Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Utah by County

All Cancer Sites, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Utah Yes 104.7 (102.3, 107.1) N/A 1,509 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.0, -0.7)
United States No 128.7 (128.5, 129.0) N/A 283,896 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.2, -1.7)
Weber County Yes 104.3 (96.3, 112.7) 15 (8, 22) 130 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.5)
Washington County Yes 89.5 (82.0, 97.7) 23 (16, 25) 116 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.8)
Wasatch County No 123.9 (97.9, 154.4) 7 (1, 23) 17 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.3)
Utah County Yes 99.7 (93.6, 106.0) 17 (11, 22) 207 falling falling trend -0.7 (-0.9, -0.4)
Uintah County Yes 114.9 (92.3, 141.3) 9 (2, 24) 18 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.1)
Tooele County No 134.0 (114.9, 155.2) 5 (1, 14) 37 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.7, -0.1)
Summit County Yes 83.3 (64.9, 105.3) 24 (11, 25) 16 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.7, -0.1)
Sevier County Yes 96.6 (74.3, 124.0) 22 (5, 25) 13 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.8, -0.2)
Sanpete County Yes 80.7 (61.5, 104.1) 25 (11, 25) 12 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.7, -0.3)
San Juan County Yes 110.8 (80.0, 149.6) 10 (2, 25) 9 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.4, 0.4)
Salt Lake County Yes 109.8 (105.8, 113.9) 11 (7, 17) 587 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.7)
Morgan County Yes 105.3 (70.0, 152.1) 14 (2, 25) 6 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.7, -0.5)
Millard County Yes 107.6 (77.6, 146.3) 13 (2, 25) 9 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.5, 1.4)
Kane County No 164.1 (117.0, 225.8) 1 (1, 17) 9 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.3, 1.9)
Juab County Yes 97.6 (63.4, 143.4) 20 (2, 25) 5 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.5, 0.1)
Iron County Yes 122.2 (103.2, 143.5) 8 (2, 20) 31 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 1.0)
Grand County Yes 108.1 (74.7, 152.8) 12 (2, 25) 7 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.2, -0.7)
Garfield County No 149.1 (89.0, 235.2) 3 (1, 25) 4
*
*
Emery County Yes 97.0 (66.2, 138.7) 21 (3, 25) 7 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.1, -0.3)
Duchesne County No 136.0 (104.5, 173.8) 4 (1, 21) 13 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.3, 1.9)
Davis County Yes 99.6 (92.5, 107.1) 18 (11, 23) 150 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.1)
Carbon County No 130.3 (103.1, 162.9) 6 (1, 22) 17 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 1.0)
Cache County Yes 98.3 (86.1, 111.7) 19 (8, 24) 48 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.1)
Box Elder County Yes 103.4 (87.2, 121.6) 16 (6, 24) 30 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.4)
Beaver County No 156.8 (97.1, 238.1) 2 (1, 25) 5 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.5, 2.4)
Daggett County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Piute County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rich County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wayne County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/28/2024 5:54 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top