Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Washington by County

All Cancer Sites, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Washington No 145.7 (144.6, 146.9) N/A 12,761 falling falling trend -1.7 (-1.9, -1.6)
United States No 149.4 (149.3, 149.6) N/A 599,666 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.2, -1.8)
Cowlitz County No 180.8 (171.1, 191.0) 1 (1, 8) 275 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.0, -0.4)
Grays Harbor County No 174.7 (163.7, 186.4) 2 (1, 12) 201 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.9)
Lewis County No 173.7 (163.1, 184.9) 3 (1, 13) 210 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.6)
Okanogan County No 171.3 (156.8, 187.0) 4 (1, 22) 111 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.3)
Columbia County No 169.0 (131.5, 218.4) 5 (1, 39) 14 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.8, -0.6)
Pacific County No 168.2 (150.8, 187.8) 6 (1, 29) 78 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.2)
Mason County No 165.1 (153.8, 177.1) 7 (1, 22) 173 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.8)
Ferry County No 162.1 (130.8, 200.3) 8 (1, 38) 21 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.6, 0.5)
Yakima County No 160.1 (153.3, 167.2) 9 (4, 20) 426 falling falling trend -0.8 (-0.9, -0.6)
Pend Oreille County No 160.1 (136.5, 187.4) 10 (1, 36) 38 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.4)
Spokane County No 159.6 (155.1, 164.2) 11 (5, 18) 997 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.2, -0.9)
Clallam County No 159.2 (149.6, 169.3) 12 (3, 26) 244 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.7)
Klickitat County No 157.6 (139.3, 178.2) 13 (1, 35) 59 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.7)
Skagit County No 157.2 (149.0, 165.7) 14 (5, 26) 296 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.7)
Pierce County No 154.9 (151.3, 158.5) 15 (9, 22) 1,474 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.1, -1.5)
Grant County No 152.7 (141.9, 164.1) 16 (5, 32) 154 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.6)
Clark County No 152.0 (147.3, 156.8) 17 (10, 26) 833 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.3, -1.5)
Stevens County No 150.3 (137.4, 164.2) 18 (5, 35) 111 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.8)
Snohomish County No 149.9 (146.1, 153.7) 19 (12, 27) 1,288 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.1)
Whatcom County No 147.3 (140.9, 154.0) 20 (12, 32) 412 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.5, -0.9)
Thurston County No 147.1 (141.4, 153.0) 21 (13, 32) 526 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.4, -1.6)
Walla Walla County No 145.7 (133.8, 158.4) 22 (8, 36) 119 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
Island County No 145.2 (135.8, 155.2) 23 (9, 35) 198 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.1, 4.0)
Lincoln County No 144.2 (119.3, 173.8) 24 (1, 39) 27 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.4)
Benton County No 144.1 (137.0, 151.4) 25 (14, 34) 325 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.4, -1.4)
Chelan County No 143.5 (133.2, 154.5) 26 (10, 36) 153 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.1)
Asotin County No 143.3 (126.5, 162.2) 27 (5, 38) 56 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.8)
Kitsap County No 142.6 (136.8, 148.5) 28 (17, 35) 492 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.7, -1.3)
Jefferson County No 140.7 (127.3, 155.7) 29 (9, 38) 104 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -1.0)
Garfield County No 138.4 (87.9, 213.2) 30 (1, 39) 6 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.8, -1.1)
Kittitas County No 138.3 (124.7, 153.2) 31 (11, 39) 78 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -1.1)
Adams County No 135.9 (111.9, 163.5) 32 (3, 39) 23 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.6, -1.2)
Franklin County No 135.7 (123.3, 148.9) 33 (14, 39) 94 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.4, -1.4)
Wahkiakum County No 135.3 (101.4, 181.9) 34 (1, 39) 12 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.5, 0.6)
Douglas County No 131.7 (118.1, 146.4) 35 (17, 39) 72 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.0, -1.2)
King County No 127.0 (124.9, 129.1) 36 (31, 39) 2,943 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.1, -2.3)
Whitman County No 126.8 (111.4, 143.7) 37 (16, 39) 51 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.6)
Skamania County No 124.2 (101.5, 151.3) 38 (9, 39) 23 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.9, -1.0)
San Juan County No 123.5 (105.7, 144.5) 39 (17, 39) 43 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.4)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/07/2022 8:43 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.



Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top