Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Texas by County

All Cancer Sites, 2011-2015

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 161.4?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Texas Yes 131.2 (130.3, 132.1) 17,790 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.7, -1.5)
United States Yes 139.6 (139.3, 139.8) 278,246 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.5, -1.4)
Real County No 199.3 (130.8, 301.5) 6
*
*
Dallam County No 198.5 (129.6, 289.1) 5 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.6, 0.5)
Edwards County No 198.0 (116.9, 335.0) 4
*
*
Hall County No 194.5 (120.4, 303.0) 5 stable stable trend 1.5 (-1.0, 4.1)
Hamilton County No 192.0 (146.6, 249.7) 15 stable stable trend -0.0 (-1.6, 1.6)
Sabine County No 189.4 (149.9, 238.6) 19 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.5, 1.2)
Sherman County No 188.3 (108.6, 307.0) 3
*
*
Schleicher County No 185.1 (108.6, 298.1) 4
*
*
Hutchinson County No 184.8 (152.8, 221.8) 24 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.8, 0.9)
Refugio County No 182.8 (134.1, 245.5) 10 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.5, 1.5)
San Jacinto County No 181.8 (154.5, 213.0) 34 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.3, 1.0)
Wilbarger County No 173.8 (135.5, 220.1) 15 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.8, 2.1)
Montague County No 173.5 (143.2, 209.0) 25 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.9, 0.9)
Wheeler County No 173.3 (121.3, 243.3) 7 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.4, 0.7)
Leon County No 172.5 (141.6, 209.2) 23 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.7)
Gray County No 171.8 (142.0, 206.3) 25 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.7)
Eastland County No 171.7 (142.6, 206.1) 27 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.8, 0.9)
Polk County No 170.6 (150.6, 193.0) 56 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.8)
Knox County No 170.1 (105.4, 263.9) 5
*
*
Ochiltree County No 170.0 (120.2, 232.7) 8 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.7, 1.9)
Orange County No 169.5 (154.0, 186.2) 90 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Callahan County No 169.4 (135.7, 210.2) 18 rising rising trend 1.5 (0.4, 2.7)
Young County No 168.9 (139.4, 203.7) 25 falling falling trend -5.0 (-9.5, -0.3)
Mitchell County No 168.6 (120.3, 231.5) 9 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.0, 0.7)
Crosby County No 168.4 (115.0, 239.6) 7 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.9, 1.4)
McCulloch County No 167.3 (126.4, 219.9) 12 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.6, 2.2)
Garza County No 167.3 (107.7, 250.3) 5
*
*
Coleman County No 166.9 (124.4, 221.6) 12 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.3, 2.1)
Concho County No 166.9 (99.3, 278.2) 4
*
*
Marion County No 166.3 (130.0, 212.0) 15 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.2, 0.9)
Castro County No 165.1 (115.9, 229.1) 7 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.2, 1.1)
San Patricio County No 165.1 (147.2, 184.6) 63 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.3, 0.0)
Kinney County No 164.7 (96.2, 270.1) 4 stable stable trend 5.6 (-0.2, 11.7)
Scurry County No 164.3 (130.0, 205.3) 17 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.3, 1.7)
Limestone County No 163.8 (136.9, 195.1) 27 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.1)
Winkler County No 163.2 (110.1, 233.1) 6 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.1, 1.8)
Floyd County No 162.9 (112.8, 229.9) 7 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.6, 2.6)
Howard County No 162.7 (137.3, 191.7) 30 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.4, -0.1)
Lampasas County No 162.7 (133.6, 196.8) 23 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.6, 1.3)
Aransas County No 162.0 (136.3, 191.8) 34 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.1, -0.1)
Trinity County No 161.5 (129.7, 200.2) 20 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.9, 1.7)
Camp County Yes 161.2 (124.8, 205.8) 14 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.9, -0.5)
Upton County Yes 161.1 (90.8, 266.6) 3 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.6, 0.9)
Gonzales County Yes 160.0 (130.4, 194.8) 21 stable stable trend -8.7 (-22.6, 7.8)
Newton County Yes 159.9 (123.9, 203.9) 14 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.1, 2.3)
Moore County Yes 159.5 (125.9, 199.2) 16 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.2, 1.1)
Lamar County Yes 159.1 (140.9, 179.1) 58 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.1)
Blanco County Yes 158.8 (118.6, 209.9) 13 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.5, 3.3)
Runnels County Yes 158.7 (122.3, 204.5) 14 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.8, 2.0)
Jim Hogg County Yes 157.4 (99.0, 238.4) 5 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.0, 1.5)
Hunt County Yes 157.3 (142.6, 173.2) 86 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.7)
Bosque County Yes 156.8 (128.8, 190.2) 25 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.7)
Red River County Yes 156.2 (124.9, 194.8) 18 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.0, 0.5)
Delta County Yes 156.0 (106.4, 225.0) 7 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.7, 1.8)
Morris County Yes 154.9 (121.1, 196.5) 16 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.0, 0.7)
Clay County Yes 154.9 (119.2, 200.1) 13 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.9, 2.1)
Ward County Yes 154.3 (115.6, 202.5) 11 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.7, 0.3)
Gregg County Yes 154.3 (141.9, 167.5) 120 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.6)
Grimes County Yes 153.5 (126.8, 184.5) 25 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 0.9)
Parker County Yes 153.3 (140.5, 167.0) 110 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.1)
Bowie County Yes 152.9 (139.0, 167.9) 94 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.3)
Brooks County Yes 152.9 (106.7, 214.0) 8 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.5, 1.9)
Galveston County Yes 152.5 (144.3, 161.0) 268 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -0.9)
Johnson County Yes 152.4 (140.8, 164.8) 131 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.1)
Potter County Yes 152.3 (138.8, 166.8) 97 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.6)
Baylor County Yes 152.3 (95.4, 238.2) 5 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.0, 2.3)
Chambers County Yes 151.9 (126.2, 181.3) 26 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.5, 0.3)
Henderson County Yes 151.9 (137.9, 167.1) 93 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.1)
Freestone County Yes 151.7 (122.8, 186.1) 21 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.9, 1.4)
Wharton County Yes 151.3 (130.9, 174.2) 41 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.2)
Upshur County Yes 151.2 (130.8, 174.0) 42 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.1)
Liberty County Yes 150.6 (134.4, 168.4) 65 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.3, -1.1)
Fannin County Yes 150.4 (128.6, 175.4) 36 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.1)
Ector County Yes 150.4 (137.6, 164.0) 105 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.1)
Terry County Yes 150.4 (113.1, 196.7) 11 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.4, 1.8)
Hopkins County Yes 150.4 (129.3, 174.2) 38 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.2)
Wichita County Yes 150.4 (138.4, 163.1) 122 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.5)
Panola County Yes 149.6 (123.4, 180.2) 24 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.2)
Milam County Yes 148.6 (124.6, 176.4) 29 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.7)
Coryell County Yes 148.4 (129.2, 169.5) 45 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.5)
Shackelford County Yes 148.2 (88.8, 239.3) 4
*
*
Kleberg County Yes 147.9 (122.2, 177.5) 24 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.6)
Jefferson County Yes 147.5 (138.8, 156.6) 226 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.5, -0.9)
Rains County Yes 147.2 (111.7, 192.3) 13 falling falling trend -4.8 (-9.2, -0.3)
Grayson County Yes 147.1 (135.7, 159.3) 128 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.2)
Bell County Yes 147.1 (138.2, 156.4) 211 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.6)
Harrison County Yes 146.9 (130.8, 164.5) 62 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.4)
Tyler County Yes 146.4 (120.4, 177.4) 24 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.5)
Palo Pinto County Yes 146.1 (122.6, 173.1) 29 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.7, -0.4)
Victoria County Yes 145.8 (131.7, 161.2) 80 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.1)
Frio County Yes 145.8 (110.7, 188.6) 12 stable stable trend -0.0 (-1.9, 1.9)
Brown County Yes 145.4 (125.9, 167.5) 42 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.6)
Caldwell County Yes 144.6 (122.8, 169.2) 33 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.0, 0.7)
Shelby County Yes 143.8 (118.9, 172.8) 24 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.0)
Bastrop County Yes 143.7 (127.8, 161.0) 63 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.2)
Ellis County Yes 143.2 (131.6, 155.6) 116 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.8)
Navarro County Yes 142.9 (124.7, 163.3) 46 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.3)
Matagorda County Yes 142.7 (121.2, 167.0) 33 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.4)
Jasper County Yes 142.3 (121.7, 165.7) 36 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.4, -0.7)
Brazoria County Yes 142.0 (133.8, 150.7) 226 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.9)
Taylor County Yes 141.8 (130.2, 154.1) 116 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.2)
Fayette County Yes 141.7 (119.0, 168.3) 32 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.9, 1.0)
Falls County Yes 141.4 (112.7, 175.7) 17 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.8)
Kaufman County Yes 140.9 (127.3, 155.6) 82 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.7)
Donley County Yes 140.7 (85.5, 226.5) 4 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.4, 2.3)
Wise County Yes 140.7 (123.4, 159.8) 50 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.6)
Hale County Yes 140.7 (117.6, 167.0) 27 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.2, 1.4)
Comanche County Yes 140.5 (109.8, 178.4) 16 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.5, 1.1)
Dimmit County Yes 139.6 (101.3, 188.1) 9 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.6, 1.3)
Calhoun County Yes 139.4 (112.3, 171.5) 19 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.5, 0.2)
San Augustine County Yes 139.4 (104.8, 184.9) 12 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.0, 0.5)
Rusk County Yes 139.0 (121.4, 158.7) 47 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.0)
Midland County Yes 138.7 (126.9, 151.3) 106 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
Crane County Yes 138.6 (80.1, 223.4) 3
*
*
Hill County Yes 138.4 (118.7, 160.9) 38 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.1)
McLennan County Yes 138.1 (129.4, 147.2) 197 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.3, -1.1)
Collingsworth County Yes 138.0 (77.3, 233.4) 3 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.0, 1.8)
Jackson County Yes 137.9 (106.7, 176.2) 14 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.5, 2.0)
Dawson County Yes 137.6 (103.6, 180.2) 12 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.0, 0.8)
Reeves County Yes 137.5 (101.4, 183.1) 10 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.1)
Jack County Yes 137.4 (96.8, 191.3) 8 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.7, 1.6)
Dallas County Yes 137.1 (134.0, 140.2) 1,575 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.1, -1.5)
Nacogdoches County Yes 137.0 (120.1, 155.7) 49 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.4)
Houston County Yes 137.0 (111.9, 166.8) 24 falling falling trend -6.0 (-9.4, -2.5)
Karnes County Yes 136.7 (103.1, 178.7) 12 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.1, 1.0)
Zavala County Yes 136.4 (99.0, 183.5) 9 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.8, 2.0)
Waller County Yes 136.1 (114.7, 160.4) 30 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.6)
Harris County Yes 136.0 (133.6, 138.4) 2,579 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.8, -1.4)
Uvalde County Yes 135.9 (111.8, 163.8) 24 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.4)
Live Oak County Yes 135.1 (101.0, 178.7) 12 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.9, 0.9)
Bee County Yes 135.1 (110.2, 164.2) 21 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.7, -0.5)
Colorado County Yes 134.1 (109.7, 163.1) 23 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.1)
Robertson County Yes 133.9 (105.7, 168.2) 16 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.6, -0.1)
Guadalupe County Yes 133.9 (122.6, 145.9) 106 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.9)
Washington County Yes 133.8 (114.3, 156.0) 38 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.2)
Hardin County Yes 133.7 (117.0, 152.4) 47 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.3, -0.1)
Hood County Yes 133.7 (118.6, 150.6) 63 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.9, -1.0)
Mason County Yes 133.7 (84.9, 210.0) 5 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.7, 0.2)
Bailey County Yes 133.0 (86.7, 196.0) 5 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.6, 1.5)
Tarrant County Yes 132.9 (129.5, 136.4) 1,217 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.8, -1.4)
Angelina County Yes 132.7 (119.3, 147.3) 74 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.4)
Fisher County Yes 132.6 (80.5, 212.9) 5 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.5, 1.1)
Llano County Yes 132.6 (111.0, 159.3) 32 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.8)
Montgomery County Yes 132.4 (126.1, 138.9) 348 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.3, -1.8)
Comal County Yes 132.0 (120.8, 144.1) 108 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.1)
Menard County Yes 131.6 (73.8, 243.0) 3
*
*
Walker County Yes 131.2 (113.3, 151.3) 40 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.4)
Coke County Yes 131.2 (83.0, 211.5) 5
*
*
Anderson County Yes 130.9 (113.1, 151.0) 41 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -0.8)
Deaf Smith County Yes 130.8 (100.6, 167.1) 13 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.6, 2.0)
Stephens County Yes 130.5 (95.1, 176.9) 10 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.1, 0.4)
Brazos County Yes 130.2 (118.8, 142.4) 98 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.7)
Cass County Yes 130.2 (110.3, 153.2) 33 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.0)
Nolan County Yes 129.5 (99.9, 165.9) 14 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.2, 0.4)
Burleson County Yes 129.1 (102.9, 161.0) 18 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.5, -0.2)
Tom Green County Yes 129.1 (117.4, 141.6) 93 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
Bexar County Yes 128.9 (125.6, 132.2) 1,208 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.4, -1.1)
Lee County Yes 128.8 (100.6, 163.3) 15 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.1, 0.0)
Kerr County Yes 128.6 (114.7, 144.2) 68 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.4)
Hartley County Yes 128.3 (77.8, 202.3) 4 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.4, 1.6)
Haskell County Yes 128.3 (84.2, 191.8) 6 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.8, 1.5)
Madison County Yes 127.8 (95.3, 169.1) 11 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.0, 0.0)
DeWitt County Yes 127.5 (102.2, 157.9) 20 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.9, 0.4)
Van Zandt County Yes 127.3 (111.8, 144.6) 52 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.2)
Atascosa County Yes 126.8 (108.0, 147.9) 34 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.7, -0.1)
Lavaca County Yes 126.7 (102.7, 155.5) 23 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.3, 1.5)
Randall County Yes 126.6 (115.3, 138.7) 94 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.2)
Cooke County Yes 126.4 (108.3, 147.1) 36 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.1)
Franklin County Yes 126.2 (93.6, 168.3) 10 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.1, 0.3)
Andrews County Yes 126.1 (93.1, 166.7) 10 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 0.8)
Lamb County Yes 126.0 (95.6, 163.9) 12 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.7, 1.0)
Gillespie County Yes 125.9 (106.2, 149.3) 35 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.3)
Nueces County Yes 125.8 (118.9, 133.0) 256 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.4)
Hansford County Yes 124.4 (77.4, 191.6) 4 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.0, 0.7)
Burnet County Yes 124.2 (107.9, 142.6) 44 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.7)
Gaines County Yes 123.9 (91.5, 163.9) 10 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.0, 1.4)
Medina County Yes 123.2 (105.5, 143.2) 36 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.2)
Austin County Yes 123.0 (101.6, 147.9) 25 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.7, -0.3)
Lubbock County Yes 122.8 (114.9, 131.0) 188 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5)
Hockley County Yes 122.0 (96.4, 152.4) 16 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.6)
San Saba County Yes 121.7 (77.7, 185.7) 5 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.6, 2.9)
Maverick County Yes 121.5 (103.7, 141.4) 34 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.9)
Carson County Yes 121.4 (79.5, 180.7) 5 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.9, 1.2)
Childress County Yes 121.3 (79.3, 181.0) 6 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.9, 2.4)
Rockwall County Yes 121.3 (106.9, 137.1) 53 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.8, -0.7)
Wilson County Yes 120.4 (102.0, 141.3) 32 stable stable trend -0.0 (-1.1, 1.1)
Wood County Yes 119.9 (103.7, 138.3) 46 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.5, -0.4)
Hays County Yes 119.6 (108.7, 131.3) 93 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.5)
Brewster County Yes 119.6 (83.3, 167.7) 8 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.4, 0.2)
Travis County Yes 119.3 (114.6, 124.1) 536 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.4)
Willacy County Yes 118.7 (92.2, 150.8) 14 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.3, 0.8)
Lynn County Yes 118.2 (73.0, 183.0) 4 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.6, -0.3)
Swisher County Yes 117.7 (80.2, 169.2) 7 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.3, 0.8)
El Paso County Yes 117.7 (113.1, 122.4) 501 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -1.1)
Hardeman County Yes 117.5 (69.9, 191.7) 4 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.6, 1.9)
Jim Wells County Yes 117.3 (98.7, 138.6) 29 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.0)
Webb County Yes 117.0 (107.9, 126.6) 125 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.7, 4.9)
Denton County Yes 116.1 (110.3, 122.0) 338 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.3, -1.5)
Smith County Yes 115.0 (107.1, 123.3) 163 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.7, -1.3)
Williamson County Yes 114.6 (108.3, 121.1) 258 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.1, -1.3)
Jones County Yes 113.9 (87.5, 147.0) 13 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.1, 0.6)
Duval County Yes 113.3 (80.7, 155.4) 9 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.4, 0.4)
Cameron County Yes 112.6 (106.4, 119.2) 246 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.2)
Kendall County Yes 110.6 (93.5, 130.3) 32 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.3, -1.1)
Bandera County Yes 109.3 (87.1, 136.7) 19 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.1, -0.4)
Titus County Yes 109.0 (88.3, 133.1) 20 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.4, -0.2)
Fort Bend County Yes 108.9 (103.3, 114.7) 314 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.9, -1.6)
Cherokee County Yes 108.4 (92.7, 126.3) 36 falling falling trend -10.8 (-19.4, -1.3)
Erath County Yes 106.8 (88.3, 128.0) 25 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.5, -0.2)
Collin County Yes 106.4 (101.6, 111.3) 402 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.4, -1.7)
Archer County Yes 104.6 (72.2, 149.1) 7
*
*
Somervell County Yes 104.5 (70.8, 150.6) 6 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.0, -1.3)
Val Verde County Yes 101.6 (84.9, 120.5) 27 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.5, -1.2)
Starr County Yes 100.6 (84.9, 118.3) 29 stable stable trend -0.0 (-1.3, 1.2)
Goliad County Yes 100.0 (66.4, 147.9) 6 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.4, 0.5)
Mills County Yes 99.6 (60.2, 161.4) 5 stable stable trend -0.8 (-4.2, 2.7)
Hidalgo County Yes 99.0 (94.4, 103.6) 361 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.7)
Parmer County Yes 88.9 (55.8, 134.5) 5
*
*
Kimble County Yes 88.0 (53.8, 146.1) 4 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.3, 0.5)
Pecos County Yes 81.5 (55.7, 115.6) 6 falling falling trend -4.7 (-7.4, -1.9)
Yoakum County Yes 79.5 (44.9, 129.7) 3 falling falling trend -2.8 (-5.1, -0.4)
Zapata County Yes 74.9 (47.2, 112.2) 5 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.0, 2.1)
Presidio County Yes 67.6 (39.8, 109.9) 4 falling falling trend -3.8 (-6.5, -1.0)
Armstrong County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Borden County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Briscoe County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cochran County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cottle County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crockett County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Culberson County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dickens County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Foard County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glasscock County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hemphill County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hudspeth County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Irion County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jeff Davis County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kenedy County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kent County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
King County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
La Salle County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lipscomb County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Loving County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Martin County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McMullen County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Motley County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oldham County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Reagan County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roberts County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sterling County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stonewall County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sutton County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Terrell County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Throckmorton County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 07/17/2019 2:56 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2015 US Population Data File is used for mortality data.
The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top