Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Texas by County

All Cancer Sites, 2013-2017

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 161.4?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Texas Yes 127.8 (126.9, 128.6) N/A 18,276 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.6, -1.5)
United States Yes 135.7 (135.4, 135.9) N/A 281,450 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.5, -1.4)
Motley County No 254.9 (145.8, 467.5) 1 (1, 216) 3
*
*
Knox County No 215.8 (143.0, 316.9) 2 (1, 209) 6
*
*
Hamilton County No 201.5 (154.6, 260.9) 3 (1, 159) 15 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.3, 1.6)
Wheeler County No 191.0 (135.0, 265.5) 4 (1, 212) 8 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.8, 1.1)
Callahan County No 190.7 (154.0, 234.6) 5 (1, 149) 20 rising rising trend 1.6 (0.6, 2.6)
Baylor County No 185.9 (118.3, 283.9) 6 (1, 218) 6 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.8, 2.7)
Kinney County No 184.7 (113.9, 290.4) 7 (1, 219) 5 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.2, 3.4)
Clay County No 183.8 (144.8, 232.3) 8 (1, 170) 16 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.2, 2.4)
Sherman County No 183.3 (103.5, 303.2) 9 (1, 220) 3
*
*
Montague County No 181.1 (151.1, 216.2) 10 (1, 131) 28 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.8)
Mitchell County No 180.7 (128.9, 247.7) 11 (1, 212) 9 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.5, 0.7)
Crosby County No 180.6 (122.6, 257.6) 12 (1, 215) 7 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.3, 1.3)
McCulloch County No 179.7 (134.9, 237.0) 13 (1, 194) 12 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.4, 2.0)
Runnels County No 178.5 (139.8, 226.6) 14 (1, 188) 15 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.6, 1.9)
Polk County No 176.1 (154.6, 200.1) 15 (2, 99) 54 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.8)
Delta County No 176.0 (119.5, 253.2) 16 (1, 218) 7 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.8, 2.1)
Trinity County No 174.9 (142.4, 214.2) 17 (1, 180) 23 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.7, 1.5)
Hutchinson County No 173.4 (142.7, 209.0) 18 (1, 156) 23 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.9, 0.6)
Upton County No 172.5 (98.8, 280.9) 19 (1, 221) 3 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.0, 1.0)
Sabine County No 171.4 (133.9, 218.9) 20 (1, 192) 18 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.7, 1.0)
Orange County No 170.4 (155.1, 187.0) 21 (6, 85) 93 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
Wilbarger County No 169.7 (133.0, 214.3) 22 (2, 195) 16 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.0, 1.5)
Real County No 169.4 (110.3, 261.5) 23 (1, 218) 6
*
*
Floyd County No 168.5 (115.3, 239.9) 24 (1, 218) 7 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.7, 2.1)
Ward County No 165.7 (124.8, 216.4) 25 (1, 206) 11 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.3, 0.3)
Crane County No 165.3 (99.7, 257.7) 26 (1, 220) 4
*
*
Eastland County No 164.3 (135.9, 197.9) 27 (3, 180) 26 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.9, 0.5)
Gray County No 164.0 (134.5, 198.3) 28 (2, 184) 23 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.4)
Leon County No 163.2 (132.0, 200.5) 29 (3, 194) 22 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.5)
Wichita County No 162.4 (149.9, 175.7) 30 (11, 95) 132 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
Liberty County Yes 160.8 (144.1, 178.8) 31 (9, 126) 71 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.8)
Coleman County Yes 159.8 (118.7, 213.3) 32 (2, 214) 11 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.4, 1.6)
Wharton County Yes 158.4 (137.7, 181.4) 33 (7, 148) 45 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.3)
Milam County Yes 158.1 (133.6, 186.4) 34 (5, 186) 31 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.9, 0.7)
Hunt County Yes 157.9 (143.4, 173.5) 35 (12, 127) 91 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.4)
Kleberg County Yes 157.8 (131.1, 188.4) 36 (3, 184) 26 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.7)
Aransas County Yes 156.5 (133.4, 183.5) 37 (5, 175) 36 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.1)
San Patricio County Yes 156.5 (139.1, 175.5) 38 (10, 145) 60 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Moore County Yes 156.2 (122.8, 195.8) 39 (3, 205) 15 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.8)
Morris County Yes 154.9 (121.6, 195.9) 40 (3, 204) 16 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.6)
Marion County Yes 154.6 (118.4, 200.7) 41 (2, 212) 14 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.1, 0.6)
Shelby County Yes 154.5 (128.8, 184.2) 42 (5, 198) 26 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.1)
Bee County Yes 154.4 (127.8, 185.2) 43 (5, 197) 24 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.2)
Johnson County Yes 154.3 (143.0, 166.4) 44 (17, 124) 142 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.2)
Potter County Yes 153.6 (140.1, 168.0) 45 (14, 129) 99 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.5)
Matagorda County Yes 152.9 (131.1, 177.6) 46 (8, 176) 37 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.4)
Parker County Yes 152.5 (140.1, 165.8) 47 (18, 135) 116 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.2, -0.1)
Jim Hogg County Yes 152.4 (94.6, 233.2) 48 (1, 221) 5 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.9, 1.3)
Bailey County Yes 152.3 (100.9, 220.9) 49 (1, 220) 6 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.5, 1.8)
Hale County Yes 151.9 (127.7, 179.5) 50 (7, 186) 29 rising rising trend 0.8 (0.1, 1.6)
Hall County Yes 151.1 (86.6, 251.6) 51 (1, 221) 4 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.8, 3.3)
San Augustine County Yes 151.0 (111.7, 202.4) 52 (2, 215) 12 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.7)
San Jacinto County Yes 151.0 (126.7, 179.1) 53 (8, 199) 30 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.7)
Lamar County Yes 151.0 (133.4, 170.5) 54 (13, 163) 56 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.2)
Lampasas County Yes 150.5 (123.1, 182.9) 55 (5, 206) 22 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.8, 0.8)
Chambers County Yes 150.0 (125.7, 177.7) 56 (6, 194) 28 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.6, -0.1)
Bowie County Yes 149.6 (136.0, 164.4) 57 (20, 147) 93 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
Bosque County Yes 149.4 (122.1, 182.0) 58 (5, 200) 24 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.4)
Blanco County Yes 149.1 (111.0, 197.9) 59 (2, 214) 13 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.7, 2.6)
Hopkins County Yes 148.9 (128.0, 172.5) 60 (10, 184) 38 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.1)
Caldwell County Yes 148.8 (127.3, 173.1) 61 (11, 186) 35 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.4)
Gregg County Yes 148.6 (136.6, 161.5) 62 (23, 151) 118 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
Haskell County Yes 148.0 (100.2, 215.3) 63 (1, 219) 7 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.2, 2.0)
Galveston County Yes 147.8 (140.0, 156.0) 64 (37, 122) 276 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -1.0)
Panola County Yes 147.6 (122.2, 177.1) 65 (8, 204) 25 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.2)
Howard County Yes 147.5 (123.1, 175.4) 66 (9, 200) 27 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
Kaufman County Yes 147.1 (133.5, 161.7) 67 (22, 149) 89 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
Coryell County Yes 147.0 (128.7, 167.2) 68 (14, 181) 47 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.3)
Colorado County Yes 147.0 (121.2, 177.5) 69 (8, 197) 25 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.1)
Concho County Yes 146.6 (85.2, 251.7) 70 (1, 221) 3
*
*
Harrison County Yes 146.5 (130.6, 164.0) 71 (18, 168) 64 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.1)
Henderson County Yes 146.5 (132.9, 161.3) 72 (23, 154) 93 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.3)
Uvalde County Yes 146.3 (121.4, 175.0) 73 (8, 201) 26 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.2)
Ector County Yes 145.9 (133.4, 159.3) 74 (24, 155) 103 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Wise County Yes 145.8 (128.7, 164.6) 75 (14, 176) 55 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.6)
DeWitt County Yes 145.6 (118.2, 178.3) 76 (6, 208) 22 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.8)
Freestone County Yes 145.5 (117.5, 178.9) 77 (7, 208) 21 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.2, 0.9)
Rains County Yes 145.4 (112.0, 187.9) 78 (4, 214) 14 falling falling trend -3.6 (-6.5, -0.6)
Grimes County Yes 145.3 (119.8, 175.0) 79 (7, 204) 24 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.8)
Ochiltree County Yes 144.1 (99.2, 201.8) 80 (2, 220) 7 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.8, 1.4)
Grayson County Yes 143.6 (132.4, 155.6) 81 (33, 155) 128 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.3)
Dawson County Yes 143.5 (108.1, 187.7) 82 (4, 216) 12 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.6)
Hemphill County Yes 143.3 (81.4, 235.0) 83 (1, 221) 3
*
*
Gonzales County Yes 143.2 (115.5, 176.1) 84 (8, 210) 19 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.3, 3.7)
Cass County Yes 143.1 (121.8, 167.5) 85 (12, 200) 35 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.0)
Bastrop County Yes 142.9 (127.5, 159.7) 86 (20, 175) 66 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.3)
Victoria County Yes 142.8 (128.9, 157.8) 87 (27, 173) 81 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.1)
Camp County Yes 142.2 (108.1, 184.5) 88 (4, 216) 12 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.8, -0.7)
Navarro County Yes 141.9 (123.8, 162.0) 89 (16, 194) 46 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.3)
Dallam County Yes 141.5 (88.5, 213.9) 90 (1, 221) 5 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.8, -0.1)
Brazoria County Yes 141.5 (133.5, 149.9) 91 (46, 145) 240 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.8)
Bell County Yes 141.5 (133.0, 150.3) 92 (43, 147) 216 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.5, -0.8)
Taylor County Yes 141.5 (129.9, 153.8) 93 (35, 158) 117 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.2)
Jack County Yes 141.4 (99.7, 196.5) 94 (3, 219) 8 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.7, 1.1)
Scurry County Yes 141.2 (109.9, 179.3) 95 (6, 215) 15 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.4, 1.2)
Upshur County Yes 141.2 (122.1, 162.7) 96 (17, 196) 41 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.2)
Jefferson County Yes 140.8 (132.4, 149.6) 97 (49, 147) 219 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.0)
Zavala County Yes 140.5 (102.1, 188.7) 98 (2, 218) 9 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.4, 1.8)
Limestone County Yes 140.4 (115.5, 169.6) 99 (10, 209) 24 falling falling trend -5.1 (-9.0, -1.1)
Calhoun County Yes 139.8 (113.1, 171.2) 100 (10, 212) 20 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.2)
Fannin County Yes 139.7 (118.8, 163.7) 101 (17, 202) 34 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
Refugio County Yes 139.6 (98.5, 194.5) 102 (3, 219) 8 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.7, 1.0)
Brown County Yes 139.6 (120.1, 161.6) 103 (21, 199) 39 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.3)
Andrews County Yes 139.4 (105.4, 180.9) 104 (5, 217) 11 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.6)
Tyler County Yes 139.4 (114.0, 169.8) 105 (13, 211) 23 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -0.7)
Falls County Yes 139.3 (111.2, 173.0) 106 (9, 213) 17 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.6)
Stephens County Yes 139.0 (102.5, 186.8) 107 (4, 218) 10 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.5)
Nolan County Yes 138.3 (107.7, 175.7) 108 (9, 215) 15 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.0, 0.4)
Hockley County Yes 138.2 (110.8, 170.4) 109 (9, 214) 18 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.5)
Jasper County Yes 138.1 (117.9, 161.2) 110 (19, 204) 35 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.7)
Angelina County Yes 137.8 (124.2, 152.7) 111 (33, 180) 77 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.3)
Palo Pinto County Yes 137.8 (115.3, 163.9) 112 (15, 211) 28 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -0.7)
Mason County Yes 137.7 (88.6, 213.6) 113 (1, 220) 6 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.2, 0.2)
Ellis County Yes 137.3 (126.4, 149.0) 114 (44, 169) 120 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.8)
Donley County Yes 136.2 (76.6, 230.2) 115 (1, 221) 4 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.2, 1.9)
Guadalupe County Yes 135.8 (124.8, 147.6) 116 (47, 173) 114 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.2, 1.1)
Garza County Yes 135.5 (82.3, 213.0) 117 (1, 221) 4
*
*
Young County Yes 135.4 (108.7, 167.5) 118 (12, 214) 19 falling falling trend -5.5 (-9.0, -1.9)
Frio County Yes 135.3 (102.6, 175.3) 119 (8, 217) 12 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.5, 1.7)
Midland County Yes 135.0 (123.6, 147.2) 120 (47, 177) 107 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.2)
Carson County Yes 134.6 (87.9, 199.7) 121 (2, 221) 6 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.8, 1.0)
Jackson County Yes 134.6 (103.0, 173.4) 122 (8, 217) 13 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.3, 1.7)
Karnes County Yes 134.3 (100.6, 176.4) 123 (5, 217) 12 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.0, 0.6)
Houston County Yes 134.2 (110.0, 163.0) 124 (13, 213) 25 falling falling trend -3.5 (-6.5, -0.4)
Dallas County Yes 134.1 (131.2, 137.2) 125 (93, 142) 1,625 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.9, -1.4)
Castro County Yes 134.1 (90.9, 191.9) 126 (3, 220) 6 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.1, 0.3)
Montgomery County Yes 134.1 (128.0, 140.3) 127 (77, 158) 383 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.6, -1.5)
Hill County Yes 133.8 (114.0, 156.4) 128 (23, 208) 36 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.0)
Fayette County Yes 133.6 (111.7, 159.4) 129 (17, 209) 30 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.1, 0.5)
Red River County Yes 133.3 (104.6, 169.5) 130 (11, 217) 16 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.3, 0.1)
Robertson County Yes 133.1 (104.8, 167.5) 131 (8, 217) 16 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.4, -0.3)
Deaf Smith County Yes 132.6 (101.7, 170.0) 132 (8, 217) 13 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.7, 1.6)
Waller County Yes 132.4 (111.9, 155.6) 133 (23, 211) 31 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.9)
Rusk County Yes 132.4 (115.2, 151.7) 134 (33, 201) 45 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
Lee County Yes 132.3 (103.9, 166.7) 135 (10, 216) 16 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.1)
Tarrant County Yes 132.2 (128.9, 135.5) 136 (100, 151) 1,284 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.2)
Newton County Yes 132.0 (98.8, 173.5) 137 (7, 218) 12 stable stable trend -14.4 (-33.0, 9.4)
Comal County Yes 131.8 (120.9, 143.3) 138 (61, 185) 115 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
Hartley County Yes 131.6 (79.8, 207.3) 139 (1, 221) 4 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.8, 1.4)
Tom Green County Yes 131.6 (119.9, 144.1) 140 (55, 185) 97 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.6)
Llano County Yes 131.4 (110.5, 157.1) 141 (25, 211) 34 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.6)
Somervell County Yes 131.2 (91.7, 183.4) 142 (5, 220) 8 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.9, -0.5)
McLennan County Yes 130.5 (122.2, 139.3) 143 (79, 176) 193 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.9, -1.5)
Jones County Yes 129.4 (100.2, 165.5) 144 (13, 217) 14 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.8)
Rockwall County Yes 129.3 (114.9, 145.1) 145 (54, 199) 60 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.3)
Winkler County Yes 128.3 (82.7, 190.2) 146 (3, 221) 5 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.6, 1.1)
Bexar County Yes 128.2 (125.0, 131.5) 147 (114, 162) 1,260 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.3, -1.0)
Harris County Yes 127.8 (125.6, 130.1) 148 (118, 162) 2,604 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.1, -1.6)
Maverick County Yes 127.8 (109.6, 148.1) 149 (35, 210) 36 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.9, 0.9)
Walker County Yes 127.7 (110.5, 146.8) 150 (41, 209) 42 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.7)
Hardeman County Yes 127.5 (77.9, 203.6) 151 (1, 221) 4 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.9, 1.0)
Hardin County Yes 127.4 (111.3, 145.4) 152 (38, 209) 46 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.3)
Nacogdoches County Yes 127.4 (111.4, 145.1) 153 (47, 207) 48 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.0)
Lavaca County Yes 126.3 (102.4, 155.1) 154 (22, 216) 23 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 1.0)
Kimble County Yes 126.1 (79.4, 197.9) 155 (2, 221) 6 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.7, 0.5)
Childress County Yes 125.2 (81.0, 187.8) 156 (3, 221) 6 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.8, 1.8)
Archer County Yes 125.0 (88.8, 173.1) 157 (6, 220) 8
*
*
Lubbock County Yes 124.9 (117.1, 133.0) 158 (99, 188) 197 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.5)
Gaines County Yes 124.8 (92.2, 164.7) 159 (9, 220) 10 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.4, 0.8)
Lamb County Yes 124.6 (92.8, 164.3) 160 (12, 219) 11 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 0.9)
Terry County Yes 124.4 (89.7, 168.4) 161 (7, 220) 9 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.9, 1.2)
Duval County Yes 123.8 (90.0, 167.1) 162 (9, 219) 10 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.0, 0.1)
Fisher County Yes 123.8 (77.9, 196.1) 163 (3, 221) 5 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.2, 0.8)
Randall County Yes 123.6 (112.7, 135.4) 164 (84, 202) 97 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.4)
Burnet County Yes 123.5 (107.3, 141.8) 165 (58, 211) 45 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
Jim Wells County Yes 123.3 (104.3, 145.0) 166 (39, 213) 31 stable stable trend -1.0 (-1.9, 0.0)
Washington County Yes 123.3 (104.8, 144.6) 167 (46, 214) 36 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.1)
Atascosa County Yes 121.8 (103.9, 142.1) 168 (46, 214) 34 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.5)
Cooke County Yes 121.3 (103.2, 141.8) 169 (49, 214) 34 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.3)
Coke County Yes 121.1 (73.3, 201.9) 170 (3, 221) 4
*
*
Bandera County Yes 120.7 (97.3, 149.2) 171 (30, 217) 22 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.6, -0.2)
Van Zandt County Yes 120.4 (105.6, 137.0) 172 (68, 212) 51 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.0)
Hansford County Yes 120.3 (73.6, 187.5) 173 (3, 221) 4 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.8, 0.4)
Nueces County Yes 119.9 (113.3, 126.8) 174 (124, 195) 255 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.0, -1.5)
Burleson County Yes 119.8 (95.4, 149.6) 175 (31, 217) 18 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.4)
Brazos County Yes 119.8 (109.2, 131.0) 176 (103, 208) 97 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.8)
Franklin County Yes 119.7 (87.9, 161.0) 177 (11, 220) 10 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.7, 0.2)
Anderson County Yes 119.6 (102.7, 138.7) 178 (60, 214) 38 falling falling trend -4.2 (-5.7, -2.5)
Hood County Yes 119.4 (105.5, 135.1) 179 (74, 212) 59 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.0, -1.3)
Hays County Yes 119.3 (108.9, 130.4) 180 (102, 207) 102 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
Reeves County Yes 119.2 (85.5, 162.5) 181 (12, 220) 9 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.4)
Kerr County Yes 118.2 (105.1, 133.0) 182 (83, 211) 64 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.5)
Erath County Yes 117.9 (98.5, 140.1) 183 (44, 216) 27 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.2)
Denton County Yes 117.7 (112.3, 123.3) 184 (138, 196) 386 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.1, -1.5)
Shackelford County Yes 117.3 (68.1, 197.1) 185 (3, 221) 3
*
*
Dimmit County Yes 115.1 (80.1, 160.6) 186 (12, 221) 7 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.6, 0.9)
Gillespie County Yes 115.0 (96.3, 137.2) 187 (53, 216) 33 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.4)
Medina County Yes 114.8 (97.9, 134.0) 188 (76, 216) 35 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.3)
El Paso County Yes 114.7 (110.2, 119.3) 189 (150, 201) 505 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.6, -1.1)
Webb County Yes 114.6 (105.8, 123.9) 190 (125, 209) 129 stable stable trend -2.5 (-6.4, 1.5)
Kendall County Yes 114.1 (97.2, 133.5) 191 (79, 216) 35 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.3, -1.3)
Madison County Yes 113.7 (82.0, 154.4) 192 (13, 221) 9 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.9, -0.3)
Wood County Yes 113.5 (98.0, 131.4) 193 (83, 216) 45 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.5)
Brooks County Yes 113.4 (73.5, 169.0) 194 (8, 221) 5 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.1, 1.3)
Goliad County Yes 113.2 (76.9, 163.6) 195 (10, 221) 7 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.1, 0.4)
Titus County Yes 113.1 (92.1, 137.6) 196 (54, 218) 21 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.2, -0.5)
San Saba County Yes 113.1 (70.0, 177.0) 197 (5, 221) 5 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.8, 2.3)
Austin County Yes 112.4 (92.3, 136.1) 198 (61, 219) 23 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.4, -0.3)
Williamson County Yes 112.4 (106.4, 118.6) 199 (151, 207) 279 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.0, -1.3)
Willacy County Yes 110.9 (85.4, 142.0) 200 (17, 220) 13 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.3, 0.5)
Brewster County Yes 110.7 (78.2, 154.5) 201 (13, 221) 8 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.2)
Travis County Yes 109.9 (105.6, 114.3) 202 (167, 207) 532 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.1, -1.5)
Wilson County Yes 108.7 (91.9, 127.8) 203 (93, 218) 31 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.7)
Fort Bend County Yes 108.6 (103.3, 114.1) 204 (165, 210) 343 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.2)
Val Verde County Yes 107.9 (91.2, 126.9) 205 (96, 218) 30 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.8, -0.8)
Cameron County Yes 107.8 (101.8, 114.1) 206 (166, 212) 244 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.3)
Smith County Yes 107.1 (99.6, 115.1) 207 (155, 213) 157 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.5, -1.3)
Collin County Yes 107.0 (102.5, 111.7) 208 (174, 211) 446 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.2, -1.6)
Cherokee County Yes 106.2 (90.9, 123.5) 209 (118, 217) 36 stable stable trend 6.7 (-13.1, 30.9)
Live Oak County Yes 106.0 (78.4, 142.3) 210 (37, 221) 10 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.6, 0.6)
Comanche County Yes 104.6 (78.6, 137.9) 211 (41, 221) 12 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.1, 0.6)
Lynn County Yes 102.0 (62.7, 160.1) 212 (6, 221) 4 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.8, 0.2)
Mills County Yes 100.1 (57.2, 167.5) 213 (8, 221) 4 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.0, 2.2)
Starr County Yes 99.9 (84.5, 117.2) 214 (137, 220) 30 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.3, 0.9)
Hidalgo County Yes 95.7 (91.4, 100.2) 215 (198, 218) 367 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.8)
Swisher County Yes 94.0 (60.6, 141.9) 216 (41, 221) 5 falling falling trend -5.9 (-9.5, -2.0)
Yoakum County Yes 91.1 (53.3, 144.6) 217 (18, 221) 4 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.2, 0.0)
Parmer County Yes 82.5 (51.7, 125.7) 218 (57, 221) 5
*
*
Zapata County Yes 69.1 (43.1, 104.4) 219 (126, 221) 4 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.3, 1.3)
Presidio County Yes 68.1 (39.6, 111.8) 220 (91, 221) 4 falling falling trend -4.1 (-6.6, -1.6)
Pecos County Yes 66.0 (43.1, 97.3) 221 (170, 221) 5 falling falling trend -5.4 (-8.1, -2.6)
Armstrong County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Borden County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Briscoe County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cochran County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Collingsworth County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cottle County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crockett County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Culberson County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dickens County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Edwards County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Foard County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glasscock County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hudspeth County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Irion County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jeff Davis County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kenedy County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kent County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
King County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
La Salle County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lipscomb County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Loving County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Martin County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McMullen County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menard County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oldham County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Reagan County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roberts County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schleicher County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sterling County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stonewall County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sutton County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Terrell County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Throckmorton County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 08/07/2020 5:41 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2017 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top