Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Washington by County

Lung & Bronchus, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 25.1?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Washington N/A No 29.8 (29.3, 30.3) N/A 2,765 falling falling trend -4.3 (-4.8, -4.0)
United States N/A No 32.4 (32.3, 32.5) N/A 136,831 falling falling trend -4.3 (-4.4, -4.1)
Cowlitz County Urban No 47.4 (42.6, 52.6) 1 (1, 5) 75 falling falling trend -2.0 (-8.0, -1.2)
Okanogan County Rural No 44.2 (37.2, 52.4) 2 (1, 12) 30 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.4)
Mason County Rural No 43.5 (38.0, 49.8) 3 (1, 9) 48 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.5, -1.2)
Grays Harbor County Rural No 39.2 (34.3, 44.6) 4 (1, 18) 50 falling falling trend -4.7 (-6.7, -3.6)
Pacific County Rural No 38.8 (31.4, 48.2) 5 (1, 28) 21 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.1, -1.1)
Wahkiakum County Rural No 37.0 (21.9, 65.7) 6 (1, 37) 4
*
*
Clallam County Rural No 36.4 (32.1, 41.2) 7 (3, 24) 59 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -0.9)
Lewis County Rural No 35.4 (30.9, 40.6) 8 (3, 27) 46 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.8, -1.4)
Skagit County Urban No 34.7 (31.1, 38.6) 9 (4, 26) 70 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.7, 3.6)
Pierce County Urban No 33.5 (31.8, 35.1) 10 (7, 22) 337 falling falling trend -4.8 (-8.1, -3.4)
Pend Oreille County Rural No 33.2 (23.6, 46.7) 11 (1, 37) 9 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.4, -0.8)
Clark County Urban No 32.7 (30.7, 34.9) 12 (7, 25) 197 falling falling trend -4.3 (-6.2, -3.3)
Spokane County Urban No 32.7 (30.7, 34.7) 13 (7, 25) 220 falling falling trend -4.1 (-5.3, -3.3)
Klickitat County Rural No 32.5 (25.1, 42.1) 14 (2, 36) 14 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.3, -1.2)
Stevens County Urban No 32.2 (26.8, 38.6) 15 (4, 33) 26 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.1, -1.2)
Walla Walla County Urban No 32.2 (27.0, 38.1) 16 (4, 33) 29 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -0.8)
Snohomish County Urban No 31.7 (30.0, 33.4) 17 (9, 26) 285 falling falling trend -3.8 (-6.2, -2.8)
Douglas County Urban No 31.6 (25.3, 39.2) 18 (3, 35) 18 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.9, -0.8)
Ferry County Rural No 31.5 (19.8, 50.8) 19 (1, 37) 5 falling falling trend -2.8 (-5.1, -0.3)
Thurston County Urban No 31.4 (28.9, 34.1) 20 (8, 29) 123 falling falling trend -3.5 (-5.5, -2.6)
Whitman County Rural No 30.8 (23.5, 39.7) 21 (3, 37) 12 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.6, -0.5)
Franklin County Urban No 30.7 (25.1, 37.1) 22 (4, 35) 23 falling falling trend -4.6 (-17.0, -3.2)
Grant County Rural No 30.7 (26.1, 35.8) 23 (6, 33) 33 falling falling trend -3.7 (-6.1, -2.5)
Yakima County Urban No 30.4 (27.5, 33.5) 24 (9, 31) 83 falling falling trend -7.5 (-14.9, -3.4)
Chelan County Urban No 29.7 (25.3, 34.6) 25 (7, 34) 35 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.1, -2.0)
Benton County Urban No 29.3 (26.3, 32.6) 26 (11, 33) 71 falling falling trend -4.6 (-12.1, -2.8)
Skamania County Urban No 28.9 (19.1, 43.1) 27 (2, 37) 6 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.0, -1.1)
Kitsap County Urban No 28.6 (26.2, 31.2) 28 (16, 33) 108 falling falling trend -6.8 (-15.0, -3.4)
Kittitas County Rural No 27.9 (21.9, 35.1) 29 (6, 37) 16 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.3, -1.6)
Asotin County Urban No 27.1 (20.2, 36.2) 30 (6, 37) 11 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.2, -0.5)
Island County Rural No 26.6 (22.9, 30.7) 31 (15, 36) 41 falling falling trend -2.9 (-3.7, -2.0)
Adams County Rural No 25.9 (16.4, 38.8) 32 (3, 37) 5 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.7, -0.9)
Whatcom County Urban No 25.8 (23.2, 28.6) 33 (23, 36) 76 falling falling trend -6.1 (-10.7, -3.9)
Lincoln County Rural Yes 24.8 (16.1, 38.2) 34 (5, 37) 5 falling falling trend -8.5 (-42.1, -2.6)
King County Urban Yes 23.1 (22.2, 24.0) 35 (31, 37) 546 falling falling trend -4.6 (-5.1, -4.1)
Jefferson County Rural Yes 21.6 (17.3, 27.6) 36 (26, 37) 19 falling falling trend -8.5 (-16.9, -5.5)
San Juan County Rural Yes 21.0 (15.0, 30.2) 37 (19, 37) 9 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.3, 0.0)
Columbia County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Garfield County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/13/2024 5:18 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top