Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Washington by County

All Cancer Sites, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name

County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Washington N/A No 144.1 (142.9, 145.2) N/A 13,105 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.7, -1.5)
United States N/A No 146.0 (145.8, 146.2) N/A 602,955 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.6, -1.4)
Adams County Rural No 136.8 (112.8, 164.1) 34 (4, 39) 24 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.5, -1.0)
Asotin County Urban No 137.8 (121.0, 156.7) 33 (8, 39) 54 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -0.9)
Benton County Urban No 146.4 (139.5, 153.6) 24 (12, 33) 346 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.5, -0.9)
Chelan County Urban No 140.1 (130.3, 150.6) 29 (13, 37) 159 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.1)
Clallam County Rural No 161.5 (152.2, 171.4) 9 (3, 23) 259 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.6)
Clark County Urban No 149.2 (144.7, 153.8) 19 (12, 29) 878 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.6, -1.5)
Columbia County Rural No 174.7 (135.0, 226.6) 3 (1, 38) 14 stable stable trend -1.8 (-8.5, 0.6)
Cowlitz County Urban No 185.5 (175.8, 195.7) 1 (1, 7) 285 falling falling trend -0.6 (-0.9, -0.2)
Douglas County Urban No 141.3 (127.5, 156.4) 28 (9, 38) 79 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3)
Ferry County Rural No 169.7 (138.0, 208.6) 6 (1, 37) 23 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.2, 0.7)
Franklin County Urban No 132.6 (120.7, 145.3) 35 (18, 39) 98 falling falling trend -2.4 (-5.3, -1.8)
Garfield County Rural No 138.5 (88.6, 212.3) 31 (1, 39) 6 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.6, -1.3)
Grant County Rural No 154.0 (143.3, 165.3) 14 (5, 31) 160 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.6)
Grays Harbor County Rural No 175.4 (164.6, 187.0) 2 (1, 12) 209 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.5, -0.8)
Island County Rural No 146.8 (137.7, 156.6) 23 (10, 35) 212 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.5, -0.8)
Jefferson County Rural No 130.8 (118.2, 144.9) 36 (19, 39) 103 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.8, -1.5)
King County Urban No 124.9 (122.8, 126.9) 37 (33, 39) 2,958 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.8, -2.0)
Kitsap County Urban No 138.0 (132.5, 143.6) 32 (22, 36) 505 falling falling trend -2.9 (-5.5, -1.7)
Kittitas County Rural No 153.9 (139.3, 169.7) 15 (3, 35) 85 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.6)
Klickitat County Rural No 151.5 (134.1, 171.0) 18 (3, 37) 59 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.6)
Lewis County Rural No 174.0 (163.5, 185.1) 4 (1, 13) 216 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.1, -0.6)
Lincoln County Rural No 146.2 (121.2, 175.7) 25 (2, 39) 28 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
Mason County Rural No 168.1 (156.8, 180.2) 7 (1, 20) 179 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.6)
Okanogan County Rural No 171.4 (156.9, 187.1) 5 (1, 20) 112 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.9, -0.1)
Pacific County Rural No 166.8 (149.7, 186.0) 8 (1, 29) 82 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.3)
Pend Oreille County Rural No 161.1 (138.1, 187.6) 10 (1, 36) 40 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.7, -0.1)
Pierce County Urban No 152.8 (149.3, 156.3) 17 (10, 24) 1,512 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.0, -1.4)
San Juan County Rural Yes 117.1 (100.9, 136.2) 39 (26, 39) 46 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.4)
Skagit County Urban No 155.9 (147.9, 164.2) 13 (6, 27) 303 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.5)
Skamania County Urban Yes 122.5 (100.9, 148.4) 38 (11, 39) 25 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.0, -1.1)
Snohomish County Urban No 149.2 (145.5, 152.9) 20 (13, 28) 1,326 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.4, -1.0)
Spokane County Urban No 153.1 (148.8, 157.5) 16 (9, 25) 1,020 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.3, -0.9)
Stevens County Urban No 157.6 (144.8, 171.6) 12 (3, 30) 121 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
Thurston County Urban No 146.0 (140.5, 151.7) 26 (14, 32) 554 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.9, -1.4)
Wahkiakum County Rural No 148.2 (114.2, 194.0) 21 (1, 39) 14 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.3, 0.3)
Walla Walla County Urban No 141.7 (130.4, 153.9) 27 (10, 37) 123 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
Whatcom County Urban No 138.6 (132.5, 145.0) 30 (22, 36) 399 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.5, -0.8)
Whitman County Rural No 147.7 (131.0, 166.0) 22 (4, 38) 59 stable stable trend 7.9 (-0.4, 13.5)
Yakima County Urban No 159.7 (152.9, 166.7) 11 (5, 21) 432 falling falling trend -0.7 (-0.9, -0.6)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/01/2024 9:20 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top