Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Utah by County

All Cancer Sites, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Utah No 140.5 (137.5, 143.6) N/A 1,751 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.7)
United States No 177.5 (177.2, 177.8) N/A 315,770 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.5, -2.0)
San Juan County Yes 107.1 (77.0, 145.2) 26 (8, 26) 9 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.0, 0.9)
Summit County Yes 111.6 (88.4, 138.6) 25 (11, 26) 21 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.0, -0.9)
Millard County Yes 117.3 (86.1, 157.0) 24 (6, 26) 10 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.2, -0.1)
Washington County No 126.0 (117.1, 135.5) 23 (13, 25) 158 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.1)
Wasatch County No 126.9 (99.2, 159.4) 22 (5, 26) 17 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.7, -0.1)
Cache County No 127.9 (113.1, 143.9) 21 (9, 25) 56 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.5)
Garfield County No 129.5 (81.8, 198.4) 20 (1, 26) 5 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.5, -0.4)
Wayne County No 132.0 (74.0, 229.3) 19 (1, 26) 3
*
*
Davis County No 132.5 (123.5, 142.0) 18 (10, 24) 169 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.4)
Emery County No 133.7 (95.1, 183.7) 17 (2, 26) 8 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.3, -1.1)
Beaver County No 136.6 (85.6, 206.6) 16 (1, 26) 5 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.7, -0.1)
Utah County No 137.4 (129.5, 145.6) 15 (9, 22) 237 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.6)
Sanpete County No 138.8 (113.2, 168.3) 14 (3, 25) 21 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.9, -1.1)
Box Elder County No 139.5 (119.8, 161.5) 13 (4, 25) 37 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.8, 2.0)
Weber County No 144.1 (133.9, 154.9) 12 (6, 20) 155 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -0.9)
Salt Lake County No 147.1 (141.9, 152.5) 11 (6, 16) 647 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.6, -1.2)
Iron County No 149.8 (127.3, 174.9) 10 (3, 23) 34 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.5, -0.6)
Uintah County No 150.7 (122.8, 182.8) 9 (2, 24) 22 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.5, -0.5)
Juab County No 152.1 (106.4, 210.0) 8 (1, 26) 8 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.2, 1.7)
Morgan County No 161.4 (114.7, 220.0) 7 (1, 26) 8
*
*
Tooele County No 164.3 (140.5, 190.8) 6 (1, 18) 39 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -0.8)
Duchesne County No 164.8 (129.2, 207.1) 5 (1, 24) 15 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.1, -0.4)
Kane County No 166.2 (117.6, 229.6) 4 (1, 26) 9 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.1, 0.0)
Carbon County No 177.8 (144.0, 217.4) 3 (1, 18) 20 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.1)
Sevier County No 192.4 (158.6, 231.4) 2 (1, 12) 23 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.7, 0.9)
Grand County No 199.0 (150.4, 259.4) 1 (1, 18) 12 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.4, 0.1)
Daggett County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Piute County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rich County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/27/2022 1:23 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top