Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Washington by County

Breast, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Ruralurban
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 15.3?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Washington N/A No 18.7 (18.2, 19.3) N/A 904 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -0.2)
United States N/A No 19.3 (19.2, 19.4) N/A 42,308 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.3, -1.1)
Benton County Urban No 21.3 (17.8, 25.4) 10 (3, 26) 27 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.4)
Chelan County Urban No 21.0 (15.9, 27.5) 11 (2, 29) 13 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.4, -0.1)
Clark County Urban No 19.1 (17.0, 21.5) 18 (7, 26) 60 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.3)
Cowlitz County Urban No 22.6 (17.9, 28.2) 7 (1, 26) 18 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.1)
Douglas County Urban Yes 14.7 (9.0, 23.0) 30 (5, 30) 4
*
*
Franklin County Urban No 16.2 (10.8, 23.1) 26 (4, 30) 6
*
*
King County Urban No 16.2 (15.2, 17.2) 27 (19, 29) 209 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.6, -2.0)
Kitsap County Urban No 16.6 (14.0, 19.6) 25 (12, 30) 32 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.9, -1.0)
Pierce County Urban No 20.2 (18.5, 22.0) 14 (6, 22) 108 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.1, -1.1)
Skagit County Urban No 23.4 (19.1, 28.5) 6 (1, 22) 23 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.3)
Snohomish County Urban No 19.4 (17.6, 21.3) 17 (7, 24) 94 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 4.5)
Spokane County Urban No 19.7 (17.6, 22.0) 16 (6, 25) 71 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -1.0)
Stevens County Urban No 20.9 (14.4, 29.9) 13 (1, 30) 8 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.9, 0.9)
Thurston County Urban No 19.7 (17.1, 22.7) 15 (5, 26) 42 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.7)
Walla Walla County Urban No 16.8 (11.2, 24.4) 23 (3, 30) 7 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.4, -0.6)
Whatcom County Urban No 16.1 (13.3, 19.5) 28 (11, 30) 24 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.9, -0.7)
Yakima County Urban No 21.0 (17.7, 24.7) 12 (3, 25) 30 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.1)
Clallam County Rural No 16.8 (12.9, 21.9) 24 (7, 30) 14 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.9, -0.2)
Grant County Rural No 17.9 (13.0, 23.9) 20 (4, 30) 9 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.3, 0.8)
Grays Harbor County Rural No 22.4 (17.2, 28.9) 8 (1, 28) 14 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.0, 12.3)
Island County Rural No 17.5 (13.2, 23.1) 21 (5, 30) 13 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.8, -0.8)
Jefferson County Rural No 21.7 (13.8, 33.9) 9 (1, 30) 7 falling falling trend -2.9 (-5.2, -0.5)
Kittitas County Rural No 15.3 (9.5, 23.8) 29 (5, 30) 4 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.3, 0.4)
Klickitat County Rural No 31.0 (19.9, 47.3) 1 (1, 27) 6 stable stable trend 3.0 (-25.1, 37.6)
Lewis County Rural No 24.9 (19.3, 31.8) 4 (1, 23) 15 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.8, -0.4)
Mason County Rural No 26.8 (20.0, 35.4) 3 (1, 22) 13 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.7, 2.2)
Okanogan County Rural No 28.8 (20.7, 39.4) 2 (1, 22) 9 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.2, 3.0)
Pacific County Rural No 18.1 (10.8, 30.6) 19 (1, 30) 4
*
*
Pend Oreille County Rural No 24.9 (14.0, 44.2) 5 (1, 30) 3
*
*
Whitman County Rural No 17.1 (9.8, 27.8) 22 (2, 30) 3
*
*
Adams County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Asotin County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Columbia County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ferry County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Garfield County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lincoln County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Juan County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Skamania County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wahkiakum County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/14/2024 8:28 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top