Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Texas by County

Colon & Rectum, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 74.4?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Texas Yes 13.7 (13.5, 13.9) N/A 3,927 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.7)
United States Yes 13.1 (13.1, 13.2) N/A 52,152 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.1, -1.8)
Anderson County Yes 23.8 (18.8, 29.8) 8 (1, 66) 16 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.2, 0.9)
Andrews County Yes 22.0 (12.5, 35.7) 12 (1, 147) 3
*
*
Angelina County Yes 14.3 (11.2, 18.0) 91 (21, 143) 15 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.2, -1.3)
Aransas County Yes 19.7 (13.3, 28.5) 20 (1, 142) 8 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.5, 0.4)
Atascosa County Yes 15.8 (11.5, 21.3) 70 (9, 146) 9 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.6, 1.9)
Austin County Yes 17.8 (12.4, 25.0) 41 (3, 146) 8 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.7, 0.0)
Bandera County Yes 10.2 (6.2, 16.7) 142 (33, 147) 4 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.6, -0.9)
Bastrop County Yes 13.1 (10.0, 16.8) 117 (26, 146) 13 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.6, -1.4)
Bee County Yes 13.1 (8.0, 20.1) 121 (9, 147) 4 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.3, 0.8)
Bell County Yes 14.4 (12.5, 16.5) 89 (41, 129) 44 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.4, -1.1)
Bexar County Yes 14.6 (13.8, 15.4) 87 (60, 107) 278 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.1)
Bosque County Yes 21.5 (14.3, 31.8) 15 (1, 142) 6 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.9, 0.5)
Bowie County Yes 16.2 (13.0, 19.9) 62 (13, 131) 19 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -0.6)
Brazoria County Yes 13.7 (12.0, 15.5) 107 (51, 136) 49 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.2, -1.6)
Brazos County Yes 11.3 (9.1, 13.8) 136 (72, 147) 19 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.5, -1.5)
Brown County Yes 13.7 (9.6, 19.0) 108 (18, 147) 8 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.6, -1.0)
Burleson County Yes 17.4 (11.4, 26.2) 42 (2, 146) 5 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.4, -0.2)
Burnet County Yes 14.2 (10.5, 19.1) 96 (16, 146) 11 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.3, -0.5)
Caldwell County Yes 18.6 (13.5, 25.2) 31 (3, 139) 9 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 0.1)
Calhoun County Yes 12.9 (7.9, 20.5) 122 (9, 147) 4
*
*
Callahan County Yes 24.2 (15.1, 37.2) 7 (1, 142) 5 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.5, 2.0)
Cameron County Yes 12.3 (10.8, 13.9) 126 (77, 142) 53 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.1)
Cass County Yes 14.2 (9.6, 20.5) 97 (10, 147) 7 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.6, -0.5)
Chambers County Yes 19.0 (13.0, 26.6) 26 (2, 143) 7 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.3, 3.2)
Cherokee County Yes 13.6 (9.8, 18.4) 110 (19, 146) 9 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.1, -2.3)
Coleman County Yes 22.1 (12.6, 38.2) 11 (1, 147) 3
*
*
Collin County Yes 10.7 (9.8, 11.8) 140 (112, 145) 98 stable stable trend 1.4 (-2.5, 5.4)
Colorado County Yes 13.1 (8.0, 20.7) 119 (11, 147) 4 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.9, -0.1)
Comal County Yes 9.5 (7.7, 11.8) 145 (107, 147) 19 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.6, -1.2)
Cooke County Yes 14.2 (10.0, 19.6) 99 (12, 147) 8 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.2, 0.5)
Coryell County Yes 16.3 (11.9, 21.6) 60 (7, 145) 10 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.7, 1.0)
Dallas County Yes 14.3 (13.6, 15.0) 93 (64, 113) 333 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.3, -1.7)
Dawson County Yes 28.9 (17.8, 44.5) 2 (1, 130) 4
*
*
DeWitt County Yes 19.9 (13.6, 28.8) 19 (1, 144) 6 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.5, 0.8)
Denton County Yes 10.5 (9.4, 11.7) 141 (113, 146) 77 falling falling trend -3.1 (-3.7, -2.5)
Eastland County Yes 18.9 (11.6, 29.2) 29 (1, 147) 5 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.5, -0.4)
Ector County Yes 19.4 (16.1, 23.2) 22 (5, 95) 25 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.6, 1.5)
El Paso County Yes 12.9 (11.8, 14.0) 123 (78, 133) 104 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.6)
Ellis County Yes 13.8 (11.4, 16.5) 105 (35, 141) 25 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.4, -1.2)
Erath County Yes 13.9 (9.4, 20.0) 102 (11, 147) 6 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.0, -0.4)
Falls County Yes 16.4 (9.9, 26.0) 56 (2, 147) 4 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.8, 1.0)
Fannin County Yes 18.4 (13.2, 25.1) 36 (3, 141) 9 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.6, -1.1)
Fayette County Yes 17.0 (11.7, 24.3) 47 (3, 145) 8 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.3, -0.1)
Fort Bend County Yes 10.8 (9.7, 12.0) 139 (109, 145) 77 falling falling trend -3.0 (-3.7, -2.4)
Freestone County Yes 15.3 (9.3, 24.0) 82 (4, 147) 4 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.0, 1.1)
Frio County Yes 19.3 (11.4, 30.6) 24 (1, 147) 4
*
*
Galveston County Yes 15.2 (13.5, 17.1) 83 (35, 119) 58 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.0, -1.7)
Gillespie County Yes 8.5 (4.8, 14.3) 147 (44, 147) 4 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.0, -0.9)
Gonzales County Yes 16.0 (9.8, 24.9) 65 (2, 147) 4 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.1, 1.8)
Gray County Yes 17.0 (10.7, 25.9) 44 (2, 147) 5 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.9, 0.6)
Grayson County Yes 18.4 (15.5, 21.7) 35 (10, 102) 31 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.5)
Gregg County Yes 16.2 (13.3, 19.5) 61 (19, 130) 23 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.6)
Grimes County Yes 15.5 (10.5, 22.5) 76 (6, 147) 6 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.8, -0.2)
Guadalupe County Yes 13.4 (11.0, 16.1) 113 (42, 143) 24 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.5, -1.5)
Hale County Yes 21.5 (15.1, 29.6) 16 (1, 135) 8 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.7, 1.3)
Hardin County Yes 15.3 (11.4, 20.1) 81 (13, 145) 11 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.5, -0.4)
Harris County Yes 13.4 (12.9, 14.0) 112 (80, 119) 554 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.4, -2.1)
Harrison County Yes 16.9 (13.2, 21.4) 48 (9, 135) 15 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.8, -0.5)
Hays County Yes 13.5 (11.2, 16.1) 111 (38, 143) 26 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.0, -1.1)
Henderson County Yes 17.0 (13.8, 20.8) 46 (9, 129) 21 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.2)
Hidalgo County Yes 12.0 (10.9, 13.1) 130 (92, 140) 91 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.7, 0.5)
Hill County Yes 16.8 (11.8, 23.5) 49 (4, 146) 8 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.0)
Hockley County Yes 24.4 (16.3, 35.1) 6 (1, 140) 6
*
*
Hood County Yes 13.9 (10.3, 18.3) 104 (19, 146) 13 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.9, -1.5)
Hopkins County Yes 14.7 (10.2, 20.7) 86 (8, 147) 7 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.3, -0.8)
Houston County Yes 12.3 (7.7, 19.2) 127 (14, 147) 5 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.6, 0.6)
Howard County Yes 18.6 (12.8, 26.0) 32 (2, 145) 7 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.4, 1.9)
Hunt County Yes 17.0 (13.7, 20.8) 45 (10, 125) 20 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.5)
Hutchinson County Yes 18.5 (11.8, 27.8) 34 (1, 146) 5 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.5, -0.1)
Jackson County Yes 17.2 (10.1, 27.9) 43 (1, 147) 4
*
*
Jasper County Yes 14.3 (10.0, 19.9) 94 (10, 147) 8 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.8, -0.4)
Jefferson County Yes 14.0 (12.1, 16.1) 101 (44, 136) 42 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.6, -1.4)
Jim Wells County Yes 18.3 (13.2, 24.9) 37 (2, 140) 9 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.7, 2.1)
Johnson County Yes 15.7 (13.2, 18.6) 71 (22, 124) 29 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.8, -0.7)
Jones County Yes 16.3 (9.8, 25.8) 59 (3, 147) 4 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.9, 0.4)
Karnes County Yes 18.7 (10.8, 30.4) 30 (1, 147) 3
*
*
Kaufman County Yes 15.4 (12.5, 18.8) 78 (20, 137) 20 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.6, -1.7)
Kendall County Yes 9.4 (6.2, 13.8) 146 (67, 147) 6 falling falling trend -4.0 (-5.8, -2.1)
Kerr County Yes 13.1 (9.6, 17.6) 118 (22, 147) 12 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.0, 0.1)
Kleberg County Yes 24.9 (17.3, 34.8) 5 (1, 118) 7 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.2, 2.0)
Lamar County Yes 11.7 (8.2, 16.2) 133 (36, 147) 8 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.2, -1.7)
Lampasas County Yes 14.8 (9.2, 23.0) 85 (4, 147) 4 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.6, 0.4)
Lavaca County Yes 12.5 (7.3, 20.4) 125 (9, 147) 4 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.0, -0.2)
Lee County Yes 16.4 (9.5, 26.6) 58 (2, 147) 4
*
*
Leon County Yes 12.5 (7.4, 20.6) 124 (11, 147) 4 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.1, -0.6)
Liberty County Yes 21.6 (17.3, 26.6) 14 (2, 90) 18 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.1, -0.6)
Limestone County Yes 19.0 (12.6, 27.6) 27 (1, 145) 6 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.1, 0.8)
Llano County Yes 13.2 (8.1, 21.2) 116 (8, 147) 6 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.4, -0.1)
Lubbock County Yes 15.7 (13.8, 17.9) 72 (29, 117) 47 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.5)
Matagorda County Yes 20.1 (14.6, 26.9) 18 (1, 133) 9 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.2, -0.6)
Maverick County Yes 15.1 (10.8, 20.6) 84 (9, 146) 8 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.0, 2.5)
McCulloch County Yes 27.5 (15.8, 46.1) 3 (1, 145) 4
*
*
McLennan County Yes 15.3 (13.3, 17.6) 79 (29, 123) 43 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.7, -1.3)
Medina County Yes 14.3 (10.4, 19.3) 90 (13, 146) 9 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.1)
Midland County Yes 14.1 (11.5, 17.2) 100 (29, 142) 21 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -0.9)
Milam County Yes 14.2 (9.0, 21.5) 98 (7, 147) 5 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.9, 0.3)
Montague County Yes 16.7 (10.9, 25.0) 52 (3, 147) 5 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.2, 0.5)
Montgomery County Yes 11.7 (10.5, 13.1) 132 (94, 142) 71 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.1, -1.6)
Moore County Yes 19.4 (11.6, 30.4) 21 (1, 147) 4
*
*
Morris County Yes 26.1 (16.5, 40.1) 4 (1, 130) 5 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.1, 3.1)
Nacogdoches County Yes 18.0 (13.8, 23.1) 38 (4, 130) 13 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.6)
Navarro County Yes 13.9 (10.0, 18.9) 103 (17, 146) 9 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.4, -1.9)
Newton County Yes 16.7 (9.2, 28.4) 53 (1, 147) 3 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.5, 0.9)
Nolan County Yes 20.6 (12.6, 32.1) 17 (1, 146) 4
*
*
Nueces County Yes 13.3 (11.7, 15.0) 114 (58, 136) 54 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.5, -1.2)
Orange County Yes 15.9 (12.5, 19.9) 69 (12, 137) 16 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.9, -0.9)
Palo Pinto County Yes 15.5 (10.6, 22.3) 77 (5, 147) 7 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.8, -0.5)
Panola County Yes 15.7 (10.1, 23.7) 73 (3, 147) 5 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.3, -0.7)
Parker County Yes 16.2 (13.5, 19.3) 63 (18, 128) 26 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.6, 0.1)
Polk County Yes 22.4 (16.8, 29.2) 10 (1, 106) 13 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.3, 1.4)
Potter County Yes 15.9 (12.9, 19.6) 66 (18, 136) 19 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -1.0)
Rains County Yes 30.0 (19.3, 45.5) 1 (1, 118) 6
*
*
Randall County Yes 12.2 (9.8, 15.0) 129 (53, 146) 19 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -0.6)
Red River County Yes 14.3 (8.0, 24.9) 92 (3, 147) 3 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.5, 0.1)
Rockwall County Yes 13.1 (10.0, 16.7) 120 (30, 146) 13 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.8, -0.6)
Rusk County Yes 14.2 (10.5, 19.0) 95 (17, 146) 10 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.0, -0.6)
Sabine County Yes 13.6 (7.7, 24.9) 109 (6, 147) 3
*
*
San Jacinto County Yes 9.9 (6.1, 15.7) 144 (45, 147) 5 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.6, -1.1)
San Patricio County Yes 15.9 (12.0, 20.7) 67 (9, 142) 11 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.5, 0.0)
Scurry County Yes 14.6 (8.3, 24.1) 88 (4, 147) 3
*
*
Shelby County Yes 22.8 (16.0, 31.8) 9 (1, 134) 8 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.6, 0.6)
Smith County Yes 12.3 (10.5, 14.3) 128 (68, 144) 35 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.5, -1.5)
Starr County Yes 13.7 (9.8, 18.8) 106 (16, 147) 8 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.1, 3.3)
Tarrant County Yes 13.2 (12.5, 14.0) 115 (81, 125) 255 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.4, -1.8)
Taylor County Yes 15.9 (13.2, 19.1) 68 (16, 128) 24 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.7, 0.0)
Titus County Yes 16.8 (11.2, 24.3) 50 (3, 146) 6 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.3, -0.1)
Tom Green County Yes 15.3 (12.5, 18.6) 80 (20, 135) 21 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.4)
Travis County Yes 10.8 (9.9, 11.8) 138 (112, 144) 112 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.2, -2.4)
Trinity County Yes 15.6 (9.7, 25.1) 75 (4, 147) 4 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.4, 1.3)
Tyler County Yes 10.0 (5.7, 16.8) 143 (25, 147) 3 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.2, -0.4)
Upshur County Yes 18.9 (13.9, 25.2) 28 (3, 139) 10 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.8, 0.1)
Uvalde County Yes 16.7 (10.9, 24.7) 51 (3, 147) 5 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.9, 0.1)
Val Verde County Yes 19.2 (14.1, 25.4) 25 (2, 126) 10 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.3, 0.6)
Van Zandt County Yes 16.5 (12.4, 21.5) 54 (7, 143) 12 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.1, -0.6)
Victoria County Yes 16.4 (13.2, 20.2) 57 (11, 134) 19 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.3)
Walker County Yes 15.6 (11.8, 20.3) 74 (11, 143) 12 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.6, -0.3)
Waller County Yes 11.6 (7.6, 16.8) 134 (27, 147) 6 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.1, -1.7)
Washington County Yes 16.5 (11.5, 22.9) 55 (4, 145) 9 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.9, -1.5)
Webb County Yes 11.1 (9.2, 13.3) 137 (73, 147) 24 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.4, 1.2)
Wharton County Yes 21.9 (16.5, 28.6) 13 (1, 111) 12 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 0.9)
Wichita County Yes 19.3 (16.2, 22.9) 23 (6, 95) 28 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.3)
Willacy County Yes 17.9 (10.9, 27.8) 39 (1, 147) 4
*
*
Williamson County Yes 11.4 (10.1, 12.7) 135 (100, 144) 62 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.1, -1.8)
Wilson County Yes 18.5 (13.8, 24.4) 33 (3, 134) 11 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.8, 0.6)
Wise County Yes 16.1 (12.2, 20.8) 64 (9, 143) 12 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.5, -0.1)
Wood County Yes 11.8 (8.3, 16.4) 131 (29, 147) 9 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.9, -0.6)
Young County Yes 17.9 (11.3, 27.3) 40 (2, 147) 5 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.6, 0.9)
Archer County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Armstrong County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bailey County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Baylor County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Blanco County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Borden County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brewster County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Briscoe County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brooks County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Camp County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carson County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Castro County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Childress County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cochran County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coke County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Collingsworth County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Comanche County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Concho County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cottle County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crane County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crockett County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crosby County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Culberson County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dallam County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Deaf Smith County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Delta County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dickens County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dimmit County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Donley County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Duval County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Edwards County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fisher County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Floyd County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Foard County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Franklin County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gaines County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Garza County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glasscock County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Goliad County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hall County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hamilton County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hansford County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardeman County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hartley County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Haskell County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hemphill County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hudspeth County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Irion County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jack County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jeff Davis County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jim Hogg County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kenedy County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kent County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kimble County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
King County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kinney County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Knox County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
La Salle County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lamb County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lipscomb County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Live Oak County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Loving County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lynn County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Madison County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marion County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Martin County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mason County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McMullen County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menard County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mills County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mitchell County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Motley County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ochiltree County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oldham County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Parmer County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pecos County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Presidio County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Reagan County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Real County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Reeves County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Refugio County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roberts County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Robertson County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Runnels County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Augustine County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Saba County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schleicher County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shackelford County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sherman County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Somervell County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stephens County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sterling County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stonewall County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sutton County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Swisher County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Terrell County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Terry County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Throckmorton County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Upton County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ward County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wheeler County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilbarger County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Winkler County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yoakum County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Zapata County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Zavala County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 02/05/2023 1:24 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top