Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Utah by County

Lung & Bronchus, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 25.1?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Utah Yes 16.6 (15.9, 17.3) N/A 451 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.4, -2.2)
United States No 35.0 (34.9, 35.0) N/A 142,497 falling falling trend -4.8 (-5.1, -4.6)
Cache County Yes 11.7 (8.8, 15.2) 20 (13, 20) 11 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.4, 1.2)
Utah County Yes 11.9 (10.3, 13.5) 19 (15, 20) 44 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.9, -1.5)
Summit County Yes 11.9 (7.2, 18.5) 18 (8, 20) 5
*
*
Davis County Yes 14.4 (12.5, 16.6) 17 (11, 19) 40 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.7, -1.6)
Uintah County Yes 15.2 (9.5, 22.9) 16 (5, 20) 5 falling falling trend -9.2 (-14.5, -3.6)
Box Elder County Yes 15.5 (11.2, 20.8) 15 (6, 20) 9 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.6, 1.1)
Sanpete County Yes 16.0 (10.4, 23.5) 14 (5, 20) 5 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.7, 0.4)
Washington County Yes 16.2 (14.1, 18.6) 13 (8, 18) 45 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.1, -1.8)
Wasatch County Yes 17.4 (10.6, 26.6) 12 (3, 20) 5
*
*
Weber County Yes 17.7 (15.4, 20.3) 11 (6, 16) 43 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.6, -0.9)
Salt Lake County Yes 17.8 (16.6, 19.0) 10 (7, 15) 173 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.7, -1.8)
Iron County Yes 18.5 (13.4, 24.9) 9 (4, 19) 9 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.5, -0.3)
Sevier County Yes 21.1 (13.8, 31.0) 8 (2, 19) 5 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.7, 0.5)
Tooele County Yes 22.1 (16.5, 28.9) 7 (2, 16) 11 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.0, -1.6)
Kane County Yes 24.6 (13.6, 42.7) 6 (1, 20) 3
*
*
Emery County Yes 25.0 (14.4, 41.1) 5 (1, 19) 3
*
*
Carbon County No 27.9 (19.3, 39.2) 4 (1, 13) 7 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.8, 1.5)
Juab County No 32.4 (18.7, 52.1) 3 (1, 17) 3
*
*
Grand County No 33.1 (20.4, 51.6) 2 (1, 13) 4 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.5, -0.7)
Duchesne County No 36.2 (25.1, 50.6) 1 (1, 8) 7
*
*
Beaver County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Daggett County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Garfield County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Millard County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Morgan County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Piute County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rich County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Juan County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wayne County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/28/2024 2:20 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top