Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Texas by County

Prostate, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Count

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 16.9?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Texas N/A No 18.2 (17.9, 18.6) N/A 2,102 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.7, 0.2)
United States N/A No 19.0 (18.9, 19.1) N/A 32,351 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.8, -0.1)
Harris County Urban No 19.2 (18.2, 20.3) 43 (28, 64) 295 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.3)
Dallas County Urban No 18.9 (17.5, 20.3) 49 (28, 72) 163 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.3, -0.9)
Tarrant County Urban No 19.8 (18.3, 21.4) 37 (20, 66) 143 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.3, 6.7)
Bexar County Urban No 18.8 (17.4, 20.3) 50 (26, 73) 139 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.8, 7.0)
Travis County Urban Yes 16.8 (14.9, 18.8) 71 (34, 93) 67 stable stable trend -8.5 (-14.3, 0.5)
El Paso County Urban No 17.2 (15.2, 19.3) 63 (32, 92) 58 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.2, -2.1)
Collin County Urban Yes 14.4 (12.6, 16.4) 95 (59, 101) 50 falling falling trend -3.7 (-4.3, -2.9)
Hidalgo County Urban Yes 14.1 (12.3, 16.1) 98 (63, 102) 45 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.3, -0.8)
Fort Bend County Urban Yes 16.0 (13.8, 18.4) 80 (37, 98) 44 stable stable trend 3.6 (-3.0, 12.8)
Denton County Urban Yes 14.5 (12.5, 16.7) 94 (53, 101) 42 falling falling trend -3.4 (-4.1, -2.4)
Williamson County Urban Yes 16.3 (14.0, 18.8) 76 (37, 98) 38 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.0, -0.8)
Montgomery County Urban Yes 14.3 (12.2, 16.6) 96 (52, 102) 37 falling falling trend -3.9 (-4.7, -2.9)
Galveston County Urban No 20.6 (17.4, 24.2) 31 (10, 85) 32 falling falling trend -3.1 (-3.8, -2.3)
Brazoria County Urban No 19.2 (15.9, 22.9) 44 (12, 91) 27 falling falling trend -3.5 (-4.3, -2.6)
Bell County Urban No 19.9 (16.5, 23.6) 36 (12, 85) 27 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.7, -1.6)
Cameron County Urban Yes 13.9 (11.6, 16.4) 99 (59, 103) 26 stable stable trend 3.1 (0.0, 9.0)
Lubbock County Urban No 22.2 (18.5, 26.4) 21 (6, 76) 26 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.2, -0.8)
Nueces County Urban Yes 15.8 (13.1, 18.9) 83 (32, 101) 26 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.0, -2.1)
Jefferson County Urban No 19.7 (16.3, 23.6) 40 (12, 88) 25 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.1, -1.9)
McLennan County Urban Yes 16.8 (13.7, 20.5) 70 (23, 100) 21 falling falling trend -3.6 (-4.4, -2.8)
Smith County Urban Yes 16.0 (13.0, 19.5) 81 (28, 101) 20 stable stable trend 3.3 (-2.6, 16.6)
Comal County Urban No 22.5 (18.1, 27.6) 20 (4, 79) 19 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.5, -0.7)
Grayson County Urban No 24.6 (19.7, 30.4) 13 (2, 69) 18 rising rising trend 4.3 (0.3, 12.6)
Hays County Urban No 22.0 (17.2, 27.6) 23 (5, 87) 17 stable stable trend -1.9 (-3.3, 0.1)
Webb County Urban No 19.1 (14.9, 23.9) 45 (9, 98) 15 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.3, 0.9)
Ellis County Urban No 19.7 (15.2, 25.0) 39 (7, 98) 15 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.6, -0.7)
Potter County Urban No 29.2 (22.8, 36.8) 3 (1, 50) 15 stable stable trend 2.6 (-0.7, 15.2)
Guadalupe County Urban No 17.7 (13.7, 22.4) 58 (14, 101) 14 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.3, -0.7)
Taylor County Urban No 20.3 (15.7, 25.7) 33 (6, 96) 14 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.9, -0.2)
Randall County Urban No 19.9 (15.2, 25.5) 34 (7, 97) 13 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.3, -0.2)
Brazos County Urban No 16.9 (12.8, 21.8) 67 (16, 102) 12 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.0, -1.5)
Parker County Urban Yes 16.8 (12.7, 21.7) 72 (16, 102) 12 falling falling trend -4.3 (-5.3, -3.2)
Johnson County Urban No 17.0 (12.8, 22.0) 65 (14, 102) 12 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.4, -1.7)
Bowie County Urban No 24.6 (18.5, 32.0) 14 (2, 83) 12 rising rising trend 27.3 (12.2, 41.4)
Midland County Urban No 20.3 (15.2, 26.4) 32 (5, 98) 11 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.2, -0.1)
Tom Green County Urban No 18.8 (14.2, 24.4) 51 (8, 100) 11 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.0, -0.8)
Wichita County Urban No 18.2 (13.6, 23.8) 56 (9, 102) 11 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.1, -2.1)
Gregg County Urban No 18.2 (13.6, 23.9) 55 (10, 101) 11 stable stable trend 5.6 (-3.5, 29.6)
Henderson County Rural No 18.1 (13.5, 24.0) 57 (10, 102) 11 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.2, -1.6)
Ector County Urban No 21.6 (15.8, 28.6) 26 (3, 98) 10 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.6, -1.9)
Kerr County Rural No 20.9 (15.5, 28.3) 29 (3, 97) 10 stable stable trend 12.0 (-1.6, 21.7)
Kaufman County Urban No 21.4 (15.5, 28.6) 27 (3, 100) 10 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.6, -1.3)
Hunt County Urban No 17.5 (12.6, 23.6) 59 (9, 102) 9 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.8, 4.6)
Liberty County Urban No 23.5 (16.6, 32.0) 18 (2, 96) 9 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.8, -1.5)
Wood County Rural No 19.8 (14.0, 27.8) 38 (5, 101) 8 stable stable trend 15.0 (-2.8, 40.2)
Hood County Rural Yes 16.2 (11.5, 22.7) 77 (12, 103) 8 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.2, -1.5)
Anderson County Rural No 27.5 (19.1, 38.1) 7 (1, 88) 8 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.3, -0.4)
Nacogdoches County Rural No 21.9 (15.2, 30.6) 25 (2, 101) 7 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.0, -1.2)
Hill County Rural No 29.1 (20.2, 40.9) 4 (1, 81) 7 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.6, -0.1)
Polk County Rural No 34.7 (22.8, 50.0) 2 (1, 70) 7 stable stable trend 36.2 (-1.9, 79.3)
Victoria County Urban Yes 14.6 (10.1, 20.3) 93 (21, 103) 7 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 1.8)
Bastrop County Urban Yes 15.9 (10.8, 22.5) 82 (11, 103) 7 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.4, -1.9)
Orange County Urban No 17.2 (11.9, 24.1) 62 (9, 103) 7 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.7, -1.1)
San Patricio County Urban No 20.7 (14.2, 29.1) 30 (4, 102) 7 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.2, -1.5)
Coryell County Urban No 24.1 (16.4, 33.8) 16 (1, 99) 7
*
*
Lamar County Rural No 21.2 (14.4, 30.4) 28 (2, 103) 6 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.6, -0.7)
Kendall County Urban No 22.6 (15.3, 32.4) 19 (2, 101) 6
*
*
Rockwall County Urban No 17.0 (11.3, 24.3) 64 (7, 103) 6
*
*
Van Zandt County Rural Yes 15.5 (10.3, 22.5) 87 (10, 103) 6 falling falling trend -3.8 (-5.3, -2.6)
Rusk County Urban No 18.9 (12.5, 27.5) 48 (4, 103) 6 falling falling trend -3.5 (-5.6, -1.9)
Angelina County Rural Yes 12.4 (8.2, 18.1) 103 (29, 103) 6 falling falling trend -4.2 (-5.8, -3.0)
Cherokee County Rural No 19.0 (12.5, 27.7) 47 (4, 103) 6 falling falling trend -3.5 (-5.8, -1.7)
Maverick County Urban No 25.3 (16.5, 36.7) 10 (1, 101) 5
*
*
Wise County Urban Yes 16.3 (10.5, 24.0) 75 (8, 103) 5
*
*
Bandera County Urban No 26.9 (17.3, 41.7) 9 (1, 100) 5
*
*
Harrison County Urban Yes 13.6 (8.7, 20.3) 101 (19, 103) 5 falling falling trend -4.3 (-5.8, -3.0)
Navarro County Rural No 18.5 (12.0, 27.5) 54 (5, 103) 5
*
*
Upshur County Urban No 19.9 (12.8, 29.8) 35 (3, 103) 5 falling falling trend -3.5 (-5.6, -1.6)
Gillespie County Rural No 17.5 (11.3, 27.5) 60 (6, 103) 5 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.4, -0.6)
Jasper County Rural No 24.3 (15.6, 36.5) 15 (1, 102) 5 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.9, -0.5)
Brown County Rural No 19.3 (12.4, 29.2) 42 (3, 103) 5 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.5, -1.3)
Burnet County Rural Yes 13.1 (8.3, 20.2) 102 (20, 103) 5 falling falling trend -4.0 (-5.5, -2.6)
Chambers County Urban No 28.4 (17.7, 42.7) 6 (1, 101) 5
*
*
Waller County Urban No 19.0 (11.8, 28.8) 46 (2, 103) 5
*
*
Austin County Urban No 21.9 (13.5, 34.0) 24 (2, 103) 4 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.9, -1.1)
Val Verde County Rural No 19.5 (12.2, 29.5) 41 (2, 103) 4 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.8, 1.1)
Walker County Rural Yes 13.8 (8.5, 21.0) 100 (16, 103) 4
*
*
Hardin County Urban Yes 14.6 (8.9, 22.7) 92 (9, 103) 4 falling falling trend -3.9 (-5.5, -2.4)
Llano County Rural Yes 15.7 (9.6, 27.4) 86 (8, 103) 4 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.9, -1.7)
Palo Pinto County Rural No 23.8 (14.5, 37.1) 17 (1, 103) 4
*
*
Wilson County Urban No 16.9 (10.3, 26.1) 66 (5, 103) 4
*
*
Caldwell County Urban Yes 16.7 (10.0, 26.3) 73 (5, 103) 4 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.3, -1.6)
Lavaca County Rural No 25.2 (15.4, 40.3) 11 (1, 103) 4
*
*
Starr County Rural Yes 16.6 (10.0, 25.5) 74 (5, 103) 4
*
*
Washington County Rural Yes 15.0 (9.2, 24.0) 90 (9, 103) 4 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.9, -1.0)
Cass County Rural No 18.6 (11.1, 29.9) 53 (3, 103) 4
*
*
Fayette County Rural No 17.4 (10.4, 28.7) 61 (3, 103) 4 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.8, -0.2)
Medina County Urban Yes 14.2 (8.4, 22.4) 97 (12, 103) 4 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.8, -0.7)
Scurry County Rural No 47.2 (28.0, 74.0) 1 (1, 63) 4
*
*
Shelby County Rural No 27.4 (16.3, 43.5) 8 (1, 102) 4
*
*
Atascosa County Urban Yes 15.2 (8.8, 24.2) 89 (7, 103) 4
*
*
Bosque County Urban No 24.8 (14.5, 41.1) 12 (1, 103) 4
*
*
Wharton County Rural Yes 15.8 (9.2, 25.3) 84 (6, 103) 4 falling falling trend -4.3 (-6.6, -2.5)
Colorado County Rural No 22.1 (12.8, 36.7) 22 (1, 103) 3
*
*
Jim Wells County Rural Yes 16.8 (9.6, 27.3) 69 (4, 103) 3 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.9, -0.1)
Aransas County Urban Yes 16.1 (9.1, 27.9) 78 (4, 103) 3 falling falling trend -3.4 (-6.0, -0.8)
Erath County Rural Yes 16.9 (9.6, 27.5) 68 (3, 103) 3
*
*
Fannin County Rural Yes 15.3 (8.6, 25.1) 88 (6, 103) 3 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.8, -1.6)
Grimes County Rural No 18.7 (10.2, 31.2) 52 (2, 103) 3
*
*
Hopkins County Rural Yes 15.7 (8.9, 25.8) 85 (5, 103) 3
*
*
Matagorda County Rural Yes 16.1 (8.9, 26.6) 79 (5, 103) 3
*
*
Robertson County Urban No 29.1 (16.5, 48.4) 5 (1, 103) 3
*
*
San Jacinto County Urban Yes 14.7 (8.3, 25.2) 91 (9, 103) 3
*
*
Andrews County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Archer County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Armstrong County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bailey County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Baylor County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bee County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Blanco County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Borden County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brewster County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Briscoe County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brooks County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Burleson County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Calhoun County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Callahan County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Camp County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carson County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Castro County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Childress County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cochran County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coke County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coleman County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Collingsworth County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Comanche County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Concho County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cooke County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cottle County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crane County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crockett County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crosby County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Culberson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dallam County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dawson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
DeWitt County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Deaf Smith County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Delta County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dickens County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dimmit County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Donley County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Duval County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Eastland County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Edwards County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Falls County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fisher County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Floyd County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Foard County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Franklin County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Freestone County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Frio County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gaines County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Garza County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glasscock County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Goliad County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gonzales County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gray County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hale County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hall County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hamilton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hansford County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardeman County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hartley County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Haskell County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hemphill County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hockley County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Houston County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Howard County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hudspeth County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hutchinson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Irion County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jack County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jeff Davis County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jim Hogg County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jones County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Karnes County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kenedy County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kent County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kimble County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
King County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kinney County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kleberg County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Knox County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
La Salle County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lamb County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lampasas County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lee County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Leon County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Limestone County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lipscomb County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Live Oak County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Loving County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lynn County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Madison County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marion County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Martin County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mason County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McCulloch County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McMullen County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menard County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Milam County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mills County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mitchell County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montague County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Moore County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Morris County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Motley County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Newton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Nolan County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ochiltree County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oldham County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Panola County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Parmer County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pecos County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Presidio County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rains County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Reagan County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Real County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Red River County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Reeves County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Refugio County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roberts County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Runnels County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sabine County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Augustine County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Saba County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schleicher County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shackelford County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sherman County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Somervell County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stephens County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sterling County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stonewall County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sutton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Swisher County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Terrell County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Terry County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Throckmorton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Titus County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Trinity County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tyler County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Upton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Uvalde County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ward County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wheeler County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilbarger County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Willacy County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Winkler County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yoakum County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Young County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Zapata County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Zavala County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/22/2024 4:00 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top