Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Virginia by County

Breast, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 15.3?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
Virginia No 20.6 (20.0, 21.1) N/A 1,130 falling falling trend -1.8 (-1.9, -1.7)
United States No 19.6 (19.5, 19.7) N/A 42,101 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.4, -1.1)
Colonial Heights City No 40.0 (25.1, 61.0) 3 (1, 67) 5 rising rising trend 13.2 (4.5, 22.6)
Hopewell City No 42.2 (28.3, 60.8) 2 (1, 54) 6 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.4, 3.1)
Lee County No 25.7 (15.6, 40.8) 25 (1, 84) 5 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.6, 3.7)
Shenandoah County No 30.5 (22.7, 40.5) 8 (1, 60) 11 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.1, 1.5)
Bristol City No 26.4 (15.8, 42.9) 19 (1, 83) 4 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.4, 1.5)
Botetourt County No 20.5 (13.6, 30.5) 54 (7, 84) 6 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.7, 1.6)
Russell County No 30.3 (20.5, 44.0) 10 (1, 74) 7 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.7, 1.5)
Halifax County with South Boston City No 34.9 (24.3, 48.9) 4 (1, 61) 9 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.5, 1.2)
Martinsville City No 28.2 (16.0, 48.2) 13 (1, 84) 3 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.3, 2.0)
Spotsylvania County No 27.2 (22.2, 33.1) 17 (4, 56) 22 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.7, 0.8)
Henry County No 18.0 (12.2, 25.9) 65 (13, 84) 8 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.1, 1.1)
Tazewell County No 27.6 (19.7, 38.0) 15 (2, 75) 9 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.1, 1.1)
Petersburg City No 47.0 (34.4, 62.9) 1 (1, 16) 10 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.5, 1.3)
Roanoke County No 20.8 (16.4, 26.3) 51 (13, 79) 16 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.6)
Campbell County No 23.5 (17.3, 31.6) 33 (6, 79) 10 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.2, 0.6)
Portsmouth City No 26.2 (20.5, 33.1) 22 (4, 63) 16 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.3)
Hanover County No 20.9 (16.7, 26.1) 49 (14, 76) 17 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.2, 0.4)
Salem City No 29.6 (19.6, 43.8) 11 (1, 79) 6 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.1, 0.8)
Henrico County No 22.4 (19.6, 25.4) 39 (17, 63) 50 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.7)
Pulaski County No 19.2 (12.5, 28.9) 62 (10, 84) 6 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.0, 0.5)
Virginia Beach City No 22.1 (19.6, 24.8) 42 (20, 63) 61 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.8)
Chesapeake City No 23.9 (20.5, 27.9) 31 (10, 61) 35 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.9)
Franklin County No 19.1 (13.3, 26.8) 63 (10, 84) 8 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.7, -0.2)
Rockingham County No 17.2 (12.7, 22.8) 70 (25, 84) 11 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.8, 0.0)
Wythe County No 20.3 (12.7, 31.6) 56 (5, 84) 5 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.9, 0.1)
Frederick County No 24.6 (19.0, 31.4) 29 (6, 73) 14 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.8, -0.3)
Lynchburg City No 21.1 (15.5, 28.3) 46 (9, 81) 10 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.8, -0.2)
Newport News City No 24.7 (20.6, 29.5) 28 (8, 63) 26 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -0.8)
Buchanan County No 25.1 (15.7, 39.7) 26 (2, 83) 5 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.3, 0.1)
Culpeper County No 25.0 (17.9, 34.2) 27 (4, 78) 8 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.4, 0.1)
Danville City No 23.0 (15.6, 33.1) 34 (4, 82) 7 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.9, -0.2)
Scott County No 19.8 (10.6, 34.7) 57 (3, 84) 3 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.7, 0.6)
Wise County No 27.7 (19.1, 39.3) 14 (2, 76) 7 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.2, 0.0)
Fairfax City No 26.3 (15.8, 41.6) 21 (1, 83) 4 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.7, 0.4)
Augusta County No 16.8 (12.3, 22.7) 73 (25, 84) 10 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.0, -0.6)
Isle of Wight County No 17.4 (11.0, 26.6) 68 (13, 84) 5 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.6, 0.0)
Orange County No 18.0 (11.5, 27.4) 64 (9, 84) 5 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.4, -0.1)
Pittsylvania County No 19.5 (13.7, 27.0) 59 (11, 83) 9 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.0, -0.5)
Roanoke City No 21.2 (16.6, 26.9) 45 (12, 77) 15 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.7, -0.9)
Chesterfield County No 21.1 (18.4, 24.1) 48 (21, 68) 46 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.6, -1.2)
Richmond City No 26.0 (22.0, 30.5) 24 (7, 53) 33 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.5, -1.3)
Stafford County No 17.1 (13.0, 22.1) 71 (29, 84) 12 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.1, -0.6)
Accomack County No 27.4 (18.1, 40.1) 16 (1, 81) 7 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.8, -0.2)
Hampton City No 23.0 (18.6, 28.3) 35 (10, 71) 20 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.7, -1.3)
Loudoun County No 19.4 (16.6, 22.5) 60 (28, 76) 37 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.9, -1.1)
Norfolk City No 23.8 (20.1, 28.1) 32 (10, 62) 30 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.7, -1.3)
Suffolk City No 26.1 (20.4, 33.0) 23 (5, 68) 15 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.9, -1.3)
Bedford City and County No 20.6 (15.7, 26.7) 53 (12, 79) 13 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.2, -1.1)
Mecklenburg County No 22.1 (14.2, 33.8) 41 (3, 83) 6 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.7, -0.8)
Charlottesville City No 20.4 (12.9, 30.7) 55 (5, 84) 5 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.7, -0.8)
Fairfax County No 17.2 (15.8, 18.6) 69 (51, 77) 116 falling falling trend -2.4 (-2.8, -2.0)
Fauquier County No 21.6 (16.0, 28.6) 44 (8, 80) 10 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.4, -1.3)
Prince William County No 18.0 (15.5, 20.7) 66 (40, 78) 40 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.1, -1.6)
Montgomery County Yes 15.1 (10.6, 20.9) 78 (30, 84) 8 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.8, -1.1)
Washington County No 17.7 (12.4, 25.0) 67 (15, 84) 8 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.0, -1.0)
York County No 16.1 (11.1, 22.8) 75 (25, 84) 7 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.3, -0.7)
Arlington County Yes 12.9 (10.1, 16.2) 83 (60, 84) 15 falling falling trend -3.0 (-3.9, -2.1)
Manassas City No 21.1 (12.6, 33.0) 47 (4, 84) 4 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.3, -0.8)
Albemarle County Yes 12.9 (9.7, 17.0) 82 (58, 84) 11 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.4, -1.8)
Harrisonburg City No 16.9 (9.7, 27.2) 72 (8, 84) 3 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.0, -1.2)
Amherst County Yes 12.9 (7.7, 21.4) 81 (32, 84) 4 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.1, -1.5)
Goochland County No 15.9 (9.3, 27.2) 76 (14, 84) 4 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.5, -1.2)
Warren County No 20.7 (13.9, 30.2) 52 (6, 83) 6 falling falling trend -3.6 (-5.4, -1.7)
Smyth County Yes 11.4 (6.4, 19.8) 84 (44, 84) 3 falling falling trend -3.9 (-5.9, -1.9)
Fluvanna County Yes 14.8 (8.3, 25.1) 80 (15, 84) 3 falling falling trend -4.0 (-5.9, -2.1)
Alexandria City Yes 14.9 (11.4, 19.3) 79 (43, 84) 13 stable stable trend -21.1 (-40.6, 4.8)
Brunswick County No 28.4 (15.0, 50.1) 12 (1, 84) 3
*
*
Caroline County No 26.4 (17.2, 39.2) 18 (2, 83) 5
*
*
Carroll County Yes 15.2 (9.6, 24.3) 77 (21, 84) 5
*
*
Dinwiddie County No 30.5 (20.1, 44.7) 7 (1, 76) 6
*
*
Floyd County No 30.4 (16.6, 52.0) 9 (1, 84) 3
*
*
Fredericksburg City No 22.4 (13.0, 36.2) 38 (3, 84) 3
*
*
Giles County No 21.7 (12.6, 37.1) 43 (3, 84) 3
*
*
Gloucester County No 22.3 (15.1, 32.3) 40 (5, 83) 6
*
*
James City County No 19.5 (14.4, 26.0) 58 (13, 82) 12
*
*
Louisa County No 20.9 (13.8, 30.9) 50 (6, 84) 6
*
*
Lunenburg County No 32.9 (17.3, 58.9) 6 (1, 84) 3
*
*
Nottoway County No 33.9 (19.4, 56.4) 5 (1, 82) 4
*
*
Page County No 19.2 (11.7, 31.0) 61 (6, 84) 4
*
*
Powhatan County No 22.6 (14.5, 34.7) 36 (4, 84) 5
*
*
Prince George County No 16.6 (9.3, 27.3) 74 (8, 84) 3
*
*
Staunton City No 22.5 (13.5, 35.7) 37 (3, 84) 4
*
*
Waynesboro City No 26.3 (16.3, 41.0) 20 (1, 82) 4
*
*
Winchester City No 24.4 (15.2, 37.5) 30 (2, 83) 5
*
*
Alleghany County and Clifton Forge City ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Amelia County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Appomattox County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bath County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bland County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Buckingham County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Buena Vista City ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Charles City County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Charlotte County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clarke County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Covington City ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Craig County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cumberland County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dickenson County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Emporia City ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Essex County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Falls Church City ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Franklin City ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Galax City ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grayson County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greene County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greensville County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Highland County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
King George County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
King William County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
King and Queen County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lancaster County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lexington City ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Madison County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Manassas Park City ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mathews County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Middlesex County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Nelson County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
New Kent County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Northampton County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Northumberland County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Norton City ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Patrick County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Poquoson City ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Prince Edward County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Radford City ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rappahannock County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Richmond County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rockbridge County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Southampton County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Surry County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sussex County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Westmoreland County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Williamsburg City ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/01/2022 4:38 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top