Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for West Virginia by County

All Cancer Sites, 2018-2022

White Non-Hispanic, Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
West Virginia N/A No 180.9 (178.5, 183.4) N/A 4,551 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.1, -0.9)
United States 6 N/A No 151.3 (151.1, 151.5) N/A 463,400 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.1)
Gilmer County Rural No 223.3 (181.2, 273.9) 4 (1, 49) 21 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.8, 1.1)
Pleasants County Rural No 217.1 (178.1, 263.2) 6 (1, 48) 23 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.0, 1.2)
Monroe County Rural No 183.1 (156.7, 213.5) 28 (4, 54) 38 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.8, 0.5)
Roane County Rural No 224.2 (195.2, 256.9) 3 (1, 31) 47 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.8, 0.4)
Wetzel County Rural No 206.6 (180.7, 235.7) 11 (1, 44) 49 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.5)
Lincoln County Rural No 242.1 (216.4, 270.3) 1 (1, 14) 69 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.3)
Morgan County Urban No 207.0 (182.6, 234.4) 9 (1, 42) 58 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.4)
Barbour County Rural No 206.6 (179.4, 237.3) 10 (1, 44) 45 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.3)
Fayette County Urban No 204.6 (188.3, 222.3) 12 (3, 33) 124 falling falling trend -0.4 (-0.8, -0.1)
Hampshire County Urban No 177.1 (157.6, 198.9) 34 (10, 53) 65 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.3)
Lewis County Rural No 213.5 (188.1, 241.9) 8 (1, 36) 54 stable stable trend -0.5 (-0.9, 0.0)
McDowell County Rural No 228.4 (202.2, 257.6) 2 (1, 23) 60 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.1)
Pendleton County Rural No 181.4 (146.4, 224.8) 31 (2, 55) 21 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.8)
Ritchie County Rural No 173.6 (142.7, 210.5) 36 (4, 55) 24 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.4)
Wood County Urban No 187.2 (176.2, 198.7) 21 (11, 40) 232 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.9, -0.2)
Marion County Rural No 181.2 (167.5, 195.7) 32 (12, 48) 138 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.2)
Mercer County Rural No 189.7 (176.2, 204.0) 20 (9, 41) 161 falling falling trend -0.6 (-0.9, -0.2)
Pocahontas County Rural No 197.6 (162.6, 239.2) 17 (1, 53) 26 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.5)
Randolph County Rural No 181.7 (163.6, 201.6) 29 (8, 51) 78 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.1)
Wirt County Urban No 170.6 (131.0, 220.3) 40 (2, 55) 14 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.5)
Calhoun County Rural No 199.7 (161.3, 246.3) 15 (1, 54) 21 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.3)
Grant County Rural No 157.3 (131.2, 188.1) 51 (13, 55) 28 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.3)
Harrison County Rural No 198.2 (185.3, 211.8) 16 (5, 33) 185 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.4)
Mingo County Rural No 217.6 (194.1, 243.3) 5 (1, 30) 68 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.2)
Raleigh County Urban No 167.7 (156.3, 179.8) 42 (24, 53) 172 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.3)
Summers County Rural No 186.3 (159.4, 217.6) 23 (3, 53) 39 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.0)
Tucker County Rural No 184.7 (150.2, 227.0) 25 (1, 55) 23 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.3)
Greenbrier County Rural No 185.6 (168.8, 203.9) 24 (8, 48) 98 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.3)
Jackson County Rural No 168.9 (151.5, 188.1) 41 (16, 54) 72 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.1)
Jefferson County Urban No 183.8 (169.1, 199.6) 27 (9, 47) 122 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.2)
Mineral County Rural No 175.0 (156.5, 195.3) 35 (12, 53) 70 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.3)
Preston County Urban No 166.1 (149.7, 184.1) 44 (20, 55) 79 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.3)
Braxton County Rural No 173.2 (147.9, 202.4) 38 (7, 55) 36 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.7, 0.0)
Cabell County Urban No 181.6 (170.8, 193.0) 30 (14, 45) 223 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.7)
Upshur County Rural No 167.3 (148.2, 188.5) 43 (16, 55) 59 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
Berkeley County Urban No 192.4 (181.4, 204.0) 19 (8, 36) 242 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.5)
Brooke County Urban No 165.2 (146.5, 186.1) 45 (16, 55) 62 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.5)
Hancock County Urban No 173.5 (156.5, 192.1) 37 (13, 53) 83 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.4)
Hardy County Rural No 159.3 (134.9, 187.5) 50 (16, 55) 34 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.3)
Logan County Rural No 214.2 (195.3, 234.7) 7 (1, 28) 102 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5)
Marshall County Urban No 164.9 (148.5, 183.0) 46 (19, 55) 80 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.6)
Mason County Rural No 202.3 (182.5, 224.1) 14 (2, 37) 81 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5)
Wyoming County Rural No 187.0 (164.9, 211.6) 22 (5, 50) 58 falling falling trend -1.0 (-4.6, -0.4)
Nicholas County Rural No 160.5 (142.4, 180.7) 49 (21, 55) 62 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.6)
Taylor County Rural No 184.6 (160.8, 211.4) 26 (4, 53) 45 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
Clay County Urban No 203.3 (168.4, 244.5) 13 (1, 52) 25 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.6)
Boone County Urban No 197.4 (175.5, 221.6) 18 (2, 45) 65 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.9)
Doddridge County Rural No 151.7 (121.4, 189.0) 53 (12, 55) 18 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.5)
Monongalia County Urban No 143.8 (133.0, 155.2) 55 (45, 55) 138 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -1.0)
Ohio County Urban No 164.4 (149.9, 180.1) 47 (22, 55) 105 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.1)
Tyler County Rural No 148.9 (122.0, 181.6) 54 (17, 55) 22 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.7)
Wayne County Urban No 178.6 (163.4, 195.1) 33 (12, 50) 107 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.7, -1.1)
Kanawha County Urban No 172.4 (165.1, 180.1) 39 (25, 49) 443 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.5, -1.3)
Putnam County Urban No 151.7 (139.5, 164.9) 52 (37, 55) 118 falling falling trend -1.7 (-4.0, -1.2)
Webster County Rural No 161.0 (131.1, 196.9) 48 (10, 55) 22 falling falling trend -5.7 (-13.5, -2.4)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/13/2024 7:47 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
6 Hispanic mortality recent trend data for the United States has been excluded for the following states: Louisiana, New Hampshire, and Oklahoma. The data on Hispanic and non-Hispanic mortality for these states may be unreliable for the time period used in the generation of the recent trend (1990 - 2022) and has been excluded from the calculation of the United States recent trend. This was based on the NCHS Policy.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top