Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Vermont by County

All Cancer Sites, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Vermont No 156.2 (152.4, 160.0) N/A 1,391 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.3, -1.1)
United States No 149.4 (149.3, 149.6) N/A 599,666 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.2, -1.8)
Addison County No 134.0 (120.1, 149.3) 14 (10, 14) 72 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -1.0)
Bennington County No 170.1 (155.0, 186.6) 5 (1, 11) 101 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
Caledonia County No 154.5 (137.7, 173.0) 9 (2, 14) 68 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5)
Chittenden County No 143.4 (135.8, 151.4) 13 (9, 14) 276 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.9, -1.4)
Essex County No 181.4 (147.7, 223.0) 1 (1, 13) 21 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.3)
Franklin County No 173.3 (158.4, 189.2) 4 (1, 9) 106 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
Grand Isle County No 174.5 (137.2, 219.9) 3 (1, 14) 18 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.8, -0.3)
Lamoille County No 163.0 (143.7, 184.3) 7 (1, 13) 54 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5)
Orange County No 147.7 (131.5, 165.7) 12 (4, 14) 65 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.7)
Orleans County No 161.0 (143.7, 180.1) 8 (1, 13) 68 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.5, -0.8)
Rutland County No 176.4 (164.2, 189.4) 2 (1, 7) 167 falling falling trend -0.6 (-0.8, -0.4)
Washington County No 152.2 (140.2, 165.1) 10 (5, 14) 126 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -1.0)
Windham County No 163.9 (149.6, 179.2) 6 (1, 12) 109 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.9)
Windsor County No 151.7 (140.2, 164.1) 11 (5, 14) 140 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.8)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/19/2024 12:58 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top