Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Washington by County

Breast, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 15.3?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Washington No 19.2 (18.7, 19.8) N/A 902 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.5)
United States No 19.6 (19.5, 19.7) N/A 42,101 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.4, -1.1)
Benton County No 19.2 (15.8, 23.2) 22 (5, 30) 23 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -0.6)
Chelan County No 21.9 (16.4, 28.9) 11 (1, 30) 12 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.2, -0.4)
Clallam County No 21.2 (16.3, 27.4) 14 (2, 29) 16 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.5, -0.3)
Clark County No 20.2 (18.0, 22.7) 17 (6, 26) 61 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.4)
Cowlitz County No 22.3 (17.6, 27.9) 7 (2, 28) 17 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.4)
Douglas County No 16.1 (10.0, 24.8) 29 (3, 30) 5
*
*
Franklin County No 17.2 (11.7, 24.3) 27 (3, 30) 6
*
*
Grant County No 21.2 (15.9, 27.8) 13 (2, 30) 11 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.1, 0.7)
Grays Harbor County No 23.5 (18.3, 30.1) 6 (1, 27) 15 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.6, 4.5)
Island County Yes 15.3 (11.2, 20.6) 30 (10, 30) 11 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.2, -1.1)
Jefferson County No 23.9 (15.1, 37.3) 5 (1, 30) 7 falling falling trend -2.7 (-5.2, -0.1)
King County No 16.8 (15.8, 17.9) 28 (20, 30) 215 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.6, -2.0)
Kitsap County No 18.3 (15.6, 21.5) 25 (8, 30) 34 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.8, -1.0)
Kittitas County No 19.4 (12.6, 28.9) 21 (2, 30) 5 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.1, 0.5)
Klickitat County No 27.3 (17.7, 41.8) 3 (1, 29) 5 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.4, 0.3)
Lewis County No 25.2 (19.7, 31.9) 4 (1, 25) 16 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.5, -0.5)
Mason County No 18.6 (13.0, 26.0) 24 (3, 30) 9 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.2, 1.0)
Okanogan County No 32.6 (23.7, 44.2) 1 (1, 17) 10 stable stable trend -3.7 (-30.2, 32.9)
Pacific County No 21.3 (13.2, 34.8) 12 (1, 30) 5
*
*
Pend Oreille County No 27.9 (15.2, 49.5) 2 (1, 30) 3
*
*
Pierce County No 19.7 (18.0, 21.5) 19 (8, 26) 101 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.3, -1.2)
San Juan County No 22.0 (11.2, 41.3) 9 (1, 30) 4
*
*
Skagit County No 22.1 (17.8, 27.2) 8 (2, 28) 21 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.1, 0.1)
Snohomish County No 18.7 (16.9, 20.6) 23 (11, 28) 89 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.4, -1.5)
Spokane County No 21.9 (19.7, 24.4) 10 (3, 22) 74 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.9)
Stevens County No 20.9 (14.0, 30.3) 16 (1, 30) 7 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.9, 0.7)
Thurston County No 21.1 (18.3, 24.3) 15 (4, 26) 42 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
Walla Walla County No 17.4 (11.6, 25.0) 26 (3, 30) 7 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.4, -0.4)
Whatcom County No 20.0 (16.7, 23.7) 18 (5, 29) 29 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.6, -0.7)
Yakima County No 19.4 (16.3, 23.1) 20 (5, 29) 28 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.5)
Adams County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Asotin County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Columbia County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ferry County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Garfield County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lincoln County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Skamania County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wahkiakum County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Whitman County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/29/2022 10:32 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top