Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Texas by County

All Cancer Sites, 2015-2019

White (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Texas *** 146.7 (146.0, 147.4) N/A 34,314 falling falling trend -1.7 (-1.9, -1.4)
United States *** 153.4 (153.2, 153.6) N/A 505,697 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.2, -1.7)
Presidio County *** 70.0 (48.7, 99.1) 243 (231, 243) 8 falling falling trend -3.7 (-5.2, -2.2)
Hudspeth County *** 78.4 (46.5, 125.0) 242 (148, 243) 4
*
*
Jeff Davis County *** 82.9 (50.3, 164.8) 241 (45, 243) 4 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.4, 1.4)
Collingsworth County *** 104.7 (61.9, 168.7) 240 (23, 243) 4 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.5, 0.4)
Zapata County *** 110.5 (86.5, 139.1) 239 (131, 243) 15 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.3, 0.7)
Hidalgo County *** 115.5 (112.0, 119.0) 238 (221, 239) 831 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.2, -0.8)
Carson County *** 117.8 (87.2, 157.3) 237 (54, 243) 10 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.1, -0.8)
Menard County *** 118.6 (74.3, 190.9) 236 (8, 243) 5 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.0, -0.6)
Brewster County *** 120.0 (95.0, 150.8) 235 (89, 242) 17 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.4)
Travis County *** 122.6 (119.1, 126.2) 234 (211, 235) 1,000 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.1, -1.7)
Ochiltree County *** 122.6 (91.3, 161.0) 233 (46, 243) 11 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.7, -0.6)
Cameron County *** 122.7 (118.0, 127.6) 232 (207, 236) 510 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.2, -0.8)
Pecos County *** 122.7 (99.2, 150.3) 231 (93, 242) 19 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.8, -1.6)
Brazos County *** 124.4 (116.1, 133.2) 230 (188, 237) 170 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.1, -1.4)
Fort Bend County *** 124.7 (119.7, 129.9) 229 (202, 234) 494 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.0, -1.9)
Reeves County *** 124.8 (99.8, 154.2) 228 (66, 242) 17 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.6, -0.8)
Live Oak County *** 125.0 (102.1, 152.2) 227 (82, 241) 22 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.5, -0.7)
Fayette County *** 125.5 (110.6, 142.4) 226 (144, 240) 55 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -0.8)
Kendall County *** 126.6 (113.8, 140.7) 225 (156, 240) 74 falling falling trend -5.8 (-9.1, -2.5)
Collin County *** 127.3 (123.5, 131.3) 224 (199, 231) 871 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.0, -1.5)
Willacy County *** 127.7 (107.3, 151.0) 223 (108, 241) 28 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.1)
Lipscomb County *** 128.1 (83.1, 190.7) 222 (9, 243) 5 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.0, -1.1)
Shackelford County *** 128.5 (87.0, 186.4) 221 (11, 243) 6 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.4, -1.1)
Denton County *** 128.5 (124.3, 132.9) 220 (197, 230) 743 falling falling trend -2.4 (-2.8, -2.0)
Terry County *** 130.5 (104.5, 161.2) 219 (68, 241) 18 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.1)
Webb County *** 130.5 (123.5, 137.8) 218 (182, 232) 266 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.0, -0.3)
Garza County *** 131.5 (92.7, 181.6) 217 (16, 243) 8 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.4, -0.5)
Gillespie County *** 131.6 (116.9, 148.1) 216 (132, 238) 71 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.8)
Hall County *** 131.8 (85.9, 198.0) 215 (6, 243) 6 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.8, 1.3)
Fisher County *** 132.2 (94.7, 183.4) 214 (16, 243) 9 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.1, 0.4)
Concho County *** 136.0 (92.1, 197.4) 213 (8, 243) 6 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.7, 1.1)
Bailey County *** 136.1 (100.1, 180.9) 212 (14, 243) 10 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.6, 0.0)
Williamson County *** 136.1 (131.2, 141.1) 211 (174, 222) 612 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.8, -1.3)
Colorado County *** 136.3 (117.4, 157.7) 210 (83, 238) 41 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.6)
Comanche County *** 136.3 (114.8, 161.5) 209 (62, 239) 31 falling falling trend -5.1 (-8.8, -1.2)
El Paso County *** 136.4 (132.7, 140.3) 208 (179, 219) 1,033 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.1)
Starr County *** 136.7 (123.2, 151.1) 207 (113, 236) 76 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.6, 0.7)
Parmer County *** 137.0 (106.0, 174.4) 206 (20, 242) 14 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.2, 0.7)
Castro County *** 137.6 (104.3, 178.7) 205 (17, 241) 12 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -0.5)
Harris County *** 137.9 (135.9, 139.9) 204 (179, 212) 3,903 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.7, -2.0)
Sutton County *** 137.9 (95.6, 194.4) 203 (7, 243) 7 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.9, -0.6)
Irion County *** 138.1 (78.5, 234.3) 202 (2, 243) 3
*
*
San Saba County *** 138.4 (105.1, 180.7) 201 (15, 242) 13 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.3)
Smith County *** 139.1 (132.2, 146.2) 200 (153, 219) 324 rising rising trend 7.6 (3.6, 11.7)
Medina County *** 139.4 (126.2, 153.7) 199 (110, 232) 84 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.6)
Rockwall County *** 139.9 (128.7, 151.8) 198 (124, 232) 120 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -1.0)
Randall County *** 139.9 (131.3, 148.9) 197 (137, 223) 205 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.5)
Hays County *** 139.9 (131.7, 148.5) 196 (139, 221) 233 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -1.0)
Dallas County *** 140.6 (138.0, 143.2) 195 (170, 207) 2,270 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.7, -1.5)
Atascosa County *** 141.7 (127.6, 156.9) 194 (101, 231) 76 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
Dimmit County *** 142.1 (112.8, 176.9) 193 (24, 241) 17 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.3)
Washington County *** 142.4 (127.1, 159.5) 192 (87, 235) 69 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.7)
Hartley County *** 143.0 (104.1, 192.5) 191 (8, 242) 9 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.7, 0.0)
Walker County *** 143.8 (130.3, 158.4) 190 (95, 228) 86 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -0.9)
Comal County *** 144.0 (136.1, 152.4) 189 (127, 214) 259 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.8)
Nueces County *** 144.3 (138.8, 150.0) 188 (140, 208) 538 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.8, -1.4)
Dallam County *** 144.5 (103.7, 195.5) 187 (9, 242) 9 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.4, -0.8)
Mason County *** 144.9 (106.8, 195.8) 186 (7, 242) 12 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -0.5)
Val Verde County *** 145.3 (130.7, 161.1) 185 (81, 226) 74 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.3, -1.1)
Reagan County *** 145.8 (89.6, 222.3) 184 (2, 243) 4 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.4, 1.1)
Maverick County *** 146.0 (131.4, 161.7) 183 (82, 231) 74 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.6, 0.4)
Bexar County *** 146.2 (143.6, 148.9) 182 (149, 193) 2,397 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.4, -1.2)
Austin County *** 146.4 (129.1, 165.6) 181 (61, 231) 55 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.5)
Erath County *** 147.3 (131.2, 164.9) 180 (64, 229) 63 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.7)
Montgomery County *** 147.8 (143.1, 152.6) 179 (134, 196) 796 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.1, -1.6)
Bandera County *** 149.1 (131.2, 169.3) 178 (42, 229) 58 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.8)
Wilson County *** 149.1 (135.1, 164.3) 177 (72, 222) 87 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.4)
Tyler County *** 149.2 (130.2, 170.6) 176 (47, 232) 47 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -0.9)
Jefferson County *** 149.3 (141.5, 157.4) 175 (109, 202) 289 falling falling trend -5.5 (-10.0, -0.8)
Midland County *** 149.4 (140.1, 159.1) 174 (101, 206) 203 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.7)
Howard County *** 149.4 (131.8, 168.7) 173 (53, 229) 54 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.7)
McLennan County *** 149.7 (142.7, 157.1) 172 (116, 200) 352 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.8, -1.3)
Tarrant County *** 150.0 (147.2, 152.8) 171 (136, 182) 2,269 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.5, -1.3)
Andrews County *** 150.4 (123.0, 181.8) 170 (21, 238) 22 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.2)
Tom Green County *** 150.7 (141.2, 160.7) 169 (93, 209) 195 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.7)
Karnes County *** 150.8 (125.2, 180.3) 168 (21, 236) 25 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.2)
Calhoun County *** 151.3 (130.8, 174.4) 167 (40, 230) 40 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.6)
Throckmorton County *** 151.5 (95.5, 242.8) 166 (1, 243) 5 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.0, 1.4)
Houston County *** 151.6 (131.5, 174.5) 165 (33, 234) 44 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.5)
Jack County *** 151.8 (120.4, 189.5) 164 (12, 239) 16 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -0.7)
Mills County *** 151.9 (115.3, 199.4) 163 (8, 240) 14 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.4, 0.8)
Moore County *** 152.0 (127.3, 180.2) 162 (24, 236) 27 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.5)
Rusk County *** 152.1 (137.7, 167.7) 161 (62, 216) 84 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.8)
Ward County *** 152.6 (122.3, 188.1) 160 (10, 239) 18 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.5)
Cherokee County *** 152.6 (138.3, 168.0) 159 (49, 217) 88 rising rising trend 11.4 (5.7, 17.4)
Lamb County *** 152.6 (126.1, 183.4) 158 (17, 236) 24 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.6, 0.8)
Dickens County *** 152.8 (96.0, 236.8) 157 (1, 243) 5 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.7, 1.0)
Burnet County *** 152.9 (140.0, 167.0) 156 (66, 217) 110 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -1.1)
Lubbock County *** 153.3 (146.7, 160.1) 155 (100, 187) 415 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.2, -0.7)
Guadalupe County *** 153.3 (144.5, 162.5) 154 (90, 198) 232 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.9)
San Jacinto County *** 153.4 (135.7, 173.1) 153 (44, 222) 60 falling falling trend -7.6 (-10.2, -4.9)
Red River County *** 153.8 (127.8, 184.7) 152 (18, 237) 27 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.2)
Llano County *** 154.6 (136.4, 175.5) 151 (37, 224) 73 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.5)
La Salle County *** 154.7 (116.6, 201.5) 150 (7, 240) 11 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.0, 0.3)
Nacogdoches County *** 154.8 (140.7, 170.0) 149 (54, 216) 93 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
Crane County *** 155.0 (105.5, 219.2) 148 (2, 242) 6 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.8, -0.1)
Harrison County *** 155.1 (141.7, 169.4) 147 (53, 212) 102 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.5, -1.3)
Jim Wells County *** 155.3 (139.2, 172.8) 146 (45, 219) 70 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.4)
Kerr County *** 155.4 (143.8, 167.9) 145 (69, 202) 151 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
Wharton County *** 155.6 (139.4, 173.2) 144 (46, 217) 71 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.8)
Frio County *** 155.9 (130.7, 184.5) 143 (17, 234) 28 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.2)
Crockett County *** 156.0 (106.6, 221.8) 142 (2, 243) 7 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.0, 0.2)
Hood County *** 156.3 (144.9, 168.6) 141 (65, 203) 153 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.5, -1.4)
Burleson County *** 156.8 (134.9, 181.7) 140 (23, 228) 39 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.6)
Waller County *** 157.0 (139.1, 176.6) 139 (36, 224) 59 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.9)
Kinney County *** 157.1 (112.6, 216.4) 138 (4, 241) 9 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.7, 1.4)
Wood County *** 157.8 (144.3, 172.4) 137 (46, 204) 118 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.7)
Madison County *** 158.0 (129.4, 191.3) 136 (11, 237) 22 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.3)
Archer County *** 158.1 (128.0, 194.1) 135 (12, 237) 20 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.4)
Titus County *** 158.1 (138.5, 179.8) 134 (26, 224) 48 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.9)
Ellis County *** 158.3 (149.3, 167.6) 133 (71, 184) 244 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.0)
Gonzales County *** 159.4 (137.1, 184.4) 132 (22, 226) 38 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.4)
Zavala County *** 159.5 (128.9, 195.2) 131 (7, 238) 19 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.1)
Cooke County *** 159.7 (144.4, 176.3) 130 (40, 208) 84 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3)
Hale County *** 159.7 (140.9, 180.4) 129 (26, 215) 53 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.5)
Wilbarger County *** 159.7 (132.6, 191.4) 128 (13, 233) 26 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Grimes County *** 160.2 (140.6, 182.1) 127 (25, 220) 51 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.3)
Marion County *** 160.5 (130.5, 197.2) 126 (9, 236) 23 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.3)
Crosby County *** 160.7 (121.6, 209.5) 125 (3, 240) 12 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.5)
Milam County *** 161.0 (141.9, 182.3) 124 (22, 217) 54 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.4)
Newton County *** 161.1 (133.3, 193.7) 123 (11, 233) 26 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.3, -1.2)
Lavaca County *** 161.6 (141.5, 184.4) 122 (25, 217) 50 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.1)
Angelina County *** 162.0 (150.4, 174.4) 121 (48, 184) 148 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.1)
Hardin County *** 162.2 (148.6, 176.8) 120 (37, 197) 109 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.0, -1.6)
Rains County *** 162.6 (136.4, 193.2) 119 (12, 231) 31 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.3)
Armstrong County *** 162.7 (107.0, 245.9) 118 (1, 242) 5
*
*
Yoakum County *** 163.1 (124.8, 209.2) 117 (5, 239) 13 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.2, 1.6)
Floyd County *** 163.4 (124.1, 212.5) 116 (4, 240) 12 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.8, 0.8)
Caldwell County *** 163.6 (146.7, 182.0) 115 (23, 199) 71 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
Camp County *** 163.6 (134.5, 197.8) 114 (8, 233) 23 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.5)
Van Zandt County *** 164.1 (151.3, 177.9) 113 (42, 191) 127 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.5)
Bastrop County *** 164.4 (152.2, 177.4) 112 (42, 184) 144 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.6)
Cochran County *** 164.7 (107.9, 242.6) 111 (1, 242) 5 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.1, 1.5)
Briscoe County *** 164.7 (105.0, 259.7) 110 (1, 243) 5
*
*
Deaf Smith County *** 165.5 (139.3, 195.1) 109 (9, 224) 29 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.8, 1.0)
Hopkins County *** 165.6 (148.8, 183.9) 108 (21, 200) 74 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.7)
Hardeman County *** 165.6 (119.4, 226.4) 107 (2, 241) 9 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.3, 0.6)
Parker County *** 165.8 (156.6, 175.4) 106 (51, 161) 256 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.8)
Victoria County *** 165.9 (154.5, 177.9) 105 (40, 175) 165 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5)
San Augustine County *** 166.0 (133.9, 205.8) 104 (7, 234) 21 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.0)
Gregg County *** 166.6 (156.1, 177.6) 103 (43, 167) 197 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -1.1)
Chambers County *** 166.9 (147.3, 188.2) 102 (20, 209) 56 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.3, -0.8)
Gray County *** 167.0 (145.4, 191.2) 101 (14, 210) 44 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.2)
Brazoria County *** 167.5 (160.6, 174.5) 100 (56, 141) 466 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.2)
Oldham County *** 167.5 (98.1, 269.6) 99 (1, 243) 4
*
*
Cass County *** 168.0 (150.1, 187.8) 98 (18, 198) 68 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.3)
Lampasas County *** 168.1 (146.8, 192.1) 97 (15, 208) 47 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.4)
Childress County *** 168.6 (128.8, 217.4) 96 (3, 240) 13 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.4)
Winkler County *** 168.8 (127.8, 218.5) 95 (2, 238) 12 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.5, 1.3)
Hockley County *** 169.5 (146.9, 194.8) 94 (14, 212) 41 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.2)
Limestone County *** 169.6 (147.3, 194.7) 93 (14, 212) 45 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.4, -1.3)
Scurry County *** 169.7 (144.2, 198.7) 92 (12, 218) 32 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.3)
Clay County *** 169.8 (141.5, 203.0) 91 (8, 226) 28 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.5)
Jones County *** 170.2 (146.2, 197.3) 90 (10, 211) 37 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.1)
Brown County *** 170.4 (154.5, 187.6) 89 (16, 184) 89 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.4)
Edwards County *** 170.4 (108.0, 263.3) 88 (1, 243) 6 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.7, 1.2)
Schleicher County *** 170.5 (114.5, 246.5) 87 (1, 242) 6 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.1, 2.8)
Bell County *** 170.9 (163.4, 178.7) 86 (43, 136) 397 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.9)
Taylor County *** 171.1 (161.4, 181.4) 85 (31, 147) 238 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.5)
Callahan County *** 171.5 (146.2, 200.5) 84 (9, 215) 35 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.4)
Freestone County *** 171.7 (148.1, 198.3) 83 (11, 209) 40 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.4)
Brooks County *** 171.8 (134.3, 217.0) 82 (4, 237) 15 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.5)
Galveston County *** 172.2 (165.5, 179.1) 81 (47, 126) 527 falling falling trend -5.3 (-9.7, -0.6)
Palo Pinto County *** 172.3 (153.9, 192.4) 80 (16, 189) 68 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.9)
Blanco County *** 172.3 (145.5, 203.7) 79 (7, 225) 32 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.8, 1.0)
Swisher County *** 172.6 (136.4, 216.3) 78 (4, 231) 16 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.6)
Uvalde County *** 172.8 (152.6, 195.1) 77 (14, 190) 55 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.5)
Franklin County *** 172.9 (142.9, 208.2) 76 (5, 228) 26 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.3)
Runnels County *** 173.2 (144.2, 207.1) 75 (6, 222) 26 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.2)
Bee County *** 173.3 (152.7, 196.1) 74 (13, 188) 52 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.3)
Jasper County *** 173.7 (155.9, 193.3) 73 (16, 193) 74 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.8)
Gaines County *** 173.9 (144.4, 207.3) 72 (6, 224) 26 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.2)
Hunt County *** 174.4 (163.1, 186.4) 71 (26, 144) 183 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.3)
Refugio County *** 174.6 (139.3, 217.4) 70 (4, 230) 18 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.6)
Upshur County *** 175.4 (158.8, 193.4) 69 (16, 168) 87 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.7)
Lynn County *** 175.7 (133.5, 227.7) 68 (1, 237) 12 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.8)
Somervell County *** 176.0 (142.9, 215.3) 67 (3, 229) 21 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -0.7)
Hansford County *** 176.1 (131.0, 232.1) 66 (1, 239) 10 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.5)
Goliad County *** 176.2 (141.2, 218.6) 65 (4, 230) 20 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.2)
Dawson County *** 176.3 (145.7, 211.5) 64 (5, 223) 24 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.6)
Jackson County *** 176.3 (149.7, 206.7) 63 (7, 211) 32 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.4)
San Patricio County *** 176.4 (162.7, 191.0) 62 (18, 153) 126 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.8)
Navarro County *** 176.5 (160.6, 193.6) 61 (17, 163) 94 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
Bosque County *** 176.8 (154.9, 201.4) 60 (10, 201) 53 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.4)
Real County *** 176.8 (128.4, 242.1) 59 (1, 239) 11 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -0.6)
Henderson County *** 176.9 (165.9, 188.6) 58 (22, 132) 208 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.8)
Ector County *** 177.0 (166.3, 188.2) 57 (25, 135) 212 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.6)
Grayson County *** 177.0 (167.7, 186.7) 56 (26, 124) 285 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.6)
Eastland County *** 177.6 (155.0, 202.9) 55 (8, 198) 49 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.3)
Stephens County *** 177.6 (146.0, 214.8) 54 (5, 222) 23 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
Kimble County *** 178.1 (135.2, 233.4) 53 (1, 237) 14 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.1)
Johnson County *** 178.3 (169.3, 187.7) 52 (23, 116) 308 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.2, -0.7)
Sabine County *** 178.7 (150.7, 212.0) 51 (6, 209) 35 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.3)
Panola County *** 178.8 (156.5, 203.7) 50 (7, 192) 48 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.0)
Haskell County *** 178.9 (140.7, 226.6) 49 (3, 232) 16 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.6, 0.9)
Hemphill County *** 179.6 (125.6, 249.3) 48 (1, 240) 7 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.8, 1.2)
Lamar County *** 180.3 (165.1, 196.6) 47 (15, 150) 110 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
Aransas County *** 181.0 (162.0, 202.0) 46 (9, 158) 78 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.6)
Fannin County *** 181.5 (164.0, 200.7) 45 (10, 156) 82 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.4)
Leon County *** 181.7 (158.2, 208.2) 44 (6, 193) 48 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.4)
Robertson County *** 182.0 (154.8, 213.0) 43 (7, 208) 35 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.4)
Young County *** 182.6 (159.4, 208.7) 42 (6, 183) 47 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.1, 0.0)
Kaufman County *** 182.9 (171.3, 195.2) 41 (15, 117) 193 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -0.9)
Upton County *** 183.0 (124.8, 259.1) 40 (1, 241) 7 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.0, -0.3)
Wise County *** 183.6 (169.7, 198.4) 39 (12, 123) 136 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.8, 0.1)
Bowie County *** 183.9 (171.5, 197.0) 38 (14, 116) 171 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.6)
Potter County *** 184.1 (172.5, 196.3) 37 (16, 109) 192 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.8)
Shelby County *** 184.8 (162.3, 209.8) 36 (7, 180) 51 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.6)
Sherman County *** 185.1 (126.0, 263.6) 35 (1, 241) 6 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.5, 2.0)
DeWitt County *** 185.1 (162.4, 210.5) 34 (6, 175) 50 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.3)
Duval County *** 185.7 (155.2, 220.9) 33 (4, 207) 27 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.3)
Wheeler County *** 186.3 (143.9, 238.7) 32 (1, 235) 14 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.6)
Montague County *** 186.3 (164.3, 210.8) 31 (7, 156) 56 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.6, 0.9)
Lee County *** 186.5 (160.5, 215.9) 30 (5, 187) 38 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.0)
Coke County *** 188.2 (143.5, 247.7) 29 (1, 233) 12 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.7, -0.4)
Orange County *** 189.2 (176.8, 202.3) 28 (11, 98) 179 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.8)
Wichita County *** 189.6 (179.1, 200.5) 27 (12, 84) 256 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.2, 2.5)
Hill County *** 189.8 (172.3, 208.7) 26 (8, 123) 94 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.0)
Hutchinson County *** 189.8 (165.8, 216.5) 25 (6, 177) 47 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.1)
Kleberg County *** 189.9 (167.5, 214.5) 24 (6, 156) 53 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.5)
Falls County *** 193.3 (165.1, 225.4) 23 (3, 186) 35 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Nolan County *** 194.3 (166.1, 226.3) 22 (4, 162) 36 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.5)
Jim Hogg County *** 196.7 (146.8, 258.3) 21 (1, 233) 11 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.9, 1.0)
Matagorda County *** 198.4 (178.6, 219.9) 20 (4, 107) 77 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.1)
Morris County *** 199.2 (167.0, 236.7) 19 (1, 173) 30 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Coryell County *** 200.8 (183.4, 219.4) 18 (5, 89) 100 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.7, 0.2)
Knox County *** 201.5 (148.9, 269.1) 17 (1, 233) 10 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.3, 1.0)
Liberty County *** 201.8 (187.3, 217.1) 16 (6, 76) 154 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.9)
Mitchell County *** 202.7 (161.8, 251.3) 15 (1, 218) 17 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.8)
Coleman County *** 205.1 (171.7, 244.6) 14 (1, 188) 29 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.7, 0.9)
Martin County *** 205.7 (153.2, 270.1) 13 (1, 232) 11 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.3, 1.6)
Donley County *** 210.6 (153.2, 285.4) 12 (1, 236) 10 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.3, 1.3)
McCulloch County *** 211.9 (175.1, 255.2) 11 (1, 166) 26 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.2)
Cottle County *** 212.8 (132.7, 337.8) 10 (1, 242) 5 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.9, 1.5)
Trinity County *** 216.8 (189.6, 247.6) 9 (1, 90) 52 rising rising trend 3.7 (0.6, 6.9)
Motley County *** 218.9 (126.9, 365.2) 8 (1, 242) 4 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.3, 2.2)
Foard County *** 222.3 (125.1, 375.5) 7 (1, 242) 4 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.2, 3.2)
Stonewall County *** 223.1 (143.1, 344.6) 6 (1, 241) 5 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.0, 1.5)
Hamilton County *** 227.3 (190.1, 270.8) 5 (1, 115) 31 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.3, 1.0)
Baylor County *** 231.6 (178.3, 299.3) 4 (1, 202) 14 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.7)
Delta County *** 235.2 (185.6, 295.7) 3 (1, 132) 17 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.3, 1.4)
Anderson County *** 240.6 (222.3, 260.1) 2 (1, 19) 132 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.4)
Polk County *** 247.4 (228.0, 268.1) 1 (1, 15) 138 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.7, 0.5)
Borden County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Culberson County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glasscock County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kenedy County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kent County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
King County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Loving County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McMullen County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roberts County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sterling County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Terrell County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/22/2021 5:54 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top