Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Texas by County

Breast, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 15.3?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Texas N/A No 19.7 (19.4, 20.0) N/A 3,127 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.0, 0.2)
United States N/A No 19.3 (19.2, 19.4) N/A 42,308 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.3, -1.1)
Lamb County Rural No 35.1 (19.7, 58.8) 1 (1, 119) 3
*
*
Hockley County Urban No 34.9 (21.2, 54.2) 2 (1, 114) 4
*
*
Burleson County Urban No 34.8 (19.9, 56.7) 3 (1, 117) 4
*
*
Cass County Rural No 33.1 (22.7, 47.2) 4 (1, 99) 8 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.1, 2.2)
Kleberg County Rural No 33.0 (21.0, 49.3) 5 (1, 112) 5 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.1, 4.1)
Nolan County Rural No 31.0 (17.2, 52.4) 6 (1, 119) 3
*
*
Trinity County Rural No 28.9 (17.1, 48.6) 7 (1, 119) 4
*
*
Hale County Rural No 28.8 (18.6, 42.6) 8 (1, 117) 5 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.5, 2.2)
Limestone County Rural No 28.8 (17.4, 45.3) 9 (1, 118) 5
*
*
Freestone County Rural No 27.2 (16.3, 43.9) 10 (1, 119) 4
*
*
Young County Rural No 27.2 (15.4, 45.2) 11 (1, 119) 4 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.2, 2.5)
Polk County Rural No 27.1 (18.3, 38.7) 12 (1, 116) 7 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.3, 1.9)
Jasper County Rural No 27.1 (18.2, 39.1) 13 (1, 116) 7 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.4, 1.7)
Wood County Rural No 27.0 (18.9, 37.6) 14 (1, 110) 10 stable stable trend 7.6 (-0.2, 34.1)
Gregg County Urban No 26.8 (21.8, 32.6) 15 (2, 79) 21 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.4, 0.1)
Shelby County Rural No 26.7 (16.4, 41.6) 16 (1, 118) 4
*
*
Nacogdoches County Rural No 26.5 (19.5, 35.4) 17 (2, 107) 10 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.4, 1.5)
Ector County Urban No 26.5 (21.3, 32.6) 18 (2, 88) 18 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.7)
Liberty County Urban No 26.2 (19.9, 33.7) 19 (2, 104) 12 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.4, -0.1)
Calhoun County Rural No 25.7 (15.0, 42.0) 20 (1, 119) 4
*
*
DeWitt County Rural No 25.6 (14.2, 43.4) 21 (1, 119) 3 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.5, 2.0)
Wichita County Urban No 25.6 (20.7, 31.4) 22 (4, 89) 21 stable stable trend 3.7 (-1.0, 19.4)
Brown County Rural No 25.2 (17.7, 35.3) 23 (1, 114) 8 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.7, 1.2)
Kaufman County Urban No 24.9 (19.9, 30.6) 24 (4, 96) 18 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.3, 0.8)
Hill County Rural No 24.7 (16.4, 35.9) 25 (1, 118) 6 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.4, 1.7)
Hopkins County Rural No 24.6 (16.7, 35.3) 26 (1, 117) 7 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.1, 2.1)
Wilson County Urban No 24.5 (17.2, 34.1) 27 (2, 116) 8 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.2, 2.8)
Bowie County Urban No 24.3 (18.9, 30.8) 28 (4, 104) 15 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.0)
Uvalde County Rural No 24.1 (14.1, 38.7) 29 (1, 119) 4
*
*
Washington County Rural No 23.9 (15.9, 34.9) 30 (1, 118) 7 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.0, 0.9)
Orange County Urban No 23.8 (18.3, 30.6) 31 (3, 108) 13 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.5)
Hutchinson County Rural No 23.4 (13.0, 39.5) 32 (1, 119) 3 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.2, 0.9)
Grimes County Rural No 23.3 (13.9, 37.0) 33 (1, 119) 4 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.8, 1.6)
Llano County Rural No 23.2 (12.8, 40.1) 34 (1, 119) 5 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.8, 2.2)
Taylor County Urban No 23.2 (18.6, 28.5) 35 (6, 105) 20 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.8, -0.1)
Rockwall County Urban No 23.1 (17.9, 29.4) 36 (5, 110) 14
*
*
Victoria County Urban No 23.0 (17.6, 29.6) 37 (5, 113) 13 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.6, 1.3)
Bee County Rural No 22.8 (12.7, 37.9) 38 (1, 119) 3
*
*
Henderson County Rural No 22.8 (17.5, 29.3) 39 (5, 113) 15 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 0.1)
Potter County Urban No 22.6 (17.5, 28.8) 40 (6, 111) 14 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.1, -0.7)
Coryell County Urban No 22.6 (16.3, 30.4) 41 (4, 115) 9 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.9, 0.4)
Montague County Rural No 22.5 (12.8, 37.8) 42 (1, 119) 4
*
*
Johnson County Urban No 22.5 (18.5, 27.1) 43 (8, 103) 23 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.9)
Lamar County Rural No 22.4 (15.4, 31.6) 44 (2, 118) 8 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.5, 1.0)
Palo Pinto County Rural No 22.4 (14.5, 33.8) 45 (2, 119) 5
*
*
Grayson County Urban No 22.3 (18.2, 27.2) 46 (9, 107) 22 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.3)
Houston County Rural No 22.2 (11.7, 38.8) 47 (1, 119) 3 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.2, 2.0)
Anderson County Rural No 22.0 (14.7, 31.8) 48 (3, 118) 6 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.7, -0.3)
Parker County Urban No 22.0 (17.8, 26.9) 49 (11, 109) 20 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.1)
Jefferson County Urban No 21.8 (18.5, 25.5) 50 (14, 103) 33 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.6)
Ellis County Urban No 21.8 (17.9, 26.3) 51 (10, 107) 23 stable stable trend 2.3 (-1.0, 12.9)
Austin County Urban No 21.6 (13.5, 33.3) 52 (1, 119) 5 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.1, 0.8)
Burnet County Rural No 21.6 (15.1, 30.4) 53 (5, 118) 8 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.6, 1.4)
Medina County Urban No 21.5 (14.8, 30.5) 54 (4, 118) 7 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.3, 0.2)
Lubbock County Urban No 21.5 (18.4, 24.9) 55 (17, 102) 36 stable stable trend 3.9 (-1.1, 15.0)
Wise County Urban No 21.4 (15.4, 29.1) 56 (6, 117) 9 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.9, 1.7)
Lavaca County Rural No 21.3 (13.1, 34.4) 57 (2, 119) 4
*
*
Starr County Rural No 21.0 (14.4, 29.6) 58 (4, 118) 7 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.1, 3.7)
Cameron County Urban No 20.9 (18.3, 23.8) 59 (21, 97) 48 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.4)
Matagorda County Rural No 20.8 (13.5, 31.1) 60 (3, 119) 5 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.8, 1.0)
Guadalupe County Urban No 20.8 (17.0, 25.3) 61 (14, 112) 21 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.5, 10.6)
San Jacinto County Urban No 20.8 (11.7, 34.4) 62 (1, 119) 4 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.2, 1.1)
Cooke County Rural No 20.7 (13.9, 30.1) 63 (4, 119) 6 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.7, -0.7)
Bosque County Urban No 20.7 (11.1, 36.4) 64 (1, 119) 3
*
*
San Patricio County Urban No 20.6 (14.7, 28.1) 65 (6, 118) 8 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.8, 0.5)
Dallas County Urban No 20.5 (19.4, 21.6) 66 (37, 85) 268 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.2)
Harris County Urban No 20.4 (19.5, 21.2) 67 (43, 82) 471 falling falling trend -1.7 (-1.9, -1.4)
Brazoria County Urban No 20.3 (17.6, 23.4) 68 (24, 105) 40 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.8)
El Paso County Urban No 20.3 (18.5, 22.2) 69 (32, 96) 95 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.1, -1.1)
Webb County Urban No 20.0 (16.5, 24.0) 70 (21, 112) 24 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.9)
Tarrant County Urban No 20.0 (18.8, 21.2) 71 (41, 90) 220 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.1)
Randall County Urban No 19.8 (15.9, 24.6) 72 (14, 114) 18 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.4, -0.4)
Harrison County Urban No 19.8 (14.0, 27.1) 73 (8, 119) 8 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.6, 0.7)
McLennan County Urban No 19.7 (16.6, 23.2) 74 (25, 110) 31 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.4, -0.6)
Bexar County Urban No 19.7 (18.5, 20.9) 75 (45, 91) 209 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.1)
Bell County Urban No 19.6 (16.8, 22.7) 76 (26, 110) 35 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.1)
Comal County Urban No 19.5 (16.0, 23.7) 77 (19, 114) 22 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.3)
Bastrop County Urban No 19.4 (14.7, 25.3) 78 (12, 117) 12 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.3, 0.0)
Smith County Urban No 19.4 (16.3, 23.0) 79 (24, 113) 29 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.3, -1.3)
Hunt County Urban No 19.2 (14.5, 25.0) 80 (12, 118) 12 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.9, -0.5)
Hood County Rural No 19.1 (14.0, 25.7) 81 (14, 118) 11 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.3, -1.3)
Panola County Rural No 19.0 (10.8, 32.0) 82 (3, 119) 3
*
*
Van Zandt County Rural No 18.6 (13.1, 25.9) 83 (12, 119) 8 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.0, 0.7)
Williamson County Urban No 18.5 (16.5, 20.8) 84 (43, 110) 61 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.5)
Fannin County Rural No 18.5 (11.0, 29.4) 85 (4, 119) 4
*
*
Colorado County Rural No 18.5 (10.2, 32.2) 86 (2, 119) 3
*
*
Rusk County Urban No 18.5 (12.4, 26.8) 87 (9, 119) 6 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.3, 0.1)
Galveston County Urban No 18.5 (15.9, 21.3) 88 (37, 113) 39 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.0, -1.4)
Montgomery County Urban No 18.4 (16.4, 20.6) 89 (42, 108) 63 falling falling trend -2.4 (-5.3, -1.6)
Caldwell County Urban No 18.2 (11.8, 27.1) 90 (9, 119) 5 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.2, 1.1)
Navarro County Rural No 18.2 (12.2, 26.3) 91 (9, 119) 6 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.8, 0.2)
Atascosa County Urban No 18.2 (11.8, 26.9) 92 (8, 119) 5 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.0, 1.8)
Hays County Urban No 18.1 (14.8, 22.1) 93 (29, 117) 21 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.1, 0.1)
Hidalgo County Urban No 17.9 (16.1, 19.8) 94 (53, 111) 74 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.7, 7.5)
Waller County Urban No 17.7 (11.2, 26.7) 95 (8, 119) 5 falling falling trend -5.3 (-10.8, -3.1)
Midland County Urban No 17.7 (13.8, 22.5) 96 (26, 118) 14 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.9, -0.5)
Nueces County Urban No 17.4 (15.0, 20.2) 97 (42, 114) 38 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.6, -1.3)
Kerr County Rural No 17.3 (12.4, 24.2) 98 (16, 119) 10 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.5, -0.6)
Walker County Rural No 16.8 (11.1, 24.5) 99 (13, 119) 6 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.1, 1.0)
Fort Bend County Urban No 16.8 (15.0, 18.7) 100 (65, 114) 71 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.3, -1.0)
Erath County Rural No 16.7 (10.0, 26.4) 101 (9, 119) 4
*
*
Aransas County Urban No 16.7 (9.1, 29.2) 102 (5, 119) 4 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.5, -0.5)
Fayette County Rural No 16.6 (9.4, 28.4) 103 (7, 119) 4 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.6, 0.4)
Tom Green County Urban No 16.4 (12.5, 21.3) 104 (31, 119) 12 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.5, -0.4)
Travis County Urban No 16.4 (15.0, 18.0) 105 (72, 114) 98 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.5, -1.7)
Denton County Urban No 16.4 (14.7, 18.1) 106 (73, 115) 76 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.6, -1.2)
Collin County Urban No 16.4 (14.9, 18.0) 107 (73, 115) 91 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.6, -1.5)
Upshur County Urban No 16.3 (10.1, 25.2) 108 (10, 119) 5 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.6, 1.2)
Hardin County Urban No 16.2 (10.6, 23.8) 109 (14, 119) 6 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.1, -0.8)
Brazos County Urban No 16.2 (12.7, 20.3) 110 (40, 119) 15 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.1, -1.0)
Cherokee County Rural No 15.9 (10.3, 23.8) 111 (17, 119) 5 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.9, -0.6)
Maverick County Urban No 15.4 (9.7, 23.2) 112 (15, 119) 5
*
*
Angelina County Rural Yes 15.2 (11.0, 20.7) 113 (33, 119) 9 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.4, -0.5)
Wharton County Rural Yes 15.0 (9.2, 23.5) 114 (17, 119) 4 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.2, -0.6)
Chambers County Urban Yes 14.8 (8.5, 23.8) 115 (13, 119) 3
*
*
Kendall County Urban Yes 14.6 (9.4, 22.2) 116 (23, 119) 5
*
*
Val Verde County Rural Yes 14.5 (8.6, 22.9) 117 (13, 119) 4 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.1, -1.5)
Jim Wells County Rural Yes 13.7 (8.1, 22.2) 118 (22, 119) 4 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.9, -0.7)
Gillespie County Rural Yes 13.4 (7.9, 23.0) 119 (24, 119) 4 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.1, -1.3)
Andrews County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Archer County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Armstrong County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bailey County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bandera County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Baylor County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Blanco County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Borden County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brewster County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Briscoe County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brooks County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Callahan County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Camp County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carson County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Castro County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Childress County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cochran County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coke County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coleman County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Collingsworth County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Comanche County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Concho County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cottle County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crane County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crockett County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crosby County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Culberson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dallam County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dawson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Deaf Smith County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Delta County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dickens County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dimmit County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Donley County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Duval County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Eastland County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Edwards County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Falls County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fisher County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Floyd County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Foard County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Franklin County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Frio County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gaines County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Garza County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glasscock County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Goliad County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gonzales County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gray County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hall County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hamilton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hansford County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardeman County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hartley County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Haskell County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hemphill County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Howard County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hudspeth County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Irion County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jack County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jeff Davis County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jim Hogg County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jones County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Karnes County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kenedy County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kent County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kimble County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
King County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kinney County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Knox County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
La Salle County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lampasas County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lee County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Leon County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lipscomb County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Live Oak County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Loving County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lynn County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Madison County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marion County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Martin County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mason County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McCulloch County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McMullen County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menard County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Milam County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mills County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mitchell County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Moore County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Morris County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Motley County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Newton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ochiltree County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oldham County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Parmer County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pecos County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Presidio County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rains County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Reagan County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Real County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Red River County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Reeves County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Refugio County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roberts County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Robertson County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Runnels County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sabine County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Augustine County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Saba County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schleicher County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Scurry County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shackelford County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sherman County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Somervell County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stephens County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sterling County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stonewall County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sutton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Swisher County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Terrell County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Terry County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Throckmorton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Titus County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tyler County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Upton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ward County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wheeler County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilbarger County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Willacy County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Winkler County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yoakum County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Zapata County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Zavala County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 09/18/2024 2:23 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top