Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Texas by County

Lung & Bronchus, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 25.1?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Texas No 31.3 (31.0, 31.6) N/A 8,908 falling falling trend -4.4 (-4.9, -3.9)
United States No 35.0 (34.9, 35.0) N/A 142,497 falling falling trend -4.8 (-5.1, -4.6)
Hidalgo County Yes 16.3 (15.1, 17.7) 188 (179, 188) 122 falling falling trend -7.1 (-10.9, -3.2)
Cameron County Yes 17.5 (15.8, 19.4) 187 (175, 188) 77 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.3, -2.3)
Willacy County Yes 17.5 (10.7, 27.3) 186 (125, 188) 4 stable stable trend -1.9 (-3.8, 0.1)
El Paso County Yes 19.3 (17.9, 20.7) 185 (172, 187) 155 falling falling trend -3.8 (-4.6, -3.1)
Webb County Yes 19.5 (16.9, 22.4) 184 (161, 188) 41 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.7, -1.3)
Starr County Yes 19.6 (14.8, 25.5) 183 (141, 188) 11 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.8, -0.4)
Frio County Yes 19.8 (11.8, 31.0) 182 (103, 188) 4 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.6, -0.7)
Maverick County Yes 20.0 (14.8, 26.3) 181 (138, 188) 10 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.3, -0.6)
Fort Bend County Yes 21.0 (19.4, 22.6) 180 (166, 185) 145 falling falling trend -3.7 (-4.2, -3.1)
Val Verde County Yes 21.2 (16.0, 27.5) 179 (130, 188) 11 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.4, -2.0)
Reeves County Yes 21.9 (12.5, 35.5) 178 (53, 188) 3
*
*
Gaines County Yes 22.0 (12.6, 35.4) 177 (50, 188) 3 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.2, -0.4)
Kendall County Yes 22.9 (18.0, 29.0) 176 (122, 188) 15 falling falling trend -3.7 (-4.9, -2.6)
Brewster County Yes 23.4 (12.8, 40.2) 175 (31, 188) 3
*
*
Travis County Yes 24.0 (22.6, 25.5) 174 (154, 178) 233 falling falling trend -5.0 (-6.1, -3.9)
Hockley County Yes 24.1 (16.4, 34.3) 173 (73, 188) 6 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.6, -0.7)
Lamb County Yes 24.2 (14.9, 37.6) 172 (61, 188) 4 stable stable trend -1.9 (-3.9, 0.2)
Bexar County Yes 24.4 (23.4, 25.5) 171 (154, 176) 460 falling falling trend -4.9 (-6.4, -3.5)
Brazos County Yes 24.5 (21.1, 28.1) 170 (131, 183) 41 falling falling trend -6.5 (-8.6, -4.3)
Fayette County Yes 24.7 (18.8, 32.5) 169 (105, 188) 12 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.1, -0.7)
Atascosa County No 25.2 (19.6, 31.8) 168 (101, 187) 14 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.2, -2.1)
Collin County No 25.2 (23.7, 26.8) 167 (146, 176) 217 falling falling trend -4.4 (-5.3, -3.5)
Colorado County No 25.3 (18.5, 34.4) 166 (87, 188) 9 falling falling trend -10.5 (-17.6, -2.8)
Hays County No 26.3 (23.0, 29.9) 165 (121, 179) 49 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.3, -1.8)
Gillespie County No 26.3 (20.6, 33.8) 164 (94, 186) 15 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.7, -0.4)
Pecos County No 26.4 (16.3, 40.5) 163 (29, 188) 4 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.8, -0.6)
Dawson County No 26.6 (16.2, 41.4) 162 (32, 188) 4 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.3, 0.1)
Williamson County No 26.6 (24.6, 28.7) 161 (136, 174) 140 falling falling trend -2.9 (-3.5, -2.4)
Washington County No 26.8 (21.1, 33.8) 160 (96, 188) 16 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.2, -1.4)
Refugio County No 27.0 (15.4, 46.0) 159 (19, 188) 3 falling falling trend -13.2 (-21.7, -3.8)
Wilbarger County No 27.3 (17.3, 41.5) 158 (29, 188) 5 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.2, -0.2)
Denton County No 27.3 (25.5, 29.2) 157 (134, 170) 192 falling falling trend -3.2 (-3.7, -2.8)
Medina County No 27.4 (21.9, 33.9) 156 (83, 185) 18 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.0, -0.9)
Ward County No 27.5 (15.9, 44.4) 155 (13, 188) 3
*
*
Harris County No 27.9 (27.1, 28.6) 154 (137, 162) 1,103 falling falling trend -6.2 (-7.2, -5.1)
Wilson County No 28.0 (22.3, 34.7) 153 (83, 183) 18 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.0, -1.7)
Moore County No 28.1 (18.5, 40.8) 152 (26, 188) 6 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.9, -0.8)
Nueces County No 28.2 (25.9, 30.6) 151 (123, 169) 116 falling falling trend -3.1 (-3.5, -2.7)
Duval County No 28.3 (17.4, 44.1) 150 (18, 188) 4 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.4, -1.0)
Jim Wells County No 28.6 (22.0, 36.6) 149 (63, 185) 13 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.7, -1.9)
Comanche County No 28.6 (19.6, 41.3) 148 (34, 188) 7 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.0, -0.3)
Wharton County No 29.7 (23.6, 37.1) 147 (68, 181) 16 falling falling trend -5.5 (-7.9, -3.2)
Kleberg County No 29.9 (21.9, 39.9) 146 (49, 186) 9 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.7, -0.8)
Goliad County No 30.1 (17.9, 49.4) 145 (9, 188) 4
*
*
Lubbock County No 30.2 (27.4, 33.1) 144 (106, 162) 91 falling falling trend -3.7 (-4.8, -2.5)
Dallas County No 30.2 (29.2, 31.3) 143 (121, 152) 691 falling falling trend -4.2 (-4.7, -3.7)
Austin County No 30.3 (23.4, 38.9) 142 (54, 184) 14 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.1, -1.0)
Comal County No 30.5 (27.1, 34.2) 141 (101, 167) 62 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.7, -1.2)
Deaf Smith County No 31.0 (20.7, 44.6) 140 (17, 188) 6 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.2, 0.3)
Hale County No 31.1 (23.5, 40.4) 139 (38, 183) 11 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.5)
Parmer County No 31.2 (17.7, 51.0) 138 (6, 188) 3
*
*
Midland County No 31.4 (27.4, 35.9) 137 (85, 166) 46 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.8, -1.7)
Victoria County No 31.7 (27.1, 36.8) 136 (76, 170) 35 falling falling trend -3.0 (-3.7, -2.3)
Rockwall County No 31.7 (26.7, 37.3) 135 (64, 171) 30 falling falling trend -3.5 (-4.3, -2.8)
Randall County No 32.0 (28.2, 36.3) 134 (82, 164) 50 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.8)
Guadalupe County No 32.1 (28.4, 36.1) 133 (85, 161) 57 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.6, -1.6)
Karnes County No 32.1 (20.8, 47.4) 132 (8, 188) 5 stable stable trend -1.5 (-2.9, 0.0)
Jones County No 32.2 (22.6, 44.7) 131 (22, 187) 7 stable stable trend -1.5 (-2.9, 0.0)
Walker County No 32.2 (26.7, 38.6) 130 (60, 172) 25 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.4, -1.8)
Caldwell County No 32.3 (25.4, 40.5) 129 (45, 179) 15 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.2, -1.2)
Callahan County No 32.4 (22.2, 46.4) 128 (15, 188) 7 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.6, -0.7)
Bee County No 32.8 (24.6, 42.8) 127 (28, 181) 11 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.7, -1.3)
Somervell County No 33.0 (20.3, 51.9) 126 (6, 188) 4 falling falling trend -3.4 (-4.7, -2.1)
Uvalde County No 33.1 (24.9, 43.3) 125 (25, 182) 11 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.3, -1.8)
Mason County No 33.3 (19.0, 60.6) 124 (4, 188) 3
*
*
Taylor County No 33.4 (29.4, 37.8) 123 (70, 155) 52 falling falling trend -3.7 (-5.0, -2.4)
Mitchell County No 33.4 (19.0, 55.0) 122 (4, 188) 3 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.5, -1.2)
Archer County No 33.4 (21.4, 51.4) 121 (4, 188) 5 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.0, -1.0)
Gray County No 33.9 (24.9, 45.4) 120 (20, 182) 9 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.7, -0.7)
Montgomery County No 34.4 (32.3, 36.6) 119 (89, 137) 215 falling falling trend -4.9 (-5.9, -3.9)
Jefferson County No 34.7 (31.7, 37.9) 118 (78, 144) 103 falling falling trend -8.1 (-10.7, -5.4)
Tarrant County No 34.8 (33.6, 36.0) 117 (94, 131) 660 falling falling trend -3.7 (-4.2, -3.2)
Clay County No 35.0 (23.6, 51.3) 116 (9, 188) 6 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.1, 0.5)
Kerr County No 35.1 (30.1, 41.0) 115 (51, 158) 37 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.7, -1.2)
Runnels County No 35.2 (23.6, 51.8) 114 (7, 187) 6 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.4, -0.9)
Blanco County No 35.4 (24.7, 50.6) 113 (9, 184) 8 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.4, -1.1)
Bandera County No 35.7 (28.1, 45.4) 112 (18, 173) 16 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.2, -1.4)
San Patricio County No 35.7 (29.9, 42.3) 111 (34, 161) 27 falling falling trend -5.0 (-7.2, -2.8)
Carson County No 35.7 (20.3, 60.3) 110 (3, 188) 3 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.6, -0.3)
Castro County No 36.0 (20.7, 59.0) 109 (3, 188) 3
*
*
Smith County No 36.2 (33.1, 39.5) 108 (65, 137) 105 stable stable trend 5.6 (0.0, 11.4)
Burnet County No 36.3 (30.5, 43.2) 107 (36, 158) 29 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.4, -1.6)
Jackson County No 36.4 (25.6, 50.6) 106 (8, 184) 8 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.0, -0.4)
McLennan County No 36.6 (33.5, 39.9) 105 (65, 136) 105 falling falling trend -4.3 (-5.4, -3.1)
Live Oak County No 36.6 (24.8, 52.8) 104 (6, 185) 7 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.1, -0.3)
Haskell County No 37.1 (20.9, 63.2) 103 (2, 188) 3 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.8, 0.8)
Howard County No 37.2 (28.9, 47.1) 102 (15, 169) 14 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.8, -0.9)
Milam County No 37.3 (29.1, 47.5) 101 (15, 172) 14 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.4, -0.5)
Brazoria County No 37.3 (34.4, 40.4) 100 (61, 129) 130 falling falling trend -3.4 (-4.0, -2.8)
Grimes County No 37.8 (29.6, 47.9) 99 (15, 169) 15 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.6, -2.0)
Terry County No 37.9 (24.7, 55.6) 98 (4, 187) 5 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.8, 0.5)
Ellis County No 37.9 (33.9, 42.3) 97 (45, 134) 69 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.8, -1.6)
Gonzales County No 38.1 (28.5, 50.2) 96 (9, 177) 11 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.2, -1.0)
Lavaca County No 38.2 (29.2, 49.6) 95 (10, 172) 13 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.1, -0.1)
Rains County No 38.2 (26.8, 53.9) 94 (6, 179) 8 falling falling trend -3.4 (-4.9, -1.9)
Eastland County No 38.3 (28.9, 50.3) 93 (10, 173) 12 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.7, -0.6)
Andrews County No 38.4 (25.7, 55.0) 92 (5, 186) 6 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.4, -0.1)
Newton County No 38.7 (27.7, 53.4) 91 (5, 180) 8 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.7, -0.5)
Marion County No 38.8 (26.3, 56.6) 90 (3, 183) 7 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.6, 0.3)
Nacogdoches County No 39.1 (32.9, 46.3) 89 (23, 148) 29 falling falling trend -4.4 (-6.9, -1.8)
Titus County No 39.4 (30.7, 50.0) 88 (9, 166) 14 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.9, -1.4)
Lampasas County No 39.4 (30.2, 51.0) 87 (8, 168) 13 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.7, -1.2)
Ector County No 39.7 (34.8, 45.0) 86 (28, 132) 50 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.6, -1.7)
Tom Green County No 39.9 (35.3, 44.9) 85 (30, 128) 56 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.4, -1.5)
Limestone County No 40.1 (30.9, 51.5) 84 (9, 165) 13 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.2, -1.2)
Scurry County No 40.1 (28.3, 55.4) 83 (5, 181) 8 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.4, 0.5)
Cherokee County No 40.4 (34.0, 47.9) 82 (16, 145) 28 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.2, -1.7)
Erath County No 40.5 (32.5, 49.9) 81 (10, 159) 18 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.8, -0.8)
DeWitt County No 40.6 (30.8, 52.8) 80 (6, 167) 12 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.7)
Rusk County No 40.6 (34.1, 48.2) 79 (15, 144) 28 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.7)
Hutchinson County No 40.8 (30.6, 53.6) 78 (5, 170) 11 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -0.7)
Matagorda County No 41.2 (33.3, 50.5) 77 (11, 155) 20 falling falling trend -3.6 (-5.2, -2.0)
Hood County No 41.2 (35.9, 47.3) 76 (21, 130) 45 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.1, -2.1)
Llano County No 41.4 (32.2, 53.2) 75 (7, 159) 20 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.7, -0.8)
Gregg County No 41.4 (36.8, 46.4) 74 (26, 119) 61 falling falling trend -3.5 (-4.6, -2.4)
Bell County No 41.5 (38.3, 44.9) 73 (35, 107) 128 falling falling trend -7.8 (-14.6, -0.5)
McCulloch County No 41.6 (27.7, 61.6) 72 (2, 183) 6 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.0, 0.7)
Navarro County No 41.8 (34.9, 49.7) 71 (13, 140) 27 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.8, -1.2)
Hamilton County No 41.8 (28.4, 61.3) 70 (2, 183) 6 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.1, 1.4)
Burleson County No 41.9 (31.9, 54.5) 69 (5, 161) 12 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.1, -0.4)
Waller County No 42.0 (34.0, 51.3) 68 (10, 147) 20 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.1, -1.0)
Harrison County No 42.0 (36.1, 48.7) 67 (15, 127) 37 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.7, 0.0)
Wichita County No 42.4 (37.9, 47.3) 66 (22, 114) 67 falling falling trend -4.1 (-5.1, -3.1)
Houston County No 42.5 (33.8, 53.3) 65 (8, 154) 17 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.7, -1.2)
Calhoun County No 42.5 (32.5, 55.0) 64 (5, 164) 12 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.1, -1.1)
Potter County No 42.6 (37.4, 48.2) 63 (19, 119) 51 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.7, -1.5)
Hardin County No 42.7 (36.2, 50.1) 62 (12, 134) 32 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.1, -1.6)
Jasper County No 42.7 (35.0, 51.9) 61 (8, 149) 22 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.5, -1.7)
Chambers County No 42.7 (33.8, 53.3) 60 (6, 148) 17 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.2, -1.0)
Bastrop County No 42.8 (37.2, 49.0) 59 (14, 123) 45 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.6, -1.0)
Nolan County No 42.8 (30.8, 58.4) 58 (3, 171) 9 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.9, 0.6)
Parker County No 42.9 (38.4, 47.7) 57 (17, 109) 71 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.6, -1.3)
Brown County No 42.9 (35.5, 51.6) 56 (9, 140) 24 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.7, -1.0)
Falls County No 43.0 (32.0, 56.9) 55 (3, 169) 10 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.6, -1.3)
Leon County No 43.1 (33.2, 55.6) 54 (5, 158) 14 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.4, -1.1)
Hopkins County No 43.2 (35.5, 52.2) 53 (8, 135) 22 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.8, -1.0)
Childress County No 43.3 (25.5, 69.7) 52 (1, 188) 4 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.7, -0.1)
Franklin County No 43.4 (30.3, 61.3) 51 (2, 178) 7 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.8, 0.2)
Swisher County No 43.5 (27.4, 66.7) 50 (1, 186) 5
*
*
Real County No 43.5 (24.6, 79.2) 49 (1, 188) 3
*
*
Angelina County No 43.6 (38.2, 49.5) 48 (15, 116) 48 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.8, -1.7)
Galveston County No 43.8 (40.8, 46.9) 47 (27, 93) 169 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.0, -2.4)
San Jacinto County No 43.9 (35.7, 53.8) 46 (7, 140) 21 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.9, -0.8)
Tyler County No 44.1 (34.6, 56.0) 45 (5, 151) 15 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.0, -0.9)
Upshur County No 44.2 (36.8, 52.7) 44 (8, 134) 26 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.6, -0.8)
Wood County No 44.4 (38.0, 51.9) 43 (9, 120) 38 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.7, -0.8)
Bosque County No 44.9 (35.5, 56.8) 42 (5, 145) 16 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.1)
Hill County No 45.1 (37.4, 54.2) 41 (6, 127) 25 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.0)
Camp County No 45.6 (32.2, 63.2) 40 (2, 177) 8 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.9, -1.7)
Aransas County No 45.8 (37.1, 56.4) 39 (4, 129) 21 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.2, -1.5)
Lee County No 46.0 (34.6, 60.3) 38 (3, 152) 11 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.0, 1.0)
Grayson County No 46.1 (41.8, 50.9) 37 (12, 90) 85 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.2, -1.3)
Johnson County No 46.2 (41.9, 50.9) 36 (12, 90) 89 falling falling trend -2.9 (-3.8, -2.1)
Kaufman County No 46.7 (41.3, 52.5) 35 (7, 98) 59 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.8, -1.6)
Red River County No 46.7 (34.8, 62.6) 34 (2, 160) 11 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.0, -0.3)
Bowie County No 47.8 (42.4, 53.8) 33 (7, 94) 58 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -1.1)
Hunt County No 48.1 (42.6, 54.0) 32 (6, 88) 59 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
Jack County No 48.1 (31.8, 70.5) 31 (1, 179) 6 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.7, -0.3)
Anderson County No 48.1 (41.0, 56.2) 30 (6, 104) 33 falling falling trend -4.1 (-5.4, -2.8)
Madison County No 48.5 (34.7, 66.2) 29 (1, 162) 8 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.6, 0.6)
Fannin County No 48.9 (40.6, 58.6) 28 (3, 111) 25 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.1)
Sabine County No 49.0 (36.6, 66.2) 27 (1, 150) 11 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.6, 0.1)
Van Zandt County No 49.2 (42.7, 56.6) 26 (5, 92) 42 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.3)
Cooke County No 49.3 (41.4, 58.5) 25 (4, 105) 28 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Shelby County No 49.5 (39.6, 61.4) 24 (2, 126) 17 stable stable trend -20.7 (-41.5, 7.5)
Palo Pinto County No 49.5 (40.4, 60.4) 23 (3, 115) 21 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.7, -1.1)
Orange County No 49.8 (43.9, 56.4) 22 (5, 81) 53 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.7, -1.4)
Cass County No 50.4 (41.8, 60.6) 21 (3, 104) 25 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.3)
Coke County No 50.6 (29.4, 87.6) 20 (1, 187) 3 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.0, -0.4)
Stephens County No 50.8 (34.9, 72.4) 19 (1, 166) 7 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.9, -0.5)
Henderson County No 51.6 (46.2, 57.6) 18 (5, 67) 70 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.6, -1.5)
Lamar County No 52.4 (45.2, 60.6) 17 (3, 81) 38 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.6)
Coryell County No 52.5 (44.5, 61.4) 16 (2, 85) 32 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.5, -1.7)
Montague County No 52.6 (41.2, 66.6) 15 (1, 130) 16 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.3, -0.1)
Robertson County No 54.0 (41.3, 69.7) 14 (1, 127) 13 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.3, -0.1)
Wise County No 54.0 (46.9, 61.9) 13 (2, 71) 44 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.1)
Baylor County No 54.1 (31.8, 90.8) 12 (1, 184) 4
*
*
Young County No 54.5 (42.7, 69.0) 11 (1, 121) 15 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.5)
Liberty County No 54.6 (47.8, 62.0) 10 (3, 68) 50 falling falling trend -3.6 (-4.8, -2.3)
San Augustine County No 55.7 (39.0, 78.8) 9 (1, 149) 8 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.2, 0.8)
Panola County No 55.9 (45.1, 68.8) 8 (1, 92) 19 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.2)
Freestone County No 55.9 (44.6, 69.8) 7 (1, 100) 17 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 0.7)
Coleman County No 57.0 (41.3, 78.7) 6 (1, 142) 9 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.4, 1.2)
Delta County No 58.0 (37.3, 88.3) 5 (1, 174) 5 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.1, 0.1)
Morris County No 63.6 (48.2, 83.0) 4 (1, 81) 12 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.4)
Trinity County No 65.8 (52.7, 82.1) 3 (1, 51) 19 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.9)
Donley County No 71.9 (39.9, 122.0) 2 (1, 177) 4 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.7, 2.0)
Polk County No 74.1 (64.3, 85.0) 1 (1, 11) 48 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.3)
Armstrong County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bailey County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Borden County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Briscoe County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brooks County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cochran County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Collingsworth County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Concho County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cottle County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crane County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crockett County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crosby County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Culberson County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dallam County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dickens County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dimmit County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Edwards County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fisher County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Floyd County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Foard County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Garza County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glasscock County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hall County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hansford County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardeman County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hartley County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hemphill County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hudspeth County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Irion County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jeff Davis County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jim Hogg County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kenedy County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kent County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kimble County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
King County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kinney County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Knox County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
La Salle County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lipscomb County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Loving County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lynn County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Martin County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McMullen County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menard County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mills County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Motley County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ochiltree County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oldham County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Presidio County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Reagan County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roberts County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Saba County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schleicher County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shackelford County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sherman County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sterling County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stonewall County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sutton County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Terrell County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Throckmorton County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Upton County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wheeler County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Winkler County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yoakum County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Zapata County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Zavala County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 02/07/2023 1:17 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top