Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Washington by County

All Cancer Sites, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Name

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Washington N/A No 126.8 (125.4, 128.3) N/A 6,228 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.6, -1.4)
United States N/A No 126.4 (126.2, 126.6) N/A 285,526 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.4, -1.1)
Yakima County Urban No 145.9 (137.1, 155.2) 7 (2, 19) 210 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.7, -0.2)
Whitman County Rural No 136.2 (114.0, 161.5) 13 (1, 37) 28 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.4)
Whatcom County Urban Yes 113.5 (105.9, 121.6) 33 (25, 38) 175 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.8)
Walla Walla County Urban No 124.9 (109.8, 141.7) 28 (7, 37) 57 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.1)
Wahkiakum County Rural Yes 109.8 (69.9, 176.5) 37 (1, 38) 5 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.3, 0.2)
Thurston County Urban No 131.4 (124.3, 138.7) 20 (9, 30) 275 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.7)
Stevens County Urban No 129.2 (112.9, 147.7) 24 (4, 37) 50 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.7)
Spokane County Urban No 135.3 (129.9, 141.0) 15 (8, 26) 489 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.6)
Snohomish County Urban No 133.4 (128.8, 138.2) 17 (9, 27) 647 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.2, -0.8)
Skamania County Urban Yes 97.2 (70.7, 132.7) 38 (10, 38) 10 falling falling trend -7.5 (-15.4, -4.2)
Skagit County Urban No 135.4 (125.1, 146.5) 14 (5, 30) 138 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.6)
San Juan County Rural Yes 111.2 (90.0, 138.4) 35 (7, 38) 22 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.5)
Pierce County Urban No 134.0 (129.6, 138.5) 16 (9, 26) 727 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.2)
Pend Oreille County Rural No 127.8 (100.2, 163.0) 25 (1, 38) 16 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.5, -0.5)
Pacific County Rural No 143.4 (121.4, 169.9) 8 (1, 34) 36 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.1)
Okanogan County Rural No 153.7 (134.3, 175.4) 6 (1, 26) 51 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.7, 0.4)
Mason County Rural No 154.5 (139.2, 171.3) 4 (1, 20) 84 stable stable trend 6.4 (-1.1, 11.9)
Lincoln County Rural No 138.3 (104.2, 182.0) 11 (1, 38) 13 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.6)
Lewis County Rural No 154.8 (141.2, 169.6) 3 (1, 16) 101 falling falling trend -1.6 (-7.2, -0.8)
Klickitat County Rural No 138.8 (115.0, 167.1) 10 (1, 37) 27 stable stable trend -1.0 (-1.8, 0.0)
Kittitas County Rural Yes 122.6 (104.8, 143.0) 29 (6, 38) 35 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.3)
Kitsap County Urban Yes 118.3 (111.4, 125.6) 31 (21, 37) 232 falling falling trend -2.1 (-5.0, -1.6)
King County Urban Yes 110.2 (107.7, 112.9) 36 (30, 38) 1,437 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.4, -1.8)
Jefferson County Rural No 125.3 (107.1, 147.0) 27 (4, 38) 48 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.8)
Island County Rural No 137.0 (124.5, 150.6) 12 (4, 30) 102 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.7, 7.9)
Grays Harbor County Rural No 163.3 (148.7, 179.3) 1 (1, 11) 100 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.3)
Grant County Rural No 132.0 (118.3, 146.8) 18 (5, 34) 71 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.1)
Franklin County Urban Yes 116.5 (101.6, 132.9) 32 (11, 38) 45 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.5)
Ferry County Rural No 153.8 (112.4, 210.3) 5 (1, 38) 11 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.2, 1.8)
Douglas County Urban No 129.9 (111.5, 150.7) 23 (3, 37) 38 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.1)
Cowlitz County Urban No 156.0 (143.7, 169.2) 2 (1, 14) 127 falling falling trend -0.9 (-3.7, -0.5)
Columbia County Rural No 139.8 (89.4, 217.9) 9 (1, 38) 6 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.3, 0.4)
Clark County Urban No 131.8 (126.1, 137.6) 19 (9, 29) 423 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.2, -1.4)
Clallam County Rural No 131.1 (119.8, 143.6) 21 (7, 33) 114 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.6)
Chelan County Urban No 127.2 (114.3, 141.3) 26 (7, 36) 77 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.5, -0.7)
Benton County Urban No 130.7 (121.7, 140.1) 22 (8, 32) 165 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.7, 5.9)
Asotin County Urban Yes 111.5 (90.6, 136.6) 34 (9, 38) 23 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.1)
Adams County Rural Yes 122.3 (91.3, 160.1) 30 (1, 38) 11 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.0, -0.7)
Garfield County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/06/2024 9:44 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.


Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top