Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Utah by County

All Cancer Sites, 2016-2020

White Non-Hispanic, Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
Utah Yes 122.1 (120.2, 124.2) N/A 2,931 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.1, -0.9)
United States 6 No 154.4 (154.1, 154.6) N/A 464,265 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.0, -1.7)
Carbon County No 151.5 (128.9, 177.1) 4 (1, 18) 34 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.3)
Sevier County No 144.4 (123.7, 167.9) 8 (1, 21) 36 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.3)
Iron County No 138.1 (122.8, 154.8) 10 (2, 21) 62 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.2)
Cache County Yes 113.4 (103.5, 124.0) 23 (13, 27) 98 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.3)
Kane County No 160.9 (126.5, 202.9) 2 (1, 22) 17 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.0, 0.7)
San Juan County Yes 122.5 (92.3, 160.4) 18 (2, 27) 11 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.1, 0.7)
Utah County Yes 118.2 (113.1, 123.5) 20 (13, 24) 408 falling falling trend -0.7 (-0.9, -0.5)
Box Elder County Yes 120.7 (107.5, 135.1) 19 (8, 26) 62 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.1)
Duchesne County No 152.4 (127.4, 180.9) 3 (1, 20) 27 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.2)
Millard County Yes 111.8 (88.9, 139.4) 25 (6, 27) 17 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.0, 0.4)
Wayne County No 129.9 (81.8, 200.7) 13 (1, 27) 5 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.6, 1.0)
Beaver County No 150.4 (107.2, 205.1) 7 (1, 27) 9 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.1, 0.3)
Weber County No 123.9 (117.1, 131.0) 17 (9, 22) 253 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.7)
Davis County Yes 115.7 (109.8, 121.9) 21 (14, 25) 293 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.7)
Juab County No 124.3 (95.1, 159.5) 16 (2, 27) 13 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.3, 0.3)
Salt Lake County No 127.0 (123.5, 130.5) 15 (9, 19) 1,055 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.2, -0.9)
Tooele County No 150.6 (134.5, 168.0) 6 (1, 14) 68 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.4)
Uintah County No 135.1 (115.9, 156.6) 11 (2, 24) 37 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.3)
Garfield County No 143.2 (101.9, 197.2) 9 (1, 27) 9 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.9, 0.4)
Wasatch County No 127.4 (107.4, 150.0) 14 (3, 26) 32 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.3)
Morgan County No 131.1 (101.2, 166.9) 12 (1, 27) 14 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.4, -0.2)
Washington County Yes 107.7 (101.6, 114.1) 26 (19, 27) 260 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.9)
Grand County No 150.8 (120.8, 187.2) 5 (1, 24) 18 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.4, -0.6)
Sanpete County Yes 112.8 (96.0, 131.8) 24 (9, 27) 33 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -0.7)
Summit County Yes 99.3 (83.9, 116.6) 27 (16, 27) 35 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.7, -0.6)
Emery County Yes 115.6 (90.0, 146.8) 22 (4, 27) 15 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.1, -0.7)
Piute County No 169.7 (87.6, 304.0) 1 (1, 27) 4
*
*
Daggett County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rich County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/28/2024 5:24 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

6 Hispanic mortality recent trend data for the United States has been excluded for the following states: Louisiana, New Hampshire, and Oklahoma. The data on Hispanic and non-Hispanic mortality for these states may be unreliable for the time period used in the generation of the recent trend (1990 - 2020) and has been excluded from the calculation of the United States recent trend. This was based on the NCHS Policy.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top