 197) 7 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.2, 0.1)
Bailey County Yes 55.6 (31.8, 90.0) 106 (2, 198) 3
*
*
Jim Wells County Yes 55.4 (45.0, 67.5) 107 (23, 188) 21 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.2)
Waller County Yes 55.1 (45.5, 66.2) 108 (22, 185) 24 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.7, -0.8)
Burnet County Yes 55.0 (46.0, 65.6) 109 (22, 185) 30 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.9, -0.7)
Victoria County Yes 55.0 (48.1, 62.6) 110 (40, 178) 50 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.5)
Ellis County Yes 54.8 (49.9, 60.1) 111 (58, 163) 95 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.7, -1.6)
Shelby County Yes 54.7 (42.7, 69.3) 112 (15, 192) 15 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.2, -1.7)
Washington County Yes 54.7 (44.5, 66.7) 113 (23, 189) 23 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.2, -0.9)
Howard County Yes 54.5 (44.3, 66.4) 114 (23, 188) 21 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.9, -1.0)
Comanche County Yes 54.2 (38.8, 74.8) 115 (7, 197) 9 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.7, 0.9)
Starr County Yes 54.2 (45.4, 64.2) 116 (30, 185) 27 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.7, 1.8)
Brazoria County Yes 54.1 (50.7, 57.7) 117 (76, 153) 192 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.3, -1.3)
Parker County Yes 54.0 (48.6, 59.8) 118 (55, 166) 79 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.5, -1.3)
Chambers County Yes 53.9 (44.2, 65.2) 119 (30, 190) 22 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.7, -1.4)
Lampasas County Yes 53.8 (40.7, 70.2) 120 (12, 196) 12 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.9, -1.2)
Lubbock County Yes 53.8 (49.9, 58.0) 121 (72, 156) 145 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.8)
Kerr County Yes 53.7 (45.1, 63.7) 122 (34, 185) 32 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -0.6)
Swisher County Yes 53.5 (33.4, 82.5) 123 (5, 198) 4 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.1, 1.9)
Hutchinson County Yes 53.4 (40.2, 69.7) 124 (15, 197) 12 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.6)
Castro County Yes 53.2 (32.5, 82.7) 125 (2, 198) 4 stable stable trend -6.1 (-27.9, 22.3)
Ochiltree County Yes 53.1 (34.4, 78.4) 126 (4, 198) 5 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.7, -0.5)
Bell County Yes 53.0 (49.3, 56.9) 127 (74, 158) 154 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.2, -1.4)
Wharton County Yes 52.9 (43.3, 64.1) 128 (31, 192) 23 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.5, -0.3)
Reeves County Yes 52.7 (36.4, 73.8) 129 (9, 197) 7 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.3, 0.0)
Lee County Yes 52.7 (38.6, 70.6) 130 (11, 197) 10 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.0, -1.0)
Bee County Yes 52.4 (41.7, 65.1) 131 (20, 194) 17 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.2, -1.0)
Cooke County Yes 52.2 (43.0, 63.0) 132 (38, 191) 25 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.1, -1.3)
Van Zandt County Yes 52.0 (43.9, 61.4) 133 (43, 188) 32 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.6)
Cherokee County Yes 52.0 (43.4, 61.9) 134 (37, 190) 28 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.1, -1.6)
Nacogdoches County Yes 52.0 (43.8, 61.2) 135 (41, 188) 32 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -0.7)
Nueces County Yes 51.7 (48.3, 55.1) 136 (86, 162) 191 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.1, -1.3)
Llano County Yes 51.6 (37.6, 69.9) 137 (12, 197) 13 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.2, 0.8)
Jack County Yes 51.3 (32.9, 77.1) 138 (6, 198) 5 falling falling trend -2.1 (-4.1, -0.1)
Bastrop County Yes 51.1 (44.7, 58.3) 139 (62, 185) 49 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.1, -1.1)
Guadalupe County Yes 51.0 (46.0, 56.4) 140 (78, 176) 79 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.8, 2.7)
Karnes County Yes 50.9 (35.5, 70.9) 141 (9, 197) 7 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.8, 0.7)
Erath County Yes 50.7 (40.6, 62.6) 142 (32, 196) 18 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.3, 0.0)
Uvalde County Yes 50.7 (38.7, 65.4) 143 (22, 197) 13 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.2, -0.9)
Austin County Yes 50.3 (39.6, 63.1) 144 (26, 196) 17 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.1, -1.1)
Midland County Yes 50.0 (45.0, 55.4) 145 (83, 179) 77 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.3, -1.0)
Dallas County Yes 49.6 (48.4, 50.9) 146 (119, 158) 1,215 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.3, -2.0)
Yoakum County Yes 49.5 (28.7, 79.1) 147 (2, 198) 4
*
*
Zapata County Yes 49.5 (33.0, 71.1) 148 (10, 198) 6
*
*
Jones County Yes 48.9 (36.4, 64.7) 149 (23, 197) 10 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.0, -0.2)
Terry County Yes 48.8 (32.0, 71.3) 150 (10, 198) 6 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.1, -0.6)
Winkler County Yes 48.8 (28.7, 77.7) 151 (6, 198) 4 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.3, 0.2)
Rusk County Yes 48.7 (40.9, 57.7) 152 (51, 193) 29 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.1, -1.3)
Calhoun County Yes 48.5 (36.7, 63.3) 153 (30, 197) 12 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.2, -0.3)
Hood County Yes 48.4 (40.6, 57.4) 154 (61, 193) 32 falling falling trend -2.9 (-3.8, -2.0)
Harris County Yes 48.3 (47.4, 49.2) 155 (129, 163) 2,096 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.4, -2.1)
Bexar County Yes 48.3 (46.8, 49.8) 156 (127, 166) 860 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.4)
Titus County Yes 48.2 (37.7, 60.7) 157 (41, 197) 15 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.0, -1.0)
Lavaca County Yes 47.8 (35.3, 63.8) 158 (25, 197) 11 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.9, 0.5)
Andrews County Yes 47.8 (33.7, 65.9) 159 (14, 197) 8 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.5, -0.9)
Walker County Yes 47.8 (40.7, 55.8) 160 (70, 194) 34 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.4)
Tarrant County Yes 47.7 (46.3, 49.1) 161 (132, 169) 945 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.1, -1.7)
Wilson County Yes 47.7 (39.8, 56.9) 162 (60, 195) 27 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.9, -0.8)
Burleson County Yes 47.7 (35.7, 63.2) 163 (21, 197) 12 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.9, -1.1)
Maverick County Yes 47.4 (39.0, 56.9) 164 (55, 196) 23 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.7)
Frio County Yes 47.1 (33.0, 65.1) 165 (18, 197) 7 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.6, 1.0)
Gillespie County Yes 46.8 (35.5, 61.0) 166 (33, 197) 15 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.9, -0.9)
Montgomery County Yes 46.7 (44.2, 49.3) 167 (127, 179) 271 falling falling trend -2.4 (-2.9, -2.0)
Cameron County Yes 46.1 (43.0, 49.4) 168 (125, 184) 163 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.3)
Stephens County Yes 46.1 (29.6, 69.8) 169 (9, 198) 5 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.8, 0.2)
Madison County Yes 46.0 (30.8, 66.4) 170 (19, 198) 6 falling falling trend -2.1 (-4.0, -0.3)
Willacy County Yes 45.4 (32.6, 61.4) 171 (25, 198) 9 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.8, 1.8)
Medina County Yes 45.2 (37.1, 54.5) 172 (74, 197) 24 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.3)
El Paso County Yes 45.1 (42.9, 47.3) 173 (138, 183) 340 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 0.8)
Moore County Yes 45.0 (32.7, 60.5) 174 (37, 198) 9 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.8, -0.9)
Tom Green County Yes 44.8 (39.4, 50.9) 175 (103, 194) 52 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.8)
Bandera County Yes 44.8 (32.4, 61.0) 176 (32, 198) 12 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.4, -0.1)
Comal County Yes 44.8 (39.9, 50.2) 177 (108, 192) 68 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.4, -1.0)
Smith County Yes 44.8 (40.9, 49.0) 178 (120, 189) 102 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.0, -1.9)
Webb County Yes 44.3 (40.4, 48.5) 179 (127, 190) 94 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.3)
Val Verde County Yes 43.7 (35.0, 53.8) 180 (80, 197) 18 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.8, -0.3)
Rockwall County Yes 43.4 (37.7, 49.9) 181 (99, 197) 42 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.6, -1.8)
Deaf Smith County Yes 42.9 (29.6, 59.9) 182 (28, 198) 7 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.1, 1.1)
Hays County Yes 42.7 (38.4, 47.3) 183 (134, 194) 76 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -0.9)
Fayette County Yes 42.5 (32.3, 55.6) 184 (59, 197) 14 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.6, -1.2)
Archer County Yes 42.5 (25.6, 67.5) 185 (13, 198) 4 falling falling trend -2.9 (-5.1, -0.7)
Randall County Yes 42.3 (37.4, 47.8) 186 (129, 196) 56 falling falling trend -4.9 (-8.3, -1.4)
Hidalgo County Yes 42.2 (40.0, 44.5) 187 (156, 190) 274 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.5)
Live Oak County Yes 42.0 (27.9, 61.7) 188 (29, 198) 6 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.2, 0.6)
Brazos County Yes 41.8 (37.3, 46.6) 189 (133, 196) 65 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.0, -1.6)
Parmer County Yes 41.6 (24.6, 65.9) 190 (17, 198) 4
*
*
Kendall County Yes 39.3 (31.1, 49.2) 191 (99, 198) 18 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.8, -1.5)
Williamson County Yes 39.1 (36.6, 41.6) 192 (169, 195) 191 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.1, 0.9)
Brewster County Yes 37.4 (23.1, 59.2) 193 (35, 198) 5 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.7, -0.9)
Fort Bend County Yes 37.2 (35.3, 39.2) 194 (176, 197) 279 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.6, -1.7)
Travis County Yes 36.6 (35.0, 38.2) 195 (180, 197) 413 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.0, -2.4)
Denton County Yes 36.6 (34.7, 38.5) 196 (180, 197) 284 falling falling trend -2.5 (-2.9, -2.1)
Collin County Yes 34.6 (32.9, 36.4) 197 (185, 197) 321 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.6, -1.9)
Pecos County Yes 19.4 (11.0, 31.9) 198 (189, 198) 3 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.7, -0.7)
Armstrong County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Baylor County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Borden County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Briscoe County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cochran County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coke County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Collingsworth County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Concho County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cottle County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crane County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crockett County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Culberson County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dallam County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dickens County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Edwards County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fisher County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Floyd County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Foard County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glasscock County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hall County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hansford County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardeman County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hartley County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hemphill County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hudspeth County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Irion County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jeff Davis County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jim Hogg County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kenedy County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kent County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
King County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kinney County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Knox County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
La Salle County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lipscomb County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Loving County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lynn County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Martin County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mason County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McMullen County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menard County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mills County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Motley County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oldham County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Presidio County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Reagan County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roberts County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schleicher County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shackelford County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sherman County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sterling County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stonewall County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sutton County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Terrell County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Throckmorton County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Upton County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 08/12/2020 11:06 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2017 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top