Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Virginia by County

All Cancer Sites, 2018-2022

Black Non-Hispanic, Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name

County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Virginia N/A No 170.7 (167.9, 173.5) N/A 3,015 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.2, -1.9)
United States 6 N/A No 168.6 (168.1, 169.2) N/A 70,631 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.1, -2.0)
Accomack County Rural No 202.3 (167.3, 242.9) 25 (6, 72) 26 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.4, -1.0)
Albemarle County Urban No 172.2 (139.8, 210.0) 54 (15, 87) 20 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.3)
Alexandria City Urban No 167.6 (145.8, 191.5) 58 (23, 83) 47 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.4, -2.0)
Alleghany County and Clifton Forge City Rural No 306.7 (171.9, 517.1) 2 (1, 92) 4
*
*
Amelia County Urban No 146.5 (102.6, 209.0) 74 (12, 93) 8 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.2, -0.5)
Amherst County Urban No 182.2 (142.8, 230.4) 46 (8, 87) 16 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.7, 0.0)
Appomattox County Urban No 150.9 (100.7, 219.2) 73 (9, 93) 6 falling falling trend -6.3 (-20.6, -2.4)
Arlington County Urban No 134.5 (112.1, 159.9) 83 (48, 92) 28 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.6, -2.0)
Augusta County Urban Yes 107.0 (62.5, 170.4) 91 (27, 93) 4
*
*
Bedford City and County Urban No 178.6 (138.4, 228.1) 50 (8, 88) 14 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.6, -0.4)
Brunswick County Rural No 212.9 (177.0, 254.9) 18 (4, 68) 26 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.7, -1.1)
Buckingham County Rural No 157.4 (120.3, 203.8) 68 (14, 92) 12 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.8, -0.8)
Campbell County Urban No 185.3 (150.7, 225.9) 43 (9, 83) 21 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.0, -0.8)
Caroline County Rural No 152.7 (123.3, 187.9) 72 (27, 90) 19 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.0, -1.1)
Charles City County Urban No 172.2 (129.7, 231.4) 53 (8, 90) 11 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.5, -0.3)
Charlotte County Rural No 215.6 (161.4, 285.8) 16 (2, 81) 11 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.4, 0.0)
Charlottesville City Urban No 166.9 (131.0, 209.8) 61 (11, 90) 17 falling falling trend -4.3 (-10.9, -2.4)
Chesapeake City Urban No 158.8 (146.2, 172.3) 67 (42, 79) 123 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.3, -1.4)
Chesterfield County Urban No 161.1 (147.1, 175.9) 64 (37, 80) 120 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.3, -0.9)
Colonial Heights City Urban No 191.4 (111.0, 303.4) 35 (2, 93) 4
*
*
Culpeper County Urban No 190.8 (150.6, 238.7) 37 (6, 85) 16 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.0, -1.1)
Cumberland County Rural No 255.8 (184.8, 346.6) 5 (2, 75) 11 stable stable trend -0.7 (-17.6, 2.1)
Danville City Rural No 206.9 (181.6, 234.8) 21 (7, 57) 52 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.3)
Dinwiddie County Urban No 169.6 (137.3, 208.2) 57 (13, 87) 21 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.6, 0.0)
Emporia City Rural No 185.4 (131.1, 255.5) 42 (3, 92) 8 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.3, -1.4)
Essex County Rural No 181.7 (131.8, 245.6) 47 (5, 91) 10 falling falling trend -2.3 (-9.1, -1.0)
Fairfax City Urban No 642.6 (397.5, 964.9) 1 (1, 10) 5 stable stable trend 27.7 (-2.3, 76.6)
Fairfax County Urban Yes 118.1 (108.3, 128.5) 89 (77, 93) 122 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.1, -2.0)
Fauquier County Urban No 188.8 (149.0, 237.3) 39 (6, 84) 16 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.3, -1.7)
Fluvanna County Urban No 137.9 (94.7, 194.8) 77 (19, 93) 7 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.2, -0.6)
Franklin City Rural No 298.9 (233.3, 377.6) 4 (1, 30) 15 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.2, -0.1)
Franklin County Urban No 200.2 (151.9, 260.7) 26 (3, 85) 13 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.8, -0.2)
Frederick County Urban No 127.3 (73.1, 202.5) 86 (9, 93) 4
*
*
Fredericksburg City Urban No 169.6 (121.3, 229.9) 56 (6, 92) 9 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.8, -0.8)
Gloucester County Urban No 184.7 (135.6, 249.7) 45 (4, 90) 10 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.7, -0.5)
Goochland County Urban No 193.2 (147.2, 252.7) 31 (4, 89) 12 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.5, -0.4)
Greensville County Rural No 240.5 (187.9, 303.2) 9 (2, 67) 16 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 1.0)
Halifax County with South Boston City Rural No 187.2 (159.5, 219.1) 41 (11, 76) 37 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.8)
Hampton City Urban No 171.6 (158.7, 185.4) 55 (31, 71) 137 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.1, -1.2)
Hanover County Urban No 165.6 (136.2, 200.0) 62 (17, 88) 23 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.7, -0.6)
Harrisonburg City Urban No 252.0 (165.2, 364.6) 7 (1, 88) 6
*
*
Henrico County Urban No 156.3 (145.5, 167.6) 70 (47, 79) 168 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.5, -1.4)
Henry County Rural No 141.2 (116.6, 170.3) 75 (39, 91) 26 falling falling trend -2.4 (-5.1, -1.4)
Hopewell City Urban No 214.3 (171.1, 264.7) 17 (3, 72) 18 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.5, -0.2)
Isle of Wight County Urban No 160.5 (130.6, 196.2) 65 (17, 89) 21 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.8, -1.0)
James City County Urban No 159.1 (129.8, 193.4) 66 (20, 89) 21 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.6, -0.7)
King George County Rural No 124.4 (81.8, 181.3) 88 (20, 93) 6 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.8, 0.3)
King William County Urban No 191.4 (135.9, 265.6) 34 (3, 91) 8 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.8, -0.5)
King and Queen County Urban No 191.1 (122.6, 290.6) 36 (2, 93) 5 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.7, 0.3)
Lancaster County Rural No 225.8 (163.8, 305.9) 13 (2, 83) 10 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.4, -1.1)
Loudoun County Urban No 137.2 (116.6, 160.3) 80 (47, 91) 36 falling falling trend -3.3 (-3.9, -2.6)
Louisa County Rural No 175.3 (137.3, 222.0) 51 (9, 88) 16 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.3, 0.5)
Lunenburg County Rural No 181.6 (135.9, 240.4) 48 (5, 89) 11 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.3, 1.3)
Lynchburg City Urban No 239.2 (210.0, 271.3) 10 (3, 41) 51 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.4, 8.4)
Manassas City Urban No 139.1 (91.7, 200.6) 76 (12, 93) 7 falling falling trend -15.0 (-30.3, -1.9)
Martinsville City Rural No 302.7 (242.2, 373.4) 3 (1, 27) 20 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.2, 1.2)
Mecklenburg County Rural No 207.2 (176.3, 242.6) 20 (6, 67) 34 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.6)
Middlesex County Rural Yes 97.6 (60.1, 166.2) 93 (48, 93) 4
*
*
Montgomery County Urban Yes 114.0 (64.1, 185.5) 90 (17, 93) 3 falling falling trend -3.8 (-5.3, -2.5)
Nelson County Urban No 154.1 (99.4, 240.1) 71 (7, 93) 5 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.7, 0.2)
New Kent County Urban No 128.9 (82.0, 194.6) 85 (17, 93) 5 falling falling trend -2.1 (-4.1, -0.1)
Newport News City Urban No 193.9 (178.9, 209.8) 30 (15, 56) 135 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.0, -1.1)
Norfolk City Urban No 199.9 (186.7, 213.7) 27 (14, 49) 184 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.1, -1.3)
Northampton County Rural No 205.8 (157.5, 266.7) 23 (3, 81) 14 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.5)
Northumberland County Rural No 191.5 (140.9, 258.6) 33 (4, 90) 10 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.8, -0.1)
Nottoway County Rural No 226.4 (181.1, 280.5) 12 (2, 69) 18 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.3)
Orange County Rural No 254.2 (196.8, 323.4) 6 (2, 67) 14 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.9, -0.4)
Petersburg City Urban No 216.4 (193.5, 241.3) 15 (7, 49) 71 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -1.1)
Pittsylvania County Rural No 179.2 (153.4, 208.9) 49 (15, 78) 38 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.5)
Portsmouth City Urban No 196.7 (180.0, 214.5) 29 (14, 55) 109 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.9)
Powhatan County Urban No 190.5 (135.3, 266.0) 38 (3, 91) 8 falling falling trend -2.7 (-6.2, -1.5)
Prince Edward County Rural No 251.7 (204.7, 306.8) 8 (2, 52) 21 stable stable trend 2.3 (-0.3, 11.9)
Prince George County Urban No 136.5 (105.8, 172.9) 81 (36, 93) 14 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.0, -1.0)
Prince William County Urban No 135.5 (122.3, 149.6) 82 (59, 89) 99 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.5, -1.6)
Richmond City Urban No 188.8 (177.4, 200.7) 40 (21, 55) 228 falling falling trend -2.4 (-2.9, -2.1)
Richmond County Rural No 209.9 (145.1, 296.3) 19 (2, 90) 7 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.8, 0.4)
Roanoke City Urban No 193.1 (171.1, 217.0) 32 (12, 65) 61 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -1.0)
Roanoke County Urban No 167.1 (122.6, 222.0) 59 (8, 92) 10 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.3, 4.0)
Salem City Urban No 233.6 (137.0, 367.4) 11 (2, 93) 4 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.5, 0.5)
Southampton County Rural No 137.8 (106.2, 177.8) 78 (30, 93) 14 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.8, -0.3)
Spotsylvania County Urban No 132.1 (111.1, 155.9) 84 (51, 92) 31 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.0, -1.4)
Stafford County Urban No 137.3 (113.1, 164.7) 79 (41, 92) 29 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.8, -1.3)
Staunton City Urban No 174.4 (118.3, 248.7) 52 (5, 93) 7 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.6, -0.7)
Suffolk City Urban No 185.0 (166.1, 205.5) 44 (16, 68) 76 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.2, -1.1)
Surry County Urban No 125.8 (84.3, 187.4) 87 (20, 93) 6 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.5, -0.5)
Sussex County Urban No 203.2 (159.0, 257.1) 24 (4, 81) 15 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.6, -0.9)
Virginia Beach City Urban No 166.9 (153.8, 180.8) 60 (35, 76) 131 falling falling trend -1.7 (-4.9, -1.0)
Warren County Urban No 163.4 (98.5, 255.8) 63 (3, 93) 4 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.8, -0.2)
Waynesboro City Urban No 223.2 (145.9, 325.3) 14 (2, 91) 6
*
*
Westmoreland County Rural No 156.4 (117.8, 205.6) 69 (13, 92) 12 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.3, -1.9)
Williamsburg City Urban No 206.0 (133.7, 306.1) 22 (2, 92) 5
*
*
Winchester City Urban No 198.7 (129.4, 290.1) 28 (2, 93) 6 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.9, 0.8)
York County Urban Yes 102.9 (78.5, 132.7) 92 (68, 93) 12 falling falling trend -3.6 (-4.7, -2.4)
Bath County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bland County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Botetourt County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bristol City Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Buchanan County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Buena Vista City Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carroll County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clarke County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Covington City Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Craig County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dickenson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Falls Church City Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Floyd County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Galax City Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Giles County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grayson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greene County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Highland County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lee County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lexington City Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Madison County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Manassas Park City Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mathews County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Norton City Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Page County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Patrick County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Poquoson City Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pulaski County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Radford City Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rappahannock County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rockbridge County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rockingham County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Russell County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Scott County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shenandoah County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Smyth County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tazewell County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washington County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wise County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wythe County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/22/2024 4:03 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
6 Hispanic mortality recent trend data for the United States has been excluded for the following states: Louisiana, New Hampshire, and Oklahoma. The data on Hispanic and non-Hispanic mortality for these states may be unreliable for the time period used in the generation of the recent trend (1990 - 2022) and has been excluded from the calculation of the United States recent trend. This was based on the NCHS Policy.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top