Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for West Virginia by County

Colon & Rectum, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 8.9?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
West Virginia No 16.6 (15.9, 17.3) N/A 430 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.8, -1.3)
United States No 13.1 (13.1, 13.2) N/A 52,152 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.1, -1.8)
McDowell County No 34.3 (25.0, 46.4) 1 (1, 11) 10 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.9, 2.3)
Greenbrier County No 18.0 (13.1, 24.4) 18 (2, 41) 10 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.3, 1.5)
Wyoming County No 16.3 (10.3, 25.0) 24 (2, 42) 5 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.3, 2.3)
Lincoln County No 21.9 (14.7, 31.8) 7 (1, 39) 6 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.0, 1.9)
Mercer County No 20.3 (15.9, 25.5) 10 (2, 34) 17 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 0.8)
Nicholas County No 22.6 (16.0, 31.4) 6 (1, 38) 8 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.9, 1.5)
Raleigh County No 17.4 (13.9, 21.5) 20 (6, 38) 19 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.3)
Randolph County No 17.0 (11.9, 23.9) 22 (3, 42) 8 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.2, 1.0)
Preston County No 14.7 (10.2, 20.8) 30 (6, 42) 7 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.9, 0.6)
Hampshire County No 20.2 (13.7, 29.0) 11 (1, 41) 7 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.6, 0.9)
Wood County No 18.3 (14.9, 22.2) 16 (4, 35) 22 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.1)
Boone County No 14.2 (8.7, 22.3) 35 (5, 42) 4 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.9, 0.9)
Logan County No 24.1 (18.0, 31.9) 3 (1, 28) 11 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.4, 0.5)
Mason County No 14.7 (9.7, 21.8) 31 (5, 42) 6 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.8, 0.5)
Fayette County No 22.6 (17.6, 28.8) 5 (1, 27) 15 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.3)
Mingo County No 22.7 (15.8, 31.9) 4 (1, 38) 7 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.6, 0.0)
Monroe County No 17.3 (10.7, 27.9) 21 (2, 42) 4 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.2, 0.8)
Wetzel County No 21.4 (13.5, 33.0) 9 (1, 41) 5 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.9, 0.4)
Marion County No 16.2 (12.5, 20.8) 25 (7, 41) 14 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.6)
Barbour County No 19.1 (11.5, 30.1) 12 (1, 42) 4 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.8, -0.1)
Marshall County No 17.7 (12.7, 24.4) 19 (3, 41) 9 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.7, -0.2)
Braxton County No 18.4 (11.2, 29.4) 15 (1, 42) 4 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.6, 0.3)
Cabell County No 14.9 (11.9, 18.4) 29 (11, 42) 19 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.5, -1.0)
Lewis County No 21.7 (13.8, 33.0) 8 (1, 41) 5 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.6, -0.1)
Morgan County No 18.9 (11.7, 29.4) 13 (1, 42) 5 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.7, 0.0)
Harrison County No 15.1 (11.8, 19.1) 28 (10, 41) 15 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.0, -1.1)
Brooke County No 14.6 (9.6, 21.9) 33 (6, 42) 6 falling falling trend -2.1 (-4.0, -0.2)
Hancock County No 15.2 (10.6, 21.7) 27 (5, 42) 7 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.3, -1.0)
Wayne County No 14.1 (10.0, 19.4) 36 (9, 42) 9 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.4, -0.8)
Jackson County No 13.0 (8.6, 19.2) 40 (10, 42) 6 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.6, -0.7)
Kanawha County No 14.4 (12.4, 16.7) 34 (18, 41) 39 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.0, -1.5)
Berkeley County No 16.7 (13.6, 20.3) 23 (7, 39) 22 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.2, -1.4)
Monongalia County No 12.6 (9.6, 16.1) 41 (18, 42) 13 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.4, -1.2)
Upshur County No 13.2 (8.2, 20.3) 39 (7, 42) 5 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.8, -1.0)
Ohio County No 14.6 (10.4, 20.1) 32 (8, 42) 9 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.1, -2.1)
Mineral County No 14.0 (9.3, 20.6) 37 (7, 42) 6 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.1, -2.2)
Putnam County No 11.5 (8.3, 15.6) 42 (21, 42) 9 falling falling trend -3.8 (-5.0, -2.6)
Jefferson County No 15.8 (11.8, 20.7) 26 (6, 42) 11 falling falling trend -4.2 (-6.1, -2.2)
Roane County No 18.2 (10.4, 30.2) 17 (1, 42) 4
*
*
Summers County No 18.4 (11.1, 30.1) 14 (1, 42) 4
*
*
Taylor County No 13.7 (8.0, 22.7) 38 (4, 42) 4
*
*
Webster County No 25.2 (13.6, 44.1) 2 (1, 42) 3
*
*
Calhoun County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Doddridge County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gilmer County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardy County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pendleton County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pleasants County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pocahontas County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ritchie County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tucker County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tyler County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wirt County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/28/2024 7:59 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top