Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Texas by County

Liver & Bile Duct, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name

County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Texas N/A *** 8.5 (8.3, 8.6) N/A 2,620 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.1, 1.2)
United States N/A *** 6.6 (6.6, 6.6) N/A 28,305 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.8, -0.2)
Anderson County Rural *** 25.2 (20.3, 31.0) 1 (1, 6) 19 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.2, 1.1)
Angelina County Rural *** 7.8 (5.6, 10.6) 73 (17, 104) 8 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.5, 3.7)
Aransas County Urban *** 10.0 (6.4, 15.8) 39 (5, 103) 5
*
*
Atascosa County Urban *** 8.7 (5.7, 12.9) 59 (8, 104) 5
*
*
Bandera County Urban *** 10.1 (6.2, 16.7) 36 (4, 104) 4
*
*
Bastrop County Urban *** 10.3 (7.9, 13.2) 30 (7, 89) 14
*
*
Bee County Rural *** 18.5 (12.3, 26.7) 3 (1, 61) 6
*
*
Bell County Urban *** 7.7 (6.4, 9.1) 74 (35, 95) 27 rising rising trend 1.4 (0.5, 2.8)
Bexar County Urban *** 10.2 (9.5, 10.8) 32 (22, 54) 205 rising rising trend 0.5 (0.2, 0.9)
Bowie County Urban *** 6.9 (5.0, 9.4) 83 (29, 104) 9 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.7, 2.3)
Brazoria County Urban *** 9.6 (8.3, 11.2) 45 (16, 77) 37 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.9, 3.1)
Brazos County Urban *** 6.5 (4.9, 8.4) 89 (44, 104) 12
*
*
Brown County Rural *** 7.3 (4.4, 11.7) 79 (11, 104) 4
*
*
Burnet County Rural *** 5.3 (3.3, 8.4) 98 (43, 104) 5
*
*
Caldwell County Urban *** 14.1 (9.9, 19.4) 10 (2, 84) 8 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.7, 3.5)
Calhoun County Rural *** 18.1 (11.7, 27.2) 4 (1, 66) 5
*
*
Cameron County Urban *** 9.5 (8.3, 10.9) 48 (19, 76) 43 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.9, 3.4)
Cass County Rural *** 7.0 (3.9, 12.0) 82 (11, 104) 3
*
*
Chambers County Urban *** 10.8 (7.0, 16.1) 24 (3, 100) 5
*
*
Cherokee County Rural *** 10.5 (7.3, 14.7) 28 (4, 98) 7
*
*
Collin County Urban *** 4.7 (4.1, 5.4) 104 (90, 104) 47 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.7, 1.7)
Colorado County Rural *** 11.6 (6.9, 19.0) 19 (2, 103) 4
*
*
Comal County Urban *** 6.7 (5.3, 8.5) 86 (42, 103) 16 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.7, 0.4)
Cooke County Rural *** 6.2 (3.7, 9.9) 92 (26, 104) 4
*
*
Coryell County Urban *** 5.5 (3.3, 8.5) 96 (36, 104) 4
*
*
Dallas County Urban *** 7.9 (7.4, 8.4) 71 (51, 82) 198 falling falling trend -1.9 (-4.8, -0.2)
Denton County Urban *** 4.8 (4.1, 5.5) 103 (89, 104) 40 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.4, 1.6)
Ector County Urban *** 13.4 (10.7, 16.6) 12 (3, 52) 18 rising rising trend 3.6 (2.5, 5.4)
El Paso County Urban *** 10.9 (9.9, 11.9) 23 (15, 50) 96 stable stable trend -1.1 (-7.1, 1.5)
Ellis County Urban *** 6.0 (4.6, 7.8) 95 (54, 104) 12 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.4, 2.6)
Fannin County Rural *** 12.2 (8.3, 17.5) 15 (2, 92) 6
*
*
Fort Bend County Urban *** 6.8 (6.0, 7.8) 85 (58, 97) 53 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.1, 2.7)
Galveston County Urban *** 11.1 (9.7, 12.7) 22 (10, 55) 48 stable stable trend -1.1 (-8.6, 1.4)
Grayson County Urban *** 8.0 (6.2, 10.1) 69 (23, 98) 15 rising rising trend 2.0 (0.9, 3.4)
Gregg County Urban *** 8.8 (6.7, 11.3) 58 (15, 96) 13 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.4, 4.0)
Grimes County Rural *** 11.8 (7.7, 17.8) 17 (2, 99) 5
*
*
Guadalupe County Urban *** 8.1 (6.4, 10.1) 67 (23, 98) 16
*
*
Hale County Rural *** 8.7 (5.0, 14.3) 60 (5, 104) 3
*
*
Hardin County Urban *** 9.0 (6.0, 12.9) 53 (9, 103) 6 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.6, 2.6)
Harris County Urban *** 8.6 (8.2, 9.0) 61 (42, 70) 384 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.1, 0.9)
Harrison County Urban *** 7.6 (5.3, 10.8) 75 (18, 104) 7
*
*
Hays County Urban *** 8.4 (6.7, 10.4) 62 (19, 93) 19
*
*
Henderson County Rural *** 9.9 (7.6, 12.8) 40 (9, 90) 14 rising rising trend 1.8 (0.7, 3.3)
Hidalgo County Urban *** 9.2 (8.3, 10.2) 51 (26, 73) 72 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.1, 1.4)
Hill County Rural *** 8.9 (5.8, 13.5) 55 (7, 103) 5
*
*
Hood County Rural *** 5.2 (3.4, 7.7) 102 (56, 104) 6 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.1, 3.4)
Hopkins County Rural *** 8.2 (5.1, 12.7) 65 (7, 104) 4
*
*
Howard County Rural *** 15.1 (10.0, 21.9) 7 (1, 81) 6 rising rising trend 3.4 (1.7, 6.0)
Hunt County Urban *** 9.8 (7.5, 12.6) 42 (10, 92) 13 rising rising trend 2.8 (1.3, 5.3)
Jasper County Rural *** 6.7 (3.8, 11.2) 87 (14, 104) 3
*
*
Jefferson County Urban *** 9.9 (8.4, 11.6) 41 (14, 76) 32 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.4, 2.3)
Jim Wells County Rural *** 21.6 (16.0, 28.6) 2 (1, 16) 10 rising rising trend 3.4 (1.9, 5.6)
Johnson County Urban *** 8.8 (7.1, 10.9) 56 (18, 92) 18 rising rising trend 3.4 (2.3, 5.4)
Kaufman County Urban *** 7.1 (5.3, 9.3) 81 (28, 104) 11
*
*
Kendall County Urban *** 6.5 (4.0, 10.2) 88 (23, 104) 4
*
*
Kerr County Rural *** 7.9 (5.4, 11.3) 70 (13, 104) 8
*
*
Kleberg County Rural *** 11.3 (6.7, 18.0) 21 (2, 104) 4
*
*
Lamar County Rural *** 8.0 (5.3, 11.8) 68 (11, 104) 6
*
*
Leon County Rural *** 13.3 (8.2, 21.6) 13 (1, 99) 4
*
*
Liberty County Urban *** 11.9 (9.0, 15.5) 16 (4, 78) 12 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.3, 3.7)
Llano County Rural *** 6.3 (3.3, 12.3) 91 (13, 104) 3
*
*
Lubbock County Urban *** 11.4 (9.7, 13.2) 20 (9, 57) 36 rising rising trend 3.5 (2.7, 4.8)
Matagorda County Rural *** 8.3 (5.1, 12.9) 64 (8, 104) 4
*
*
Maverick County Urban *** 14.8 (10.5, 20.2) 8 (1, 73) 8
*
*
McLennan County Urban *** 8.2 (6.8, 9.8) 66 (26, 93) 25 rising rising trend 2.3 (1.5, 3.5)
Medina County Urban *** 10.5 (7.3, 14.8) 27 (5, 96) 7
*
*
Midland County Urban *** 9.1 (7.0, 11.5) 52 (14, 93) 14
*
*
Milam County Rural *** 10.0 (6.0, 16.2) 38 (3, 104) 4
*
*
Montgomery County Urban *** 6.9 (6.0, 7.8) 84 (58, 96) 48 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.3, 2.4)
Nacogdoches County Rural *** 5.5 (3.3, 8.6) 97 (32, 104) 4
*
*
Navarro County Rural *** 9.3 (6.3, 13.2) 49 (7, 102) 7
*
*
Nueces County Urban *** 12.4 (10.9, 14.0) 14 (7, 40) 53 rising rising trend 2.4 (1.7, 3.4)
Orange County Urban *** 9.7 (7.2, 12.7) 43 (10, 95) 11 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.1, 3.2)
Palo Pinto County Rural *** 9.0 (5.2, 14.6) 54 (5, 104) 4
*
*
Parker County Urban *** 7.9 (6.1, 10.0) 72 (25, 99) 15
*
*
Polk County Rural *** 14.6 (10.2, 20.2) 9 (1, 70) 10 stable stable trend 1.3 (0.0, 2.8)
Potter County Urban *** 10.1 (7.7, 12.9) 37 (9, 91) 13 rising rising trend 3.0 (1.6, 5.0)
Randall County Urban *** 6.1 (4.5, 8.1) 93 (47, 104) 10 rising rising trend 2.5 (0.9, 5.0)
Rockwall County Urban *** 5.2 (3.4, 7.6) 100 (49, 104) 6
*
*
Rusk County Urban *** 6.3 (4.0, 9.7) 90 (27, 104) 5
*
*
San Jacinto County Urban *** 9.6 (6.0, 15.0) 46 (4, 103) 5
*
*
San Patricio County Urban *** 15.7 (12.1, 20.1) 5 (2, 40) 13 rising rising trend 3.5 (2.1, 5.8)
Smith County Urban *** 7.6 (6.2, 9.1) 78 (37, 97) 23 rising rising trend 1.6 (0.4, 3.3)
Starr County Rural *** 11.8 (8.2, 16.5) 18 (3, 93) 7
*
*
Tarrant County Urban *** 7.6 (7.1, 8.2) 76 (55, 86) 161 rising rising trend 2.3 (1.9, 3.0)
Taylor County Urban *** 9.6 (7.5, 12.1) 44 (11, 88) 15 rising rising trend 4.7 (3.4, 6.9)
Titus County Rural *** 8.8 (5.0, 14.5) 57 (5, 104) 3
*
*
Tom Green County Urban *** 8.4 (6.4, 10.8) 63 (18, 100) 12 stable stable trend -3.3 (-15.7, 1.3)
Travis County Urban *** 7.6 (6.8, 8.3) 77 (50, 90) 87 stable stable trend -1.1 (-9.5, 2.1)
Upshur County Urban *** 10.1 (6.8, 14.7) 34 (4, 100) 6
*
*
Uvalde County Rural *** 13.6 (8.4, 21.1) 11 (1, 97) 4
*
*
Val Verde County Rural *** 10.5 (6.9, 15.4) 26 (4, 100) 5 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.2, 4.8)
Van Zandt County Rural *** 9.2 (6.6, 12.7) 50 (8, 101) 8
*
*
Victoria County Urban *** 9.5 (7.1, 12.5) 47 (10, 95) 11 rising rising trend 2.8 (1.6, 4.8)
Walker County Rural *** 10.4 (7.5, 14.1) 29 (6, 94) 9
*
*
Waller County Urban *** 6.1 (3.4, 10.0) 94 (18, 104) 3
*
*
Washington County Rural *** 5.2 (2.9, 8.9) 101 (38, 104) 3
*
*
Webb County Urban *** 15.6 (13.3, 18.2) 6 (2, 23) 34 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.6, 2.2)
Wharton County Rural *** 7.2 (4.3, 11.3) 80 (13, 104) 4
*
*
Wichita County Urban *** 10.1 (7.9, 12.7) 35 (10, 89) 15 rising rising trend 6.4 (2.8, 19.3)
Williamson County Urban *** 5.3 (4.5, 6.2) 99 (82, 104) 33 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.1, 2.5)
Wilson County Urban *** 10.3 (7.1, 14.5) 31 (5, 100) 7
*
*
Wise County Urban *** 10.1 (7.2, 13.9) 33 (7, 96) 8
*
*
Wood County Rural *** 10.7 (7.7, 14.8) 25 (5, 91) 9 rising rising trend 3.8 (2.4, 6.1)
Andrews County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Archer County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Armstrong County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Austin County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bailey County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Baylor County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Blanco County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Borden County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bosque County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brewster County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Briscoe County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brooks County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Burleson County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Callahan County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Camp County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carson County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Castro County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Childress County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cochran County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coke County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coleman County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Collingsworth County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Comanche County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Concho County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cottle County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crane County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crockett County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crosby County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Culberson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dallam County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dawson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
DeWitt County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Deaf Smith County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Delta County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dickens County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dimmit County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Donley County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Duval County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Eastland County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Edwards County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Erath County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Falls County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fayette County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fisher County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Floyd County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Foard County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Franklin County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Freestone County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Frio County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gaines County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Garza County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gillespie County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glasscock County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Goliad County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gonzales County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gray County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hall County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hamilton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hansford County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardeman County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hartley County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Haskell County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hemphill County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hockley County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Houston County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hudspeth County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hutchinson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Irion County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jack County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jeff Davis County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jim Hogg County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jones County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Karnes County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kenedy County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kent County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kimble County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
King County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kinney County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Knox County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
La Salle County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lamb County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lampasas County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lavaca County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lee County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Limestone County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lipscomb County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Live Oak County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Loving County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lynn County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Madison County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marion County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Martin County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mason County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McCulloch County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McMullen County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menard County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mills County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mitchell County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montague County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Moore County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Morris County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Motley County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Newton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Nolan County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ochiltree County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oldham County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Panola County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Parmer County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pecos County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Presidio County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rains County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Reagan County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Real County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Red River County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Reeves County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Refugio County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roberts County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Robertson County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Runnels County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sabine County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Augustine County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Saba County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schleicher County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Scurry County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shackelford County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shelby County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sherman County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Somervell County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stephens County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sterling County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stonewall County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sutton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Swisher County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Terrell County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Terry County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Throckmorton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Trinity County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tyler County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Upton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ward County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wheeler County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilbarger County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Willacy County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Winkler County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yoakum County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Young County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Zapata County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Zavala County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/22/2024 4:04 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

*** No Healthy People 2030 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top