Death Rates Table
County
|
Met Healthy People Objective of 15.3? |
Age-Adjusted Death Rate† deaths per 100,000 (95% Confidence Interval) 
|
CI*Rank⋔ (95% Confidence Interval) 
|
Average Annual Count
|
Recent Trend |
Recent 5-Year Trend‡ in Death Rates (95% Confidence Interval)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Virginia | No | 20.6 (20.0, 21.1) | N/A | 1,130 |
falling 
|
-1.8 (-1.9, -1.7) |
| United States | No | 19.6 (19.5, 19.7) | N/A | 42,101 |
falling
|
-1.3 (-1.4, -1.1) |
| Petersburg City | No | 47.0 (34.4, 62.9) | 1 (1, 16) | 10 |
stable 
|
-0.6 (-2.5, 1.3) |
| Hopewell City | No | 42.2 (28.3, 60.8) | 2 (1, 54) | 6 |
stable
|
1.3 (-0.4, 3.1) |
| Colonial Heights City | No | 40.0 (25.1, 61.0) | 3 (1, 67) | 5 |
rising 
|
13.2 (4.5, 22.6) |
| Halifax County with South Boston City | No | 34.9 (24.3, 48.9) | 4 (1, 61) | 9 |
stable
|
-0.2 (-1.5, 1.2) |
| Nottoway County | No | 33.9 (19.4, 56.4) | 5 (1, 82) | 4 |
|
|
| Lunenburg County | No | 32.9 (17.3, 58.9) | 6 (1, 84) | 3 |
|
|
| Dinwiddie County | No | 30.5 (20.1, 44.7) | 7 (1, 76) | 6 |
|
|
| Shenandoah County | No | 30.5 (22.7, 40.5) | 8 (1, 60) | 11 |
stable
|
0.2 (-1.1, 1.5) |
| Floyd County | No | 30.4 (16.6, 52.0) | 9 (1, 84) | 3 |
|
|
| Russell County | No | 30.3 (20.5, 44.0) | 10 (1, 74) | 7 |
stable
|
-0.1 (-1.7, 1.5) |
| Salem City | No | 29.6 (19.6, 43.8) | 11 (1, 79) | 6 |
stable
|
-1.2 (-3.1, 0.8) |
| Brunswick County | No | 28.4 (15.0, 50.1) | 12 (1, 84) | 3 |
|
|
| Martinsville City | No | 28.2 (16.0, 48.2) | 13 (1, 84) | 3 |
stable
|
-0.2 (-2.3, 2.0) |
| Wise County | No | 27.7 (19.1, 39.3) | 14 (2, 76) | 7 |
stable
|
-1.6 (-3.2, 0.0) |
| Tazewell County | No | 27.6 (19.7, 38.0) | 15 (2, 75) | 9 |
stable
|
-0.5 (-2.1, 1.1) |
| Accomack County | No | 27.4 (18.1, 40.1) | 16 (1, 81) | 7 |
falling
|
-2.0 (-3.8, -0.2) |
| Spotsylvania County | No | 27.2 (22.2, 33.1) | 17 (4, 56) | 22 |
stable
|
-0.4 (-1.7, 0.8) |
| Caroline County | No | 26.4 (17.2, 39.2) | 18 (2, 83) | 5 |
|
|
| Bristol City | No | 26.4 (15.8, 42.9) | 19 (1, 83) | 4 |
stable
|
0.1 (-1.4, 1.5) |
| Waynesboro City | No | 26.3 (16.3, 41.0) | 20 (1, 82) | 4 |
|
|
| Fairfax City | No | 26.3 (15.8, 41.6) | 21 (1, 83) | 4 |
stable
|
-1.7 (-3.7, 0.4) |
| Portsmouth City | No | 26.2 (20.5, 33.1) | 22 (4, 63) | 16 |
stable
|
-0.8 (-1.9, 0.3) |
| Suffolk City | No | 26.1 (20.4, 33.0) | 23 (5, 68) | 15 |
falling
|
-2.1 (-2.9, -1.3) |
| Richmond City | No | 26.0 (22.0, 30.5) | 24 (7, 53) | 33 |
falling
|
-1.9 (-2.5, -1.3) |
| Lee County | No | 25.7 (15.6, 40.8) | 25 (1, 84) | 5 |
stable
|
1.0 (-1.6, 3.7) |
| Buchanan County | No | 25.1 (15.7, 39.7) | 26 (2, 83) | 5 |
stable
|
-1.6 (-3.3, 0.1) |
| Culpeper County | No | 25.0 (17.9, 34.2) | 27 (4, 78) | 8 |
stable
|
-1.6 (-3.4, 0.1) |
| Newport News City | No | 24.7 (20.6, 29.5) | 28 (8, 63) | 26 |
falling
|
-1.5 (-2.1, -0.8) |
| Frederick County | No | 24.6 (19.0, 31.4) | 29 (6, 73) | 14 |
falling
|
-1.5 (-2.8, -0.3) |
| Winchester City | No | 24.4 (15.2, 37.5) | 30 (2, 83) | 5 |
|
|
| Chesapeake City | No | 23.9 (20.5, 27.9) | 31 (10, 61) | 35 |
falling
|
-1.4 (-2.0, -0.9) |
| Norfolk City | No | 23.8 (20.1, 28.1) | 32 (10, 62) | 30 |
falling
|
-2.0 (-2.7, -1.3) |
| Campbell County | No | 23.5 (17.3, 31.6) | 33 (6, 79) | 10 |
stable
|
-0.8 (-2.2, 0.6) |
| Danville City | No | 23.0 (15.6, 33.1) | 34 (4, 82) | 7 |
falling
|
-1.6 (-2.9, -0.2) |
| Hampton City | No | 23.0 (18.6, 28.3) | 35 (10, 71) | 20 |
falling
|
-2.0 (-2.7, -1.3) |
| Powhatan County | No | 22.6 (14.5, 34.7) | 36 (4, 84) | 5 |
|
|
| Staunton City | No | 22.5 (13.5, 35.7) | 37 (3, 84) | 4 |
|
|
| Fredericksburg City | No | 22.4 (13.0, 36.2) | 38 (3, 84) | 3 |
|
|
| Henrico County | No | 22.4 (19.6, 25.4) | 39 (17, 63) | 50 |
falling
|
-1.3 (-1.9, -0.7) |
| Gloucester County | No | 22.3 (15.1, 32.3) | 40 (5, 83) | 6 |
|
|
| Mecklenburg County | No | 22.1 (14.2, 33.8) | 41 (3, 83) | 6 |
falling
|
-2.2 (-3.7, -0.8) |
| Virginia Beach City | No | 22.1 (19.6, 24.8) | 42 (20, 63) | 61 |
falling
|
-1.3 (-1.9, -0.8) |
| Giles County | No | 21.7 (12.6, 37.1) | 43 (3, 84) | 3 |
|
|
| Fauquier County | No | 21.6 (16.0, 28.6) | 44 (8, 80) | 10 |
falling
|
-2.4 (-3.4, -1.3) |
| Roanoke City | No | 21.2 (16.6, 26.9) | 45 (12, 77) | 15 |
falling
|
-1.8 (-2.7, -0.9) |
| Lynchburg City | No | 21.1 (15.5, 28.3) | 46 (9, 81) | 10 |
falling
|
-1.5 (-2.8, -0.2) |
| Manassas City | No | 21.1 (12.6, 33.0) | 47 (4, 84) | 4 |
falling
|
-3.0 (-5.3, -0.8) |
| Chesterfield County | No | 21.1 (18.4, 24.1) | 48 (21, 68) | 46 |
falling
|
-1.9 (-2.6, -1.2) |
| Hanover County | No | 20.9 (16.7, 26.1) | 49 (14, 76) | 17 |
stable
|
-0.9 (-2.2, 0.4) |
| Louisa County | No | 20.9 (13.8, 30.9) | 50 (6, 84) | 6 |
|
|
| Roanoke County | No | 20.8 (16.4, 26.3) | 51 (13, 79) | 16 |
stable
|
-0.6 (-1.9, 0.6) |
| Warren County | No | 20.7 (13.9, 30.2) | 52 (6, 83) | 6 |
falling
|
-3.6 (-5.4, -1.7) |
| Bedford City and County | No | 20.6 (15.7, 26.7) | 53 (12, 79) | 13 |
falling
|
-2.2 (-3.2, -1.1) |
| Botetourt County | No | 20.5 (13.6, 30.5) | 54 (7, 84) | 6 |
stable
|
0.0 (-1.7, 1.6) |
| Charlottesville City | No | 20.4 (12.9, 30.7) | 55 (5, 84) | 5 |
falling
|
-2.3 (-3.7, -0.8) |
| Wythe County | No | 20.3 (12.7, 31.6) | 56 (5, 84) | 5 |
stable
|
-1.4 (-2.9, 0.1) |
| Scott County | No | 19.8 (10.6, 34.7) | 57 (3, 84) | 3 |
stable
|
-1.6 (-3.7, 0.6) |
| James City County | No | 19.5 (14.4, 26.0) | 58 (13, 82) | 12 |
|
|
| Pittsylvania County | No | 19.5 (13.7, 27.0) | 59 (11, 83) | 9 |
falling
|
-1.8 (-3.0, -0.5) |
| Loudoun County | No | 19.4 (16.6, 22.5) | 60 (28, 76) | 37 |
falling
|
-2.0 (-2.9, -1.1) |
| Page County | No | 19.2 (11.7, 31.0) | 61 (6, 84) | 4 |
|
|
| Pulaski County | No | 19.2 (12.5, 28.9) | 62 (10, 84) | 6 |
stable
|
-1.3 (-3.0, 0.5) |
| Franklin County | No | 19.1 (13.3, 26.8) | 63 (10, 84) | 8 |
falling
|
-1.4 (-2.7, -0.2) |
| Orange County | No | 18.0 (11.5, 27.4) | 64 (9, 84) | 5 |
falling
|
-1.8 (-3.4, -0.1) |
| Henry County | No | 18.0 (12.2, 25.9) | 65 (13, 84) | 8 |
stable
|
-0.5 (-2.1, 1.1) |
| Prince William County | No | 18.0 (15.5, 20.7) | 66 (40, 78) | 40 |
falling
|
-2.4 (-3.1, -1.6) |
| Washington County | No | 17.7 (12.4, 25.0) | 67 (15, 84) | 8 |
falling
|
-2.5 (-4.0, -1.0) |
| Isle of Wight County | No | 17.4 (11.0, 26.6) | 68 (13, 84) | 5 |
stable
|
-1.8 (-3.6, 0.0) |
| Fairfax County | No | 17.2 (15.8, 18.6) | 69 (51, 77) | 116 |
falling
|
-2.4 (-2.8, -2.0) |
| Rockingham County | No | 17.2 (12.7, 22.8) | 70 (25, 84) | 11 |
stable
|
-1.4 (-2.8, 0.0) |
| Stafford County | No | 17.1 (13.0, 22.1) | 71 (29, 84) | 12 |
falling
|
-1.9 (-3.1, -0.6) |
| Harrisonburg City | No | 16.9 (9.7, 27.2) | 72 (8, 84) | 3 |
falling
|
-3.1 (-5.0, -1.2) |
| Augusta County | No | 16.8 (12.3, 22.7) | 73 (25, 84) | 10 |
falling
|
-1.8 (-3.0, -0.6) |
| Prince George County | No | 16.6 (9.3, 27.3) | 74 (8, 84) | 3 |
|
|
| York County | No | 16.1 (11.1, 22.8) | 75 (25, 84) | 7 |
falling
|
-2.5 (-4.3, -0.7) |
| Goochland County | No | 15.9 (9.3, 27.2) | 76 (14, 84) | 4 |
falling
|
-3.4 (-5.5, -1.2) |
| Carroll County | Yes | 15.2 (9.6, 24.3) | 77 (21, 84) | 5 |
|
|
| Montgomery County | Yes | 15.1 (10.6, 20.9) | 78 (30, 84) | 8 |
falling
|
-2.5 (-3.8, -1.1) |
| Alexandria City | Yes | 14.9 (11.4, 19.3) | 79 (43, 84) | 13 |
stable
|
-21.1 (-40.6, 4.8) |
| Fluvanna County | Yes | 14.8 (8.3, 25.1) | 80 (15, 84) | 3 |
falling
|
-4.0 (-5.9, -2.1) |
| Amherst County | Yes | 12.9 (7.7, 21.4) | 81 (32, 84) | 4 |
falling
|
-3.3 (-5.1, -1.5) |
| Albemarle County | Yes | 12.9 (9.7, 17.0) | 82 (58, 84) | 11 |
falling
|
-3.1 (-4.4, -1.8) |
| Arlington County | Yes | 12.9 (10.1, 16.2) | 83 (60, 84) | 15 |
falling
|
-3.0 (-3.9, -2.1) |
| Smyth County | Yes | 11.4 (6.4, 19.8) | 84 (44, 84) | 3 |
falling
|
-3.9 (-5.9, -1.9) |
| Alleghany County and Clifton Forge City | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Amelia County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Appomattox County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Bath County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Bland County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Buckingham County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Buena Vista City | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Charles City County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Charlotte County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Clarke County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Covington City | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Craig County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Cumberland County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Dickenson County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Emporia City | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Essex County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Falls Church City | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Franklin City | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Galax City | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Grayson County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Greene County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Greensville County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Highland County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| King George County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| King William County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| King and Queen County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Lancaster County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Lexington City | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Madison County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Manassas Park City | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Mathews County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Middlesex County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Nelson County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| New Kent County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Northampton County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Northumberland County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Norton City | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Patrick County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Poquoson City | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Prince Edward County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Radford City | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Rappahannock County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Richmond County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Rockbridge County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Southampton County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Surry County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Sussex County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Westmoreland County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Williamsburg City | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/30/2023 9:03 pm.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/30/2023 9:03 pm.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.