Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for West Virginia by County

All Cancer Sites, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 65+

Sorted by CI*Rank

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
West Virginia N/A No 965.8 (951.1, 980.6) N/A 3,367 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.2, -1.0)
United States N/A No 844.0 (842.9, 845.1) N/A 441,232 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.8, -1.5)
Wetzel County Rural No 1,208.8 (1,045.3, 1,390.7) 1 (1, 30) 39 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.7, 1.1)
Pleasants County Rural No 1,189.1 (938.0, 1,486.2) 2 (1, 51) 16 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.1, 1.1)
Gilmer County Rural No 1,182.8 (930.0, 1,482.6) 3 (1, 52) 15 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.8)
Lewis County Rural No 1,168.3 (1,010.0, 1,344.5) 4 (1, 36) 40 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.5)
Lincoln County Rural No 1,156.7 (1,006.4, 1,323.0) 5 (1, 38) 44 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.1)
Mason County Rural No 1,130.9 (1,005.5, 1,267.5) 6 (1, 34) 60 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.1)
Clay County Urban No 1,106.3 (887.1, 1,363.1) 7 (1, 54) 18 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.4, -0.6)
Berkeley County Urban No 1,104.7 (1,031.7, 1,181.5) 8 (2, 25) 182 falling falling trend -1.1 (-4.7, -0.2)
Calhoun County Rural No 1,097.7 (866.4, 1,371.0) 9 (1, 54) 16 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 0.9)
Logan County Rural No 1,090.0 (976.8, 1,212.7) 10 (1, 37) 71 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
Fayette County Urban No 1,083.3 (986.2, 1,187.3) 11 (1, 35) 94 falling falling trend -0.6 (-0.9, -0.2)
Jefferson County Urban No 1,077.4 (980.3, 1,181.4) 12 (1, 36) 95 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.1)
Harrison County Rural No 1,073.5 (993.7, 1,157.8) 13 (2, 32) 136 falling falling trend -1.0 (-4.2, -0.6)
Barbour County Rural No 1,070.6 (911.1, 1,250.0) 14 (1, 50) 33 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.6)
Mingo County Rural No 1,055.9 (918.1, 1,208.6) 15 (1, 48) 45 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.4)
Taylor County Rural No 1,038.1 (887.0, 1,207.5) 16 (1, 52) 34 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.4)
Morgan County Urban No 1,036.0 (896.2, 1,191.2) 17 (1, 50) 40 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.3)
Boone County Urban No 1,018.2 (885.5, 1,165.3) 18 (2, 51) 45 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.3, -1.2)
Wirt County Urban No 1,004.6 (747.8, 1,321.4) 19 (1, 55) 11 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 1.2)
Roane County Rural No 1,000.2 (844.1, 1,176.8) 20 (1, 54) 30 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.0)
Greenbrier County Rural No 997.9 (898.7, 1,105.0) 21 (4, 49) 75 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3)
Randolph County Rural No 996.4 (885.0, 1,117.8) 22 (4, 50) 59 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.1)
Tucker County Rural No 984.2 (786.3, 1,216.6) 23 (1, 55) 17 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.2)
Ritchie County Rural No 984.0 (783.6, 1,219.4) 24 (1, 55) 17 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.7)
Braxton County Rural No 983.6 (824.7, 1,164.2) 25 (2, 55) 28 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.7)
Wood County Urban No 983.2 (917.1, 1,052.9) 26 (11, 44) 166 falling falling trend -0.6 (-0.9, -0.2)
McDowell County Rural No 983.1 (852.8, 1,127.8) 27 (3, 53) 42 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.4)
Mercer County Rural No 971.8 (895.9, 1,052.3) 28 (9, 47) 123 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.4)
Hampshire County Urban No 971.6 (852.0, 1,103.3) 29 (4, 53) 49 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.3)
Wayne County Urban No 963.5 (869.9, 1,064.3) 30 (8, 51) 78 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.0, -1.2)
Pendleton County Rural No 956.6 (760.0, 1,188.5) 31 (1, 55) 16 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 0.9)
Marion County Rural No 944.9 (863.5, 1,032.0) 32 (12, 51) 100 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.2)
Cabell County Urban No 941.1 (878.1, 1,007.4) 33 (16, 49) 168 falling falling trend -1.4 (-3.5, -1.1)
Jackson County Rural No 932.0 (821.4, 1,053.4) 34 (8, 54) 52 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Kanawha County Urban No 932.0 (887.8, 977.7) 35 (20, 48) 343 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.0, -1.5)
Mineral County Rural No 921.7 (811.6, 1,042.5) 36 (8, 54) 52 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3)
Hancock County Urban No 920.7 (819.1, 1,031.5) 37 (10, 54) 61 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.4)
Marshall County Urban No 912.2 (811.1, 1,022.4) 38 (13, 54) 61 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.5)
Summers County Rural No 911.9 (765.5, 1,078.2) 39 (5, 55) 28 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.5)
Raleigh County Urban No 900.7 (833.1, 972.4) 40 (20, 53) 135 falling falling trend -3.3 (-9.1, -0.8)
Pocahontas County Rural No 899.9 (725.4, 1,103.7) 41 (3, 55) 19 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.1)
Wyoming County Rural No 893.3 (767.0, 1,034.3) 42 (9, 55) 38 falling falling trend -1.6 (-7.1, -0.9)
Preston County Urban No 891.9 (788.9, 1,004.5) 43 (13, 55) 56 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.2)
Ohio County Urban No 886.0 (800.5, 978.1) 44 (19, 54) 81 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.9)
Upshur County Rural No 880.1 (765.5, 1,007.1) 45 (13, 55) 43 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.4)
Webster County Rural No 879.2 (695.3, 1,096.2) 46 (3, 55) 16 falling falling trend -5.6 (-17.5, -0.8)
Monroe County Rural No 873.1 (728.8, 1,037.5) 47 (9, 55) 26 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.3)
Putnam County Urban No 869.8 (789.7, 955.8) 48 (21, 55) 88 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -1.2)
Brooke County Urban No 860.1 (750.7, 980.9) 49 (14, 55) 45 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.4)
Nicholas County Rural No 855.3 (746.0, 976.2) 50 (16, 55) 45 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.6)
Hardy County Rural No 834.6 (692.7, 996.9) 51 (13, 55) 25 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.6)
Tyler County Rural No 823.7 (649.6, 1,030.1) 52 (8, 55) 16 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.4, -0.6)
Grant County Rural No 812.0 (665.0, 981.8) 53 (14, 55) 21 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.2)
Doddridge County Rural No 796.4 (610.5, 1,020.9) 54 (9, 55) 13 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.4, 0.3)
Monongalia County Urban No 785.7 (716.6, 859.6) 55 (39, 55) 99 falling falling trend -2.1 (-7.9, -1.5)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/22/2024 4:00 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top