Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Texas by County

Lung & Bronchus, 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Texas *** 32.5 (32.2, 32.8) N/A 8,981 falling falling trend -4.5 (-5.1, -4.0)
United States *** 36.7 (36.6, 36.8) N/A 146,023 falling falling trend -4.9 (-5.2, -4.5)
Polk County *** 77.6 (67.5, 88.8) 1 (1, 9) 48 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.3)
Donley County *** 75.4 (42.7, 125.7) 2 (1, 176) 4 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.4, 2.3)
Baylor County *** 69.5 (43.7, 109.3) 3 (1, 158) 5
*
*
Trinity County *** 66.8 (53.4, 83.5) 4 (1, 58) 18 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.1, 1.1)
Morris County *** 63.2 (47.9, 82.7) 5 (1, 98) 12 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.5)
Coleman County *** 60.1 (44.0, 82.0) 6 (1, 126) 9 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.1, 1.4)
Delta County *** 59.2 (38.1, 90.2) 7 (1, 175) 5 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.5, -0.1)
Liberty County *** 56.6 (49.6, 64.3) 8 (2, 56) 50 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.7, -1.2)
Anderson County *** 55.8 (48.0, 64.5) 9 (2, 75) 38 falling falling trend -3.8 (-5.1, -2.5)
Panola County *** 55.4 (44.6, 68.3) 10 (2, 105) 19 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.3, -0.1)
Lamar County *** 55.3 (47.9, 63.7) 11 (2, 69) 40 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.6)
Shelby County *** 55.1 (44.5, 67.7) 12 (2, 109) 19 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.6)
Montague County *** 55.1 (43.1, 69.6) 13 (1, 119) 16 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.1)
Young County *** 54.7 (42.8, 69.3) 14 (2, 123) 15 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.7)
San Augustine County *** 53.4 (36.5, 77.0) 15 (1, 173) 7 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.3, 0.9)
Wise County *** 53.2 (46.0, 61.2) 16 (3, 84) 41 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.2)
Fannin County *** 52.3 (43.5, 62.5) 17 (3, 112) 26 falling falling trend -1.0 (-2.0, -0.1)
Robertson County *** 51.4 (39.3, 66.6) 18 (2, 142) 12 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.3, 0.0)
Bowie County *** 51.3 (45.6, 57.5) 19 (6, 88) 61 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.1, -1.0)
Orange County *** 50.8 (44.9, 57.4) 20 (6, 85) 54 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.6, -1.3)
Sabine County *** 50.6 (38.3, 67.6) 21 (2, 147) 12 stable stable trend -1.5 (-2.9, 0.0)
McCulloch County *** 50.3 (34.7, 72.1) 22 (1, 170) 7 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.9, 0.9)
Palo Pinto County *** 50.3 (41.1, 61.1) 23 (3, 120) 22 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.9, -1.2)
Henderson County *** 50.2 (44.9, 56.1) 24 (6, 80) 67 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.7, -1.4)
Cass County *** 50.0 (41.4, 60.3) 25 (3, 117) 25 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.3)
Limestone County *** 49.8 (39.5, 62.3) 26 (3, 133) 17 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.0, -1.0)
Coryell County *** 49.5 (41.7, 58.2) 27 (4, 111) 29 falling falling trend -2.9 (-3.8, -1.9)
Cooke County *** 49.2 (41.2, 58.5) 28 (5, 109) 28 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.1)
Freestone County *** 49.0 (38.4, 62.2) 29 (2, 140) 15 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.6)
Red River County *** 48.7 (36.6, 64.7) 30 (2, 155) 11 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.1, -0.2)
Hill County *** 48.5 (40.5, 57.9) 31 (4, 122) 27 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.2)
Kaufman County *** 48.3 (42.8, 54.3) 32 (8, 96) 59 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.8, -1.5)
Lee County *** 48.1 (36.2, 63.0) 33 (2, 155) 11 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.9, 1.2)
Leon County *** 47.7 (37.3, 60.9) 34 (4, 149) 15 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.2, -0.9)
Van Zandt County *** 47.4 (40.9, 54.8) 35 (8, 110) 39 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.1)
Stephens County *** 47.2 (32.1, 67.9) 36 (2, 178) 6 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.0, -0.5)
San Jacinto County *** 47.2 (38.5, 57.6) 37 (5, 138) 22 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.8, -0.6)
Burleson County *** 47.1 (36.3, 60.8) 38 (3, 152) 14 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.0, -0.2)
Grayson County *** 47.1 (42.7, 52.0) 39 (13, 92) 83 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.2, -1.3)
Hunt County *** 47.1 (41.6, 53.1) 40 (10, 103) 55 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.6)
Johnson County *** 46.8 (42.4, 51.5) 41 (13, 95) 87 falling falling trend -2.9 (-3.8, -1.9)
Wichita County *** 46.6 (41.8, 51.8) 42 (12, 98) 72 falling falling trend -4.0 (-5.1, -2.9)
Jasper County *** 46.1 (37.9, 55.8) 43 (6, 142) 23 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.5, -1.6)
Bosque County *** 46.0 (36.2, 58.3) 44 (5, 150) 16 stable stable trend -11.3 (-22.3, 1.2)
Navarro County *** 45.7 (38.4, 54.1) 45 (7, 126) 29 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.8, -1.0)
Aransas County *** 45.5 (36.8, 56.2) 46 (6, 146) 21 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.3, -1.5)
Wood County *** 45.5 (38.9, 53.1) 47 (9, 123) 38 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.7, -0.7)
Scurry County *** 45.4 (32.8, 61.4) 48 (3, 169) 9 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.1, 0.8)
Hutchinson County *** 45.4 (34.4, 58.9) 49 (3, 160) 12 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.5)
Harrison County *** 45.3 (39.1, 52.3) 50 (11, 128) 39 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.2)
Rains County *** 45.3 (32.6, 62.3) 51 (3, 172) 9 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.6, -1.6)
Brown County *** 45.2 (37.5, 54.2) 52 (7, 134) 25 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.7, -0.9)
Falls County *** 45.1 (33.8, 59.3) 53 (4, 165) 11 stable stable trend 1.9 (-2.1, 6.1)
Real County *** 45.1 (25.5, 81.5) 54 (1, 188) 3
*
*
Galveston County *** 45.0 (41.9, 48.3) 55 (27, 94) 168 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.1, -2.2)
Chambers County *** 44.8 (35.6, 55.7) 56 (5, 143) 17 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.1, -0.8)
Hopkins County *** 44.8 (36.8, 54.1) 57 (7, 146) 23 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.7, -0.9)
Bell County *** 44.6 (41.2, 48.2) 58 (27, 97) 132 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.2, -1.9)
Bastrop County *** 44.3 (38.5, 50.8) 59 (15, 120) 45 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.3, -0.8)
Llano County *** 44.3 (35.4, 55.7) 60 (4, 148) 22 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.6, -0.7)
Houston County *** 44.2 (35.2, 55.2) 61 (6, 149) 17 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.6, -1.0)
Angelina County *** 44.0 (38.5, 50.0) 62 (15, 122) 48 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.8, -1.7)
Marion County *** 43.9 (30.8, 62.1) 63 (2, 179) 8 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.3, 0.6)
Parker County *** 43.7 (39.2, 48.7) 64 (19, 112) 70 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.6, -1.2)
Hardin County *** 43.6 (37.1, 51.1) 65 (9, 134) 32 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.1, -1.5)
Gregg County *** 43.6 (38.9, 48.8) 66 (21, 115) 64 falling falling trend -4.1 (-5.6, -2.5)
Hood County *** 43.6 (38.1, 50.0) 67 (16, 123) 46 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.2, -2.0)
Tyler County *** 43.5 (34.2, 55.1) 68 (6, 158) 15 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.2, -0.9)
Jack County *** 43.4 (27.9, 65.0) 69 (2, 187) 5 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.8, -0.2)
Potter County *** 42.9 (37.7, 48.6) 70 (20, 127) 50 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.7, -1.4)
Lampasas County *** 42.8 (33.0, 55.0) 71 (4, 167) 13 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.3, -1.0)
Matagorda County *** 42.6 (34.6, 52.1) 72 (9, 149) 20 falling falling trend -3.8 (-5.6, -2.0)
Madison County *** 42.2 (29.3, 59.2) 73 (3, 180) 7 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.8, 0.7)
Gray County *** 42.2 (32.1, 54.7) 74 (6, 172) 12 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.5, -0.5)
Eastland County *** 42.1 (32.2, 54.7) 75 (6, 170) 13 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.6, -0.4)
Ector County *** 42.0 (37.0, 47.5) 76 (25, 130) 53 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.6, -1.6)
Camp County *** 41.7 (29.2, 58.3) 77 (4, 180) 7 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.2, -2.0)
Swisher County *** 41.7 (26.0, 64.5) 78 (3, 188) 4
*
*
Upshur County *** 41.6 (34.3, 50.1) 79 (13, 150) 24 falling falling trend -4.2 (-6.2, -2.1)
Rusk County *** 41.5 (34.8, 49.2) 80 (17, 149) 28 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.7)
Childress County *** 41.3 (23.8, 67.3) 81 (1, 188) 3 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.6, 0.1)
Hamilton County *** 41.3 (28.2, 60.3) 82 (3, 184) 6 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.2, 1.5)
Franklin County *** 40.8 (28.5, 57.7) 83 (4, 183) 7 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.8, 0.4)
Karnes County *** 40.2 (27.6, 56.6) 84 (5, 184) 7 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.8, 0.3)
Burnet County *** 40.2 (34.0, 47.4) 85 (21, 150) 31 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.2, -1.4)
Goliad County *** 40.0 (25.7, 61.2) 86 (3, 187) 5
*
*
Erath County *** 39.9 (31.9, 49.3) 87 (15, 165) 18 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.9, -0.7)
DeWitt County *** 39.7 (30.0, 51.9) 88 (7, 174) 12 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.8, 0.9)
Cherokee County *** 39.7 (33.3, 47.1) 89 (20, 150) 28 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.2, -1.6)
San Patricio County *** 39.2 (33.1, 46.2) 90 (26, 155) 30 falling falling trend -5.0 (-7.5, -2.5)
Ward County *** 39.0 (24.7, 58.5) 91 (3, 187) 5
*
*
Waller County *** 39.0 (31.2, 48.1) 92 (19, 168) 18 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.3, -1.1)
Ellis County *** 38.9 (34.8, 43.4) 93 (49, 137) 68 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.8, -1.5)
Nolan County *** 38.9 (27.5, 53.9) 94 (5, 184) 8 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.0, 0.6)
Newton County *** 38.9 (27.9, 53.6) 95 (6, 182) 8 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.6, -0.3)
Tom Green County *** 38.9 (34.3, 43.9) 96 (42, 138) 53 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.5, -1.5)
Howard County *** 38.9 (30.4, 48.9) 97 (14, 167) 15 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.9, -0.8)
Calhoun County *** 38.7 (29.1, 50.8) 98 (11, 176) 11 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.3, -1.1)
Gonzales County *** 38.7 (28.9, 51.0) 99 (9, 174) 11 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.1, -0.8)
Grimes County *** 38.6 (30.1, 49.0) 100 (11, 173) 15 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.6, -1.9)
Brazoria County *** 38.6 (35.6, 41.7) 101 (60, 131) 129 falling falling trend -3.4 (-4.0, -2.8)
Bandera County *** 38.2 (30.1, 48.7) 102 (18, 173) 16 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.2, -1.3)
Mason County *** 38.1 (22.1, 67.1) 103 (3, 188) 3
*
*
Titus County *** 38.1 (29.4, 48.6) 104 (12, 173) 13 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.8, -1.3)
Haskell County *** 38.0 (21.5, 64.6) 105 (2, 188) 3 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.4, 1.1)
Milam County *** 37.8 (29.4, 48.2) 106 (14, 174) 14 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.3)
Jefferson County *** 37.8 (34.6, 41.1) 107 (68, 134) 111 falling falling trend -10.6 (-14.9, -6.1)
Somervell County *** 37.5 (23.4, 57.8) 108 (3, 188) 5 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.6, -1.9)
McLennan County *** 37.5 (34.3, 40.9) 109 (65, 137) 104 falling falling trend -4.5 (-5.8, -3.2)
Runnels County *** 37.1 (25.0, 54.2) 110 (7, 187) 6 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.2, -0.6)
Nacogdoches County *** 37.0 (30.9, 44.0) 111 (35, 162) 27 falling falling trend -6.1 (-9.8, -2.2)
Archer County *** 36.5 (23.5, 55.4) 112 (6, 188) 5 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.1, -0.9)
Terry County *** 36.4 (23.5, 53.9) 113 (5, 188) 5 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.8, 0.8)
Tarrant County *** 36.3 (35.0, 37.6) 114 (90, 131) 665 falling falling trend -3.6 (-4.1, -3.1)
Carson County *** 35.9 (20.5, 60.5) 115 (3, 188) 3 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.4, -0.1)
Taylor County *** 35.8 (31.7, 40.4) 116 (62, 153) 55 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.6, -1.5)
Blanco County *** 35.4 (24.5, 51.0) 117 (5, 187) 7 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.5, -1.0)
Live Oak County *** 35.3 (23.6, 51.4) 118 (6, 188) 6 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.1, -0.1)
Kerr County *** 35.3 (30.3, 41.1) 119 (55, 160) 37 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.7, -1.1)
Jones County *** 35.2 (25.2, 48.1) 120 (13, 186) 8 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.8, 0.2)
Smith County *** 35.0 (32.0, 38.3) 121 (81, 149) 99 rising rising trend 9.0 (1.9, 16.6)
Ochiltree County *** 34.9 (19.7, 57.0) 122 (4, 188) 3 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.5, -0.2)
Callahan County *** 34.7 (24.2, 49.0) 123 (12, 186) 7 falling falling trend -12.7 (-22.0, -2.2)
Wilbarger County *** 34.7 (23.5, 50.0) 124 (8, 187) 6 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.3, -0.1)
Guadalupe County *** 34.6 (30.7, 38.8) 125 (70, 158) 59 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.5, -1.5)
Montgomery County *** 34.6 (32.4, 36.8) 126 (95, 143) 207 falling falling trend -5.2 (-6.2, -4.1)
Lavaca County *** 34.3 (25.8, 45.3) 127 (20, 181) 11 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.4, -0.2)
Midland County *** 34.2 (29.9, 38.8) 128 (76, 164) 49 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.7, -1.5)
Victoria County *** 34.1 (29.3, 39.4) 129 (67, 166) 38 falling falling trend -3.0 (-3.7, -2.2)
Andrews County *** 33.9 (22.0, 49.8) 130 (9, 188) 5 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.3, 0.2)
Castro County *** 33.7 (19.1, 56.0) 131 (4, 188) 3
*
*
Uvalde County *** 33.5 (25.2, 43.9) 132 (26, 182) 11 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.2, -1.6)
Austin County *** 33.5 (26.0, 42.7) 133 (42, 178) 14 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.0, -0.7)
Hale County *** 33.5 (25.6, 43.2) 134 (33, 180) 12 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 0.8)
Jackson County *** 33.5 (23.0, 47.5) 135 (16, 188) 7 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.5, -0.6)
Mitchell County *** 33.3 (18.9, 54.8) 136 (4, 188) 3 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.4, -1.0)
Clay County *** 33.3 (22.5, 48.9) 137 (9, 188) 6 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.3, 0.5)
Moore County *** 32.0 (21.4, 45.8) 138 (13, 188) 6 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.0, -0.7)
Bee County *** 31.9 (23.8, 41.9) 139 (36, 185) 11 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.9, -1.3)
Lubbock County *** 31.8 (28.9, 34.8) 140 (103, 163) 93 falling falling trend -4.4 (-6.1, -2.7)
Rockwall County *** 31.7 (26.7, 37.5) 141 (75, 176) 29 falling falling trend -3.6 (-4.4, -2.8)
Comal County *** 31.6 (28.0, 35.5) 142 (95, 166) 60 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.6, -1.1)
Kleberg County *** 31.6 (23.3, 41.9) 143 (34, 185) 10 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.5, -0.6)
Walker County *** 31.5 (26.0, 37.8) 144 (74, 177) 24 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.5, -1.7)
Washington County *** 31.4 (25.2, 38.9) 145 (70, 180) 18 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.1, -1.3)
Hockley County *** 31.1 (22.4, 42.3) 146 (28, 187) 8 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.4, -0.5)
Dallas County *** 30.9 (29.8, 32.0) 147 (125, 156) 692 falling falling trend -4.5 (-5.1, -3.9)
Duval County *** 30.9 (19.5, 47.0) 148 (12, 188) 5 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.2, -0.7)
Randall County *** 30.6 (26.7, 34.8) 149 (100, 173) 47 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.8)
Brewster County *** 30.6 (18.3, 49.0) 150 (10, 188) 4
*
*
Wharton County *** 30.6 (24.3, 38.1) 151 (66, 182) 17 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.4, -1.5)
Nueces County *** 30.1 (27.7, 32.7) 152 (120, 166) 121 falling falling trend -3.0 (-3.4, -2.6)
Comanche County *** 30.1 (20.9, 43.0) 153 (26, 188) 7 falling falling trend -1.5 (-3.0, -0.1)
Caldwell County *** 29.6 (22.9, 37.5) 154 (75, 185) 14 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.5, -1.4)
Harris County *** 29.5 (28.7, 30.3) 155 (133, 160) 1,136 falling falling trend -6.2 (-7.5, -4.9)
Refugio County *** 28.6 (16.6, 47.8) 156 (16, 188) 3 falling falling trend -12.6 (-21.6, -2.5)
Denton County *** 28.5 (26.7, 30.5) 157 (131, 168) 187 falling falling trend -3.2 (-3.7, -2.7)
Deaf Smith County *** 28.4 (18.6, 41.5) 158 (24, 188) 5 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.4, 0.4)
Hays County *** 28.3 (24.7, 32.1) 159 (117, 179) 50 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.2, -1.7)
Williamson County *** 28.0 (25.9, 30.2) 160 (131, 173) 139 falling falling trend -2.9 (-3.4, -2.3)
Medina County *** 27.3 (21.8, 33.9) 161 (102, 185) 17 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.1, -0.9)
Jim Wells County *** 27.0 (20.6, 34.8) 162 (87, 187) 12 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.8, -1.8)
Kendall County *** 26.8 (21.2, 33.5) 163 (98, 186) 16 falling falling trend -3.4 (-4.5, -2.3)
Wilson County *** 26.8 (21.2, 33.5) 164 (96, 187) 16 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.2, -1.7)
Dawson County *** 26.7 (16.3, 41.6) 165 (28, 188) 4 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.2, 0.4)
Dimmit County *** 26.1 (14.8, 43.0) 166 (20, 188) 3
*
*
Collin County *** 26.1 (24.5, 27.8) 167 (147, 176) 214 falling falling trend -4.3 (-5.3, -3.2)
Gillespie County *** 25.9 (20.2, 33.5) 168 (98, 187) 15 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.8, -0.3)
Brazos County *** 25.6 (22.1, 29.4) 169 (131, 183) 41 falling falling trend -6.5 (-9.0, -4.0)
Atascosa County *** 25.6 (19.9, 32.3) 170 (107, 188) 14 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.2, -1.9)
Pecos County *** 25.5 (15.7, 39.1) 171 (50, 188) 4 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.0, -0.6)
Bexar County *** 25.4 (24.3, 26.4) 172 (154, 177) 464 falling falling trend -5.6 (-7.7, -3.4)
Fayette County *** 25.3 (19.3, 33.3) 173 (103, 188) 12 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.2, -0.6)
Travis County *** 25.0 (23.5, 26.5) 174 (154, 179) 232 falling falling trend -5.0 (-6.3, -3.8)
Lamb County *** 23.8 (14.7, 37.1) 175 (70, 188) 4 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.7, 0.4)
Frio County *** 23.4 (14.4, 35.9) 176 (66, 188) 4 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.7, -0.5)
Colorado County *** 23.1 (16.6, 32.0) 177 (98, 188) 8 falling falling trend -13.8 (-22.2, -4.4)
Reeves County *** 23.1 (13.4, 37.0) 178 (58, 188) 3
*
*
Val Verde County *** 23.0 (17.6, 29.5) 179 (126, 188) 12 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.5, -2.0)
Willacy County *** 22.2 (14.3, 32.9) 180 (80, 188) 5 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.5, 0.3)
Fort Bend County *** 21.9 (20.3, 23.7) 181 (166, 185) 143 falling falling trend -3.6 (-4.2, -3.0)
Gaines County *** 21.9 (12.6, 35.2) 182 (59, 188) 3 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.5, -0.4)
Starr County *** 20.6 (15.6, 26.6) 183 (134, 188) 12 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.8, -0.2)
El Paso County *** 19.9 (18.5, 21.4) 184 (173, 187) 157 falling falling trend -4.0 (-4.8, -3.2)
Webb County *** 19.6 (17.0, 22.6) 185 (168, 188) 40 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.7, -1.2)
Cameron County *** 18.8 (17.0, 20.7) 186 (174, 188) 80 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.2, -2.2)
Hidalgo County *** 17.5 (16.2, 18.9) 187 (179, 188) 127 falling falling trend -9.0 (-15.9, -1.5)
Maverick County *** 17.3 (12.5, 23.3) 188 (157, 188) 9 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.8, -0.8)
Armstrong County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bailey County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Borden County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Briscoe County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brooks County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cochran County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coke County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Collingsworth County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Concho County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cottle County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crane County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crockett County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crosby County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Culberson County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dallam County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dickens County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Edwards County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fisher County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Floyd County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Foard County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Garza County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glasscock County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hall County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hansford County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardeman County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hartley County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hemphill County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hudspeth County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Irion County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jeff Davis County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jim Hogg County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kenedy County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kent County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kimble County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
King County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kinney County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Knox County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
La Salle County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lipscomb County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Loving County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lynn County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Martin County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McMullen County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menard County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mills County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Motley County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oldham County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Parmer County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Presidio County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Reagan County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roberts County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Saba County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schleicher County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shackelford County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sherman County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sterling County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stonewall County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sutton County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Terrell County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Throckmorton County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Upton County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wheeler County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Winkler County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yoakum County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Zapata County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Zavala County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/25/2021 5:17 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top