Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Washington by County

All Cancer Sites, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Count
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Washington N/A No 167.9 (166.1, 169.7) N/A 6,877 falling falling trend -1.7 (-1.9, -1.6)
United States N/A No 173.2 (173.0, 173.5) N/A 317,428 falling falling trend -1.8 (-1.8, -1.8)
Columbia County Rural No 216.3 (155.1, 302.9) 2 (1, 37) 9 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.9, -0.3)
Wahkiakum County Rural No 186.0 (133.3, 262.9) 12 (1, 38) 9
*
*
Ferry County Rural No 197.6 (147.1, 263.2) 5 (1, 37) 13 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.2, 0.9)
Adams County Rural No 151.0 (115.8, 193.1) 34 (3, 38) 13 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.9, -1.0)
Lincoln County Rural No 155.8 (120.2, 200.6) 32 (3, 38) 15 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.2)
Skamania County Urban No 147.3 (114.2, 188.8) 35 (5, 38) 15 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.0, -1.3)
San Juan County Rural No 124.2 (100.1, 154.7) 38 (26, 38) 23 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.6, -0.8)
Pend Oreille County Rural No 199.6 (162.4, 244.4) 3 (1, 35) 24 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 1.0)
Whitman County Rural No 168.5 (142.3, 198.1) 23 (3, 37) 31 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.2)
Asotin County Urban No 168.8 (142.3, 199.6) 22 (2, 37) 31 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.8, -1.5)
Klickitat County Rural No 168.0 (142.1, 198.1) 26 (3, 37) 33 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.3)
Douglas County Urban No 159.5 (138.0, 183.4) 29 (7, 38) 41 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.1)
Pacific County Rural No 192.2 (166.3, 222.2) 8 (1, 32) 46 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.3)
Kittitas County Rural No 187.6 (164.3, 213.5) 11 (1, 33) 50 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -0.7)
Franklin County Urban No 155.7 (136.2, 177.1) 33 (10, 38) 52 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.1, -1.5)
Jefferson County Rural No 139.4 (121.9, 160.0) 37 (25, 38) 55 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.1, -1.8)
Okanogan County Rural No 193.9 (171.9, 218.3) 7 (1, 30) 62 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.3)
Walla Walla County Urban No 168.3 (150.4, 188.0) 25 (6, 36) 66 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
Stevens County Urban No 190.8 (170.4, 213.2) 9 (1, 30) 71 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.5)
Chelan County Urban No 157.9 (142.5, 174.5) 31 (13, 37) 82 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.2, -1.3)
Grant County Rural No 182.8 (165.8, 201.1) 14 (3, 31) 89 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.5)
Mason County Rural No 185.4 (168.2, 204.0) 13 (2, 29) 95 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.5)
Island County Rural No 159.4 (145.7, 174.1) 30 (14, 37) 109 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.1)
Grays Harbor County Rural No 189.0 (172.9, 206.5) 10 (2, 27) 110 falling falling trend -2.1 (-6.8, -1.6)
Lewis County Rural No 196.9 (180.6, 214.4) 6 (1, 22) 115 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.6)
Clallam County Rural No 198.4 (183.3, 214.6) 4 (1, 19) 145 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.5)
Cowlitz County Urban No 223.4 (207.6, 240.2) 1 (1, 6) 158 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.3)
Skagit County Urban No 181.7 (169.2, 195.0) 15 (4, 29) 164 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
Benton County Urban No 168.5 (157.4, 180.2) 24 (10, 33) 181 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.1)
Yakima County Urban No 179.5 (168.9, 190.6) 17 (5, 29) 223 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.2, -0.9)
Whatcom County Urban No 172.1 (161.9, 182.9) 21 (9, 32) 224 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.5, -0.7)
Kitsap County Urban No 164.0 (155.0, 173.3) 28 (16, 34) 273 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.4)
Thurston County Urban No 167.3 (158.4, 176.7) 27 (13, 33) 280 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.9, -1.2)
Clark County Urban No 173.4 (166.1, 181.0) 19 (11, 29) 455 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.9, -1.3)
Spokane County Urban No 177.5 (170.6, 184.6) 18 (8, 27) 531 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.6, -1.2)
Snohomish County Urban No 173.0 (166.9, 179.3) 20 (12, 29) 678 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.6, -1.2)
Pierce County Urban No 180.3 (174.5, 186.3) 16 (8, 23) 785 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.5, -1.5)
King County Urban No 146.0 (142.6, 149.4) 36 (30, 38) 1,521 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.1, -1.9)
Garfield County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/08/2024 1:41 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top