Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for West Virginia by County

Breast, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 15.3?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
West Virginia No 21.2 (20.0, 22.4) N/A 286 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -1.1)
United States No 19.6 (19.5, 19.7) N/A 42,101 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.4, -1.1)
Lewis County No 30.2 (16.8, 51.0) 1 (1, 31) 3
*
*
Boone County No 29.9 (19.1, 45.8) 2 (1, 30) 5 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.1, 3.8)
Upshur County No 29.8 (19.1, 44.9) 3 (1, 30) 5
*
*
Logan County No 27.3 (18.3, 39.6) 4 (1, 30) 7 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.9, 1.0)
Fayette County No 27.2 (19.6, 37.2) 5 (1, 28) 9 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.8, 0.4)
Mineral County No 26.5 (17.2, 39.9) 6 (1, 31) 6 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.5, 0.3)
Cabell County No 25.3 (19.8, 32.0) 7 (1, 27) 16 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.1)
Randolph County No 25.2 (16.6, 37.5) 8 (1, 31) 6 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.3, 2.4)
Ohio County No 24.9 (17.4, 34.9) 9 (1, 30) 9 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.7, 1.5)
Berkeley County No 24.6 (19.5, 30.7) 10 (2, 27) 17 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.4, -0.1)
Mason County No 24.0 (15.0, 36.9) 11 (1, 32) 5 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.8, 0.1)
Raleigh County No 23.8 (18.3, 30.6) 12 (2, 29) 14 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.5, -0.6)
Putnam County No 23.7 (17.2, 32.1) 13 (1, 30) 9 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.4, 1.0)
Mercer County No 22.9 (16.8, 30.8) 14 (2, 31) 11 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.9, 0.1)
Marion County No 22.7 (16.0, 31.5) 15 (1, 31) 8 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.9, 0.9)
Jefferson County No 22.5 (16.0, 31.0) 16 (2, 31) 8 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.6, 0.9)
Preston County No 22.4 (14.1, 34.2) 17 (1, 32) 5 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.5, 0.6)
Brooke County No 22.3 (12.8, 37.0) 18 (1, 32) 4 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.1, 0.6)
Nicholas County No 21.5 (12.4, 35.2) 19 (1, 32) 4 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.4, -0.9)
McDowell County No 21.1 (12.1, 36.1) 20 (1, 32) 3 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.5, 1.7)
Morgan County No 20.8 (11.8, 36.1) 21 (1, 32) 3 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.6, 0.6)
Marshall County No 20.8 (12.8, 32.5) 22 (1, 32) 5 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.6, 0.5)
Mingo County No 20.7 (12.3, 33.6) 23 (1, 32) 4 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.4, 1.8)
Hampshire County No 19.6 (10.6, 34.0) 24 (1, 32) 3
*
*
Harrison County No 19.4 (14.1, 26.2) 25 (5, 32) 10 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.6, -0.4)
Jackson County No 19.2 (12.1, 29.9) 26 (2, 32) 5
*
*
Kanawha County No 18.9 (15.7, 22.6) 27 (12, 31) 28 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.5, -1.1)
Wood County No 18.7 (14.4, 24.2) 28 (8, 32) 13 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 1.1)
Greenbrier County No 18.3 (11.8, 27.9) 29 (4, 32) 6 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.4, 1.0)
Monongalia County No 17.7 (13.0, 23.8) 30 (9, 32) 10 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.5, -0.7)
Wayne County No 17.2 (11.1, 26.0) 31 (5, 32) 6 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.2, 0.3)
Hancock County Yes 11.1 (6.3, 19.6) 32 (22, 32) 3
*
*
Barbour County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Braxton County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Calhoun County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Doddridge County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gilmer County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardy County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lincoln County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Monroe County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pendleton County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pleasants County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pocahontas County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ritchie County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roane County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Summers County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Taylor County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tucker County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tyler County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Webster County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wetzel County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wirt County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wyoming County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/01/2022 9:46 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top