Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Washington by County

All Cancer Sites, 2018-2022

White Non-Hispanic, Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
Washington N/A No 149.3 (148.0, 150.5) N/A 11,310 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.6, -1.4)
United States 6 N/A No 151.3 (151.1, 151.5) N/A 463,400 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.1)
Ferry County Rural No 189.6 (150.5, 239.2) 2 (1, 36) 21 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.9, 1.6)
Cowlitz County Urban No 192.1 (181.8, 203.0) 1 (1, 7) 275 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.8, -0.2)
Yakima County Urban No 176.8 (168.1, 185.9) 5 (2, 14) 339 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.7, -0.3)
Okanogan County Rural No 175.1 (158.7, 193.1) 7 (1, 26) 98 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.1)
Walla Walla County Urban No 144.1 (131.6, 157.5) 32 (12, 38) 111 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.3)
Whitman County Rural No 150.5 (132.8, 170.0) 25 (5, 38) 55 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.1)
Lewis County Rural No 179.4 (168.3, 191.1) 3 (1, 15) 208 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.5)
Pacific County Rural No 176.6 (157.6, 198.2) 6 (1, 27) 78 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.1)
Pend Oreille County Rural No 166.6 (142.2, 195.1) 10 (1, 37) 39 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.0)
Skagit County Urban No 161.9 (153.1, 171.0) 13 (6, 27) 284 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.4)
Clallam County Rural No 164.4 (154.6, 174.9) 11 (4, 27) 246 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.6)
Lincoln County Rural No 147.5 (121.6, 178.5) 28 (2, 39) 27 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
Wahkiakum County Rural No 154.2 (118.5, 203.9) 20 (1, 39) 14 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.1, 0.5)
Klickitat County Rural No 153.8 (135.5, 174.6) 22 (3, 38) 56 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.4)
Mason County Rural No 168.8 (157.0, 181.5) 9 (2, 27) 168 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
Snohomish County Urban No 157.2 (153.1, 161.4) 17 (11, 26) 1,153 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.2, -0.9)
Benton County Urban No 153.6 (145.9, 161.6) 23 (10, 32) 316 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.8)
Grays Harbor County Rural No 177.0 (165.5, 189.3) 4 (1, 17) 193 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.8)
Island County Rural No 153.9 (143.9, 164.6) 21 (9, 34) 201 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.7)
Kittitas County Rural No 157.6 (142.4, 174.2) 16 (3, 35) 83 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.5)
San Juan County Rural Yes 119.8 (102.5, 140.6) 39 (25, 39) 44 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.3)
Spokane County Urban No 155.1 (150.6, 159.7) 19 (12, 29) 959 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.2, -0.9)
Stevens County Urban No 158.0 (144.6, 172.5) 15 (5, 34) 113 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.6)
Whatcom County Urban No 141.0 (134.4, 147.8) 34 (23, 37) 364 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
Adams County Rural No 160.2 (127.8, 199.9) 14 (1, 39) 19 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.4)
Chelan County Urban No 148.2 (137.2, 160.1) 26 (10, 36) 150 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -1.0)
Grant County Rural No 164.3 (151.7, 177.8) 12 (3, 29) 135 falling falling trend -1.3 (-6.4, -0.6)
Asotin County Urban No 139.9 (122.5, 159.5) 35 (11, 39) 52 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.7)
Columbia County Rural No 174.6 (135.3, 228.4) 8 (1, 39) 14 stable stable trend -1.7 (-13.5, 2.4)
Douglas County Urban No 146.4 (131.3, 163.2) 30 (9, 38) 73 falling falling trend -1.7 (-6.7, -0.7)
Pierce County Urban No 155.3 (151.4, 159.3) 18 (12, 28) 1,238 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.4)
Clark County Urban No 153.5 (148.7, 158.5) 24 (13, 30) 805 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.7, -1.4)
Thurston County Urban No 147.9 (141.9, 154.0) 27 (17, 34) 491 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.4, -1.4)
Jefferson County Rural No 133.9 (120.5, 149.2) 36 (19, 39) 99 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.9, -1.5)
Skamania County Urban No 129.0 (105.6, 157.4) 37 (9, 39) 23 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.8, -0.9)
Garfield County Rural No 146.3 (92.8, 227.4) 31 (1, 39) 6 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.4, -1.0)
Franklin County Urban No 146.9 (131.6, 163.5) 29 (8, 38) 71 falling falling trend -2.3 (-7.2, -1.7)
King County Urban No 128.6 (126.2, 131.0) 38 (33, 39) 2,238 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.8, -2.0)
Kitsap County Urban No 141.2 (135.2, 147.4) 33 (23, 37) 454 falling falling trend -2.9 (-5.8, -1.7)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/13/2024 8:10 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
6 Hispanic mortality recent trend data for the United States has been excluded for the following states: Louisiana, New Hampshire, and Oklahoma. The data on Hispanic and non-Hispanic mortality for these states may be unreliable for the time period used in the generation of the recent trend (1990 - 2022) and has been excluded from the calculation of the United States recent trend. This was based on the NCHS Policy.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top