Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Washington by County

All Cancer Sites, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 65+

Sorted by Count

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Washington N/A No 863.1 (855.4, 870.9) N/A 9,832 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.6, -1.3)
United States N/A No 844.0 (842.9, 845.1) N/A 441,232 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.8, -1.5)
Garfield County Rural No 830.1 (515.0, 1,261.6) 28 (1, 39) 4
*
*
Wahkiakum County Rural No 797.4 (594.5, 1,047.1) 31 (1, 39) 11 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.1, 0.9)
Columbia County Rural No 1,119.7 (857.1, 1,437.3) 1 (1, 36) 12 stable stable trend -1.4 (-5.5, 0.2)
Ferry County Rural No 932.9 (741.9, 1,157.7) 12 (1, 39) 18 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.2, 0.9)
Adams County Rural No 894.8 (721.4, 1,097.0) 20 (1, 39) 19 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.7, -0.7)
Skamania County Urban No 778.8 (630.0, 952.3) 36 (4, 39) 20 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.7, -0.4)
Lincoln County Rural No 795.2 (650.7, 962.3) 33 (5, 39) 22 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.7, -0.1)
Pend Oreille County Rural No 996.6 (842.8, 1,170.1) 5 (1, 35) 32 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.2)
San Juan County Rural No 704.4 (605.5, 814.6) 39 (23, 39) 38 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.5)
Asotin County Urban No 779.2 (676.6, 893.0) 35 (12, 39) 42 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.4)
Whitman County Rural No 881.1 (768.1, 1,006.0) 22 (3, 38) 44 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.1)
Klickitat County Rural No 918.0 (801.8, 1,046.1) 13 (2, 36) 47 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.4)
Douglas County Urban No 855.9 (762.7, 957.2) 26 (6, 38) 62 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Pacific County Rural No 961.0 (857.2, 1,073.7) 9 (1, 32) 65 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.4)
Franklin County Urban No 784.6 (700.2, 876.3) 34 (14, 39) 67 falling falling trend -2.8 (-5.5, -2.0)
Kittitas County Rural No 983.3 (879.4, 1,096.0) 7 (1, 29) 67 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Jefferson County Rural No 749.5 (678.2, 826.2) 38 (25, 39) 85 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.8, -1.4)
Okanogan County Rural No 987.3 (894.6, 1,087.0) 6 (1, 26) 86 stable stable trend -0.5 (-0.9, 0.0)
Stevens County Urban No 911.1 (827.6, 1,000.6) 16 (4, 34) 92 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.4)
Walla Walla County Urban No 795.6 (724.5, 871.8) 32 (17, 39) 94 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.3)
Grant County Rural No 889.4 (817.9, 965.6) 21 (6, 34) 117 falling falling trend -1.5 (-7.4, -0.6)
Chelan County Urban No 853.4 (787.7, 923.2) 27 (9, 36) 128 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.7)
Mason County Rural No 974.1 (900.6, 1,051.9) 8 (2, 25) 136 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Grays Harbor County Rural No 1,034.6 (962.2, 1,110.9) 3 (1, 15) 160 falling falling trend -1.5 (-3.5, -1.0)
Lewis County Rural No 1,019.1 (949.6, 1,092.3) 4 (1, 16) 164 falling falling trend -1.0 (-3.2, -0.6)
Island County Rural No 876.7 (818.1, 938.3) 24 (8, 34) 173 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.5)
Clallam County Rural No 958.1 (900.9, 1,017.9) 10 (3, 24) 213 falling falling trend -0.6 (-0.9, -0.3)
Cowlitz County Urban No 1,092.0 (1,027.0, 1,160.0) 2 (1, 7) 216 falling falling trend -0.4 (-0.7, -0.1)
Skagit County Urban No 941.8 (888.9, 997.0) 11 (4, 26) 242 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.0, -0.3)
Benton County Urban No 878.1 (830.5, 927.7) 23 (10, 32) 261 falling falling trend -1.5 (-5.3, -0.9)
Whatcom County Urban No 815.3 (774.3, 858.0) 30 (21, 36) 305 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.6)
Yakima County Urban No 916.3 (871.1, 963.2) 14 (6, 27) 314 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.7, -0.6)
Kitsap County Urban No 820.7 (783.7, 859.0) 29 (21, 36) 384 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.6, -1.6)
Thurston County Urban No 864.5 (827.3, 902.9) 25 (13, 32) 421 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.6, -1.3)
Clark County Urban No 912.3 (881.0, 944.4) 15 (8, 26) 667 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.6, -1.2)
Spokane County Urban No 899.7 (870.9, 929.2) 19 (10, 27) 760 falling falling trend -1.4 (-3.4, -1.0)
Snohomish County Urban No 904.3 (878.3, 930.8) 18 (10, 26) 958 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.1, -0.6)
Pierce County Urban No 906.2 (882.0, 931.0) 17 (10, 26) 1,093 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.2)
King County Urban No 760.4 (746.0, 775.0) 37 (30, 39) 2,192 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.2, -1.8)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/22/2024 4:00 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top