Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Washington by County

Esophagus, 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Washington *** 4.3 (4.1, 4.5) N/A 376 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.6, -0.5)
United States *** 3.9 (3.8, 3.9) N/A 15,474 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.2, -1.0)
Benton County *** 4.8 (3.6, 6.3) 12 (3, 24) 10
*
*
Chelan County *** 3.7 (2.3, 5.9) 21 (5, 24) 4
*
*
Clallam County *** 5.7 (4.0, 8.2) 6 (1, 22) 9 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.1, 1.5)
Clark County *** 4.5 (3.7, 5.4) 15 (6, 22) 25 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.4)
Cowlitz County *** 7.3 (5.4, 9.6) 2 (1, 12) 11
*
*
Douglas County *** 6.5 (3.8, 10.6) 4 (1, 24) 3
*
*
Grant County *** 6.0 (3.9, 8.8) 5 (1, 23) 5
*
*
Grays Harbor County *** 5.6 (3.8, 8.2) 7 (1, 23) 7 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.2, 1.5)
Island County *** 4.0 (2.5, 6.2) 20 (4, 24) 5 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.5, 0.3)
Jefferson County *** 4.1 (2.3, 8.0) 18 (3, 24) 3
*
*
King County *** 3.5 (3.2, 3.9) 23 (16, 24) 81 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.3, -0.5)
Kitsap County *** 3.7 (2.8, 4.8) 22 (9, 24) 13 stable stable trend -20.8 (-43.9, 12.0)
Lewis County *** 5.3 (3.6, 7.7) 8 (1, 24) 6 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.9, 1.9)
Mason County *** 4.2 (2.6, 6.6) 17 (3, 24) 4 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.7, 2.6)
Pacific County *** 9.2 (5.4, 15.7) 1 (1, 18) 4
*
*
Pierce County *** 4.0 (3.5, 4.6) 19 (10, 24) 38 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.6)
Skagit County *** 6.6 (5.0, 8.6) 3 (1, 14) 12
*
*
Snohomish County *** 4.3 (3.7, 4.9) 16 (8, 23) 38 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.1, -1.5)
Spokane County *** 4.9 (4.2, 5.8) 10 (4, 19) 31 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.1, 2.0)
Stevens County *** 4.8 (2.9, 8.0) 11 (1, 24) 4
*
*
Thurston County *** 3.5 (2.7, 4.5) 24 (12, 24) 13 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.7, -0.1)
Walla Walla County *** 5.2 (3.1, 8.1) 9 (1, 24) 4
*
*
Whatcom County *** 4.6 (3.5, 6.0) 14 (4, 24) 13 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.2, 0.4)
Yakima County *** 4.8 (3.7, 6.1) 13 (4, 23) 13 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.3, 2.1)
Adams County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Asotin County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Columbia County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ferry County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Franklin County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Garfield County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kittitas County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Klickitat County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lincoln County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Okanogan County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pend Oreille County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Juan County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Skamania County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wahkiakum County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Whitman County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/29/2021 1:07 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data for the following has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of estimates:
Adams, Asotin, Columbia, Ferry, Franklin, Garfield, Kittitas, Klickitat, Lincoln, Okanogan, Pend Oreille, San Juan, Skamania, Wahkiakum, Whitman

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top