Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Utah by County

All Cancer Sites, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
Utah Yes 120.6 (118.7, 122.4) N/A 3,259 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.2, -0.9)
United States No 149.4 (149.3, 149.6) N/A 599,666 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.2, -1.8)
Davis County Yes 114.1 (108.5, 120.0) 21 (14, 25) 319 stable stable trend 2.4 (-2.5, 7.4)
Carbon County No 148.7 (127.5, 172.5) 4 (1, 17) 37 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.2)
Sevier County No 142.7 (122.4, 165.5) 8 (1, 20) 36 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.3)
San Juan County Yes 109.1 (87.1, 135.0) 25 (7, 27) 18 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.5)
Utah County Yes 116.1 (111.3, 121.2) 19 (13, 24) 443 falling falling trend -0.7 (-0.9, -0.5)
Box Elder County Yes 120.1 (107.4, 133.8) 18 (8, 26) 67 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.1)
Cache County Yes 111.4 (101.9, 121.5) 23 (13, 27) 103 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.4)
Duchesne County No 150.1 (126.1, 177.4) 3 (1, 19) 28 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.2)
Iron County No 134.5 (119.9, 150.4) 10 (2, 20) 65 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.1)
Kane County No 161.3 (127.8, 201.8) 1 (1, 20) 18 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.1, 0.6)
Millard County Yes 112.6 (90.5, 139.0) 22 (5, 27) 19 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.0, 0.4)
Wayne County No 125.1 (79.2, 191.7) 14 (1, 27) 5 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.7, 1.0)
Juab County No 122.8 (94.3, 156.9) 16 (2, 27) 13 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.3, 0.4)
Weber County Yes 122.0 (115.6, 128.6) 17 (9, 22) 285 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.8)
Beaver County No 143.5 (103.9, 193.0) 7 (1, 27) 9 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.3, 0.1)
Salt Lake County No 125.5 (122.3, 128.7) 13 (9, 18) 1,234 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.3, -0.9)
Tooele County No 146.6 (131.6, 162.6) 6 (1, 14) 75 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.6)
Wasatch County No 124.9 (105.7, 146.4) 15 (3, 26) 34 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.4)
Morgan County No 132.5 (102.7, 168.1) 11 (1, 27) 14 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.4, -0.2)
Washington County Yes 107.1 (101.2, 113.2) 26 (18, 27) 274 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -1.0)
Garfield County No 138.7 (99.5, 189.3) 9 (1, 27) 9 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.9, 0.2)
Grand County No 147.7 (118.8, 182.0) 5 (1, 24) 19 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -0.6)
Sanpete County Yes 109.4 (93.2, 127.5) 24 (9, 27) 34 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -0.8)
Summit County Yes 95.9 (81.2, 112.3) 27 (17, 27) 37 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.8, -0.8)
Uintah County No 130.9 (113.0, 150.7) 12 (2, 25) 40 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.0, -0.9)
Emery County Yes 114.7 (89.6, 145.1) 20 (4, 27) 15 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.2, -0.8)
Piute County No 158.3 (85.7, 274.7) 2 (1, 27) 4
*
*
Daggett County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rich County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/02/2022 12:41 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top