Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Washington by County

All Cancer Sites, 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Washington *** 174.1 (172.1, 176.0) N/A 6,683 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.6, -1.8)
United States *** 181.4 (181.1, 181.7) N/A 314,987 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.6, -2.0)
Columbia County *** 230.6 (164.4, 323.2) 1 (1, 37) 9 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.2, -0.8)
Cowlitz County *** 214.5 (198.9, 231.1) 2 (1, 10) 148 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.6)
Mason County *** 210.8 (192.0, 231.1) 3 (1, 15) 101 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.4)
Lewis County *** 209.1 (191.8, 227.6) 4 (1, 14) 115 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.7)
Pacific County *** 200.5 (173.7, 231.7) 5 (1, 28) 44 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.3)
Grays Harbor County *** 196.2 (179.2, 214.5) 6 (1, 23) 105 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.1, -1.3)
Okanogan County *** 194.6 (172.2, 219.3) 7 (1, 28) 60 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.5)
Skagit County *** 192.2 (178.9, 206.3) 8 (2, 22) 163 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.3)
Spokane County *** 190.4 (182.9, 198.1) 9 (4, 18) 515 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.6, -1.2)
Pierce County *** 190.1 (184.0, 196.4) 10 (5, 17) 778 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.3, -1.5)
Clallam County *** 188.4 (173.4, 204.6) 11 (3, 26) 131 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.6)
Pend Oreille County *** 185.4 (149.4, 229.3) 12 (1, 37) 21 falling falling trend -5.6 (-9.8, -1.1)
Yakima County *** 184.3 (173.4, 195.8) 13 (5, 26) 220 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.3, -0.9)
Clark County *** 182.1 (174.2, 190.3) 14 (7, 24) 427 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.3)
Snohomish County *** 181.0 (174.6, 187.6) 15 (8, 24) 663 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.2)
Adams County *** 177.6 (137.9, 224.6) 16 (1, 38) 14 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.9, -0.8)
Grant County *** 177.0 (159.8, 195.5) 17 (4, 33) 81 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
Whatcom County *** 175.8 (165.2, 186.9) 18 (8, 31) 217 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.9)
Walla Walla County *** 173.9 (155.0, 194.7) 19 (4, 35) 63 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.6)
Stevens County *** 173.5 (153.8, 195.5) 20 (4, 36) 62 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.7)
Kitsap County *** 172.5 (163.0, 182.5) 21 (11, 31) 264 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.9, -1.3)
Benton County *** 172.1 (160.4, 184.5) 22 (10, 32) 170 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.0, -1.2)
Thurston County *** 168.5 (159.2, 178.2) 23 (14, 33) 259 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.5, -1.9)
Chelan County *** 166.7 (150.4, 184.4) 24 (8, 36) 81 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.2, -1.2)
Douglas County *** 165.6 (143.3, 190.6) 25 (5, 37) 41 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.2)
Wahkiakum County *** 165.6 (116.5, 241.2) 26 (1, 38) 8
*
*
Lincoln County *** 164.7 (128.5, 210.3) 27 (1, 38) 16 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.3, -0.2)
Asotin County *** 164.1 (138.3, 194.2) 28 (4, 38) 30 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.2, -1.7)
Island County *** 160.7 (146.3, 176.4) 29 (14, 37) 100 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.0, -1.2)
Klickitat County *** 156.6 (130.6, 187.3) 30 (6, 38) 28 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.7, -0.7)
Whitman County *** 156.4 (130.9, 185.3) 31 (6, 38) 28 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.4)
Franklin County *** 155.8 (135.6, 178.0) 32 (11, 38) 48 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.2, -1.7)
Jefferson County *** 155.3 (136.3, 177.6) 33 (13, 38) 55 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.9, -1.5)
Kittitas County *** 154.0 (132.9, 177.7) 34 (11, 38) 40 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.8, -1.5)
King County *** 153.6 (150.0, 157.2) 35 (26, 36) 1,533 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.1, -1.8)
Ferry County *** 152.4 (109.3, 210.0) 36 (1, 38) 10 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.7, 0.4)
Skamania County *** 131.7 (99.6, 172.7) 37 (14, 38) 12 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.3, -1.7)
San Juan County *** 127.6 (103.0, 159.0) 38 (24, 38) 22 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.7, -1.1)
Garfield County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/08/2021 7:25 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data for the following has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of estimates:
Garfield

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top