Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Virginia by County

Pancreas, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Virginia N/A *** 11.2 (11.0, 11.5) N/A 1,196 stable stable trend 0.2 (0.0, 0.4)
United States N/A *** 11.2 (11.1, 11.2) N/A 46,760 rising rising trend 0.3 (0.2, 0.3)
York County Urban *** 10.2 (7.5, 13.8) 71 (18, 88) 9 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.2, 1.8)
Wythe County Rural *** 13.1 (8.6, 19.5) 30 (1, 88) 6 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.7, 4.3)
Wise County Rural *** 10.4 (6.8, 15.4) 70 (6, 88) 5 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.5, 2.4)
Winchester City Urban *** 16.3 (10.9, 23.8) 5 (1, 85) 6
*
*
Westmoreland County Rural *** 16.3 (10.7, 24.7) 6 (1, 84) 6
*
*
Waynesboro City Urban *** 14.5 (9.3, 22.0) 20 (1, 88) 5
*
*
Washington County Urban *** 11.3 (8.4, 15.2) 54 (8, 87) 11 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.4, 2.4)
Warren County Urban *** 6.9 (4.1, 11.1) 88 (38, 88) 4
*
*
Virginia Beach City Urban *** 9.4 (8.3, 10.7) 78 (48, 85) 51 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.5)
Tazewell County Rural *** 11.0 (7.7, 15.6) 57 (6, 88) 7
*
*
Suffolk City Urban *** 12.6 (9.8, 16.0) 36 (5, 82) 14 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 1.3)
Staunton City Urban *** 9.2 (5.4, 15.2) 79 (6, 88) 4 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.8, 1.0)
Stafford County Urban *** 11.1 (8.7, 13.9) 56 (13, 86) 16 stable stable trend -14.1 (-25.5, 1.8)
Spotsylvania County Urban *** 10.4 (8.3, 13.0) 68 (20, 87) 17
*
*
Smyth County Rural *** 12.6 (8.6, 18.2) 39 (2, 87) 7 rising rising trend 5.6 (2.1, 25.9)
Shenandoah County Rural *** 11.4 (8.2, 15.7) 53 (6, 87) 8 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.8, 3.1)
Scott County Urban *** 9.2 (5.0, 16.1) 81 (5, 88) 3
*
*
Salem City Urban *** 10.8 (6.3, 17.6) 60 (2, 88) 4 rising rising trend 1.8 (0.1, 4.1)
Russell County Rural *** 11.6 (7.3, 18.0) 52 (2, 88) 5 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.3, 2.5)
Rockingham County Urban *** 8.7 (6.5, 11.4) 85 (34, 88) 11 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.9, 2.2)
Rockbridge County Rural *** 9.4 (5.8, 15.5) 77 (8, 88) 4
*
*
Roanoke County Urban *** 10.6 (8.4, 13.3) 63 (18, 86) 17 rising rising trend 1.5 (0.2, 3.5)
Roanoke City Urban *** 15.1 (12.2, 18.6) 12 (2, 66) 19 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.2, 1.9)
Richmond City Urban *** 10.7 (8.9, 12.7) 61 (24, 84) 27 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.0)
Pulaski County Urban *** 10.5 (7.0, 15.5) 67 (7, 88) 6 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.7, 1.5)
Prince William County Urban *** 9.2 (7.9, 10.7) 80 (48, 87) 38 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 1.0)
Prince George County Urban *** 9.8 (6.0, 15.1) 75 (6, 88) 4
*
*
Prince Edward County Rural *** 19.8 (12.8, 29.7) 1 (1, 80) 5 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.8, 3.0)
Powhatan County Urban *** 9.7 (6.0, 15.3) 76 (8, 88) 4
*
*
Portsmouth City Urban *** 15.1 (12.0, 18.7) 13 (1, 63) 18 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 0.9)
Pittsylvania County Rural *** 10.5 (7.5, 14.3) 66 (11, 88) 10 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.9, 1.7)
Petersburg City Urban *** 14.9 (10.1, 21.4) 16 (1, 85) 6 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.6, 1.7)
Patrick County Rural *** 12.3 (7.8, 19.8) 45 (2, 88) 5
*
*
Page County Rural *** 16.9 (11.6, 24.3) 4 (1, 78) 7
*
*
Orange County Rural *** 14.9 (10.7, 20.5) 17 (1, 82) 8 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.6, 3.2)
Northampton County Rural *** 18.7 (11.5, 30.5) 2 (1, 84) 4
*
*
Norfolk City Urban *** 13.3 (11.3, 15.7) 26 (8, 68) 31 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.5)
Newport News City Urban *** 11.7 (9.6, 14.1) 50 (14, 81) 22 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 1.2)
New Kent County Urban *** 12.6 (7.3, 20.6) 37 (1, 88) 4
*
*
Montgomery County Urban *** 9.0 (6.5, 12.1) 83 (28, 88) 9
*
*
Mecklenburg County Rural *** 14.8 (10.6, 20.6) 18 (1, 83) 9 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.7, 1.9)
Martinsville City Rural *** 17.9 (10.1, 29.8) 3 (1, 88) 3
*
*
Manassas City Urban *** 13.3 (8.0, 20.5) 28 (1, 88) 4
*
*
Lynchburg City Urban *** 10.5 (7.7, 14.1) 65 (14, 87) 10 stable stable trend -5.5 (-21.4, 0.1)
Louisa County Rural *** 14.0 (9.7, 19.7) 22 (1, 85) 8
*
*
Loudoun County Urban *** 12.4 (10.8, 14.3) 42 (14, 69) 43 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.1, 2.3)
Lee County Rural *** 15.5 (9.9, 23.8) 9 (1, 87) 5
*
*
Lancaster County Rural *** 15.6 (7.1, 31.0) 8 (1, 88) 3
*
*
King George County Rural *** 12.3 (7.2, 19.8) 44 (1, 88) 4
*
*
James City County Urban *** 12.1 (9.7, 15.1) 47 (9, 82) 18 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.3, 2.0)
Isle of Wight County Urban *** 14.2 (10.2, 19.7) 21 (1, 85) 8
*
*
Hopewell City Urban *** 15.1 (9.4, 23.1) 14 (1, 87) 4
*
*
Henry County Rural *** 11.7 (8.5, 15.9) 51 (6, 86) 10 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.2, 2.1)
Henrico County Urban *** 13.6 (12.1, 15.3) 25 (9, 57) 57 rising rising trend 4.0 (2.3, 8.4)
Harrisonburg City Urban *** 14.5 (9.7, 20.8) 19 (1, 86) 6
*
*
Hanover County Urban *** 11.3 (9.0, 14.1) 55 (14, 84) 17 stable stable trend 13.1 (-1.1, 23.8)
Hampton City Urban *** 12.4 (10.0, 15.1) 43 (9, 80) 21 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.0, 1.0)
Halifax County with South Boston City Rural *** 15.3 (10.7, 21.5) 11 (1, 81) 8 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.3, 3.2)
Grayson County Rural *** 13.3 (7.5, 22.8) 27 (1, 88) 3
*
*
Goochland County Urban *** 9.0 (5.4, 14.9) 82 (9, 88) 4
*
*
Gloucester County Urban *** 12.7 (8.8, 17.8) 35 (3, 87) 8
*
*
Frederick County Urban *** 12.7 (10.1, 15.9) 33 (6, 79) 17 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.4, 3.3)
Franklin County Urban *** 12.2 (9.1, 16.3) 46 (5, 85) 11 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.5, 3.1)
Fluvanna County Urban *** 12.7 (8.3, 19.1) 34 (1, 88) 5
*
*
Fauquier County Urban *** 11.9 (9.0, 15.5) 48 (6, 85) 12 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.9, 1.8)
Fairfax County Urban *** 8.9 (8.2, 9.7) 84 (61, 86) 111 stable stable trend -0.5 (-0.8, 0.0)
Fairfax City Urban *** 15.5 (9.5, 23.9) 10 (1, 87) 4
*
*
Dinwiddie County Urban *** 13.8 (9.0, 20.7) 23 (1, 88) 5 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.0, 3.0)
Danville City Rural *** 15.7 (11.3, 21.4) 7 (1, 79) 9 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.1, 3.1)
Culpeper County Urban *** 12.5 (8.9, 17.1) 41 (3, 86) 8
*
*
Clarke County Urban *** 13.0 (7.5, 22.2) 31 (1, 88) 3
*
*
Chesterfield County Urban *** 10.7 (9.3, 12.2) 62 (30, 80) 46 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.4, 1.6)
Chesapeake City Urban *** 14.9 (12.9, 17.2) 15 (3, 48) 40 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.4, 1.8)
Charlottesville City Urban *** 11.0 (7.0, 16.5) 58 (4, 88) 5
*
*
Carroll County Rural *** 8.0 (4.8, 13.0) 86 (20, 88) 4 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.8, 1.9)
Caroline County Rural *** 13.8 (9.2, 20.1) 24 (1, 87) 6
*
*
Campbell County Urban *** 11.7 (8.6, 15.8) 49 (7, 86) 10 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.6, 1.5)
Buchanan County Rural *** 12.5 (7.8, 20.0) 40 (1, 88) 4 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.2, 2.8)
Brunswick County Rural *** 12.8 (7.2, 21.9) 32 (1, 88) 3
*
*
Botetourt County Urban *** 6.9 (4.3, 11.2) 87 (40, 88) 4 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.7, 0.5)
Bedford City and County Urban *** 9.9 (7.7, 12.8) 74 (24, 87) 14 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.7)
Augusta County Urban *** 10.4 (8.0, 13.4) 69 (18, 87) 13 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.2, 1.7)
Arlington County Urban *** 10.8 (8.9, 13.1) 59 (20, 85) 22 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.6)
Amherst County Urban *** 13.2 (9.0, 19.2) 29 (2, 87) 7 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.8, 1.6)
Alleghany County and Clifton Forge City Rural *** 12.6 (7.4, 21.4) 38 (1, 88) 4
*
*
Alexandria City Urban *** 10.0 (7.8, 12.7) 72 (23, 87) 14 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.1)
Albemarle County Urban *** 10.6 (8.4, 13.2) 64 (19, 86) 18 rising rising trend 1.6 (0.2, 3.7)
Accomack County Rural *** 10.0 (6.8, 14.6) 73 (11, 88) 7 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.5, 1.4)
Amelia County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Appomattox County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bath County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bland County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bristol City Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Buckingham County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Buena Vista City Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Charles City County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Charlotte County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Colonial Heights City Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Covington City Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Craig County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cumberland County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dickenson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Emporia City Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Essex County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Falls Church City Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Floyd County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Franklin City Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fredericksburg City Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Galax City Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Giles County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greene County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greensville County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Highland County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
King William County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
King and Queen County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lexington City Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lunenburg County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Madison County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Manassas Park City Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mathews County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Middlesex County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Nelson County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Northumberland County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Norton City Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Nottoway County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Poquoson City Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Radford City Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rappahannock County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Richmond County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Southampton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Surry County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sussex County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Williamsburg City Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 04/20/2025 12:32 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.


Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top