Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Texas by County

Colon & Rectum, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name

County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 74.4?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Texas N/A Yes 13.9 (13.7, 14.0) N/A 4,085 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.8, 0.1)
United States N/A Yes 12.9 (12.8, 12.9) N/A 52,325 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.8)
Anderson County Rural Yes 22.7 (17.9, 28.5) 16 (3, 95) 16 falling falling trend -1.8 (-14.1, -0.2)
Angelina County Rural Yes 16.0 (12.6, 20.0) 81 (20, 142) 16 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.9, -1.0)
Aransas County Urban Yes 21.3 (14.6, 30.5) 24 (1, 142) 8 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.1, 1.0)
Atascosa County Urban Yes 22.3 (17.0, 28.7) 21 (2, 112) 12 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.7, 2.8)
Austin County Urban Yes 16.4 (11.3, 23.3) 74 (8, 149) 7 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.8, -0.1)
Bandera County Urban Yes 14.2 (9.5, 21.5) 104 (17, 149) 6 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.9, 0.9)
Bastrop County Urban Yes 11.2 (8.6, 14.4) 140 (70, 149) 13 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.1, -1.8)
Bee County Rural Yes 13.4 (8.3, 20.7) 118 (13, 149) 4 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.0, 0.7)
Bell County Urban Yes 14.8 (12.9, 16.8) 97 (46, 133) 48 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -0.9)
Bexar County Urban Yes 14.4 (13.7, 15.2) 102 (72, 117) 280 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -0.8)
Bosque County Urban Yes 23.3 (15.8, 33.7) 13 (1, 136) 7 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.0, 0.7)
Bowie County Urban Yes 17.1 (13.8, 20.9) 62 (16, 127) 20 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.2)
Brazoria County Urban Yes 13.6 (11.9, 15.4) 115 (64, 139) 50 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.0, -1.3)
Brazos County Urban Yes 11.3 (9.1, 13.8) 139 (83, 149) 20 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.4, -1.5)
Brown County Rural Yes 13.1 (9.3, 18.2) 123 (27, 149) 8 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.8, -1.2)
Burleson County Urban Yes 17.0 (10.9, 26.1) 64 (4, 149) 5 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.6, 0.1)
Burnet County Rural Yes 12.7 (9.3, 17.1) 128 (36, 149) 10 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.3, -0.3)
Caldwell County Urban Yes 17.3 (12.6, 23.3) 58 (11, 146) 9 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.6, 0.1)
Calhoun County Rural Yes 12.9 (7.5, 21.1) 125 (12, 149) 4
*
*
Callahan County Urban Yes 20.1 (12.0, 32.3) 32 (2, 149) 4 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.7, 2.3)
Cameron County Urban Yes 12.5 (11.0, 14.1) 131 (83, 145) 54 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.2)
Cass County Rural Yes 15.0 (10.2, 21.6) 95 (15, 149) 7 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.4, -0.5)
Chambers County Urban Yes 17.3 (11.9, 24.2) 57 (7, 148) 7 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.5, 9.2)
Cherokee County Rural Yes 13.8 (10.0, 18.7) 111 (28, 149) 9 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.0, -1.9)
Coleman County Rural Yes 30.2 (18.6, 48.6) 3 (1, 136) 4
*
*
Collin County Urban Yes 10.8 (9.9, 11.8) 142 (120, 148) 108 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.8, 4.8)
Colorado County Rural Yes 17.3 (11.6, 25.5) 59 (6, 148) 6 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.8, 0.7)
Comal County Urban Yes 10.5 (8.6, 12.7) 146 (98, 149) 23 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.1, -0.6)
Cooke County Rural Yes 15.5 (11.0, 21.3) 87 (12, 149) 8 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.3, 0.5)
Coryell County Urban Yes 13.4 (9.7, 18.0) 119 (27, 149) 9 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.1, 0.7)
Dallas County Urban Yes 13.8 (13.1, 14.5) 112 (82, 123) 328 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.2, -1.6)
Dawson County Rural Yes 25.8 (14.9, 41.7) 10 (1, 148) 3
*
*
DeWitt County Rural Yes 26.0 (18.4, 36.1) 9 (1, 115) 8 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.8, 1.5)
Denton County Urban Yes 9.9 (8.9, 11.0) 147 (129, 149) 81 falling falling trend -2.9 (-3.4, -2.3)
Duval County Rural Yes 27.8 (15.9, 45.5) 5 (1, 148) 3
*
*
Eastland County Rural Yes 23.3 (15.0, 34.9) 14 (1, 141) 6 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.1, 0.0)
Ector County Urban Yes 21.1 (17.6, 25.1) 25 (7, 86) 27 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.2, 1.8)
El Paso County Urban Yes 14.2 (13.1, 15.4) 105 (68, 127) 120 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.3)
Ellis County Urban Yes 15.0 (12.6, 17.8) 93 (36, 138) 29 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.1, -1.1)
Erath County Rural Yes 13.7 (9.3, 19.6) 114 (21, 149) 6 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.8, 0.6)
Fannin County Rural Yes 19.5 (14.3, 26.3) 35 (6, 140) 9 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.6, -0.7)
Fayette County Rural Yes 17.7 (12.0, 25.5) 53 (4, 148) 7 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.4, -0.2)
Fort Bend County Urban Yes 10.5 (9.5, 11.6) 145 (120, 149) 82 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.5, -1.9)
Freestone County Rural Yes 17.4 (11.0, 26.6) 56 (4, 149) 5 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.0, 1.3)
Frio County Rural Yes 22.7 (13.8, 35.2) 19 (1, 149) 4
*
*
Galveston County Urban Yes 14.5 (12.8, 16.3) 101 (56, 131) 57 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.0, -1.8)
Gillespie County Rural Yes 12.3 (7.7, 19.1) 133 (19, 149) 6 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.8, 0.5)
Gonzales County Rural Yes 21.0 (13.4, 31.4) 26 (1, 146) 5 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.5, 2.3)
Gray County Rural Yes 19.7 (12.8, 29.2) 34 (2, 148) 5 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.7, 1.0)
Grayson County Urban Yes 17.1 (14.4, 20.2) 61 (21, 122) 30 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.5)
Gregg County Urban Yes 15.2 (12.4, 18.4) 90 (32, 138) 22 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.6)
Grimes County Rural Yes 15.8 (10.6, 22.7) 84 (8, 149) 6 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.9, -0.3)
Guadalupe County Urban Yes 12.6 (10.5, 15.2) 130 (64, 148) 24 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.2, -1.5)
Hale County Rural Yes 20.0 (13.9, 28.0) 33 (3, 144) 7 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.1, 1.1)
Hardin County Urban Yes 15.4 (11.4, 20.3) 89 (19, 148) 11 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.2)
Harris County Urban Yes 13.2 (12.7, 13.8) 122 (94, 128) 563 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.4, -1.9)
Harrison County Urban Yes 14.6 (11.1, 18.9) 100 (25, 148) 12 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.0, -0.7)
Hays County Urban Yes 12.9 (10.8, 15.4) 126 (61, 147) 28 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.7, -0.6)
Henderson County Rural Yes 18.8 (15.4, 22.9) 41 (11, 121) 23 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.4)
Hidalgo County Urban Yes 12.3 (11.2, 13.5) 132 (94, 143) 95 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.5, 0.6)
Hill County Rural Yes 16.6 (11.8, 22.9) 69 (11, 147) 9 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.0)
Hockley County Urban Yes 27.2 (18.6, 38.5) 6 (1, 122) 7
*
*
Hood County Rural Yes 15.8 (12.0, 20.6) 83 (16, 146) 14 falling falling trend -2.8 (-8.8, -1.7)
Hopkins County Rural Yes 13.0 (8.9, 18.5) 124 (28, 149) 7 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.2, -0.8)
Houston County Rural Yes 16.4 (11.0, 24.1) 75 (8, 149) 6 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.9, 1.0)
Howard County Rural Yes 19.0 (12.9, 26.8) 39 (3, 147) 7 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.2, 1.9)
Hunt County Urban Yes 15.0 (12.1, 18.5) 94 (28, 141) 18 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -0.6)
Hutchinson County Rural Yes 15.4 (9.2, 24.4) 88 (7, 149) 4 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.8, -0.3)
Jackson County Rural Yes 14.8 (8.3, 24.8) 98 (5, 149) 3
*
*
Jasper County Rural Yes 16.9 (12.1, 23.4) 66 (9, 147) 8 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 0.1)
Jefferson County Urban Yes 15.1 (13.2, 17.3) 91 (42, 130) 45 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.6, -1.3)
Jim Wells County Rural Yes 26.2 (19.8, 34.0) 8 (1, 74) 12 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.7, 3.1)
Johnson County Urban Yes 17.1 (14.5, 19.9) 63 (24, 120) 33 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.5, -0.2)
Jones County Urban Yes 17.9 (10.9, 28.1) 47 (2, 149) 4 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.6, 1.1)
Karnes County Rural Yes 22.7 (13.6, 36.0) 18 (1, 149) 4
*
*
Kaufman County Urban Yes 17.0 (14.0, 20.4) 65 (19, 130) 24 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.4, -1.5)
Kendall County Urban Yes 9.7 (6.5, 14.1) 148 (70, 149) 6 falling falling trend -3.8 (-5.8, -1.7)
Kerr County Rural Yes 13.3 (9.9, 17.7) 120 (33, 149) 13 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.8, 0.1)
Kleberg County Rural Yes 25.2 (17.5, 35.1) 11 (1, 125) 7 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.7, 2.3)
Lamar County Rural Yes 14.7 (10.8, 19.7) 99 (21, 149) 10 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.0, -1.2)
Lampasas County Urban Yes 22.7 (15.7, 32.2) 17 (1, 141) 7 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.5, 1.5)
Lavaca County Rural Yes 16.6 (10.6, 25.2) 68 (6, 149) 5 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.6, 0.3)
Lee County Rural Yes 13.5 (7.7, 22.4) 116 (11, 149) 3
*
*
Leon County Rural Yes 11.6 (6.5, 20.2) 137 (19, 149) 3 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.4, -0.3)
Liberty County Urban Yes 19.3 (15.2, 24.0) 37 (8, 126) 17 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.8, -0.6)
Limestone County Rural Yes 15.7 (10.1, 23.7) 85 (7, 149) 5 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.4, 0.5)
Llano County Rural Yes 10.6 (5.9, 18.3) 144 (32, 149) 4 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.8, -0.1)
Lubbock County Urban Yes 16.3 (14.3, 18.5) 76 (32, 120) 50 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.4)
Madison County Rural Yes 22.0 (12.7, 35.6) 22 (1, 149) 3
*
*
Matagorda County Rural Yes 17.9 (12.7, 24.6) 48 (6, 145) 8 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.1, -0.4)
Maverick County Urban Yes 16.1 (11.5, 21.9) 78 (9, 148) 8 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.5, 3.0)
McLennan County Urban Yes 13.8 (11.9, 15.9) 113 (55, 139) 40 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.8, -1.4)
Medina County Urban Yes 16.1 (12.0, 21.4) 77 (15, 147) 11 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.4, 0.4)
Midland County Urban Yes 14.1 (11.4, 17.3) 108 (37, 145) 20 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.7)
Milam County Rural Yes 20.9 (14.5, 29.4) 28 (2, 137) 7 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.1, 0.7)
Montague County Rural Yes 17.8 (11.8, 26.4) 51 (5, 148) 6 falling falling trend -4.9 (-25.0, -1.1)
Montgomery County Urban Yes 11.9 (10.7, 13.2) 135 (97, 145) 77 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.8, -1.3)
Moore County Rural Yes 20.5 (12.4, 31.7) 30 (1, 149) 4
*
*
Morris County Rural Yes 35.8 (24.1, 51.8) 1 (1, 85) 7 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.5, 3.5)
Nacogdoches County Rural Yes 20.2 (15.6, 25.7) 31 (6, 125) 14 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 0.8)
Navarro County Rural Yes 13.9 (10.1, 18.9) 109 (24, 149) 9 stable stable trend -3.1 (-5.7, 4.6)
Newton County Rural Yes 22.6 (13.0, 37.1) 20 (1, 149) 4 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.4, 1.7)
Nolan County Rural Yes 18.4 (10.8, 29.7) 45 (2, 149) 4
*
*
Nueces County Urban Yes 13.4 (11.8, 15.2) 117 (66, 139) 53 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -0.8)
Orange County Urban Yes 13.9 (10.8, 17.7) 110 (35, 148) 14 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.9, -1.0)
Palo Pinto County Rural Yes 17.7 (12.1, 25.1) 54 (4, 149) 7 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.5, 0.0)
Panola County Rural Yes 16.6 (10.8, 24.7) 71 (5, 149) 5 falling falling trend -2.0 (-4.1, -0.1)
Parker County Urban Yes 14.1 (11.7, 16.9) 107 (45, 144) 25 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.5, 0.2)
Polk County Rural Yes 23.5 (17.4, 30.9) 12 (1, 109) 12 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.2, 1.6)
Potter County Urban Yes 16.7 (13.7, 20.3) 67 (20, 132) 21 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.8)
Rains County Rural Yes 26.3 (17.5, 39.3) 7 (1, 136) 6
*
*
Randall County Urban Yes 12.8 (10.3, 15.6) 127 (57, 148) 20 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.1)
Red River County Rural Yes 17.6 (9.9, 30.0) 55 (2, 149) 3 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.4, 0.2)
Reeves County Rural Yes 28.0 (16.5, 44.2) 4 (1, 148) 4
*
*
Rockwall County Urban Yes 11.7 (8.9, 15.0) 136 (64, 149) 13 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.9, -0.5)
Rusk County Urban Yes 18.7 (14.3, 24.2) 42 (7, 133) 13 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.6, 0.1)
Sabine County Rural Yes 18.2 (9.2, 33.6) 46 (1, 149) 3
*
*
San Jacinto County Urban Yes 16.0 (10.7, 23.3) 80 (8, 149) 7 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.5, 0.0)
San Patricio County Urban Yes 21.0 (16.5, 26.3) 27 (5, 108) 16 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.3, 0.5)
Scurry County Rural Yes 16.6 (9.6, 26.9) 70 (4, 149) 3
*
*
Shelby County Rural Yes 23.1 (16.4, 31.9) 15 (1, 131) 8 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.5, 1.1)
Smith County Urban Yes 12.7 (10.8, 14.7) 129 (74, 145) 36 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.2, -1.2)
Starr County Rural Yes 15.5 (11.3, 20.8) 86 (16, 149) 9 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.3, 3.9)
Tarrant County Urban Yes 13.3 (12.6, 14.0) 121 (89, 130) 267 stable stable trend 2.7 (-2.0, 5.4)
Taylor County Urban Yes 16.5 (13.7, 19.6) 72 (26, 132) 26 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.8, -0.1)
Titus County Rural Yes 10.6 (6.1, 17.1) 143 (32, 149) 3 falling falling trend -2.0 (-4.0, -0.1)
Tom Green County Urban Yes 16.0 (13.1, 19.3) 82 (26, 137) 22 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.3)
Travis County Urban Yes 11.1 (10.2, 12.0) 141 (118, 147) 122 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.2, 5.5)
Trinity County Rural Yes 16.1 (9.9, 26.1) 79 (5, 149) 4 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.1, 1.9)
Tyler County Rural Yes 15.0 (9.5, 23.2) 92 (9, 149) 5 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.2, 0.5)
Upshur County Urban Yes 14.9 (10.6, 20.5) 96 (13, 149) 8 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.2)
Uvalde County Rural Yes 21.9 (14.8, 31.2) 23 (1, 144) 6 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.3, 1.0)
Val Verde County Rural Yes 19.2 (14.0, 25.5) 38 (5, 137) 9 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.8, 1.5)
Van Zandt County Rural Yes 17.3 (13.4, 22.0) 60 (12, 139) 14 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.0, -0.4)
Victoria County Urban Yes 16.4 (13.2, 20.2) 73 (20, 137) 19 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.4, -0.2)
Walker County Rural Yes 12.1 (8.9, 16.2) 134 (47, 149) 10 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.9, -0.8)
Waller County Urban Yes 9.0 (5.7, 13.6) 149 (74, 149) 5 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.9, -1.4)
Washington County Rural Yes 17.9 (12.8, 24.5) 49 (6, 146) 9 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.5, -1.0)
Webb County Urban Yes 14.3 (12.1, 16.7) 103 (46, 140) 31 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.6, 1.8)
Wharton County Rural Yes 19.5 (14.5, 25.8) 36 (5, 138) 11 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 1.0)
Wichita County Urban Yes 17.9 (14.8, 21.4) 50 (16, 120) 26 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Wilbarger County Rural Yes 18.9 (10.9, 31.2) 40 (1, 149) 3
*
*
Willacy County Rural Yes 18.4 (11.2, 28.6) 44 (2, 149) 4
*
*
Williamson County Urban Yes 11.4 (10.2, 12.7) 138 (107, 147) 69 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.9, -1.6)
Wilson County Urban Yes 17.8 (13.2, 23.6) 52 (7, 145) 11 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.7, 0.8)
Wise County Urban Yes 18.7 (14.5, 23.7) 43 (8, 133) 14 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.1, 0.6)
Wood County Rural Yes 14.2 (10.4, 19.1) 106 (26, 149) 11 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.4, -0.4)
Young County Rural Yes 20.6 (13.2, 31.0) 29 (2, 148) 5 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.9, 0.7)
Zavala County Rural Yes 35.3 (20.7, 56.4) 2 (1, 132) 4
*
*
Andrews County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Archer County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Armstrong County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bailey County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Baylor County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Blanco County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Borden County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brewster County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Briscoe County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brooks County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Camp County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carson County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Castro County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Childress County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cochran County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coke County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Collingsworth County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Comanche County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Concho County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cottle County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crane County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crockett County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crosby County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Culberson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dallam County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Deaf Smith County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Delta County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dickens County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dimmit County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Donley County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Edwards County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Falls County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fisher County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Floyd County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Foard County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Franklin County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gaines County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Garza County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glasscock County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Goliad County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hall County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hamilton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hansford County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardeman County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hartley County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Haskell County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hemphill County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hudspeth County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Irion County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jack County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jeff Davis County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jim Hogg County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kenedy County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kent County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kimble County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
King County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kinney County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Knox County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
La Salle County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lamb County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lipscomb County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Live Oak County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Loving County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lynn County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marion County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Martin County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mason County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McCulloch County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McMullen County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menard County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mills County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mitchell County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Motley County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ochiltree County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oldham County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Parmer County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pecos County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Presidio County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Reagan County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Real County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Refugio County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roberts County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Robertson County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Runnels County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Augustine County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Saba County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schleicher County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shackelford County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sherman County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Somervell County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stephens County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sterling County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stonewall County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sutton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Swisher County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Terrell County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Terry County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Throckmorton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Upton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ward County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wheeler County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Winkler County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yoakum County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Zapata County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/22/2024 4:04 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top