Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for West Virginia by County

All Cancer Sites, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <65

Sorted by Ruralurban
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
West Virginia N/A Yes 64.2 (62.6, 65.9) N/A 1,335 stable stable trend -0.7 (-0.9, 0.1)
United States N/A Yes 45.0 (44.9, 45.1) N/A 161,722 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.4, -1.9)
Barbour County Rural Yes 76.8 (57.8, 100.5) 11 (1, 52) 12 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.0, 0.5)
Braxton County Rural Yes 52.4 (36.8, 73.5) 50 (10, 55) 8 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.2, -0.9)
Calhoun County Rural Yes 67.6 (42.2, 105.2) 23 (1, 55) 6 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.9, -0.1)
Doddridge County Rural Yes 53.9 (34.9, 82.1) 49 (5, 55) 5
*
*
Gilmer County Rural Yes 69.9 (46.1, 103.4) 18 (1, 55) 6 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.0, 2.1)
Grant County Rural Yes 60.2 (41.1, 86.0) 35 (3, 55) 7 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.5, 1.4)
Greenbrier County Rural Yes 62.7 (51.4, 76.1) 29 (9, 53) 25 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.3)
Hardy County Rural Yes 57.8 (41.7, 78.8) 42 (6, 55) 10 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.7, 14.8)
Harrison County Rural Yes 66.8 (58.5, 76.1) 25 (9, 46) 51 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.3)
Jackson County Rural Yes 55.6 (44.7, 68.7) 46 (14, 55) 20 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.0)
Lewis County Rural Yes 73.1 (56.4, 93.8) 14 (2, 50) 14 stable stable trend -1.0 (-1.9, 0.0)
Lincoln County Rural Yes 107.6 (88.7, 129.7) 2 (1, 12) 26 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.0, 1.2)
Logan County Rural Yes 83.6 (70.5, 98.6) 6 (2, 32) 33 stable stable trend -1.0 (-1.9, 0.0)
Marion County Rural Yes 68.8 (59.4, 79.4) 20 (7, 44) 42 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.2)
Mason County Rural Yes 66.6 (53.7, 82.0) 26 (5, 52) 21 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.4)
McDowell County Rural Yes 91.6 (74.5, 112.0) 3 (1, 28) 23 stable stable trend -0.2 (-10.1, 10.8)
Mercer County Rural Yes 77.4 (67.4, 88.5) 10 (3, 33) 49 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.2)
Mineral County Rural Yes 68.4 (55.4, 83.9) 21 (4, 51) 21 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.0)
Mingo County Rural Yes 90.5 (74.3, 109.6) 4 (1, 25) 24 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 0.9)
Monroe County Rural Yes 76.7 (57.0, 101.9) 12 (1, 51) 12 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.9, 1.6)
Nicholas County Rural Yes 58.5 (45.9, 73.8) 39 (10, 55) 17 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.1)
Pendleton County Rural Yes 66.6 (41.6, 104.1) 27 (1, 55) 5
*
*
Pleasants County Rural Yes 71.9 (49.0, 103.5) 16 (1, 55) 7 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.1, 1.6)
Pocahontas County Rural Yes 88.6 (60.8, 126.2) 5 (1, 52) 8 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.0, 1.4)
Randolph County Rural Yes 62.6 (50.5, 77.2) 30 (8, 53) 21 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.1)
Ritchie County Rural Yes 56.5 (38.0, 82.9) 45 (5, 55) 7 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.8, 0.6)
Roane County Rural Yes 108.2 (85.4, 135.9) 1 (1, 17) 18 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.5, 1.9)
Summers County Rural Yes 72.2 (53.1, 97.4) 15 (2, 53) 11 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.2, 14.2)
Taylor County Rural Yes 58.0 (43.4, 76.6) 41 (8, 55) 11 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.2)
Tucker County Rural Yes 66.9 (42.1, 103.8) 24 (1, 55) 5 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.3, 2.0)
Tyler County Rural Yes 50.5 (34.5, 74.4) 51 (10, 55) 7 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.3, 0.4)
Upshur County Rural Yes 62.5 (49.2, 78.6) 31 (7, 54) 17 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.4)
Webster County Rural Yes 55.4 (35.9, 83.7) 47 (4, 55) 6 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.5, 0.8)
Wetzel County Rural Yes 57.8 (41.7, 78.7) 43 (6, 55) 10 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.3, 0.6)
Wyoming County Rural Yes 82.7 (66.3, 102.4) 7 (1, 39) 20 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.6)
Berkeley County Urban Yes 56.8 (51.3, 62.9) 44 (24, 52) 81 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.7)
Boone County Urban Yes 75.2 (60.3, 93.1) 13 (2, 46) 20 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.3)
Brooke County Urban Yes 61.6 (48.3, 78.0) 32 (6, 54) 17 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.1)
Cabell County Urban Yes 70.7 (63.0, 79.0) 17 (7, 38) 68 stable stable trend -0.4 (-5.1, 3.2)
Clay County Urban Yes 69.2 (47.5, 99.3) 19 (1, 55) 7 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.4, 1.1)
Fayette County Urban Yes 78.2 (66.9, 91.1) 9 (3, 34) 38 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.4)
Hampshire County Urban Yes 58.4 (45.7, 74.2) 40 (9, 55) 17 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.5)
Hancock County Urban Yes 59.8 (48.6, 73.2) 36 (11, 54) 23 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.3)
Jefferson County Urban Yes 50.5 (43.3, 58.7) 52 (29, 55) 37 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.5, -1.2)
Kanawha County Urban Yes 60.8 (56.0, 66.1) 33 (19, 47) 129 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.9)
Marshall County Urban Yes 54.6 (43.7, 67.8) 48 (16, 55) 20 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.2)
Monongalia County Urban Yes 46.0 (40.0, 52.8) 54 (39, 55) 44 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -0.9)
Morgan County Urban Yes 81.7 (64.1, 103.3) 8 (1, 44) 18 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 1.1)
Ohio County Urban Yes 58.7 (48.6, 70.4) 38 (13, 54) 27 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.6, -1.1)
Preston County Urban Yes 58.8 (48.2, 71.2) 37 (14, 54) 23 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.4)
Putnam County Urban Yes 45.1 (37.9, 53.4) 55 (40, 55) 31 falling falling trend -1.9 (-5.3, -1.3)
Raleigh County Urban Yes 60.4 (52.9, 68.7) 34 (16, 51) 51 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.4)
Wayne County Urban Yes 63.8 (53.4, 75.9) 28 (8, 50) 29 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.2)
Wirt County Urban Yes 46.9 (24.8, 83.4) 53 (4, 55) 3
*
*
Wood County Urban Yes 68.2 (60.8, 76.4) 22 (9, 40) 68 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.1)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/04/2024 5:32 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top