Death Rates Table
Death Rate Report for Virginia by County
Pancreas, 2018-2022
All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages
Sorted by Rate
County
|
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
|
Met Healthy People Objective of ***? |
Age-Adjusted Death Rate † deaths per 100,000 (95% Confidence Interval) 
|
CI*Rank ⋔ (95% Confidence Interval)
|
Average Annual Count
|
Recent Trend |
Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Death Rates (95% Confidence Interval)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Virginia | N/A | *** | 11.2 (11.0, 11.5) | N/A | 1,196 |
stable 
|
0.2 (0.0, 0.4) |
| United States | N/A | *** | 11.2 (11.1, 11.2) | N/A | 46,760 |
rising 
|
0.3 (0.2, 0.3) |
| Warren County | Urban | *** | 6.9 (4.1, 11.1) | 88 (38, 88) | 4 |
|
|
| Botetourt County | Urban | *** | 6.9 (4.3, 11.2) | 87 (40, 88) | 4 |
stable
|
-1.8 (-3.7, 0.5) |
| Carroll County | Rural | *** | 8.0 (4.8, 13.0) | 86 (20, 88) | 4 |
stable
|
-0.1 (-1.8, 1.9) |
| Rockingham County | Urban | *** | 8.7 (6.5, 11.4) | 85 (34, 88) | 11 |
stable
|
0.4 (-0.9, 2.2) |
| Fairfax County | Urban | *** | 8.9 (8.2, 9.7) | 84 (61, 86) | 111 |
stable
|
-0.5 (-0.8, 0.0) |
| Montgomery County | Urban | *** | 9.0 (6.5, 12.1) | 83 (28, 88) | 9 |
|
|
| Goochland County | Urban | *** | 9.0 (5.4, 14.9) | 82 (9, 88) | 4 |
|
|
| Scott County | Urban | *** | 9.2 (5.0, 16.1) | 81 (5, 88) | 3 |
|
|
| Prince William County | Urban | *** | 9.2 (7.9, 10.7) | 80 (48, 87) | 38 |
stable
|
-0.3 (-1.2, 1.0) |
| Staunton City | Urban | *** | 9.2 (5.4, 15.2) | 79 (6, 88) | 4 |
stable
|
-1.4 (-3.8, 1.0) |
| Virginia Beach City | Urban | *** | 9.4 (8.3, 10.7) | 78 (48, 85) | 51 |
stable
|
-0.4 (-1.2, 0.5) |
| Rockbridge County | Rural | *** | 9.4 (5.8, 15.5) | 77 (8, 88) | 4 |
|
|
| Powhatan County | Urban | *** | 9.7 (6.0, 15.3) | 76 (8, 88) | 4 |
|
|
| Prince George County | Urban | *** | 9.8 (6.0, 15.1) | 75 (6, 88) | 4 |
|
|
| Bedford City and County | Urban | *** | 9.9 (7.7, 12.8) | 74 (24, 87) | 14 |
stable
|
-0.6 (-1.6, 0.7) |
| Accomack County | Rural | *** | 10.0 (6.8, 14.6) | 73 (11, 88) | 7 |
stable
|
-0.6 (-2.5, 1.4) |
| Alexandria City | Urban | *** | 10.0 (7.8, 12.7) | 72 (23, 87) | 14 |
stable
|
-1.1 (-2.2, 0.1) |
| York County | Urban | *** | 10.2 (7.5, 13.8) | 71 (18, 88) | 9 |
stable
|
-0.6 (-2.2, 1.8) |
| Wise County | Rural | *** | 10.4 (6.8, 15.4) | 70 (6, 88) | 5 |
stable
|
0.3 (-1.5, 2.4) |
| Augusta County | Urban | *** | 10.4 (8.0, 13.4) | 69 (18, 87) | 13 |
stable
|
0.0 (-1.2, 1.7) |
| Spotsylvania County | Urban | *** | 10.4 (8.3, 13.0) | 68 (20, 87) | 17 |
|
|
| Pulaski County | Urban | *** | 10.5 (7.0, 15.5) | 67 (7, 88) | 6 |
stable
|
-0.3 (-1.7, 1.5) |
| Pittsylvania County | Rural | *** | 10.5 (7.5, 14.3) | 66 (11, 88) | 10 |
stable
|
0.3 (-0.9, 1.7) |
| Lynchburg City | Urban | *** | 10.5 (7.7, 14.1) | 65 (14, 87) | 10 |
stable
|
-5.5 (-21.4, 0.1) |
| Albemarle County | Urban | *** | 10.6 (8.4, 13.2) | 64 (19, 86) | 18 |
rising
|
1.6 (0.2, 3.7) |
| Roanoke County | Urban | *** | 10.6 (8.4, 13.3) | 63 (18, 86) | 17 |
rising
|
1.5 (0.2, 3.5) |
| Chesterfield County | Urban | *** | 10.7 (9.3, 12.2) | 62 (30, 80) | 46 |
stable
|
0.4 (-0.4, 1.6) |
| Richmond City | Urban | *** | 10.7 (8.9, 12.7) | 61 (24, 84) | 27 |
stable
|
-0.8 (-1.6, 0.0) |
| Salem City | Urban | *** | 10.8 (6.3, 17.6) | 60 (2, 88) | 4 |
rising
|
1.8 (0.1, 4.1) |
| Arlington County | Urban | *** | 10.8 (8.9, 13.1) | 59 (20, 85) | 22 |
stable
|
-0.3 (-1.1, 0.6) |
| Charlottesville City | Urban | *** | 11.0 (7.0, 16.5) | 58 (4, 88) | 5 |
|
|
| Tazewell County | Rural | *** | 11.0 (7.7, 15.6) | 57 (6, 88) | 7 |
|
|
| Stafford County | Urban | *** | 11.1 (8.7, 13.9) | 56 (13, 86) | 16 |
stable
|
-14.1 (-25.5, 1.8) |
| Hanover County | Urban | *** | 11.3 (9.0, 14.1) | 55 (14, 84) | 17 |
stable
|
13.1 (-1.1, 23.8) |
| Washington County | Urban | *** | 11.3 (8.4, 15.2) | 54 (8, 87) | 11 |
stable
|
0.8 (-0.4, 2.4) |
| Shenandoah County | Rural | *** | 11.4 (8.2, 15.7) | 53 (6, 87) | 8 |
stable
|
0.8 (-0.8, 3.1) |
| Russell County | Rural | *** | 11.6 (7.3, 18.0) | 52 (2, 88) | 5 |
stable
|
0.4 (-1.3, 2.5) |
| Henry County | Rural | *** | 11.7 (8.5, 15.9) | 51 (6, 86) | 10 |
stable
|
0.3 (-1.2, 2.1) |
| Newport News City | Urban | *** | 11.7 (9.6, 14.1) | 50 (14, 81) | 22 |
stable
|
0.0 (-1.0, 1.2) |
| Campbell County | Urban | *** | 11.7 (8.6, 15.8) | 49 (7, 86) | 10 |
stable
|
-0.2 (-1.6, 1.5) |
| Fauquier County | Urban | *** | 11.9 (9.0, 15.5) | 48 (6, 85) | 12 |
stable
|
-0.4 (-1.9, 1.8) |
| James City County | Urban | *** | 12.1 (9.7, 15.1) | 47 (9, 82) | 18 |
stable
|
0.0 (-1.3, 2.0) |
| Franklin County | Urban | *** | 12.2 (9.1, 16.3) | 46 (5, 85) | 11 |
stable
|
1.0 (-0.5, 3.1) |
| Patrick County | Rural | *** | 12.3 (7.8, 19.8) | 45 (2, 88) | 5 |
|
|
| King George County | Rural | *** | 12.3 (7.2, 19.8) | 44 (1, 88) | 4 |
|
|
| Hampton City | Urban | *** | 12.4 (10.0, 15.1) | 43 (9, 80) | 21 |
stable
|
-0.1 (-1.0, 1.0) |
| Loudoun County | Urban | *** | 12.4 (10.8, 14.3) | 42 (14, 69) | 43 |
stable
|
0.8 (-0.1, 2.3) |
| Culpeper County | Urban | *** | 12.5 (8.9, 17.1) | 41 (3, 86) | 8 |
|
|
| Buchanan County | Rural | *** | 12.5 (7.8, 20.0) | 40 (1, 88) | 4 |
stable
|
0.6 (-1.2, 2.8) |
| Smyth County | Rural | *** | 12.6 (8.6, 18.2) | 39 (2, 87) | 7 |
rising
|
5.6 (2.1, 25.9) |
| Alleghany County and Clifton Forge City | Rural | *** | 12.6 (7.4, 21.4) | 38 (1, 88) | 4 |
|
|
| New Kent County | Urban | *** | 12.6 (7.3, 20.6) | 37 (1, 88) | 4 |
|
|
| Suffolk City | Urban | *** | 12.6 (9.8, 16.0) | 36 (5, 82) | 14 |
stable
|
-0.1 (-1.1, 1.3) |
| Gloucester County | Urban | *** | 12.7 (8.8, 17.8) | 35 (3, 87) | 8 |
|
|
| Fluvanna County | Urban | *** | 12.7 (8.3, 19.1) | 34 (1, 88) | 5 |
|
|
| Frederick County | Urban | *** | 12.7 (10.1, 15.9) | 33 (6, 79) | 17 |
stable
|
1.0 (-0.4, 3.3) |
| Brunswick County | Rural | *** | 12.8 (7.2, 21.9) | 32 (1, 88) | 3 |
|
|
| Clarke County | Urban | *** | 13.0 (7.5, 22.2) | 31 (1, 88) | 3 |
|
|
| Wythe County | Rural | *** | 13.1 (8.6, 19.5) | 30 (1, 88) | 6 |
stable
|
1.3 (-0.7, 4.3) |
| Amherst County | Urban | *** | 13.2 (9.0, 19.2) | 29 (2, 87) | 7 |
stable
|
-0.3 (-1.8, 1.6) |
| Manassas City | Urban | *** | 13.3 (8.0, 20.5) | 28 (1, 88) | 4 |
|
|
| Grayson County | Rural | *** | 13.3 (7.5, 22.8) | 27 (1, 88) | 3 |
|
|
| Norfolk City | Urban | *** | 13.3 (11.3, 15.7) | 26 (8, 68) | 31 |
stable
|
-0.4 (-1.2, 0.5) |
| Henrico County | Urban | *** | 13.6 (12.1, 15.3) | 25 (9, 57) | 57 |
rising
|
4.0 (2.3, 8.4) |
| Caroline County | Rural | *** | 13.8 (9.2, 20.1) | 24 (1, 87) | 6 |
|
|
| Dinwiddie County | Urban | *** | 13.8 (9.0, 20.7) | 23 (1, 88) | 5 |
stable
|
0.1 (-2.0, 3.0) |
| Louisa County | Rural | *** | 14.0 (9.7, 19.7) | 22 (1, 85) | 8 |
|
|
| Isle of Wight County | Urban | *** | 14.2 (10.2, 19.7) | 21 (1, 85) | 8 |
|
|
| Waynesboro City | Urban | *** | 14.5 (9.3, 22.0) | 20 (1, 88) | 5 |
|
|
| Harrisonburg City | Urban | *** | 14.5 (9.7, 20.8) | 19 (1, 86) | 6 |
|
|
| Mecklenburg County | Rural | *** | 14.8 (10.6, 20.6) | 18 (1, 83) | 9 |
stable
|
0.5 (-0.7, 1.9) |
| Orange County | Rural | *** | 14.9 (10.7, 20.5) | 17 (1, 82) | 8 |
stable
|
0.9 (-0.6, 3.2) |
| Petersburg City | Urban | *** | 14.9 (10.1, 21.4) | 16 (1, 85) | 6 |
stable
|
-0.1 (-1.6, 1.7) |
| Chesapeake City | Urban | *** | 14.9 (12.9, 17.2) | 15 (3, 48) | 40 |
stable
|
0.6 (-0.4, 1.8) |
| Hopewell City | Urban | *** | 15.1 (9.4, 23.1) | 14 (1, 87) | 4 |
|
|
| Portsmouth City | Urban | *** | 15.1 (12.0, 18.7) | 13 (1, 63) | 18 |
stable
|
-0.1 (-1.1, 0.9) |
| Roanoke City | Urban | *** | 15.1 (12.2, 18.6) | 12 (2, 66) | 19 |
stable
|
0.8 (-0.2, 1.9) |
| Halifax County with South Boston City | Rural | *** | 15.3 (10.7, 21.5) | 11 (1, 81) | 8 |
stable
|
1.2 (-0.3, 3.2) |
| Fairfax City | Urban | *** | 15.5 (9.5, 23.9) | 10 (1, 87) | 4 |
|
|
| Lee County | Rural | *** | 15.5 (9.9, 23.8) | 9 (1, 87) | 5 |
|
|
| Lancaster County | Rural | *** | 15.6 (7.1, 31.0) | 8 (1, 88) | 3 |
|
|
| Danville City | Rural | *** | 15.7 (11.3, 21.4) | 7 (1, 79) | 9 |
stable
|
1.4 (-0.1, 3.1) |
| Westmoreland County | Rural | *** | 16.3 (10.7, 24.7) | 6 (1, 84) | 6 |
|
|
| Winchester City | Urban | *** | 16.3 (10.9, 23.8) | 5 (1, 85) | 6 |
|
|
| Page County | Rural | *** | 16.9 (11.6, 24.3) | 4 (1, 78) | 7 |
|
|
| Martinsville City | Rural | *** | 17.9 (10.1, 29.8) | 3 (1, 88) | 3 |
|
|
| Northampton County | Rural | *** | 18.7 (11.5, 30.5) | 2 (1, 84) | 4 |
|
|
| Prince Edward County | Rural | *** | 19.8 (12.8, 29.7) | 1 (1, 80) | 5 |
stable
|
0.9 (-0.8, 3.0) |
| Amelia County | Urban | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Appomattox County | Urban | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Bath County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Bland County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Bristol City | Urban | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Buckingham County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Buena Vista City | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Charles City County | Urban | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Charlotte County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Colonial Heights City | Urban | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Covington City | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Craig County | Urban | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Cumberland County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Dickenson County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Emporia City | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Essex County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Falls Church City | Urban | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Floyd County | Urban | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Franklin City | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Fredericksburg City | Urban | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Galax City | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Giles County | Urban | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Greene County | Urban | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Greensville County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Highland County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| King William County | Urban | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| King and Queen County | Urban | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Lexington City | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Lunenburg County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Madison County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Manassas Park City | Urban | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Mathews County | Urban | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Middlesex County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Nelson County | Urban | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Northumberland County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Norton City | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Nottoway County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Poquoson City | Urban | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Radford City | Urban | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Rappahannock County | Urban | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Richmond County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Southampton County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Surry County | Urban | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Sussex County | Urban | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Williamsburg City | Urban | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/02/2024 6:11 am.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
*** No Healthy People 2030 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/02/2024 6:11 am.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
*** No Healthy People 2030 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.